Being rich really insulates the fuck out of you. Its a convention of intolerant assholes who get together to figure out how to be more intolerant and who's currently the best at it.
because she's a very shitty person lolWow thanks for laughing at transphobia. How on earth is that appropriate just because she is a very very shitty person?
It's not that hard to believe. When a person reaches a certain level of class and wealth, the social impact of electing people who are actively fighting to destroy who you are doesn't really apply. It only impacts normal people and especially the vulnerable. She has more to benefit by the GOP efforts to make the rich richer. The tax cuts that Trump did when he was president far benefited the likes of Caitlyn. So from her prospective who cares if they don't allow her in the women's bathroom? She can be flown in to a 7 star bathroom whenever she wants. She doesn't care about discrimination protection because she doesn't work for anyone nor will she ever.As a Trans woman I feel sorry for her, but also I'm still flabbergasted how any trans person can be a republican.
Oh, for sure, plenty will still try. I just don't think they'll have as much success. Even a Caitlyn Jenner who says all the right things is going to be viewed unfavorably by a large portion (if not a strong majority) of the GOP who will always see her as a trans woman actively challenging God's design or whatever.I agree in that I think that's why it's not as effective, but I still view people like Blaire White and Caitlyn as attempting to be seen as one of the good ones. They want to distance themselves from the community and endear themselves to conservatives in doing so.
Most likely? To be the token 'trans' Republican that gets trotted out to say how much better it is with x,y,z transphobic laws under Republicans than whatever the Dems are doing. Like Candace Owens for issues with African Americans, but Republicans don't really hide their transphobia behind anything like they do their racism, so they have no need for her.
No one deserves that
Makes sense considering it's Caitlyn Jenner we're talking about. But like you said, Republicans are perfectly happy being openly transphobic.Most likely? To be the token 'trans' Republican that gets trotted out to say how much better it is with x,y,z transphobic laws under Republicans than whatever the Dems are doing. Like Candace Owens for issues with African Americans, but Republicans don't really hide their transphobia behind anything like they do their racism, so they have no need for her.
Transwoman goes seeking the approval of transphobes who victimize other minority groups thinking because she has money and influence they will embrace her, finds out transphobia don't like her and her desire to be accepted by them so she can join them in oppressing others ends up blowing up in her face.
I call this a lesson learned as to not be a piece of shit, and not to try and befriend people who treat others like shit.
Nah, she still has the image of Trump and the GOP passing the tax breaks.She still has that image of Trump waving the pride flag stuck in her head.
Then let her learn. I don't care how a discriminator is discriminated against. Lots of tears here for someone getting treated the way she treats others.
I'm really struggling with posts like this. Because it's the exact same posts I see when it comes to women who are raped and someone goes "I feel sorry for her but she was dressed provocatively around a bunch of virile men, what did she expect?"
We really shouldn't be doing this. Yes she's not a nice person in general but no-one deserves hate crimes, weather verbal, psychological, physical or sexual.
We should be focused on the disgusting acts of the people who did this rather than the victim herself. Her past or political alignment shouldn't come into play.
It makes me think Era would just say "I feel bad but, what did they expect" if a black republican senator got lynched and that frightens me regarding a lack of compassion due to political alignment regards to hate crimes of marginalised people.
I'd say it's three things.I'm really struggling with posts like this. Because it's the exact same posts I see when it comes to women who are raped and someone goes "I feel sorry for her but she was dressed provocatively around a bunch of virile men, what did she expect?"
We really shouldn't be doing this. Yes she's not a nice person in general but no-one deserves hate crimes, weather verbal, psychological, physical or sexual.
We should be focused on the disgusting acts of the people who did this rather than the victim herself. Her past or political alignment shouldn't come into play.
It makes me think Era would just say "I feel bad but, what did they expect" if a black republican senator got lynched and that frightens me regarding a lack of compassion due to political alignment regards to hate crimes of marginalised people.
I'm really struggling with posts like this. Because it's the exact same posts I see when it comes to women who are raped and someone goes "I feel sorry for her but she was dressed provocatively around a bunch of virile men, what did she expect?"
We really shouldn't be doing this. Yes she's not a nice person in general but no-one deserves hate crimes, weather verbal, psychological, physical or sexual.
We should be focused on the disgusting acts of the people who did this rather than the victim herself. Her past or political alignment shouldn't come into play.
It makes me think Era would just say "I feel bad but, what did they expect" if a black republican senator got lynched and that frightens me regarding a lack of compassion due to political alignment regards to hate crimes of marginalised people.
Tbh I would say it's comparable to not wearing a mask bc you don't believe covid is real, endangering those around you with risk of being a super spreaderYes no one deserves to be bullied and attacked for being trans. The CPAC people are wrong and no one here has said otherwise. But I would rather reserve my empathy for the thousands who will be affected by Jenner's actions than for her because she needs all the wake up calls she can get. This is like if someone has been being told something is poisonous numerous times and yet that someone still insist on taking a bite and ending up getting poisoned.
I'm struggling with your god awful analogies. This situation is nothing at all like an innocent woman being raped and then blamed for it because of how she dressed. That's ridiculous. Caitlyn enables these shitheads to harass and attack innocent LGBTQ individuals. And she does it for money.I'm really struggling with posts like this. Because it's the exact same posts I see when it comes to women who are raped and someone goes "I feel sorry for her but she was dressed provocatively around a bunch of virile men, what did she expect?"
