Marvel do seem to have a problem with this. I don't understand why they can't have artists just stick to books.
They get big names for the early issues then they replace them with people they grabbed off the street and hope fans keep buying the book out of habit.Marvel do seem to have a problem with this. I don't understand why they can't have artists just stick to books.
Sadly I bet there is probably some truth here.They get big names for the early issues then they replace them with people they grabbed off the street and hope fans keep buying the book out of habit.
Most artists these days either can't or struggle to do a full year of books straight, so they will take issues off.I think my fave recent marvel books have had consistent artists, but they won't draw every issue just cuz it's hard to crank them boys out every month. So Dautermann on aaron thor will do five issues and then Aaron will write a small one off story or two parter in between major arcs for Dautermann to draw. Immortal Hulk has been doing something similar with Joe Bennet. He does all the major issues, but the origin issues of the General or the Leader will be handed off to somebody else. I know Nic Klein said he's plans to be on Thor for years with Cates, although the next story seems to be drawn by Aaron Kuder(who's also great).
As is the age of pre-2012 art, thankfully. 😉I still can't believe Walt Simsonson wrote AND drew Thor for about four years.
The age of insane machine men like that are over.
Oh you.
I thought it was only $230 or something.
Some of the old school guys like Bagley and Romita Jr could hit deadlines month after month but it's very rare. I remember Chris Burnham talking about he maybe gets one good page a *day* when he was doing Morrison's Batman. His Kirkman assassin book Die!Die!Die!, first issue came out in July 2018. The #12 issue is scheduled for next month, August 2020.I still can't believe Walt Simsonson wrote AND drew Thor for about four years.
The age of insane machine men like that are over.
Is that some kind of moon currency?
Apparently Jack Kirby at his height was drawing 5 or 6 pages a day.Some of the old school guys like Bagley and Romita Jr could hit deadlines month after month but it's very rare. I remember Chris Burnham talking about he maybe gets one good page a *day* when he was doing Morrison's Batman. His Kirkman assassin book Die!Die!Die!, first issue came out in July 2018. The #12 issue is scheduled for next month, August 2020.
Maybe its just me but Ewing using that term with quotations and then immediately going "but Black Panther is the real big threat here" probably means somethingSo, something I've talked about before that bothers me about Jason Aaron's Avengers is how he brings up that Steve Rogers, Tony Stark, and Thor Odinson are the "Big Three" of the Avengers. They spend the first issue basically claiming that and setting that up and building from there, but they also acknowledge how they're gigantic failures so it seems to poke fun at it. Regardless it's never built off of. Or at least it hasn't been yet, and in the book about the mythology of superheroes as its concept, I would hope for it to come up.
Now again it gets brought up by Al Ewing in Empyre and I have to ask, if this is going to be perpetuated by Marvel, then what makes these three the "Big Three?"
We know what makes Wonder Woman, Batman, and Superman the Trinity. What balances each other out. Superman is the idealist, Batman is the realist, and Wonder Woman keeps them grounded. There's far more than just that, though. There's the greater ideals they uphold and the corners of the DCU they represent (Superman with more cosmic and sci-fi; Batman with more street level and psychological; Wonder Woman with more magical and mythical). They also have their own physically unique worlds that they bring.
I'm not hating on the idea of Steve, Tony, and Thor being the Big Three of Marvel, but I'm genuinely trying to piece together and actual creative ideology as to why those three beyond "well money duh."
Woo, finished the Dark Phoenix Arc. I'll stop here for now and finish the rest after a break from "classic" X-men.
Overall I pretty much enjoyed the entire read-through (from UXM #94 onwards), the only parts I didn't like were the ones where Alpha Flight are the antagonists (sorry Canadians). They just weren't interesting as "villains" and felt like a filler roadblock. The proteus arc is my favourite, followed closely by the Phoenix and the Dark Phoenix arc.
Claremont is really good at writing the group as a team, they complement each other well with their personalities and the "moments to shine" are spread out pretty evenly among the group. It's also great seeing their individual characters and their relationships with each other grow throughout the arcs. Wolverine especially became less grating as the story went on, and I actually liked Jean and Scott's relationship by the end.
All in all, good stuff. It's fun to revisit these stories with all the Dawn of X stuff going on and compare the characters now with what they were like then
edit: Oh, and I almost forgot to mention, Bryne's art is sublime throughout
I hope he's not leaving. He did the first 4 I think, but not 5.
I can't argue with that I guess.
Yup, absolutely. I'm following this reading order so the next "checkpoint" for me is the end of the brood sagaAgreed all around. Especially the Proteus arc which is underrated.
