And it will only get worse. Let's see how Disney will censor the movie poster of the next Star Wars movie in china.
Lol, the fact he says "Hong Kong, China" shows just how much of a tightrope he's walking on
About to ask the same shit. But what it really is CEO choose profits over freedom, any day, any century.
I mean you can ignore China and still be very profitable. There is no "period" on this discussion.
Imagine people with some power (like leaders of multinational companies) had spines, would band together and oppose anti human rights behaviour instead of profiting off of it. Humanity could be so cool.
Economic growth does not have an end where a CEO would say "this is good enough"I mean you can ignore China and still be very profitable. There is no "period" on this discussion.
I came here to post this. They've got everyone by the balls indeed.
I've got a feeling it is more like a ripping them off motion...I came here to post this. They've got everyone by the balls indeed.
Usually, unions find a way to protect workers from getting fired.
There does not seem to be much. Even this thread died super quick
Humanity would also not have any iPhones, Playstations or XBoxes. That is the reason why they are all cowards. No one speaks up if it impacts their standard of living directly.
It's like a frog put in water that's then slowly heated up.
you don't realize what's happening until it's too late.
That is how I feel about China. A lurking giant whose regressive human rights policies and political ideals are now bleeding into democracies and people's everyday lives, halfway around the world from the source.
This news sucks. Everyone's silence is just capitulating to China and is a statement on its own. Sad times and at the rate things seem to be moving I'll have to block/delete/cancel half of my life when I find out something insidious is lurking behind it all.
I agree. The stuff with movies, games and media in general is just testing the waters it seems. Next it will be no stories in anything depicting china in a negative light, then no stories about oppressive totalitarian regimes and so on. Get the claws in deep enough and you can do whatever the fuck you want and DARE anyone to speak out...hell we are already at that point!
Not to mention they also banned Mei's figure for being HK's mascot.
I must say i'm a little shocked about the amount of comments like this since the China case.
Not to mention they also banned Mei's figure for being HK's mascot.
Yeah, that isn't really going to address things, because their interests are going to be aligned with the business's on thing like this. Environmental topics run into this issue where industry unions will push back internally with the Dems against environmentalists and you have to do a lot of mediation.
This thread sounds like it's forbidden for ESL employees to talk about the HK situation - which is incorrect.[...] an ESL spokesperson said that "Mr Reichert's internal message on Slack was a reminder to ESL employees about the general social media policies that have been in place for many years; that we do not use the ESL's brand or platform for personal political statements."
The statement said that employees are "free to harbor personal views on private social media accounts."
I was wondering if that was in there as I read it. Won't really know if that's true until someone tries it in a personal capacity and we see what happens.Is there a reason why the OP left out the kinda most important part of the statement?
My point is, how far are you willing to go to sell games in China? Just to give a hyperbolic example, what if in order to sell games in China, you have to perform a satanic ritual publicly where you're naked executives have to sacrifice a live goat and drink it's blood. Would Blizzard do that? I would guess they wouldn't, right?
So by acknowledging that Blizzard executives wouldn't do that, that would mean there is a line, somewhere. My question is, where is that line? I think China is taking such an extreme stance here that it's not worth pursuing, if they're going to get so offended by something one of your FANS said (Note, not blizzard) then at some point you have to ask yourself "Is this worth it?"
I'm just asking how far these corporations are willing to go to appease such an incredibly sensitive government who uses the nuclear option at the slightest of offenses.
gotta admit, im a little ignorant as to how it really operatesI must say i'm a little shocked about the amount of comments like this since the China case.
It's as if some of you discover capitalism.
so you also think the 6 month ban for a hearthstone player wo said something political during his work as a hearthstone player was the correct choice, because "it says so in the rules"?Is there a reason why the OP left out the kinda most important part of the statement?
This thread sounds like it's forbidden for ESL employees to talk about the HK situation - which is incorrect.
Err can you explain the Marvel bit to me?People don't realize how much power China has over us companies and American media. Why do you think we have yet to see any major LGBT characters in marvel movies? China. Games will start to avoid discussing China all together. People don't seem to understand that there are literally billions of dollars at stack here. It's not pocket change. It's why these company shit their pants when they get on the news about political issues there. If they are banned, they lose incredible amount of money. Enough that executives will lose positions, wealth and power. It explains their disparate behavior. It's not excusable but news flash: people care about money more then principle.
"Therefore, we would like to suggest to not actively engage in the discussion, especially on social media," wrote Reichert.
Is there a reason why the OP left out the kinda most important part of the statement?
This thread sounds like it's forbidden for ESL employees to talk about the HK situation - which is incorrect.
maybe because of this:
I mean disney also censors black actors on their star wars posters in china."No television drama shall show abnormal sexual relationships and behaviors, such as incest, same-sex relationships, sexual perversion, sexual assault, sexual abuse, sexual violence, and so on."
Or in other words: "if you exercise your right of free speech regarding human rights abuse by a country from which we make significant money I'll fucking fire you".
What these companies are doing is nothing short of punishing their employees (and in Blizzard's case competitors) for exercising their rights when it comes to free speech, and that should be fucking illegal. People should be free to exercise their rights without having to worry about their employer punishing them for it.
Different issue all together. There is a reason why people have to qualify their statement as "something something this is my personal view and not representative of xyz company". Without the later part of the statement, it seems like ESL is forbidding its employees from engaging political discussion all together which is not true. A large organization employed many people who can have different view points, and matter of fact is, such political statement can and will affect the company economic health, which can affect its employees as well. You can't expect everyone to be okay with their income to be affected just because you have certain belief which they might not share. To me that's just selfish.so you also think the 6 month ban for a hearthstone player wo said something political during his work as a hearthstone player was the correct choice, because "it says so in the rules"?
b/c that's the same reasoning blizzard used.