We really shouldn't be doing this. Yes she's not a nice person in general but no-one deserves hate crimes, weather verbal, psychological, physical or sexual.
We should be focused on the disgusting acts of the people who did this rather than the victim herself. Her past or political alignment shouldn't come into play.
It makes me think Era would just say "I feel bad but, what did they expect" if a black republican senator got lynched and that frightens me regarding a lack of compassion due to political alignment regards to hate crimes of marginalised people.
Did you think this post out at all?I'm really struggling with posts like this. Because it's the exact same posts I see when it comes to women who are raped and someone goes "I feel sorry for her but she was dressed provocatively around a bunch of virile men, what did she expect?"
Your post is beyond ignorant, it is plain stupid. You compared hurled slurs to rape and lynching. Touch grass.It makes me think Era would just say "I feel bad but, what did they expect" if a black republican senator got lynched and that frightens me regarding a lack of compassion due to political alignment regards to hate crimes of marginalised people.
Tbh I would say it's comparable to not wearing a mask bc you don't believe covid is real, endangering those around you with risk of being a super spreader
It makes me think Era would just say "I feel bad but, what did they expect" if a black republican senator got lynched and that frightens me regarding a lack of compassion due to political alignment regards to hate crimes of marginalised people.
What happened to her here is in no way comparable to lynchings or rape, what a horrible comparison to say the least.I'm really struggling with posts like this. Because it's the exact same posts I see when it comes to women who are raped and someone goes "I feel sorry for her but she was dressed provocatively around a bunch of virile men, what did she expect?"
We really shouldn't be doing this. Yes she's not a nice person in general but no-one deserves hate crimes, weather verbal, psychological, physical or sexual.
We should be focused on the disgusting acts of the people who did this rather than the victim herself. Her past or political alignment shouldn't come into play.
It makes me think Era would just say "I feel bad but, what did they expect" if a black republican senator got lynched and that frightens me regarding a lack of compassion due to political alignment regards to hate crimes of marginalised people.
This.Victim blaming stems from blaming people for actions that ultimately do not contribute to whether they become victims or not. There is nothing wrong with dressing provocatively, nor drinking, or walking down a dark street on your own in the middle of the night. So it is problematic when people blame victims and say that those actions contributed to them getting attacked.
Jenner did not innocently walk down a dark street, nor dress in provocative clothes to look pretty. She did not just want to have a good time drinking at a bar. She deliberate courts the attention of a party that is well known to be transphobic. She supports and pushes for policies and behaviour that actively harms LGBT citizens of America. Many have pointed out to her that Trump and the Republicans are not good for the LGBT community but she refuses to listen and still continue to claim that they are better than the Democrats, just so that she can actively try to benefit herself, at the expense of other people like her. She is not comparable to victims of hate crime and other crimes because she's not doing anything "innocently".
Yes no one deserves to be bullied and attacked for being trans. The CPAC people are wrong and no one here has said otherwise. But I would rather reserve my empathy for the thousands who will be affected by Jenner's actions than for her because she needs all the wake up calls she can get. This is like if someone has been being told something is poisonous numerous times and yet that someone still insist on taking a bite and ending up getting poisoned.
Then let her learn. I don't care how a discriminator is discriminated against. Lots of tears here for someone getting treated the way she treats others.
Wasn't implying it was, was more aiming that at some of the people saying she doesn't deserve being called names like that and chased out.
You should think about the distinction between an innocent rape victim and a willing collaborator a little harder.I'm really struggling with posts like this. Because it's the exact same posts I see when it comes to women who are raped and someone goes "I feel sorry for her but she was dressed provocatively around a bunch of virile men, what did she expect?"
We really shouldn't be doing this. Yes she's not a nice person in general but no-one deserves hate crimes, weather verbal, psychological, physical or sexual.
We should be focused on the disgusting acts of the people who did this rather than the victim herself. Her past or political alignment shouldn't come into play.
It makes me think Era would just say "I feel bad but, what did they expect" if a black republican senator got lynched and that frightens me regarding a lack of compassion due to political alignment regards to hate crimes of marginalised people.
I don't believe this user was equating the 2, but rather applying her "rule" garnered from the incident and personal assessment of the feedback in this thread, i.e. if a person places themself in an environment which they have a legal right to occupy, yet also are likely to be unjustly targeted, then that person should accept some degree of the consequences for "assuming the risk" (...at least, this is what I'm assuming to be the user's general interpretation of things...).Wow. That you're equating a transphobe being treated to her own transphobia to a lynching and a rape is kind of crazy. It's insane the lengths people will go to bat for a woman who helps to contribute to the very attacks she just suffered.
I don't believe this user was equating the 2, but rather applying her "rule" garnered from the incident and personal assessment of the feedback in this thread, i.e. if a person places themself in an environment which they have a legal right to occupy, yet also are likely to be unjustly targeted, then that person should accept some degree of the consequences for "assuming the risk" (...at least, this is what I'm assuming to be the user's general interpretation of things...).
But whatever, I'm just spitballin' here; clearly we all respond differently to these sorts of things... Personally, my initial reaction was a bit of empathy for Jenner: sure, there are a myriad of things worth raking her thru the coals over, but this isn't one of them. Not that I don't understand how some would be unconcerned by what happened, but I just was (...a smidge).
sure jan