• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Conal

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
2,868
Already rich person makes bank on platform filled with people doing things they otherwise wouldn't be comfortable doing in order to stay off the streets is gross as fuck.

Get that bag though I guess.

(I'm pro sex work btw but let's not pretend like it's user base wouldn't absolutely crater if people had more socioeconomic options).
 

GamerJM

Member
Nov 8, 2017
15,640
This is mostly bad for sex workers.

Also, side note, but I'm curious as to how both she and Zendaya became stars off of "Shake It Up" when that show was complete dogshit that had zero cultural staying power or relevance. I feel ridiculous for even having been in the same room when my sister was watching it during its runtime.
 
Apr 30, 2020
45
Bethesda, Maryland
Hope it goes well for her, I personally already spend over half my salary on onlyfans and wont betray my current investments, its been a couple of years now, surely one out of my fifty subscriptions will send me her number soon right?
 

N7Commander01

Member
Jan 2, 2020
1,074
Tokyo, Japan
This is mostly bad for sex workers.

Also, side note, but I'm curious as to how both she and Zendaya became stars off of "Shake It Up" when that show was complete dogshit that had zero cultural staying power or relevance. I feel ridiculous for even having been in the same room when my sister was watching it during its runtime.

I think because while the show was bad - the two main actors were well liked enough to become mildly successful eg appearances in smaller movies/make music

Then one of them gets a few bIg roles and becomes very famous

Same thing pretty much happended with Ariana Grande and Victorious -> Sam and Cat -> Yours Truly -> Stardom lol
 

Conal

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
2,868
This is what I was wondering

The argument is that it while it takes money from the pot, more eyes/less stigma grows the pot.

Without more research it's difficult to say if it's a net benefit to everyday users or not.

I'm not 100% convinced that this particular event will have any long term negative impact on other users. I can't imagine many people forgoing their daily dose of the parasocial to pay for some sterile maxim style glamour shots of a B list celeb.

I still think rich people using modes of generating income most frequently used by poor people is gross though.
 
Jan 10, 2018
6,327
Are there any studies on the people who spend money on that? Cause I think this isn't pure lust and attractiveness. The pictures are super vanilla like a regular post on insta.
I think this goes deeper than that. It's more emotionally based.

I remember browsing that one cam website and I think place 3 was a girl who only had her legs naked and she didn't even properly show them.

Half the chat was complaining about the lack of nudity.

You can only join the chat when you pay for it. The art of the tease.
 

Feep

Lead Designer, Iridium Studios
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
4,603
Def fucking over sex workers but it's ok gotta respect "the hustle"
I could see an argument for why this is the case but I'm still not convinced. She's not directly competing with them? It would be like if a film Kickstarter came in in 2013 and grabbed three million bucks...did that negatively or positively impact Kickstarter in other categories?

Of course, Only Fans could pull a Patreon and eventually shadowban sex workers after getting that family friendly money, but I don't know how likely something like that actually is.
 

Faenix1

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,114
Canada
I consider myself to know quite a bit about film and I had to go to IMDB. I had heard her name but thought she was just a socialite... LOL

Guess it kind of helps she doesnt seem to be in many "mainstream" movies. They look like VOD/streaming stuff.

Kind of surprised I've seen Blended many times, and still had no idea who she was 😅
 

Glasfrut

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
3,536
The argument is that it while it takes money from the pot, more eyes/less stigma grows the pot.

Without more research it's difficult to say if it's a net benefit to everyday users or not.

I'm not 100% convinced that this particular event will have any long term negative impact on other users. I can't imagine many people forgoing their daily dose of the parasocial to pay for some sterile maxim style glamour shots of a B list celeb.

I still think rich people using modes of generating income most frequently used by poor people is gross though.

Right, I think I see.
 

uzipukki

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,722
Good for her. Wish I was able to rake in such money but alas.
 

dragn

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt-account
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
881
people spending money on this shit in this time should just get it taken away ffs
 

Conal

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
2,868
Right, I think I see.

I guess it's like if they started showing
The Avengers at your local independent film festival.

