• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Syril

Member
Oct 26, 2017
5,895
Seeing someone use they/them pronouns as a hashtag like some dog whistle hate speech should make me enraged, but this guy is such a fucking buffoon it honestly only makes me roll my eyes a bit.
 

PlanetSmasher

The Abominable Showman
Member
Oct 25, 2017
115,809
Because literally he believes trans is a narrow narrow identity and that the youths are destroying it.

He's mad that younger trans folks believe trans identity is a wider spectrum than his own personal definition? That's why he's been throwing all these tantrums?

I know I'm sick right now so my brain is only operating at half capacity, but wow.
 
OP
OP
excelsiorlef

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,327
He's mad that younger trans folks believe trans identity is a wider spectrum than his own personal definition? That's why he's been throwing all these tantrums?

I know I'm sick right now so my brain is only operating at half capacity, but wow.

ypyPSYY.png
 

Merc_

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 28, 2017
6,538
I look forward to lefttube ignoring this because of Natalie's ties to this fuckhead.
 
Oct 25, 2017
23,216
Yeah, fuck these two. The way Buck Angel is making fun of "They" as a pronoun is especially gross. God, fuck TERFs
 

The Albatross

Member
Oct 25, 2017
39,046
Who is this person?

Seems to get pretty mad pretty quick.... especially complaining about name calling then calling people twats.
 

Mr Swine

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
6,044
Sweden
Why are people in the twitter thread saying that the left is so hostile while the right is so open and honest? Are those saying that bots or just people that are so warped Or in denial?
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
Yeah and Lord of Ostia is correct, he's going a lot further into full blown terf territory today which I don't even understand
Because TERFism doesn't apply to him as a trans man. TERFism is directed almost solely at transwomen.

That's not to say that transmen don't face anti-trans bigotry (they absolutely do). Just generally not from TERFs specifically.
 

Deleted member 48897

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 22, 2018
13,623
Why are people in the twitter thread saying that the left is so hostile while the right is so open and honest? Are those saying that bots or just people that are so warped Or in denial?

They're just right-wingers who are finding that, go figure, the bigots are much friendlier to people already sympathetic to their views.

Yup the notion that I have to respect someone just because they are older is bullshit. Fuck that. Respect is earned.

I'm always mixed on the notion of "respect is earned" because 'respect' is too broad a concept to be summarized that way, and leads down a path justifying the sort of respectability politics that Buck Angel himself has internalized. Still, it's not hard to draw a line between excluding bigots from discourse vs. normalizing the belief that bigots actually will perform respect when specific conditions are meant (because, really, they won't). I just think it's better to be explicit about it.
 
Last edited:

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
Never trust people who default to a "respect your elders" position. The authority of age needs to be earned, it is not an obligation.
 

Deleted member 25606

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
8,973
Who is this person?

Seems to get pretty mad pretty quick.... especially complaining about name calling then calling people twats.
He's a transgender man who seems to thinks they are the final authority on trans issues and his positions are pretty fucked and "fuck you got mine".

And before you go looking I don't usually bring this up (not pertinent and Idon't care) but Buck is famous for porn, before you do a google search.
 

Ellyshia

Member
Oct 27, 2017
451
I watched 30 seconds of that vid he replied to and hooooly shit. Why are these people just so hateful?
 

Cymbal Head

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,375
As a very outside observer whose biggest exposure to this furor has been via the Contrapoints video, this seems...really bad.
 

astro

Member
Oct 25, 2017
56,979
That video is one of the worst things I've watched in a long time.

Buck continues to be a shitty human being.
 

Deleted member 4346

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,976
Wow this dude is a disaster. I'm nominally familiar with him after the whole ContraPoints thing and this makes her look bad by proxy. What a fucking mess.
 

Deleted member 48897

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 22, 2018
13,623
I watched 30 seconds of that vid he replied to and hooooly shit. Why are these people just so hateful?

The most charitable opinion I can offer for respectability politics is that these people fear backlash and are attempting to curry favor with their oppressors. You can guess this is not a winning strategy long-term and leaves people with whom they share more in common otherwise in the lurch.

(This is one of the reasons why I never fully got on board with the idea of "false consciousness" and tend to believe that white privilege is practically as important a form of solidarity, at least in, say, the US, as class solidarity among the wealthy for the preservation of privilege.)

Still there is also a pretty heaping helping of internalized bigotry in the whole thing. A belief that the way things are is as good as it gets, too. Failures of imagination in terms of seeing how much better and worse things can get at any time.
 

Finale Fireworker

Love each other or die trying.
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,713
United States
Being an 'older person' this stuff is very hard to understand sometimes.

Most equality movements begin from the position that marginalized people deserve the same rights as the unoppressed majority. This is a complicated struggle that many people have fought and died during. Women who fought for the same rights as men, African Americans who fought for the same rights as whites, and queer people who fought for the same rights as straights. What sometimes happens, both on the broader and on the individual level, is that people fight to become part of the status quo instead of dismantling the status quo.

What this means is that people fighting for equality only achieve equality on the terms of their oppressors. Black people are treated with respect but only if they act like white people, women are treated with dignity but only if they act like men, and queer people are treated with respect as long as they don't act gay. This is, at best, a stepping stone to equality and not the goal of any actual equality movement. Some people stop here, believing they have achieved equality, and continue to reject their own identity in favor of the new identity mandated by their new tenuous allies.

