• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

VeryHighlander

The Fallen
May 9, 2018
6,388
Exposing someone publicly as a predator sounds like standard reporting to me. And like any reporter, he does for personal gain, yeah sure.

But boy do some people have soft spots for Pedos or what? If Chris was investigating spousal murders nobody would give a shit if they "got a murderer killed". I don't particularly enjoy using whataboutism to make an analogy here but I'll always find it interesting how quick people are to defend the honor of child rapists. Popping out the woodwork and shit. "Nawt ackshwually pedophila you see"
 
Oct 28, 2017
4,970
But boy do some people have soft spots for Pedos or what? If Chris was investigating spousal murders nobody would give a shit if they "got a murderer killed". I don't particularly enjoy using whataboutism to make an analogy here but I'll always find it interesting how quick people are to defend the honor of child rapists. Popping out the woodwork and shit. "Nawt ackshwually pedophila you see"

Except no one is defending pedophiles in this thread Jesus Fucking Christ.

And yes, the suicide did result in a lot of the cases in Murphy thrown out because the show jumped the shark and did everything for the sole purpose of entertainment.

This Slate review details the specific problems with the show. People who don't like the show aren't feeling sorry for pedophiles, they're decrying the voyeuristic vigilante justice that is the whole basis of the show. The show has nothing to do with protecting the community or teaching parents how to teach their children how to avoid these situations or why/how pedophiles behave like they do. The fact the show has gotten cases thrown out because they've played shit up for drama speaks volumes about the show's intentions. For all intents and purposes, pedophiles caught in the sting operations would still get charged without Chris Hansen getting a huge erection every time he steps into the kitchen.
 
Last edited:

perfectchaos007

It's Happening
Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,247
Texas
In the 3rd video in the OP, did anyone else notice the actors Rooster Teeth hoodie? Lol that's unfortunate
 
Last edited:

SmokingBun

Banned
Oct 29, 2017
2,091
I think the issue some folks are having is that you are turning the prosecution of a very serious and heinous crime into a circus act.
You may as well have Ashton Kutcher bust in and go, "YOU GOT BUST'D BRO!" and then he pours Gatorade over the pedo.

Naturally they make things "spicy" for tv otherwise folks won't watch it
 

snail_maze

Member
Oct 27, 2017
974
Were the episodes actually aired after convictions? Because I don't understand how they would be able to go about showing these people uncensored otherwise
 

-Peabody-

Member
Oct 29, 2017
1,597
It should be possible to criticize the show without seeming like you're defending pedophilia. No one is saying that people committing these crimes shouldn't be arrested, but the show is kind of trashy and like another poster said, a bit of a circus act. The way Perverted Justice operates in relation to To Catch a Predator actually raises some complicated ethical questions about vigilante justice and just... the whole thing leaves a gross taste in my mouth. You can feel that peophillia is abhorrent and also that the people behind these shows are doing it more for their own self-satisfaction than actually making the world a better place.
 
Last edited:

Rose Red

Member
Oct 26, 2017
265
If they were actually only worried about the predators, they'd just do the stings the same way, turning the preds to the police without actually airing them. Turning this into money-making scheme is the suspect part. Not every aspect of human existence needs to be turned into disgusting reality tv.
 

TarNaru33

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,045
Except no one is defending pedophiles in this thread Jesus Fucking Christ.

And yes, the suicide did result in a lot of the cases in Murphy thrown out because the show jumped the shark and did everything for the sole purpose of entertainment.

This Slate review details the specific problems with the show. People who don't like the show aren't feeling sorry for pedophiles, they're decrying the voyeuristic vigilante justice that is the whole basis of the show. The show has nothing to do with protecting the community or teaching parents how to teach their children how to avoid these situations or why/how pedophiles behave like they do. The fact the show has gotten cases thrown out because they've played shit up for drama speaks volumes about the show's intentions. For all intents and purposes, pedophiles caught in the sting operations would still get charged without Chris Hansen getting a huge erection every time he steps into the kitchen.


Just giving a thumbs up to you and others explaining why some criticize the show. Its difficult to do so without accusations of defending pedophiles on this site especially if you have certain avatars, so I tend to stay from it.

Unfortunately, people by nature have perverted sense of justice, where intentions and the way things occur are often justified.
 

BernardoOne

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,289
Exposing someone publicly as a predator sounds like standard reporting to me. And like any reporter, he does for personal gain, yeah sure.

