First, you're acting like there's an equivalent amount of people dying. There aren't. The people in the internment camps are in HORRIBLE conditions, but they're not dying. As far as I know there hasn't been anyone that's died in one of those shitty as fuck camps (It wouldn't surprise me if there have been some that I unfortunately missed, but they'd at most be in the double digits compared to orders of magnitude more in China) and I HATE the fact that your disingenous whataboutism is making me even slightly seem like I'm defending anything about this (because it is entirely shit and the worst thing happening in the domestic U.S. at this instant and is abhorrent), but your take is so monumentally unequal that you leave no choice. They're NOWHERE NEAR alike. Your post is the VERY definition of whataboutism: you're comparing the ills of one thing to another and calling it the same or comparable to redirect the conversation away from the ills of the main subject.Thanks for proving my point? I'd love to know how you went from me saying that kids dying in cages is seen as a defense of China to me saying that western governments are harvesting organs.
and DrewFu
Calling it whataboutism is like treating it like a contest. Whether you die in a cage due to lack of medical attention or die from having your organs harvested is no different if it's done by the hands of the state. I doubt the victims of either outcomes care to make the distinction. Does it really matter which is worse? Focusing on which is worse is a diversionary tactic. They're more alike than not and there's no moral ground to be gained by telling China to get fucked, with the latter being what most people seem to be interested in with these threads as opposed to having a discussion on having more actionable ideas or just plain learning more about the issue. The posts pointing out how capitalism is involved have far more value than the posts about shutting the China stans up.
It's really odd how people jump at the chance to say how we need sanctions to starve them into compliance as if that were the only option when that would hurt billions of people instead of pushing the offering of asylum. It's almost as if it's more important to hurt China than actually help it's victims when directly helping the victims does both.
We already know that sanctions don't work so maybe we can pay them instead and wrap it up in conciliatory language like apologizing for flooding the country with opium and keeping it in poverty for over a century. You don't have to actually be apologetic of course and it shouldn't matter if the goal is to actually help those people.Yeah. Over the people confined to camps, and who are also travel restricted, asylum.
How's that going to work?
You should read up on the refugee camps after WW2 and how the British purposely fucked those refugees.
China wouldn't accept a lump sum of money to change internal policy that they outwardly don't recognize as even happening. To their government, their authority is worth more than any lump sum a country could give them. They'd take your money and then continue to murder people in "secret". Hell, they'd use your money to do it.We already know that sanctions don't work so maybe we can pay them instead and wrap it up in conciliatory language like apologizing for flooding the country with opium and keeping it in poverty for over a century. You don't have to actually be apologetic of course and it shouldn't matter if the goal is to actually help those people.
There have been a few who got sick and died. For the other poster to try to compare it to a death camp that harvests organs from the living, however, is the height of BS and seems hard to justify for someone that doesn't have an agenda. As you say, that is not a defense of camps in the US, but a recognition that they are not at all comparable to what is described by the China Tribunal.First, you're acting like there's an equivalent amount of people dying. There aren't. The people in the internment camps are in HORRIBLE conditions, but they're not dying. As far as I know there hasn't been anyone that's died in one of those shitty as fuck camps (It wouldn't surprise me if there have been some that I unfortunately missed, but they'd at most be in the double digits compared to orders of magnitude more in China) and I HATE the fact that your disingenous whataboutism is making me even slightly seem like I'm defending anything about this (because it is entirely shit and the worst thing happening in the domestic U.S. at this instant and is abhorrent), but your take is so monumentally unequal that you leave no choice. They're NOWHERE NEAR alike. Your post is the VERY definition of whataboutism: you're comparing the ills of one thing to another and calling it the same or comparable to redirect the conversation away from the ills of the main subject.
Giving money to the Chinese government is not going to result in them stopping the persecution of the Uighurs. The persecution of Uighurs is based on the specific ideology the Chinese government has. I'm aware of how Jewish refugees were treated, it's a complete non-sequiter to what I was talking about though.We already know that sanctions don't work so maybe we can pay them instead and wrap it up in conciliatory language like apologizing for flooding the country with opium and keeping it in poverty for over a century. You don't have to actually be apologetic of course and it shouldn't matter if the goal is to actually help those people.
