Kamala, Monica etc. They're going to be needing spin-offs real quick for this franchise to hold all that awesome.
Empire magazine's spolier special podcast on Captain Marvel is up.
They have an interview with Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck, the directors of the movie. There's some interesting stuff in there.
Spoilers below, so read at your own risk.
One of the things they reveal that I thought was interesting is that they say they always intended for Jude Law's character, Yon-Rogg, to be this manipulative, abusive spouse sort of character, right from the start of the movie to the end.
The Empire team then goes on to discuss how everything the Yon-Rogg character does is part of his abusive behaviour, including his training scenes with Carol at the start, where he's constantly asking her to keep her emotions in check (which is supposedly keeping her power in check as well).
Now, I'm not certain if this is something people are reading into too much or if I simply missed it (I've only seen the movie once so far), but I never felt that way at all, and I don't feel the movie draws a particularly clear line between the parts of Yon-Rogg that genuinely care for Carol and the parts that are manipulating her.
As her partner/superior officer, Yon-Rogg asking Carol to rein her emotions in seemed perfectly natural to me. She's a combatant in a military organization--of course you want to keep your emotions in check and not lash out at a superior officer (or any other situation) out of anger or frustration. That's basic protocol.
Maybe it's just Jude Law, but Yon-Rogg always felt like he genuinely cared for Carol. And yet, the movie goes on to pretend that there's just no complexity to that relationship. It actually felt a little forced/heavy-handed at the end to me, when Carol's big "screw you" gesture to him and the Supreme Intelligence was the idea of tapping into her emotions even years of being told not to do so. And that emotion is where her power comes from, so all those lessons from Yon-Rogg were useless. I would argue that, no, they were still valuable lessons that any combatant would have to learn.
When she says she has nothing to prove to Yon-Rogg, that makes sense. The rest, not so much. I just think the movie could have done a whole lot more to convey that Yon-Rogg, ultimately, is a grey area, instead of painting him as this outright awful person at the very end, when he very clearly didn't seem that way at the start. It feels like the concept wasn't very well fleshed out, and I would have appreciated had they taken an additional 15-20 minutes to really flesh the relationship between the two out, and better establish the duality of Yon-Rogg.
(Someone that clearly cares about Carol, yet manipulates her for the Kree and displays abusive tendencies at the same time)
He's gaslighting the shit out of her and purposefully holding her back from the full expression of her potential.
Right, but then it's a mistake to have "keep your emotions in check, Vers" be part of this abusive behaviour, in my opinion. Because that doesn't seem abusive in the slightest. It just seems like common sense. Even in hindsight.
LIke, either make him a complete dick (which, if they tried to do, I didn't see it), or give him enough complexity and layers that their showdown at the end doesn't come off feeling quite as heavy-handed. (Which they also didn't do) Their relationship feels to me like the weakest part of the film.
Right, but then it's a mistake to have "keep your emotions in check, Vers" be part of this abusive behaviour, in my opinion. Because that doesn't seem abusive in the slightest. It just seems like common sense. Even in hindsight.
LIke, either make him a complete dick (which, if they tried to do, I didn't see it), or give him enough complexity and layers that their showdown at the end doesn't come off feeling quite as heavy-handed. (Which they also didn't do) Their relationship feels to me like the weakest part of the film.
You misread that relationship. All that abusive spouse shit is obvious.Empire magazine's spolier special podcast on Captain Marvel is up.
They have an interview with Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck, the directors of the movie. There's some interesting stuff in there.
Spoilers below, so read at your own risk.
One of the things they reveal that I thought was interesting is that they say they always intended for Jude Law's character, Yon-Rogg, to be this manipulative, abusive spouse sort of character, right from the start of the movie to the end.
The Empire team then goes on to discuss how everything the Yon-Rogg character does is part of his abusive behaviour, including his training scenes with Carol at the start, where he's constantly asking her to keep her emotions in check (which is supposedly keeping her power in check as well).
Now, I'm not certain if this is something people are reading into too much or if I simply missed it (I've only seen the movie once so far), but I never felt that way at all, and I don't feel the movie draws a particularly clear line between the parts of Yon-Rogg that genuinely care for Carol and the parts that are manipulating her.
As her partner/superior officer, Yon-Rogg asking Carol to rein her emotions in seemed perfectly natural to me. She's a combatant in a military organization--of course you want to keep your emotions in check and not lash out at a superior officer (or any other situation) out of anger or frustration. That's basic protocol.