The book was just gold through like 1984, but starting in the mid 80's through to the end of Claremont I kind of felt it limped somewhat here and there. Mostly due to editorial fuckery that messed with Claremont's plans(early X-Factor ugh). Still plenty of great stuff ahead though like Mutant Massacre, everything involving Storm, and some fun crossovers. Plan to continue?
Ok. I'll definetly give that a try.
That movie was the end of the line. If they make more movies it will be completely new with different people working on it.So what's up with the new DCAU? Was Dark Justice League Apokolips War the end of the current universe and things are reset now?
if it ever comes out after all the COVID bullshit.
It would be sad if Morrison is done with Marvel and DC.Morrison says he only wrote 25 pages of arkham asylum 2 and he's done with superhero comics
it's over tim1138
Morrison says he only wrote 25 pages of arkham asylum 2 and he's done with superhero comics
it's over tim1138
Tom King
Morrison says he only wrote 25 pages of arkham asylum 2 and he's done with superhero comics
it's over tim1138
I bet we see him on The Flash within the next decade. Reading Supergods, it's evident that's his favorite character of all time and he hasn't had a proper long run on it like he has for the other members of the Big 5 in DC.I don't for a second believe that he's done with superheroes. They all come back.
This to be honest.I don't for a second believe that he's done with superheroes. They all come back.
Morrison says he only wrote 25 pages of arkham asylum 2 and he's done with superhero comics
it's over tim1138
Bleed Them DryYo, what was that vampire comic you were talking about the other day?
He has some sort of TV deal now. He co-wrote Brand New Day for Peacock. It would suck losing him on Cape books, but im also curious to see his influence on TV.Morrison says he only wrote 25 pages of arkham asylum 2 and he's done with superhero comics
it's over tim1138
So, something I've talked about before that bothers me about Jason Aaron's Avengers is how he brings up that Steve Rogers, Tony Stark, and Thor Odinson are the "Big Three" of the Avengers. They spend the first issue basically claiming that and setting that up and building from there, but they also acknowledge how they're gigantic failures so it seems to poke fun at it. Regardless it's never built off of. Or at least it hasn't been yet, and in the book about the mythology of superheroes as its concept, I would hope for it to come up.
Now again it gets brought up by Al Ewing in Empyre and I have to ask, if this is going to be perpetuated by Marvel, then what makes these three the "Big Three?"
We know what makes Wonder Woman, Batman, and Superman the Trinity. What balances each other out. Superman is the idealist, Batman is the realist, and Wonder Woman keeps them grounded. There's far more than just that, though. There's the greater ideals they uphold and the corners of the DCU they represent (Superman with more cosmic and sci-fi; Batman with more street level and psychological; Wonder Woman with more magical and mythical). They also have their own physically unique worlds that they bring.
I'm not hating on the idea of Steve, Tony, and Thor being the Big Three of Marvel, but I'm genuinely trying to piece together and actual creative ideology as to why those three beyond "well money duh."
I dont think JC was being serious, but I dont expect him to do more than he already is in comics atm. I could see him doing a black label book or something after GL.I don't believe for a second Morrison is done with cape books. He was saying the same thing before The Green Lantern. I really wish he would finish AA2 though. 666 Batman is best Batman.
Neat video. Liked hearing his insights on his Justice League story. Really need to read his Black Panther after I f
I dont think JC was being serious, but I dont expect him to do more than he already is in comics atm. I could see him doing a black label book or something after GL.
yeah, I can definitely see him slowing down a lot on comics after GL and WW3. The amount of insanity he still manages to put in GL is still pretty impressive. I would love a BL AA2, it seems like a book he's always wanted to finish.I dont think JC was being serious, but I dont expect him to do more than he already is in comics atm. I could see him doing a black label book or something after GL.
60? Why does that feel so absurd to me?"Arkham Asylum 2 he's only ever written 25 pages of, and that was ages back. Has not done anymore." From a streamed interview two days ago
says he got a million other ideas for creator owned comics tho, and he's working on a novel. The monthly ongoing grind is a young man's game and he turned 60 this year so that's that.
I felt the same way, but he's really only six years younger than his arch nemesis Alan Moore, who feels like he's been old since the dawn of time.
Well that's because Alan Moore is essentially:I felt the same way, but he's really only six years younger than his arch nemesis Alan Moore, who feels like he's been old since the dawn of time.
Magic. It either turns your soul old or keep you eternally young.I mean, Morrison's been around since the 80s, so it only makes sense that he's getting up there. The 80s were more than 30 years ago. But he just LOOKS so much younger. It's the baldness, I'm sure of it.
That being said, now that I think of it, I don't think I've seen a recent picture of him?
I mean, Morrison's been around since the 80s, so it only makes sense that he's getting up there. The 80s were more than 30 years ago. But he just LOOKS so much younger. It's the baldness, I'm sure of it.
That being said, now that I think of it, I don't think I've seen a recent picture of him?