• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

PMS341

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt-account
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
6,634
What's the point of this tweet?

I don't understand communist humor sometimes, this doesn't make any sense as a joke.

LOL what the fuck.

If you really need the joke explained (you don't), the headline is a parody of CNN's current headline, where a front-running candidate says something so obviously direct and insulting to another candidate. Both are jokes, in fact. I hope this helps.
 

Deleted member 8561

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
11,284
Well, it's just a bit odd to see someone who posts in a lot of political threads dismissing an entire field of political philosophy as uninteresting

Because socialism and communism are pretty much fringe and are over represented online and have little impact in real world political happenings. I'm not an academic, I'm not reading "political theory" in my free time.
 
Oct 26, 2017
20,440
LOL what the fuck.

If you really need the joke explained (you don't), the headline is a parody of CNN's current headline, where a front-running candidate says something so obviously direct and insulting to another candidate. Both are jokes, in fact. I hope this helps.

It's extremely not funny because it has nothing at all to do with the actual story which is obviously sourced from Warren?

The "joke" seems to be Law Boy taking an article he doesn't like and changing up it to be an insult against Buttigieg because he doesn't like Buttigieg and that's aggressively unfunny because they've made these jokes for months and months (all being aggressively unfunny with "Mayo Boy" being absolutely the worst as all of them are white) and it has nothing to do with the article.
 
Oct 25, 2017
11,188

Mekanos

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 17, 2018
44,184
socialism and communism are fringe and have no impact, but also, american workers' rights just happened one day
 

Feep

Lead Designer, Iridium Studios
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
4,603
At this point I have to wonder why Warren hasn't issued anything. It's starting to look bad on her, too.
 

splash wave

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,543
Bay Area, CA
This is such a perfect, bullshit story. Warren doesn't need to take any responsibility, since the articles cite anonymous sources who weren't actually there, and watch: she'll be asked by a moderator about it during the debate, and she'll give a vague answer neither confirming nor denying the article (pretending to take the high road or something), allowing the charge to stand without having to substantiate it.
 

AbsoluteZero0K

Alt Account
Banned
Dec 6, 2019
1,570


The Republican party fought Trump every step of the way. Major conservative publications were printing "Against Trump" issues in OCTOBER. Yes, the voters fell in line on election day, but no one fell in line a second before that.


Evangelicals like Pat Robertson, James Dobson and Franklin Graham were endorsing well before the voting booth.

Because I find all this infighting among progressives to be of worse consequence than Biden ending up the nominee and the longer we don't have a clear nominee the worse this infighting will get. As it is, more conflict among the Warren/Sanders camps just makes it easier for Biden to take it anyways.

I also don't subscribe to the idea that the best way forward is to just get the most left person possible in as President at any cost. I'd rather have bigger Congressional majorities than the most left person possible in the WH and so despite not personally wanting Biden to be President, I do think him as the nominee provides the best odds for Democrats to take Congress with more workable margins.


I mean, from what I see it's not really the "DNC" infighting here. Regardless, I don't ever want Democrats to have the same kind of herd mentality that Republicans have. There's a middle ground to be had.

It will be real interesting to see how things go once the primary is over. I hope lessons were learned from 2016.

Seems is running interference to hit progressives right where they know it will hurt: in the intersectionality.
 

Hierophant

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,196
Sydney
Because socialism and communism are pretty much fringe and are over represented online and have little impact in real world political happenings. I'm not an academic, I'm not reading "political theory" in my free time.
Love too ignore the entire history of the labour movement and Leftism and then say socialism has "little impact on the real world".
The reason why Leftism is so appealing to so many is because it's so simple, the Communist manifesto when it was first written was originally a phamplet.
 

Inuhanyou

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,214
New Jersey

Ultraviolence

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,213
It's extremely not funny because it has nothing at all to do with the actual story which is obviously sourced from Warren?

The "joke" seems to be Law Boy taking an article he doesn't like and changing up it to be an insult against Buttigieg because he doesn't like Buttigieg and that's aggressively unfunny because they've made these jokes for months and months (all being aggressively unfunny with "Mayo Boy" being absolutely the worst as all of them are white) and it has nothing to do with the article.
ugh you're so smart and logical and mature 😍
 

PMS341

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt-account
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
6,634
It's extremely not funny because it has nothing at all to do with the actual story which is obviously sourced from Warren?

It's pretty funny tbh, and has to do with the "actual story" because it's literally a direct play on the article itself.