Let's also say that Marvel builds their own screen etc. so there is no physical resources being taken away from the other screenings.

At the end of the festival it turns out that The Avengers made more money than the rest of the films combined.

You could jump the gun and say that it's presence had a negative affect on the other films but this isn't inherently true.

The audience may be so different that people who went to see The Avengers were never going to see an independent film anyway.

Further to this, it's possibly more likely that people who came for The Avengers took advantage of being at an independent film festival and saw an indie pic or 2, than people who came to see an indie film decided to watch The Avengers instead.

So while it may dwarf the takings of everything around it, its not a forgone conclusion that the other films didn't benefit from its presence.
 

MechaMarmaset

Member
Nov 20, 2017
3,582
Good for her. I will never understand people that get uptight about this stuff. There are actually dudes out there that get mad at other dudes that pay for onlyfans and I just don't get it. I don't participate but I don't give two shits what others spend thier money on and these girls or guys can make a good, relatively safe living.

It'd be like getting mad at people for paying for netflix when free TV is available over the air. Well netflix has the specific thing they want.
 

Conal

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
2,868
Good for her. I will never understand people that get uptight about this stuff. There are actually dudes out there that get mad at other dudes that pay for onlyfans and I just don't get it. I don't participate but I don't give two shits what others spend thier money on and these girls or guys can make a good, relatively safe living.

The question is should celebrities be taking up space on a platform where the alternative is often a bad, very unsafe living?
 

Gamer4life

Member
Dec 6, 2017
329
I could see an argument for why this is the case but I'm still not convinced. She's not directly competing with them? It would be like if a film Kickstarter came in in 2013 and grabbed three million bucks...did that negatively or positively impact Kickstarter in other categories?

Of course, Only Fans could pull a Patreon and eventually shadowban sex workers after getting that family friendly money, but I don't know how likely something like that actually is.
Onlyfans is owned by the same owner of Myfreecams..Leo Radvinsky. He bought OF in October of 2018 I believe. He gets to double dip since many models from MFC have an Onlyfans page so het gets another cut though not as much as the 50 percent cut on MFC. So there will never be any shadowbaning on there lol.
 

Biske

Member
Nov 11, 2017
8,273
That's cool for her, but I do think it sucks up oxygen from people using it to try and make a living as much as it could bring light and attention. Hopefully it brings more paying customers to support regular folks using it to get income.

Only fans is depressing though as you can see how little people want to pay for porn. Obviously stealing porn is huge and well accepted piracy, you can even see it regularly places like here where people proudly scoff at paying for porn when you can "get it for free" aka pirate it. If you follow any sex workers or cam girls you can regularly see them discount subscriptions for like under 5 bucks a month, which is great, a sale everybody loves a sale. But you can see how hard they have to scrape just to get people to buy into it. And a lot of them have many pics and videos and such all month. It's such an odd thing for a product or service or work to have such HUGE demand but people take it as a point of pride to not pay for it and proudly steal it. Just bonkers.
 

Apathy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,992
I saw a sex worker post on Twitter that the two biggest issues she had with Bella doing this was one, she comes from a place of privilege already and can come in and do this for research Isn't really researching because she didn't get the experience most sex workers have on the site of actually working hard to build their status.

The second biggest issue she had was that she was concerned that seeing celebrities in the site would cause more to come and that would become the biggest income stream for the site and slowly they might get pushed out off the platform just like, in her words, Patreon did (not sure myself but she said it was her experiences with Patreon). I can see her trepidation if that were to happen. If marketed right, the site could go "legitimate" and do away with the people that built it up. Specially with a name like onlyfans as it doesn't by itself convey any sexual aspect.
 

TSM

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,823
That's cool for her, but I do think it sucks up oxygen from people using it to try and make a living as much as it could bring light and attention. Hopefully it brings more paying customers to support regular folks using it to get income.

