How does someone "exploit" someone coming to sexually assault a child?
it's not exploiting the predators, it's exploiting pedophilia in general, and it's pretty fucked. it's turning it into entertainment for profit.
How does someone "exploit" someone coming to sexually assault a child?
Which did happen, IIRC. There were legitimate criticisms of the show.The real danger is that the show's antics could undermine the court cases.
But boy do some people have soft spots for Pedos or what? If Chris was investigating spousal murders nobody would give a shit if they "got a murderer killed". I don't particularly enjoy using whataboutism to make an analogy here but I'll always find it interesting how quick people are to defend the honor of child rapists. Popping out the woodwork and shit. "Nawt ackshwually pedophila you see"
Except no one is defending pedophiles in this thread Jesus Fucking Christ.
And yes, the suicide did result in a lot of the cases in Murphy thrown out because the show jumped the shark and did everything for the sole purpose of entertainment.
This Slate review details the specific problems with the show. People who don't like the show aren't feeling sorry for pedophiles, they're decrying the voyeuristic vigilante justice that is the whole basis of the show. The show has nothing to do with protecting the community or teaching parents how to teach their children how to avoid these situations or why/how pedophiles behave like they do. The fact the show has gotten cases thrown out because they've played shit up for drama speaks volumes about the show's intentions. For all intents and purposes, pedophiles caught in the sting operations would still get charged without Chris Hansen getting a huge erection every time he steps into the kitchen.
Any shows that make entertainment out of real justice/law system are garbage and show how broken American society is where every aspect of anything must be commodified into popcorn material. Shit like this, Cops or any of its copycatsExposing someone publicly as a predator sounds like standard reporting to me. And like any reporter, he does for personal gain, yeah sure.
But boy do some people have soft spots for Pedos or what? If Chris was investigating spousal murders nobody would give a shit if they "got a murderer killed". I don't particularly enjoy using whataboutism to make an analogy here but I'll always find it interesting how quick people are to defend the honor of child rapists. Popping out the woodwork and shit. "Nawt ackshwually pedophila you see"
Pedophile stans on ERA, I've seen it allI'd say 25% hero, 75% hard on. If there's one thing I hate about the show its that the volunteer group that help rope in the guys are objectively terrible people who get off on this sort of vigilante justice. Nothing they do in my opinion suggests their main motive is to make the internet a safer place for children. The only way Chris Hansen could feel comfortable with a show this damn exploitative is if he actually enjoyed fucking with these guys.
Its very easy to argue that no one should give a fuck about pedophiles getting busted but there's a lot of unintentional (or intentional, I can't honestly tell) gallows humour from a TV show structured like how it is. Every single one of the stings follow the same formula: volunteer group ropes in pedophile → pedophile arrives to site, bringing along Mike's Hard Lemonade → Chris Hansen busts through the door to read the internet chat log while pedophile cries → pedophile gets curbstomped by half a dozen police officers. Just deserts and all that but it doesn't change how the show is purposely exploiting pedophiles from start to finish for "educational" purposes.
...well, it sure beats getting your jollies off of...well, you know.No one should be getting their jollies off by watching an attempt by someone to fuck a child
it's not exploiting the predators, it's exploiting pedophilia in general, and it's pretty fucked. it's turning it into entertainment for profit.
It should be possible to criticize the show without seeming like you're defending pedophilia. No one is saying that people committing these crimes shouldn't be arrested, but the show is kind of trashy and like another poster said, a bit of a circus act. The way Perverted Justice operates in relation to To Catch a Predator actually raises some complicated ethical questions about vigilante justice and just... the whole thing leaves a gross taste in my mouth. You can feel that peophillia is abhorrent and also that the people behind these shows are doing it more for their own self-satisfaction than actually making the world a better place.
Just giving a thumbs up to you and others explaining why some criticize the show. Its difficult to do so without accusations of defending pedophiles on this site especially if you have certain avatars, so I tend to stay from it.
Unfortunately, people by nature have perverted sense of justice, where intentions and the way things occur are often justified.
I mean those are legitimate criticisms... but the original argument was more about how trashy it was for 'getting off on jailing pedos'/'exploiting' pedos and how the formula was garbage more than the issues this kind of show might cause for criminal cases. The post in question:Any shows that make entertainment out of real justice/law system are garbage and show how broken American society is where every aspect of anything must be commodified into popcorn material. Shit like this, Cops or any of its copycats
Like, by all means, create as many sting operations as you can and catch every single pedo possible. Just don't turn it into a entertainment focused show where you actually end up helping pedos get away because shitty shows like these actually damage real cases
So you might see where this post might cause some heads to turn, no? Also regarding the supposed 'curbstomps' I have no idea where that's from. I've watched approximately two of these and I didn't see that anywhere for a supposed formula.I'd say 25% hero, 75% hard on. If there's one thing I hate about the show its that the volunteer group that help rope in the guys are objectively terrible people who get off on this sort of vigilante justice. Nothing they do in my opinion suggests their main motive is to make the internet a safer place for children. The only way Chris Hansen could feel comfortable with a show this damn exploitative is if he actually enjoyed fucking with these guys.