You should read up on the refugee camps after WW2 and how the British purposely fucked those refugees.
Well said.First, you're acting like there's an equivalent amount of people dying. There aren't. The people in the internment camps are in HORRIBLE conditions, but they're not dying. As far as I know there hasn't been anyone that's died in one of those shitty as fuck camps (It wouldn't surprise me if there have been some that I unfortunately missed, but they'd at most be in the double digits compared to orders of magnitude more in China) and I HATE the fact that your disingenous whataboutism is making me even slightly seem like I'm defending anything about this (because it is entirely shit and the worst thing happening in the domestic U.S. at this instant and is abhorrent), but your take is so monumentally unequal that you leave no choice. They're NOWHERE NEAR alike. Your post is the VERY definition of whataboutism: you're comparing the ills of one thing to another and calling it the same or comparable to redirect the conversation away from the ills of the main subject.
You can call Trump's policies miserable shitty racist (it deserves worse) and say they cause massive human suffering, but your comparison is still nowhere near the same SCALE.
Like, think about this for a second. Say we have a thread about Trump throwing kids in cages. Then someone comes in and says "But China is mass murdering people!". What would you think?
The conversation of what can/can't be done about it is completely separate from making this shitty unrelated whataboutism type argument. Yes, sanctioning China would both hurt the people sanctioning and billions in China, I agree. Yes, military action is off the table. What the fuck does that have to do with calling this shit what it is?
This is beyond fucked up. From this article:
"Zheng Qiaozhi — we will call him George — still has nightmares. He was interning at China's Shenyang Army General Hospital when he was drafted to be part of an organ-harvesting team.
The prisoner was brought in, tied hand and foot, but very much alive. The army doctor in charge sliced him open from chest to belly button and exposed his two kidneys. "Cut the veins and arteries," he told his shocked intern. George did as he was told. Blood spurted everywhere.
The kidneys were placed in an organ-transplant container.
Then the doctor ordered George to remove the man's eyeballs. Hearing that, the dying prisoner gave him a look of sheer terror, and George froze. "I can't do it," he told the doctor, who then quickly scooped out the man's eyeballs himself."
Thanks for proving my point? I'd love to know how you went from me saying that kids dying in cages is seen as a defense of China to me saying that western governments are harvesting organs.
and DrewFu
Calling it whataboutism is like treating it like a contest. Whether you die in a cage due to lack of medical attention or die from having your organs harvested is no different if it's done by the hands of the state. I doubt the victims of either outcomes care to make the distinction. Does it really matter which is worse? Focusing on which is worse is a diversionary tactic. They're more alike than not and there's no moral ground to be gained by telling China to get fucked, with the latter being what most people seem to be interested in with these threads as opposed to having a discussion on having more actionable ideas or just plain learning more about the issue. The posts pointing out how capitalism is involved have far more value than the posts about shutting the China stans up.
It's really odd how people jump at the chance to say how we need sanctions to starve them into compliance as if that were the only option when that would hurt billions of people instead of pushing the offering of asylum. It's almost as if it's more important to hurt China than actually help it's victims when directly helping the victims does both.
We already know that sanctions don't work so maybe we can pay them instead and wrap it up in conciliatory language like apologizing for flooding the country with opium and keeping it in poverty for over a century. You don't have to actually be apologetic of course and it shouldn't matter if the goal is to actually help those people.
You should read up on the refugee camps after WW2 and how the British purposely fucked those refugees.
Yeah they're massively investing in infrastructure and other stuff in a lot of countries just keep a tight grip on them for the future.
Wait, what, they don't even sedate the victims?
Like, how can anyone lack the empathy to go ahead with this?