Only fans is depressing though as you can see how little people want to pay for porn. Obviously stealing porn is huge and well accepted piracy, you can even see it regularly places like here where people proudly scoff at paying for porn when you can "get it for free" aka pirate it. If you follow any sex workers or cam girls you can regularly see them discount subscriptions for like under 5 bucks a month, which is great, a sale everybody loves a sale. But you can see how hard they have to scrape just to get people to buy into it. And a lot of them have many pics and videos and such all month. It's such an odd thing for a product or service or work to have such HUGE demand but people take it as a point of pride to not pay for it and proudly steal it. Just bonkers.

How many people are actually pirating porn in 2020? There are many sites that have more porn than any one person could watch in a year all available to stream for free 24 hours a day. Bing's number one use seems to be to index the near limitless amount of porn available on those websites. As for stealing, what percentage of people even bother to download porn any more? It seems rather pointless given how freely available it is to stream. When people say "get it for free" this is what they mean. Trying to paint this as pirating or stealing is disingenuous to say the least. You seem to be making an argument from a bygone era.
 

Klyka

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,481
Germany
Onlyfans is softcore for simps
tenor.gif
 

KingK

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,856
...I really do not understand how so many people pay for this stuff. I also had no idea who she was. Everything about this is incomprehensible to me, but if everyone involved is happy with it, whatever. The whole thing just seems utterly bizarre to me.
 

Blackage

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,182
...I really do not understand how so many people pay for this stuff. I also had no idea who she was. Everything about this is incomprehensible to me, but if everyone involved is happy with it, whatever. The whole thing just seems utterly bizarre to me.

It's literally the virtual girlfriend craze we've heard about before but with actual women. That's the long and short of it. Guys/gals subbing to onlyfans feel a personal connection to the person showing them their talents.
 

Biske

Member
Nov 11, 2017
8,273
How many people are actually pirating porn in 2020? There are many sites that have more porn than any one person could watch in a year all available to stream for free 24 hours a day. Bing's number one use seems to be to index the near limitless amount of porn available on those websites. As for stealing, what percentage of people even bother to download porn any more? It seems rather pointless given how freely available it is to stream. When people say "get it for free" this is what they mean. Trying to paint this as pirating or stealing is disingenuous to say the least. You seem to be making an argument from a bygone era.

You honestly think the majority of videos on someplace like pornhub aren't pirated and uploaded to watch "for free"? Show me any streaming site that is free and its a guarantee the backbone of it is stolen content that the site just looks the otherway and relies on copyright disputes to take them down, but only then.

What websites are you streaming that aren't relying on pirated content?

Edit: Hell on a number of the porn streaming websites you can watch pirated hollywood movies. They don't give a shit what is uploaded. Mind you not just pirating content form porn studios, but regular cammers and sex workers with far less influence and power to police their stolen content

https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/...dtube-pornhub-piracy-alessa-savage-ukcutegirl Streaming websties are riddled with this stuff.


Everything seemed less comical when a fan messaged Lucy saying that they loved her new Pornhub upload. She freaked. The video wasn't supposed to feature on anything but small subscription-based site Wank It Now. Watching it back, Lucy was horrified. She doesn't do boy/girl material and the dildo looked far more realistic than she thought it would. Now people were assuming she was progressing onto more hardcore material. "My fans were sharing it around saying, 'oh my God, Lucy's doing proper porn now, she's got cum dribbling down her face'," Lucy tells me, over the phone. "I thought, 'no, I'm really not.' Now I get loads of messages asking me to do boy/girl stuff."

After the video, Lucy changed all her levels – the scorecard explaining to porn production companies how far you'll go. Now she won't touch sex toys, specifically fake cocks. Across her career as a performer, from camming to OnlyFans to porn shoots, Lucy has had hundreds of hours of footage stolen from her. Whether it's a video of her showering, making out with women, or full frontal nudes of her legs spread, someone will have uploaded it onto the internet.

Lucy is not unlucky. This is not some glitch in an otherwise fair system. Almost every time you watch free porn, whether on a tube site or at the bottom of some obscure forum, it has been uploaded without the owners' permission. This means that everyone involved, from the performer to the producers, won't earn anything. Porn does not suffer from a piracy problem. Really, the industry as it is now couldn't exist without piracy – it actively relies upon it.