Its very easy to argue that no one should give a fuck about pedophiles getting busted but there's a lot of unintentional (or intentional, I can't honestly tell) gallows humour from a TV show structured like how it is. Every single one of the stings follow the same formula: volunteer group ropes in pedophile → pedophile arrives to site, bringing along Mike's Hard Lemonade → Chris Hansen busts through the door to read the internet chat log while pedophile cries → pedophile gets curbstomped by half a dozen police officers. Just deserts and all that but it doesn't change how the show is purposely exploiting pedophiles from start to finish for "educational" purposes.
The more Chris Hansen grows old, the more he looks like William Shatner
I mean those are legitimate criticisms... but the original argument was more about how trashy it was for 'getting off on jailing pedos'/'exploiting' pedos and how the formula was garbage more than the issues this kind of show might cause for criminal cases. The post in question:
So you might see where this post might cause some heads to turn, no? Also regarding the supposed 'curbstomps' I have no idea where that's from. I've watched approximately two of these and I didn't see that anywhere for a supposed formula.
I never fully understand the law that they were breaking. I get it's intention but if everything was stagged, how does it hold up in court? Like with a drug sting theres usually a big pile of drugs to arrest them on.
I never fully understand the law that they were breaking. I get it's intention but if everything was stagged, how does it hold up in court? Like with a drug sting theres usually a big pile of drugs to arrest them on.
But that's the thing I am always hazy on. There are no thirteen year old girls, so who exactly are the victims? And thus, what actually is the crime?
I never fully understand the law that they were breaking. I get it's intention but if everything was stagged, how does it hold up in court? Like with a drug sting theres usually a big pile of drugs to arrest them on.
See, I'm way too cynical and I sometimes wonder if this is all projection and secretly Chris is a giant perv himself. But I've been waiting for that shoe to drop a long time so it's obviously not true.Sometimes I wonder if Chris Hansen thinks he's a hero or if he gets a hard-on when he pulls off these stings.
My stance as well. There is just a better way to go about this stuff.It's like Trump decision to pull out of Syria. I support it in theory but not in the way he is doing it. Same with this show.
How can people not see if they weren't caught in the sting, some 40 year old has found some lonely, underage, broken home teenager to manipulate...this shit is happening all the time sting or no sting...I never fully understand the law that they were breaking. I get it's intention but if everything was stagged, how does it hold up in court? Like with a drug sting theres usually a big pile of drugs to arrest them on.
I mean, I agree with some of your points, but I don't like your analogy because it's flawed. Besides, there's a show that specifically exploit the arrests of the poor and POC for years, it's called Cops.If you think the bolded quotes means I'm at all sympathetic towards pedophilia, then feel free to explain why. Maybe I didn't explain myself properly but I think its clear that I have significant problems with the structure and motive of the show, not the pedophiles getting busted. The end question is "do you think pedophilia is OK to exploit for reality TV". Which, from this thread, you have plenty of people thinking this type of reality TV is more than fine so long the individuals deserve it.
Which is a problem in my opinion. When I say curbstomping, its a figure of speech. Most of these individuals don't really put up any resistance yet still get pushed into the dirt/pavement by half a dozen police officers rushing at them from out of the bushes for no reason beyond letting the camera record some vigilante justice in action. And as we see in this thread, we see plenty of people who have no problems with police officers being extra rough so long they think the individual deserves it. If that's batting for pedophilia, then so be it.
To everyone who says they have no problem with this: if Fox News put out a series called "To Catch a Thief" by planting unlocked vans containing sneaker shipments in black majority neighborhoods, what would your opinion be? It would have the exact same motive as this "To Catch a Predator" series runs off and no doubt the Fox News crowd would have no problem seeing black people get roughed up when they instinctively flee because police officers rush out from nowhere after Sean Hannity tells them they're free to leave.
You mean it could be a Nowi avatar instead?I really think you're all overlooking the very real possibility that it's a Nintendo avatar, instead.
Aren't Creep Catchers straight up illegal? At least Hansen is working with cops, Creep Catchers do it all on their ownThe real problem is these vigilantes aren't smart enough to pull off a real case against a perp.
Like when "creep catchers " in Surrey "caught " a developmentally disabled guy trying to make friends on the net and he lost probably the only job he ever had.
Just leave it to the professionals not some hacks trying to get famous .
how is this even an argument? The police should seek to peacefully arrest anyone accused of a crime regardless of the crime.But you are right. The police should be much kinder to the pedophiles. They should gently ask them to come into the police car with them, and if they run away, they should just let them be. The pedophiles are the true victims of these shows.
One brought a handgunhow is this even an argument? The police should seek to peacefully arrest anyone accused of a crime regardless of the crime.
I never watched the show, but I'd hazard none of them brought weapons with them?
They weren't ever charged or even arrested . They caught a cop too whichis nuts and that dude is charged. But they quit thankfullyAren't Creep Catchers straight up illegal? At least Hansen is working with cops, Creep Catchers do it all on their own
Yeah, they're a huge time sinkman .. these Chris Hansen youtube vids are an internet blackhole. I start watching one and end up watching 7, 8 in a row.