• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Dust

C H A O S
Member
Oct 25, 2017
32,169
There are two elements that are really valuable here, in my opinion.

1)The ready games that just need to be published
2)NRS with MK

The studios without IPs are more trouble than profit and everything else is muddled.
I don't think this will go smoothly.
 

ToddBonzalez

The Pyramids? That's nothing compared to RDR2
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
15,530
Wow, fuck. Most of their studios are working on Warner IP, so that's wild.
 

Deleted member 43

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
9,271
Realistically speaking, do you see any of the platform holders going for this. I personally don't see it.
If ATT is forced to sell it piecemeal I could see platform holders being interested in some of the assets. Otherwise, I think it's unlikely, they would pay a huge premium for the right to spend even more money dismantling a company they don't need much of.
Everyone should remember that this deal might not happen. According to sources it's not imminent and not in place.
Hopefully, but I see the best chance of that being no one willing to pay what ATT thinks it's worth.
 

KG

Banned
Oct 12, 2018
1,598
So no more superhero games from them then as they would to pay for the rights?

I just don't want a first-party buying them. That will unleash console warrior bs.

I could see Square-Enix purchasing them? Do they have that kind of cash?
 
Last edited:

Disco

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,445
Oh no. I hope netherrrealms and also the batman license dont get fucked over by this
 

BlueStarEXSF

Member
Dec 3, 2018
4,502
Man, they all suck. I guess Take Two wouldnt be the worst thing in the world. If it has to be between Sony and MS, it's better with MS as they have PC releases but fuck man. I hope it doesn't happen. Ubisoft would be better here if they allowed WB gaming to keep functionning as it has.
 

Brofield

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,896
I'd almost hope Activision because they probably have the least chance of shafting Nintendo on multiplatform releases.

T2 or EA and Boon is fighting an uphill battle that I doubt even he could win to keep Mortal Kombat coming onto Switch and the Succ
 

ToddBonzalez

The Pyramids? That's nothing compared to RDR2
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
15,530
Also, if Google wants a shortcut to having a 1st party. Here it is.
 

softfocus

Member
Oct 30, 2017
903
Why the hell does AT&T have so much debt and still buy out stuff like HBO recently?
I don't get capitalism.
 

9-Volt

Member
Oct 27, 2017
12,868
Everyone on the publisher side would be gone. That's why it would be best for them to go to a company that doesn't already have a publishing operation.

Neither EA or Activision would keep the management side of WB, publishing included. There would be some serious clipping if WB goes to either one of them. They are the worst case scenarios.
 

Manmademan

Election Thread Watcher
Member
Aug 6, 2018
15,992
Disney killed their game division not too long ago, after the Toys-To-Life bubble pooped, they just aren't interested and don't think it's worth it.

Disney's game division wasnt anywhere near as robust as what's on offer here. Completely different ballpark.

Also consider that due to COVID, blockbuster movies as a revenue stream are likely going to be disrupted for some time. I doubt we'll see an Endgame level film in theatres for a long time. Parks? Same thing. Both of those divisions will be down for years to come, and recovery to pre pandemic levels is questionable.

Gaming is a much more resilient business (Sony went out of their way to say this within the past couple of days) and Disney needs new revenue streams.

Not saying Disney will be in the running, but they absolutely should be given the IP they control.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 43

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
9,271
Being a publisher is extremely difficult and expensive. Especially when it's in a market you don't operate in like Alibaba. Even with the Warner IPs it's a huge undertaking for a company that otherwise has no involvement and could easily lead to them burning cash for years and years.
I don't disagree with any of that...but these companies can afford it and the upside is potentially huge.

It's not like Google, Amazon, Apple, Tencent, Alibaba, and others haven't explored something like this before. They all have, some many times. They all see the potential.

Neither EA or Activision would keep the management side of WB, publishing included. There would be some serious clipping if WB goes to either one of them. They are the worst case scenarios.
That's literally what I have been saying with every single one of my posts.
 

Maple

Member
Oct 27, 2017
11,721
Batman, Mortal Kombat, Lego, Middle-Earth, etc, all up for grabs.

Avalanche Studios, Monolith, NetherRealm, WB Games, etc, all up for grabs.

Wow.

Would be a colossal purchase for Microsoft or Sony to secure some massive IPs and studios for their platforms. Oddly enough, I would trust either Microsoft or Sony to handle WB's portfolio better than EA, Activision, or Take Two.
 

BranFlakes

Member
Nov 5, 2017
38
so are they still gonna announce the Harry Potter RPG, and the new Batman game or will they be canceled :(
 

Kthulhu

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,670
I don't disagree with any of that...but these companies can afford it and the upside is potentially huge.

It's not like Google, Amazon, Apple, Tencent, Alibaba, and others haven't explored something like this before. They all have, some many times. They all see the potential.

Yeah except Apple and Alibaba are the black sheep in that list.
 

Vic_Viper

Thanked By SGM
Member
Oct 25, 2017
29,030
Really wonder what this means for the WB Montreal Batman game.

Also worried about what this says about WB and DC Comics under ATT. If they are getting rid of their Games' Division, what else is next lol.
 

Pancracio17

▲ Legend ▲
Avenger
Oct 29, 2017
18,699
I dont have much faith in Activision or EA, I really dont like the way they manage things. Anyone else would be fine I think.
 

¡ B 0 0 P !

Banned
Apr 4, 2019
2,915
Greater Toronto Area
EA!?

2K!?

Motherfucking Activison!?

200.gif


If those are the 3 choices I want Phil to swoop in at the last second.