What? After being sliced open and getting the kidneys removed? I always thought you are unconscious when someone does cruel stuff like this to you.This is beyond fucked up. From this article:
"Zheng Qiaozhi — we will call him George — still has nightmares. He was interning at China's Shenyang Army General Hospital when he was drafted to be part of an organ-harvesting team.
The prisoner was brought in, tied hand and foot, but very much alive. The army doctor in charge sliced him open from chest to belly button and exposed his two kidneys. "Cut the veins and arteries," he told his shocked intern. George did as he was told. Blood spurted everywhere.
The kidneys were placed in an organ-transplant container.
Then the doctor ordered George to remove the man's eyeballs. Hearing that, the dying prisoner gave him a look of sheer terror, and George froze. "I can't do it," he told the doctor, who then quickly scooped out the man's eyeballs himself."
Is Donald Trump trying to rely less on China? I have heard about the trade war but I don't know how that's turning out. I just remember him saying he wanted to revitalise industries in the USA.
I feel like actually, he might be the only person doing something. I wouldn't count on the UN, especially with not the way Greta put them to shame with her speech which highlighted their inaction.
That's a bit hyperbolic. The average GDP per capita for Europe/Japan/South Korea, etc... is about 31,000 - 82,000. China is at less than 10,000. It's economic strength is based on its massive size and scale. The population there will be getting old in a hurry due to the one child policy. Its population, as it ages, will go from a strength to a massive burden in the coming years.I will write more later - but seriously - every single product we bought from the last 40 years (or more) has lined the pockets of China in some way. Now imagine every body in every country around the world. I'm massively guilty of buying tons of stuff.
At some stage they're just going to buy everybody out and ill probably no longer be around to see that happen, but my kids will and that's a scary thought.
They'll own you and you'll do what they say or else.
First, you're acting like there's an equivalent amount of people dying. There aren't. The people in the internment camps are in HORRIBLE conditions, but they're not dying. As far as I know there hasn't been anyone that's died in one of those shitty as fuck camps (It wouldn't surprise me if there have been some that I unfortunately missed, but they'd at most be in the double digits compared to orders of magnitude more in China) and I HATE the fact that your disingenous whataboutism is making me even slightly seem like I'm defending anything about this (because it is entirely shit and the worst thing happening in the domestic U.S. at this instant and is abhorrent), but your take is so monumentally unequal that you leave no choice. They're NOWHERE NEAR alike. Your post is the VERY definition of whataboutism: you're comparing the ills of one thing to another and calling it the same or comparable to redirect the conversation away from the ills of the main subject.
You can call Trump's policies miserable shitty racist (it deserves worse) and say they cause massive human suffering, but your comparison is still nowhere near the same SCALE.
Like, think about this for a second. Say we have a thread about Trump throwing kids in cages. Then someone comes in and says "But China is mass murdering people!". What would you think?
The conversation of what can/can't be done about it is completely separate from making this shitty unrelated whataboutism type argument. Yes, sanctioning China would both hurt the people sanctioning and billions in China, I agree. Yes, military action is off the table. What the fuck does that have to do with calling this shit what it is?
Wouldn't it be easier to harvest things intact if you just sedated them. Maybe I'm overestimating how much you can violently wiggle around when strapped in.
Thanks for proving my point? I'd love to know how you went from me saying that kids dying in cages is seen as a defense of China to me saying that western governments are harvesting organs.
and DrewFu
Calling it whataboutism is like treating it like a contest. Whether you die in a cage due to lack of medical attention or die from having your organs harvested is no different if it's done by the hands of the state. I doubt the victims of either outcomes care to make the distinction. Does it really matter which is worse? Focusing on which is worse is a diversionary tactic. They're more alike than not and there's no moral ground to be gained by telling China to get fucked, with the latter being what most people seem to be interested in with these threads as opposed to having a discussion on having more actionable ideas or just plain learning more about the issue. The posts pointing out how capitalism is involved have far more value than the posts about shutting the China stans up.