Maybe it's just Jude Law, but Yon-Rogg always felt like he genuinely cared for Carol. And yet, the movie goes on to pretend that there's just no complexity to that relationship. It actually felt a little forced/heavy-handed at the end to me, when Carol's big "screw you" gesture to him and the Supreme Intelligence was the idea of tapping into her emotions even years of being told not to do so. And that emotion is where her power comes from, so all those lessons from Yon-Rogg were useless. I would argue that, no, they were still valuable lessons that any combatant would have to learn.
When she says she has nothing to prove to Yon-Rogg, that makes sense. The rest, not so much. I just think the movie could have done a whole lot more to convey that Yon-Rogg, ultimately, is a grey area, instead of painting him as this outright awful person at the very end, when he very clearly didn't seem that way at the start. It feels like the concept wasn't very well fleshed out, and I would have appreciated had they taken an additional 15-20 minutes to really flesh the relationship between the two out, and better establish the duality of Yon-Rogg.
(Someone that clearly cares about Carol, yet manipulates her for the Kree and displays abusive tendencies at the same time)
Empire magazine's spolier special podcast on Captain Marvel is up.
They have an interview with Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck, the directors of the movie. There's some interesting stuff in there.
Spoilers below, so read at your own risk.
One of the things they reveal that I thought was interesting is that they say they always intended for Jude Law's character, Yon-Rogg, to be this manipulative, abusive spouse sort of character, right from the start of the movie to the end.
The Empire team then goes on to discuss how everything the Yon-Rogg character does is part of his abusive behaviour, including his training scenes with Carol at the start, where he's constantly asking her to keep her emotions in check (which is supposedly keeping her power in check as well).
Now, I'm not certain if this is something people are reading into too much or if I simply missed it (I've only seen the movie once so far), but I never felt that way at all, and I don't feel the movie draws a particularly clear line between the parts of Yon-Rogg that genuinely care for Carol and the parts that are manipulating her.
As her partner/superior officer, Yon-Rogg asking Carol to rein her emotions in seemed perfectly natural to me. She's a combatant in a military organization--of course you want to keep your emotions in check and not lash out at a superior officer (or any other situation) out of anger or frustration. That's basic protocol.
Maybe it's just Jude Law, but Yon-Rogg always felt like he genuinely cared for Carol. And yet, the movie goes on to pretend that there's just no complexity to that relationship. It actually felt a little forced/heavy-handed at the end to me, when Carol's big "screw you" gesture to him and the Supreme Intelligence was the idea of tapping into her emotions even years of being told not to do so. And that emotion is where her power comes from, so all those lessons from Yon-Rogg were useless. I would argue that, no, they were still valuable lessons that any combatant would have to learn.
When she says she has nothing to prove to Yon-Rogg, that makes sense. The rest, not so much. I just think the movie could have done a whole lot more to convey that Yon-Rogg, ultimately, is a grey area, instead of painting him as this outright awful person at the very end, when he very clearly didn't seem that way at the start. It feels like the concept wasn't very well fleshed out, and I would have appreciated had they taken an additional 15-20 minutes to really flesh the relationship between the two out, and better establish the duality of Yon-Rogg.
(Someone that clearly cares about Carol, yet manipulates her for the Kree and displays abusive tendencies at the same time)
Right, but then it's a mistake to have "keep your emotions in check, Vers" be part of this abusive behaviour, in my opinion. Because that doesn't seem abusive in the slightest. It just seems like common sense. Even in hindsight.
LIke, either make him a complete dick (which, if they tried to do, I didn't see it), or give him enough complexity and layers that their showdown at the end doesn't come off feeling quite as heavy-handed. (Which they also didn't do) Their relationship feels to me like the weakest part of the film.
How many times do you hear "Women are too emotional" as a way of dismissing them as effective leaders or authority figures? Like it's not even based in any kind of factual reality. It's just a line you hear parroted again and again.Empire magazine's spolier special podcast on Captain Marvel is up.
They have an interview with Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck, the directors of the movie. There's some interesting stuff in there.
Spoilers below, so read at your own risk.
One of the things they reveal that I thought was interesting is that they say they always intended for Jude Law's character, Yon-Rogg, to be this manipulative, abusive spouse sort of character, right from the start of the movie to the end.
The Empire team then goes on to discuss how everything the Yon-Rogg character does is part of his abusive behaviour, including his training scenes with Carol at the start, where he's constantly asking her to keep her emotions in check (which is supposedly keeping her power in check as well).
Now, I'm not certain if this is something people are reading into too much or if I simply missed it (I've only seen the movie once so far), but I never felt that way at all, and I don't feel the movie draws a particularly clear line between the parts of Yon-Rogg that genuinely care for Carol and the parts that are manipulating her.