Or else I'm scared what would happen with MK if one of those three got the IP. Especially if it's greedy Activision.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 59955

User requested account closure
Banned
Sep 14, 2019
2,004
Man, they all suck. I guess Take Two wouldnt be the worst thing in the world. If it has to be between Sony and MS, it's better with MS as they have PC releases but fuck man. I hope it doesn't happen. Ubisoft would be better here if they allowed WB gaming to keep functionning as it has.

Take Two would be the worst thing in the world. They sabotage their own devs and games.
 

Mentalist

Member
Mar 14, 2019
17,975
EA!?

2K!?

Motherfucking Activison!?

200.gif


If those are the 3 choices I want Phil to swoop in as the last second.

Or else I'm scared what would happen with MK if one of those three got the IP. Especially if it's greedy Activision.
Don't worry, Uncle Google will take care of MK. Stadia's web magic will give us the best netcode, no latency.
 

Prine

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
15,724
The marketing and third party exclusivity so far has been significantly lower than the xbox one launch. Gamepass and studio purchases were done before the XSX launch, that's a long term investment due to their poor first party output. Additionally, the Mojang acquisition was in 2014 and had zero to due with XSX launch, what the hell are you talking about now?

I find it extraordinary that you think of these investment as fixed costs that stop on the day a transfer is made, and therefore not contributing to current and future financing of department operations. All of those investments increase department costs, all these initiatives (Gamepass, xcloud, BC etc) are continuously expanded upon, these new studios were purchased to release content, all in service of XSX/PC/nextgen and future services, all of this comes under gaming division that has increased investment significantly in preparation for its future (that includes XSX). And we have no idea about the marketing yet as MS havent officially revealed their next gen plan, but Phil did say they've had to open a publishing branch of their gaming division because they've got so much going on. To suggest these expenditures were done before XSX and so negate them as investment for next gen is absurd.
 
Last edited:
Oct 28, 2017
5,793
Hopefully this sale doesn't affect the games currently in development that are tied to WB licensed IPs.

God knows we don't need WB Montreal cancelling another project.
 

ArkhamFantasy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,545
Worst case scenario (outside of the studios getting shut down obviously)

-Google/Amazon

exclusive to platforms that nobody owns/cares about

Bad scenario
-Sony/MS/Nintendo

-Game quality would almost certainly improve, but a chunk of gamers would no longer have access to them

-EA and Activision

EA is not a very well run company and relies on exclusive licenses for most of their profits, horrible track record with acquisitions. Activision laid off 800 employee's after a record quarter and was such a bad business partner that Bungie paid them hundreds of millions of dollars to get away from them

Decent scenario

-Ubisoft

Very much into the GaaS/multiplayer/design by committee approach, but much better output than EA or Activision overall

-Take Two

Hit or miss

Good scenarios

Tencent, Disney.

Hands off, lots of money

Best case scenarios

Bandai Namco and Square Enix

Lots of creative freedom and experience, Square Enix already has western studios set up that could assist WB studios with game development. Less egregious business practices than the major western publishers.

This is just my personal list, feel free to critique and make suggestions.
 

Detective Pidgey

Alt Account
Banned
Jun 4, 2019
6,255
Theoretically, sure. But ATT won't want to break WB Games up except as a last resort, as that would devalue the assets.

It's not "unfortunate," it's a tragedy. Keeping thousands of people employed (and preventing the further consolidation of the industry) is far more important than any other considerations.

Everyone on the publisher side would be gone. That's why it would be best for them to go to a company that doesn't already have a publishing operation.

Once again, WB Games won't be sold without long term exclusive game rights.

Apple wants recurring revenue, and media is a way to do that. Turning Apple into an actual game company has a huge potential upside for them. But yeah, like I said, it's unlikely.

These companies wouldn't buy a publisher because they already are a publisher, they would buy it to become one. WB gives anyone who wants to get into the industry a fantastic opportunity to do so.

Indeed a tragedy, I can't even imagine that. So basically if MS or Sony were to get them tons of people would lose their job? So best case scenario would be Tencent, and I assume they will keep the games coming to the consoles and the people get to keep their jobs? I'm probably misunderstanding this whole thing completely.
 
Oct 27, 2017
5,832
I don't think this will happen. It's such a short sighted purchase.

If you sell Rocksteady then it better come with a 10 year license for Batman. Same for any other studio that's tied to a WB IP.

Some accountants think they can get a good price now for their game studios because games industry is "recession proof".

4 billion is way too much without owning the ip these studios are known for. Even if it included Mortal Kombat it wouldn't be worth $4 billion. But weirder things have happened and companies make bad investments all the time.

Edit: the idea above about a non-games publisher using this as a foot in the door is interesting. Maybe Disney decide to get back into games and re-buy Avalanche Software.
 

TechnicPuppet

Member
Oct 28, 2017
10,809
Worst case scenario (outside of the studios getting shut down obviously)

-Google/Amazon

exclusive to platforms that nobody owns/cares about

Bad scenario
-Sony/MS/Nintendo

-Game quality would almost certainly improve, but a chunk of gamers would no longer have access to them

-EA and Activision

EA is not a very well run company and relies on exclusive licenses for most of their profits, horrible track record with acquisitions. Activision laid off 800 employee's after a record quarter and was such a bad business partner that Bungie paid them hundreds of millions of dollars to get away from them

Decent scenario

-Ubisoft

Very much into the GaaS/multiplayer/design by committee approach, but much better output than EA or Activision overall

-Take Two

Hit or miss

Good scenarios

Tencent, Disney.

Hands off, lots of money

Best case scenarios

Bandai Namco and Square Enix

Lots of creative freedom and experience, Square Enix already has western studios set up that could assist WB studios with game development. Less egregious business practices than the major western publishers.

This is just my personal list, feel free to critique and make suggestions.

Sounds about right except I'd put MS in decent. Just because they do PC/Steam as well and would probably allow anything currently being made for other 2 to go ahead as well.