It's really odd how people jump at the chance to say how we need sanctions to starve them into compliance as if that were the only option when that would hurt billions of people instead of pushing the offering of asylum. It's almost as if it's more important to hurt China than actually help it's victims when directly helping the victims does both.
This is beyond fucked up. From this article:
"Zheng Qiaozhi — we will call him George — still has nightmares. He was interning at China's Shenyang Army General Hospital when he was drafted to be part of an organ-harvesting team.
The prisoner was brought in, tied hand and foot, but very much alive. The army doctor in charge sliced him open from chest to belly button and exposed his two kidneys. "Cut the veins and arteries," he told his shocked intern. George did as he was told. Blood spurted everywhere.
The kidneys were placed in an organ-transplant container.
Then the doctor ordered George to remove the man's eyeballs. Hearing that, the dying prisoner gave him a look of sheer terror, and George froze. "I can't do it," he told the doctor, who then quickly scooped out the man's eyeballs himself."
Let's not pretend that we don't suck on human rights, especially currently, or minimize the horrific shit our government is currently doing while talking about this, but yeah. China's on a whole other level of fucking monstrous.Yet people on this site say the US is likewise when it comes to human rights and how the countries are...
Yeah. no.
The cruelty is the point. The gov don't care at all about human livesWhat the fuck!? Besides the obvious atrocity of forcibly taking someone's organs, what the hell is the point in doing it while they're alive?
It's probably cheaper. Greed and money is almost always the answer.What the fuck!? Besides the obvious atrocity of forcibly taking someone's organs, what the hell is the point in doing it while they're alive?
It's probably cheaper. Greed and money is almost always the answer.
Even Muslim countries don't care. This world is so cruel.And since the victims are Muslims and confronting China about it might raise the price of your latest Apple products, no one gives a shit.
I would say that there is too much economic stakes for a lot of rich people in China and we would rather not drop their profits for silly human rights.Countries don't want to risk WW3 by attacking China. It's a sad situation all around
This isn't even a thing in North Korea, since most of people who escaped North Korea has never said anything about the regime harvesting their organs while victims are alive like Unit 731 or Josef Mengele style.Actually isn't this pretty close to North Korea? Maybe different utility, but similar mindset towards human beings.
This isn't even a thing in North Korea, since most of people who escaped North Korea has never said anything about the regime harvesting their organs like Unit 731 or Josef Mengele style.
Note: It may or may not be an accurate account, as the New York Post is not a reputable publication.This is beyond fucked up. From this article:
"Zheng Qiaozhi — we will call him George — still has nightmares. He was interning at China's Shenyang Army General Hospital when he was drafted to be part of an organ-harvesting team.
The prisoner was brought in, tied hand and foot, but very much alive. The army doctor in charge sliced him open from chest to belly button and exposed his two kidneys. "Cut the veins and arteries," he told his shocked intern. George did as he was told. Blood spurted everywhere.
The kidneys were placed in an organ-transplant container.
Then the doctor ordered George to remove the man's eyeballs. Hearing that, the dying prisoner gave him a look of sheer terror, and George froze. "I can't do it," he told the doctor, who then quickly scooped out the man's eyeballs himself."
The problem with trumps trade policy isn't his antagonistic approach to ChinaIs Donald Trump trying to rely less on China? I have heard about the trade war but I don't know how that's turning out. I just remember him saying he wanted to revitalise industries in the USA.
I feel like actually, he might be the only person doing something. I wouldn't count on the UN, especially with not the way Greta put them to shame with her speech which highlighted their inaction.
China has both thriving state sanctioned and black markets of human organ trade. The earliest I've heard about this is that 10 years ago, they were only doing this to prisoners who were executed.I suppose scarcity of human resources makes it untenable? And they aren't trading with anyone, really.
I really can't imagine why a "doctor" would do the operation without sedation. I guess they do that sometimes when they run out of drugs. Let's just hope they use some very cheap and effective stuff.I suppose this could be the, but they must be saving nickles per person. Which then might indicate how wide scale it is because nickles can become millions saved pretty fast...