As her partner/superior officer, Yon-Rogg asking Carol to rein her emotions in seemed perfectly natural to me. She's a combatant in a military organization--of course you want to keep your emotions in check and not lash out at a superior officer (or any other situation) out of anger or frustration. That's basic protocol.
Maybe it's just Jude Law, but Yon-Rogg always felt like he genuinely cared for Carol. And yet, the movie goes on to pretend that there's just no complexity to that relationship. It actually felt a little forced/heavy-handed at the end to me, when Carol's big "screw you" gesture to him and the Supreme Intelligence was the idea of tapping into her emotions even years of being told not to do so. And that emotion is where her power comes from, so all those lessons from Yon-Rogg were useless. I would argue that, no, they were still valuable lessons that any combatant would have to learn.
When she says she has nothing to prove to Yon-Rogg, that makes sense. The rest, not so much. I just think the movie could have done a whole lot more to convey that Yon-Rogg, ultimately, is a grey area, instead of painting him as this outright awful person at the very end, when he very clearly didn't seem that way at the start. It feels like the concept wasn't very well fleshed out, and I would have appreciated had they taken an additional 15-20 minutes to really flesh the relationship between the two out, and better establish the duality of Yon-Rogg.
(Someone that clearly cares about Carol, yet manipulates her for the Kree and displays abusive tendencies at the same time)
I thought the movie does quite well to suggest that Yon-Rogg does legitimately care for Carol/Vers. I don't think he was lying when he said he was proud of her at the end. But he also knows that he's outclassed, and he's still a nationalist and a patriot, so he stands against her.Right, but then it's a mistake to have "keep your emotions in check, Vers" be part of this abusive behaviour, in my opinion. Because that doesn't seem abusive in the slightest. It just seems like common sense. Even in hindsight.
LIke, either make him a complete dick (which, if they tried to do, I didn't see it), or give him enough complexity and layers that their showdown at the end doesn't come off feeling quite as heavy-handed. (Which they also didn't do) Their relationship feels to me like the weakest part of the film.
I thought the movie does quite well to suggest that Yon-Rogg does legitimately care for Carol/Vers. I don't think he was lying when he said he was proud of her at the end. But he also knows that he's outclassed, and he's still a nationalist and a patriot, so he stands against her.
No, this is an unnecessarily black and white take on the matter. Hell, we have evidence of slaveowners feeling affection and compassion for their slaves in real life (the now dead author who wrote about his immigrant family's domestic slave from the Philippines). People can have complex and conflicting emotions and clearly whatever affection Yon-Rogg felt towards the Kree slave soldier known as Vers didn't outweigh his loyalty to the Empire.Nope. You don't enslave people you care about. Where the hell is this take coming from?
He's a Kree military officer, he doesn't care about anything other than power and extending the reach of the Empire.
Getting humilliated and sent back to the Supreme Intelligence with nothing to show for his troubles was a fitting punishment imo.if Yon-Rogg was truly terrible he would've been dead at the end
not good enough to even join the collectiveGetting humilliated and sent back to the Supreme Intelligence with nothing to show for his troubles was a fitting punishment imo.
Fuck off.Hell, we have evidence of slaveowners feeling affection and compassion for their slaves in real life
Nah.
Were his dog and wife fucking jews? How fucking stupid are you?Nah.
Hitler loved dogs and presumably his wife. Being capable of affection or compassion doesn't make you a good person or not an evil bastard, it just makes you not a sociopath.
If we're going to roll with this metaphor Carol would be one of the conscript Osttruppen.Were his dog and wife fucking jews? How fucking stupid are you?
This is what's so scary about this approach... that even members of the audience feel that he "cares" for her.I thought the movie does quite well to suggest that Yon-Rogg does legitimately care for Carol/Vers. I don't think he was lying when he said he was proud of her at the end. But he also knows that he's outclassed, and he's still a nationalist and a patriot, so he stands against her.
Letting him live in disgrace is better than killing him. He'll never shake the shame.if Yon-Rogg was truly terrible he would've been dead at the end
... are you defending Hitler? C'mon now.Nah.
Hitler loved dogs and presumably his wife. Being capable of affection or compassion doesn't make you a good person or not an evil bastard, it just makes you not a sociopath.
How the fuck do you get that I'm defending Hitler?Letting him live in disgrace is better than killing him. He'll never shake the shame.
... are you defending Hitler? C'mon now.
That post is.... not defending him.