Are you upset because it was about Buttigieg, or that it was a CNN parody? I'm really not certain whats up. Also, "obviously sourced from Warren" is an assumption no doubt. It may have been, despite CNN and such saying it was four staffers, but right now we have no idea because it is still conjecture. There hasn't even been a statement from Warren's campaign yet.

The "joke" seems to be Law Boy taking an article he doesn't like and changing up it to be an insult against Buttigieg because he doesn't like Buttigieg and that's aggressively unfunny because they've made these jokes for months and months (all being aggressively unfunny with "Mayo Boy" being absolutely the worst as all of them are white) and it has nothing to do with the article.

No one should "like" a sensationalist article with a sensationalist headline that still hasn't been confirmed or denied by the campaign in which the article states the sources came from. The media just wants hits, and it specifically wants the left-most candidates to fight between their camps. And besides, Buttigieg himself is the kind of person who would go as far as to fake black support due to having such low numbers in the first place, and even praised Bush and the War on Terror when suggesting that mandatory civil service was a good idea. Not to mention he defends insurance companies more often than he brushes his teeth. The guy is basically a Republican lmao.
 

jviggy43

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
18,184
Because socialism and communism are pretty much fringe and are over represented online and have little impact in real world political happenings. I'm not an academic, I'm not reading "political theory" in my free time.
Oh man, take a break. Maybe reading some political theory and history would do you some good.
 

Hierophant

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,196
Sydney
It's extremely not funny because it has nothing at all to do with the actual story which is obviously sourced from Warren?

The "joke" seems to be Law Boy taking an article he doesn't like and changing up it to be an insult against Buttigieg because he doesn't like Buttigieg and that's aggressively unfunny because they've made these jokes for months and months (all being aggressively unfunny with "Mayo Boy" being absolutely the worst as all of them are white) and it has nothing to do with the article.
Ok boomer
 
Oct 26, 2017
20,440
Love too ignore the entire history of the labour movement and Leftism and then say socialism has "little impact on the real world".
The reason why Leftism is so appealing to so many is because it's so simple, the Communist manifesto when it was first written was originally a phamplet.

16% of Dems are Socialists.

That's like... 7% of the United States population.

More important than libertarians but not that big.
 

Feep

Lead Designer, Iridium Studios
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
4,603
Okay so

Who do you think the source of this story is.
If she *deliberately* leaked it, I'm not sure that's a good look for her either, but...I guess.

Warren and Bernie are fighting for the same crowd. I do wish one of them would get out of the other's way, but there's no reason for either of them to be the one to do it.
 

Bramblebutt

Banned
Jan 11, 2018
1,858
Because socialism and communism are pretty much fringe and are over represented online and have little impact in real world political happenings. I'm not an academic, I'm not reading "political theory" in my free time.
If you're going to speak with reasonable confidence about the merits of regulated capitalism over socialism and communism, it really does behoove you to read some socialist literature, considering how many of those regulations were a direct response to organized labor and socialist critique.
 

Mudcrab

Avenger
Oct 26, 2017
3,415
This is such a perfect, bullshit story. Warren doesn't need to take any responsibility, since the articles cite anonymous sources who weren't actually there, and watch: she'll be asked by a moderator about it during the debate, and she'll give a vague answer neither confirming nor denying the article (pretending to take the high road or something), allowing the charge to stand without having to substantiate it.

Pretty good strategy. You bank on this happening in a debate and if it happens, no matter what your opponent says, he's losing ground just having to deal with it.
 

andymcc

Member
Oct 25, 2017
26,316
Columbus, OH
It's extremely not funny because it has nothing at all to do with the actual story which is obviously sourced from Warren?

The "joke" seems to be Law Boy taking an article he doesn't like and changing up it to be an insult against Buttigieg because he doesn't like Buttigieg and that's aggressively unfunny because they've made these jokes for months and months (all being aggressively unfunny with "Mayo Boy" being absolutely the worst as all of them are white) and it has nothing to do with the article.

How do you even enjoy Bojack without it upsetting you, Jesus Christ
 

Emergency & I

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
6,634
This doesn't help either of them. At all.

When one of them drops out is this the type of story that will really sway a Warren Supporter to become a Bernie Supporter or vice versa?
 

Kay

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
2,077
Lads just got the message from Bernie directly to harass Law boy haters.
 

Hierophant

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,196
Sydney
Because BoJack is very clever and cares a lot.

Law Boy and the Chapo people feel like they're having a Ketamine induced stroke for the last seven months and have become a record stuck on repeat.
Why did you mention Chapo Trap House? Is this another instance on this forum of people using reddit The_Donald talking points? Calling anyone vaguely left leaning a "Chapo"?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.