But boy do some people have soft spots for Pedos or what? If Chris was investigating spousal murders nobody would give a shit if they "got a murderer killed". I don't particularly enjoy using whataboutism to make an analogy here but I'll always find it interesting how quick people are to defend the honor of child rapists. Popping out the woodwork and shit. "Nawt ackshwually pedophila you see"
Any shows that make entertainment out of real justice/law system are garbage and show how broken American society is where every aspect of anything must be commodified into popcorn material. Shit like this, Cops or any of its copycats

Like, by all means, create as many sting operations as you can and catch every single pedo possible. Just don't turn it into a entertainment focused show where you actually end up helping pedos get away because shitty shows like these actually damage real cases
 

TI92

Alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,598
Watchex these in the living room and a roommate of mine says "in some countries this relationship wouldn't be considered wrong. It's just our society that looks down on it" 🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢
 

Pand

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
554
Pedophilia and child abuse are definitely proper subjects to make entertainment out of and profit from. Nothing weird about that at all.

I'm not a fan of any of these reality misery-as-entertainment shows, especially if it involves law enforcement. It does nothing good for an eventual case against the perpetrators and only serves as justice porn.
 

SENPAIatLARGE

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,501
User banned (3 days): inflammatory accusations against another member
I'd say 25% hero, 75% hard on. If there's one thing I hate about the show its that the volunteer group that help rope in the guys are objectively terrible people who get off on this sort of vigilante justice. Nothing they do in my opinion suggests their main motive is to make the internet a safer place for children. The only way Chris Hansen could feel comfortable with a show this damn exploitative is if he actually enjoyed fucking with these guys.

Its very easy to argue that no one should give a fuck about pedophiles getting busted but there's a lot of unintentional (or intentional, I can't honestly tell) gallows humour from a TV show structured like how it is. Every single one of the stings follow the same formula: volunteer group ropes in pedophile → pedophile arrives to site, bringing along Mike's Hard Lemonade → Chris Hansen busts through the door to read the internet chat log while pedophile cries → pedophile gets curbstomped by half a dozen police officers. Just deserts and all that but it doesn't change how the show is purposely exploiting pedophiles from start to finish for "educational" purposes.
Pedophile stans on ERA, I've seen it all
 

TolerLive

Senior Lighting Artist
Verified
Nov 15, 2017
1,858
Redmond, WA
Its 6:38 AM on Christmas morning, and I've been watching Chris Hansen bust pedos for an hour. What a start to my morning.
 

Biggersmaller

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,966
Minneapolis
it's not exploiting the predators, it's exploiting pedophilia in general, and it's pretty fucked. it's turning it into entertainment for profit.

Yes. The show is gloriously busting people for pedophelia as entertainment for profit. So what!?!? It's still God's work nailing these fuckers. Not everything done for profit is by default wrong.

This isn't Cops where a busted headlight stop pulls a 3 year old drug warrant putting another black dude in jail for a few years on camera.
 
Last edited:

TinfoilHatsROn

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
3,119
It should be possible to criticize the show without seeming like you're defending pedophilia. No one is saying that people committing these crimes shouldn't be arrested, but the show is kind of trashy and like another poster said, a bit of a circus act. The way Perverted Justice operates in relation to To Catch a Predator actually raises some complicated ethical questions about vigilante justice and just... the whole thing leaves a gross taste in my mouth. You can feel that peophillia is abhorrent and also that the people behind these shows are doing it more for their own self-satisfaction than actually making the world a better place.
Just giving a thumbs up to you and others explaining why some criticize the show. Its difficult to do so without accusations of defending pedophiles on this site especially if you have certain avatars, so I tend to stay from it.

Unfortunately, people by nature have perverted sense of justice, where intentions and the way things occur are often justified.
Any shows that make entertainment out of real justice/law system are garbage and show how broken American society is where every aspect of anything must be commodified into popcorn material. Shit like this, Cops or any of its copycats

Like, by all means, create as many sting operations as you can and catch every single pedo possible. Just don't turn it into a entertainment focused show where you actually end up helping pedos get away because shitty shows like these actually damage real cases
I mean those are legitimate criticisms... but the original argument was more about how trashy it was for 'getting off on jailing pedos'/'exploiting' pedos and how the formula was garbage more than the issues this kind of show might cause for criminal cases. The post in question:
I'd say 25% hero, 75% hard on. If there's one thing I hate about the show its that the volunteer group that help rope in the guys are objectively terrible people who get off on this sort of vigilante justice. Nothing they do in my opinion suggests their main motive is to make the internet a safer place for children. The only way Chris Hansen could feel comfortable with a show this damn exploitative is if he actually enjoyed fucking with these guys.