I thought the movie does quite well to suggest that Yon-Rogg does legitimately care for Carol/Vers. I don't think he was lying when he said he was proud of her at the end. But he also knows that he's outclassed, and he's still a nationalist and a patriot, so he stands against her.
This is what's so scary about this approach... that even members of the audience feel that he "cares" for her.
Right, but then it's a mistake to have "keep your emotions in check, Vers" be part of this abusive behaviour, in my opinion. Because that doesn't seem abusive in the slightest. It just seems like common sense. Even in hindsight.
LIke, either make him a complete dick (which, if they tried to do, I didn't see it), or give him enough complexity and layers that their showdown at the end doesn't come off feeling quite as heavy-handed. (Which they also didn't do) Their relationship feels to me like the weakest part of the film.
Well crazily enough there was this:
This is what's so scary about this approach... that even members of the audience feel that he "cares" for her.
I've talked to enough abuse victims to know that his behavior is 100% accurate in how they groom and manipulate and gaslight victims into thinking that they are inferior to the guy in charge - that he's the one worth earning respect from, of obeying, of listening to. "He does it because he CARES about me. He just wants what's best for me." No, he wanted what was best for HIM.
"Control your emotions" is used against women every damn day in the workforce. While this may be a military setting, she's a brainwashed captive whose kidnapper has convinced her that her EMOTIONS are what's holding her back (and do ask the question, "holding back from WHAT?"). He doesn't want a free-thinking, emotional woman capable of disobedience or free-thought; he wants a mindless drone he can control, use for his purposes, and retain superiority over, even when he's actually at the disadvantage.
Yon-Rogg is HEINOUS, and the fact that any part of his "I'm proud of you" or "I want what's best for you" approach convinced any part of the audience he was sincere is disturbing, because that's precisely how abusers work in the real life. "No, no, you don't understand. He DOES care for me! He really does!"
Screw him. He deserved far worse and Carol realizing just how beneath him he truly was is one of the film's best moments.
no idea
Doesnt make his post any less dumb.That post is.... not defending him.
It said that evil people can still have emotions that are considered sympathetic by society. AKA, people who are evil are not usually one dimensional cartoon villains.
He doesn't want her to "control her emotions". There's nothing out-of-control about her. That was never the hurdle, no matter how much he insists it is. She doesn't actually need him. He wants her to feel dependent and inferior to him - that's it. And for 6 years, she'd bought into it.
This. The point I was trying to make is that in real life, evil people can be emotionally complex rather than one dimensional. That doesn't make them any less evil. When creating fiction, this means that emotionally complex villains are better than one dimensional, cartoonish villains. Yon-Rogg is an example of the former because he does appear to care somewhat for the charge he has been tasked with manipulating and brainwashing into a good Kree soldier.That post is.... not defending him.
It said that evil people can still have emotions that are considered sympathetic by society. AKA, people who are evil are not usually one dimensional cartoon villains.
Maybe if you actually read the posts you'd understand. Even evil people are capable of complex and contradictory emotions. This doesn't make them less evil. But it does mean that representations of evil people in fiction are better if they hold complex and contradictory emotions. Not every villain in real life, even Hitler who is the worst of villains, is an unemotional robot.Doesnt make his post any less dumb.
How do you go from Yon-Rogg cared for Carol to some slaveowners cared for their slaves to Hitler cared for dogs and his wife. The comparison is stupid and nonsensical in context of the discussion.
They don't even have a conversation about it. There's no opportunity for Carol to make her case and tell him he acted like an ass. No opportunity for him to attempt to make his case and come off sounding like an extremely flawed (and abusive) individual.
What? Carol doesn't have to "make her case," and there is absolutely no defending what the Kree did to her.
I took that as more of his bullshit. I don't think he's saying "I care about her." I think he's saying "That's my blood inside her and that makes her MINE." As in, he's just talking more about his ownership of Carol, and he's offended that someone has run off with his "blood" and someone else is impersonating what is his. It's more gaslighting (just not at Carol) and making people think he cares, but really it's still all about him.Even later in the movie, when he kills the one Skrull and says "it's my blood inside her," I honestly thought it was coming from a place of affection and wanting to look out for his partner/protege/whatever. I didn't sense any outright malice.
I took that as more of his bullshit. I don't think he's saying "I care about her." I think he's saying "That's my blood inside her and that makes her MINE." As in, he's just talking more about his ownership of Carol, and he's offended that someone has run off with his "blood" and someone else is impersonating what is his. It's more gaslighting (just not at Carol) and making people think he cares, but really it's still all about him.
Just my opinion on that moment.