This investment might have earned Fabian $150 million, but not everyone did so well out of the rise of these websites. Users ripping porn from paid-for subscription sites and uploading them onto the tubes for free, left the value of porn studios' work vastly diminished. Performers who used to make $1,500 an hour now get $500. Meanwhile, porn production companies have to hire a permanent member of staff to scrape the internet for their stolen videos.

Lucy has managed to get her work taken down off Pornhub, but says it's an arduous process. "You have to prove you're the owner of the video. Often people send them the original, unedited footage. If you can't prove it, they won't take it down." According to Lucy, you have to nag sites like Pornhub several times before they listen. "They make it such a struggle to take it down because they want the content; they are always on the side of the person uploading it."


Just because someone else has done it for you, stolen it, uploaded it and made it easy and convenient to watch, doesn't mean you aren't stealing it yourself and gleefully participating in piracy. Ignorance is no excuse.
 
Last edited:

TSM

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,823
You honestly think the majority of videos on someplace like pornhub aren't pirated and uploaded to watch "for free"? Show me any streaming site that is free and its a guarantee the backbone of it is stolen content that the site just looks the otherway and relies on copyright disputes to take them down, but only then.

What websites are you streaming that aren't relying on pirated content?

Edit: Hell on a number of the porn streaming websites you can watch pirated movies. They don't give a shit what is uploaded. Mind you not just pirating content form porn studios, but regular cammers and sex workers with far less influence and power to police their stolen content

https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/...dtube-pornhub-piracy-alessa-savage-ukcutegirl Streaming websties are riddled with this stuff.

I never argued that the content is legit on those sites. I'm saying that implying that the people that use them are pirates or theives is disingenuous. Are people that don't double check the rights holders of videos they watch on youtube also pirates and theives? Much like the rest of the internet providing "free" content it's assumed that the platform holder is responsible for vetting content which is then ad supported. Really "why would you pay for it when it's free?" applies to so much of the content on the internet, including this very forum, that I'm not sure why you are singling out porn. Hell, people not using a free email address is apparently enough of a hurdle that Resetera uses it to screen out new members.
 

HylianSeven

Shin Megami TC - Community Resetter
Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,069
...I really do not understand how so many people pay for this stuff. I also had no idea who she was. Everything about this is incomprehensible to me, but if everyone involved is happy with it, whatever. The whole thing just seems utterly bizarre to me.
The same reason people support someone on Patreon? They enjoy their content?
 

Biske

Member
Nov 11, 2017
8,273
I never argued that the content is legit on those sites. I'm saying that implying that the people that use them are pirates or theives is disingenuous. Are people that don't double check the rights holders of videos they watch on youtube also pirates and theives? Much like the rest of the internet providing "free" content it's assumed that the platform holder is responsible for vetting content which is then ad supported. Really "why would you pay for it when it's free?" applies to so much of the content on the internet, including this very forum, that I'm not sure why you are singling out porn.

If I frequent a ROM website and assume it's all legit and the website is responsible for making sure but not me, am I not pirating video games?

I'm singling out porn because in particular people view it as cheap free content that isn't worth paying for. It's obvious streaming websites are stealing videos, ripping them off websites and uploading so people don't have to pay sex workers for their work. Stealing.

It's a joke, it's piracy. It's bullshit to write it off as "oh this is pornhubs problem not mine. Sorry sex worker I'm going to watch your work for free, how about you go and struggle with them to take it down. Good luck making a living hahah gonna jerk off to you now"
 

ostrichKing

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,468
Bella Thorne had a crazy reputation in the advertising/entertainment community for ages. (Like a ton of eventual Disney TV kids- man the stories about Victorious are insane)...

As a kid, she often would need to be booked at separate call times than other kid models because she would bully other kids and shame them.

I remember hearing that she had a massively fucked up family life (it later came out she was sexually abused as a child). It is not a surprise, as I know a couple of people in the industry who were propositioned by her when she was only like 11-14 (she asked if she could visit them in their hotel rooms on photoshoots).

It's good to hear she's (maybe) doing well and getting help she needed...but man...what a fucked up childhood.