Its very easy to argue that no one should give a fuck about pedophiles getting busted but there's a lot of unintentional (or intentional, I can't honestly tell) gallows humour from a TV show structured like how it is. Every single one of the stings follow the same formula: volunteer group ropes in pedophile → pedophile arrives to site, bringing along Mike's Hard Lemonade → Chris Hansen busts through the door to read the internet chat log while pedophile cries → pedophile gets curbstomped by half a dozen police officers. Just deserts and all that but it doesn't change how the show is purposely exploiting pedophiles from start to finish for "educational" purposes.
So you might see where this post might cause some heads to turn, no? Also regarding the supposed 'curbstomps' I have no idea where that's from. I've watched approximately two of these and I didn't see that anywhere for a supposed formula.
 

KillingJoke

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
3,672
I never fully understand the law that they were breaking. I get it's intention but if everything was stagged, how does it hold up in court? Like with a drug sting theres usually a big pile of drugs to arrest them on.
 
Oct 28, 2017
4,970
I mean those are legitimate criticisms... but the original argument was more about how trashy it was for 'getting off on jailing pedos'/'exploiting' pedos and how the formula was garbage more than the issues this kind of show might cause for criminal cases. The post in question:

So you might see where this post might cause some heads to turn, no? Also regarding the supposed 'curbstomps' I have no idea where that's from. I've watched approximately two of these and I didn't see that anywhere for a supposed formula.

If you think the bolded quotes means I'm at all sympathetic towards pedophilia, then feel free to explain why. Maybe I didn't explain myself properly but I think its clear that I have significant problems with the structure and motive of the show, not the pedophiles getting busted. The end question is "do you think pedophilia is OK to exploit for reality TV". Which, from this thread, you have plenty of people thinking this type of reality TV is more than fine so long the individuals deserve it.

Which is a problem in my opinion. When I say curbstomping, its a figure of speech. Most of these individuals don't really put up any resistance yet still get pushed into the dirt/pavement by half a dozen police officers rushing at them from out of the bushes for no reason beyond letting the camera record some vigilante justice in action. And as we see in this thread, we see plenty of people who have no problems with police officers being extra rough so long they think the individual deserves it. If that's batting for pedophilia, then so be it.

To everyone who says they have no problem with this: if Fox News put out a series called "To Catch a Thief" by planting unlocked vans containing sneaker shipments in black majority neighborhoods, what would your opinion be? It would have the exact same motive as this "To Catch a Predator" series runs off and no doubt the Fox News crowd would have no problem seeing black people get roughed up when they instinctively flee because police officers rush out from nowhere after Sean Hannity tells them they're free to leave.
 
Last edited:

Sumio Mondo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,937
United Kingdom
I never fully understand the law that they were breaking. I get it's intention but if everything was stagged, how does it hold up in court? Like with a drug sting theres usually a big pile of drugs to arrest them on.

Well if the chat messages aren't descriptive enough some of them carry condoms or drugs on them. They get charged for the intention not the act, it's to stop them doing it. Why's that hard to understand?
 

Burly

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,077
I never fully understand the law that they were breaking. I get it's intention but if everything was stagged, how does it hold up in court? Like with a drug sting theres usually a big pile of drugs to arrest them on.

There are chat logs before that show the pedophiles are usually explicit in what they are going to do. Showing up to a fake house is apparently enough evidence to convict them on attempt to molest or whatever the legal charge is.

IIRC there was a guy who didn't even get out of his car, he just drove by the house (he lived hours away) and that was enough to arrest him later.
 
Last edited:
Oct 28, 2017
4,970
But that's the thing I am always hazy on. There are no thirteen year old girls, so who exactly are the victims? And thus, what actually is the crime?

The crime is the intent to commit a crime. That's why they're always told to bring condoms and lube with them, so they can prove that the individual was intent on having sex with a minor.
 

Rabid-Coot

Member
Oct 27, 2017
269
I never fully understand the law that they were breaking. I get it's intention but if everything was stagged, how does it hold up in court? Like with a drug sting theres usually a big pile of drugs to arrest them on.

This is a UK example but from what I've seen with my neighbour this year they arrest them and take all their devices for downloading and charge them with what they find on there (chat logs, indecent pics, other attempts to meet etc.)
 

