if you had more democrats, it wouldnt be happening. so,... yeah,... vote.
I mean, you'd need 60 to break the Filibuster here or 50 that were on board with a nuclear option, so you'd need the most incredibly successful past 3 elections for anything to be on the table here. Even if Dems picked up Iowa, North Carolina, and Maine in 2020, held Florida in 2018, and picked up Missouri, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin in 2016 (which requires a small miracle that Dems never took any losses when those would be majority numbers all throughout Trump's Presidency), you'd still be 3 short of breaking a Filibuster that all 50 Republicans have supported against raising the Debt Ceiling. And we have Manchin and Sinema definitely not breaking the filibuster for any reason, Feinstein has honestly never been reliably on board with it, Coons and Carper are bafflingly resistant to filibuster reform, and King and Tester are kind of less inclined to go that route as well (and Nelson probably would have been a Blue Dog pain in the ass too had he not lost in 2018). Which is to say even with 57 Democratic Senators taking all the possibly winnable seats in the past 3 election cycles, you wouldn't really arrive at a position that would prevent this either.
Democrats effectively need a 60 person super majority to do ANYTHING worth doing and there's virtually no path to that reality even if people had "voted better" or whatever.