MrRob

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
6,671
Sometimes I wonder if Chris Hansen thinks he's a hero or if he gets a hard-on when he pulls off these stings.
See, I'm way too cynical and I sometimes wonder if this is all projection and secretly Chris is a giant perv himself. But I've been waiting for that shoe to drop a long time so it's obviously not true.
 

Daitokuji

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,602
It's like Trump decision to pull out of Syria. I support it in theory but not in the way he is doing it. Same with this show.
 

joecanada

Member
Oct 28, 2017
3,651
Canada
The real problem is these vigilantes aren't smart enough to pull off a real case against a perp.
Like when "creep catchers " in Surrey "caught " a developmentally disabled guy trying to make friends on the net and he lost probably the only job he ever had.
Just leave it to the professionals not some hacks trying to get famous .
 

Nemesis121

Member
Nov 3, 2017
13,863
I never fully understand the law that they were breaking. I get it's intention but if everything was stagged, how does it hold up in court? Like with a drug sting theres usually a big pile of drugs to arrest them on.
How can people not see if they weren't caught in the sting, some 40 year old has found some lonely, underage, broken home teenager to manipulate...this shit is happening all the time sting or no sting...

Edit:just finish the first video, he admits to sleeping with a 15 year old boy, PoS scumbag...
 
Last edited:

The Watcher

Member
Oct 29, 2017
1,349
If you think the bolded quotes means I'm at all sympathetic towards pedophilia, then feel free to explain why. Maybe I didn't explain myself properly but I think its clear that I have significant problems with the structure and motive of the show, not the pedophiles getting busted. The end question is "do you think pedophilia is OK to exploit for reality TV". Which, from this thread, you have plenty of people thinking this type of reality TV is more than fine so long the individuals deserve it.

Which is a problem in my opinion. When I say curbstomping, its a figure of speech. Most of these individuals don't really put up any resistance yet still get pushed into the dirt/pavement by half a dozen police officers rushing at them from out of the bushes for no reason beyond letting the camera record some vigilante justice in action. And as we see in this thread, we see plenty of people who have no problems with police officers being extra rough so long they think the individual deserves it. If that's batting for pedophilia, then so be it.

To everyone who says they have no problem with this: if Fox News put out a series called "To Catch a Thief" by planting unlocked vans containing sneaker shipments in black majority neighborhoods, what would your opinion be? It would have the exact same motive as this "To Catch a Predator" series runs off and no doubt the Fox News crowd would have no problem seeing black people get roughed up when they instinctively flee because police officers rush out from nowhere after Sean Hannity tells them they're free to leave.
I mean, I agree with some of your points, but I don't like your analogy because it's flawed. Besides, there's a show that specifically exploit the arrests of the poor and POC for years, it's called Cops.
 
OP
OP
NTGYK

NTGYK

Attempted to circumvent ban with an alt-account
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
3,470
The real problem is these vigilantes aren't smart enough to pull off a real case against a perp.
Like when "creep catchers " in Surrey "caught " a developmentally disabled guy trying to make friends on the net and he lost probably the only job he ever had.
Just leave it to the professionals not some hacks trying to get famous .
Aren't Creep Catchers straight up illegal? At least Hansen is working with cops, Creep Catchers do it all on their own
 

captive

Member
Oct 25, 2017
17,000
Houston
But you are right. The police should be much kinder to the pedophiles. They should gently ask them to come into the police car with them, and if they run away, they should just let them be. The pedophiles are the true victims of these shows.
how is this even an argument? The police should seek to peacefully arrest anyone accused of a crime regardless of the crime.

I never watched the show, but I'd hazard none of them brought weapons with them?
 
OP
OP
NTGYK

NTGYK

Attempted to circumvent ban with an alt-account
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
3,470
how is this even an argument? The police should seek to peacefully arrest anyone accused of a crime regardless of the crime.

I never watched the show, but I'd hazard none of them brought weapons with them?
One brought a handgun
 

Alimnassor

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
773
I didn't have any sympathy. Like that one dude who came with a gun, rope and all kinds of shit. Dude was straight up planning to rape/murder the decoy.
 

Falcon511

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,156
I enjoyed the show but it was mostly for entertainment purposes. I would not call these "Investigations". At least not in the journalistic sense. Its just entertainment in watching people get caught and watching them get arrested. My only issue with the Dateline show was that the cops were always pointing their guns at the guys they were catching. That always made me feel uneasy.
 

Chucker

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,331
Maryland
HRFgK8q.jpg