An easy example I can think of in the feminist movement is famed artist Georgia O'Keefe. She worked very hard to gain respect within the art community, and was in fact respected, but only by shedding feminine aesthetic and divorcing her work from her gender. As she aged, she struggled with the fact second wave feminists celebrated her as a woman artist because she felt like she spent her whole life trying not to be seen as "a woman." She was never an enemy to this sort of change (to my knowledge) but it is worth highlighting that for her feminism was distracting from the fact she was a woman whereas future feminists wanted to emphasize the fact she was a woman.

This mindset, that equality comes from suppression rather than expression, is something we occasionally see in the queer community too.

Buck Angel believes queer people, especially trans people, should adhere to strict cishet (cisgender/heterosexual) expectations of gender and sexuality because this is what he has been warped to believe equality is. Instead of seeing new age queer people as a succeeding generation of LGBT who started an equality movement of their own, he sees them as the enemy. He sees them as a threat to how he perceives equality.

This sort of inter-queer prejudice is not exclusive to any specific type of queer person. But Buck Angel is a good example of someone who found a degree of success and respect in his life and now believes he is the authority on that. He wields and flexes his success against other queer people in a way that benefits cishet definitions of normalcy because it is only within this framework he believes equality can exist. Not on queer terms, on straight terms.

There is room for trans people who adhere to binary gender norms. There are lots of trans people like this. This is not wrong, or bad, or a problem. Just like there are butch and femme lesbians, or gay men who are really flamboyant and gay men who are more reserved. There is not a wrong way to express your identity. What is wrong is using your identity as a weapon against other people - especially people fighting for the same respect as you. At that point you have found equality only in the sense you've become part of the oppressive status quo yourself.


Buck Angel's emotions are likely driven by fear on some level. Terrible crimes and gross inhumanities are committed against trans people all over the world. A lot of older trans people adopted a more reserved notion of trans identity as a necessity for survival. Letting someone know you were trans could end your career - or even your life. I cannot imagine the stress associated with that kind of existence. It must be very difficult to live your life wanting to be invisible and blend in so you can feel safe and then be met with a new generation of trans people who are far more out and proud than you ever dared to be. When so much of your survival depended on privacy, it is probably extremely difficult to reconcile the loud and proud youth movement of today with your own lifelong experience.

Buck Angel was a forerunner of the trans movement and a hero to trans men back when there were no others like him. He showed what could be possible with their bodies and in society. When queer culture surpassed him he had the choice to learn from his successors or oppose them. He chose to oppose them. He got what he always wanted: to sit at the same table as those who opposed his existence. Now he joins them in threatening, antagonizing, and opposing the civil rights of his own people.


I am cisgender so if I mispoke or explained something incorrectly I hope a trans member will correct me. I apologize if I was inexact in any explanation or example in the above.

Edit: Fixed some bad grammar.
 
Last edited:

Siggy-P

Avenger
Mar 18, 2018
11,865
When someone says they're right because "respect your elders", what they're basically doing is admitting that the actual position itself is indefensable.
 

catboy

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,322
Good thing Contrapoints promoted and then kept defending this asshole.

HAHAHA true.
she didn't actually do that though, if you watch the video she says that she doesn't agree with all of his views and her giving him a 10 second voice over on the channel is not "platforming" him and also that if he continues on this path she would disassociate from him.

watching videos is hard i guess 🤨

anyway that last tweet in the op is extra horrid.
 

KarmaCow

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,161
Talking about upcoming "content" is the monetized apology video of the woke backlash grifting game. It's so nakedly obvious that it's all a scam.
 

Apollo

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
8,096
Scumbag unsurprisingly continues to be a scumbag. There was never a middle ground with this guy, who's been consistently and blatantly awful. That's why the Contrapoints threads full of people brushing aside the things he's done and said have been so frustrating
 
OP
OP
excelsiorlef

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,327
she didn't actually do that though, if you watch the video she says that she doesn't agree with all of his views and her giving him a 10 second voice over on the channel is not "platforming" him and also that if he continues on this path she would disassociate from him.

watching videos is hard i guess 🤨

anyway that last tweet in the op is extra horrid.
She dedicated 20 minutes largely to massively downplay his bigotry.


Look, this whole incident hinges, first of all, on whether Buck Angel is in fact a horrible person. So who is Buck Angel? Well, he's a trans man of my parents' generation. He grew up in a world where there was not anything like the visibility and access to information about transition we have today, and where there was a strict medical gatekeeping system in place for people who wanted to transition. In fact, Buck was the first female to male patient his doctor had ever treated.

In the 2000s, he rose to prominence as an adult performer, his gimmick at the time being "the man with a p*ssy". But he also became an activist. He wanted to create more positive trans representation within the porn world. And from there, he became a more general educator and advocate for trans people.

I first heard about him in the early 2010s when I was doing some googling about some little gender issues I was having myself, although I ended up deciding to remain a female. And Buck was one of the first female-to-male people I'd ever heard about. And he made an impact on me in part because you take one look at him and you think, "Honey, that's a man. But he was born a woman...You can do that?"

It's not that he inspired me to transition or anything, it was just one of many moments along my whole entire gender journey.

So I had positive feelings about Tranpa (that's what he calls himself) from back then, and then a few months ago when I was feeling angry and miserable and despised over another time I was being canceled by trans Twitter (we'll get to that one later) I saw this post from Buck on Instagram:



"Dear beautiful human being, I see your pain. It is okay that you lash out at me. You do this because I am you and you are reflecting your self hate to me. I am strong and will be here for you forever and no matter what. This is my intention as a human being, to help others. Love, Buck Angel."


And then the caption:



"Suffering. That is why the trans community lashes out at each other. I am very aware of the hate towards me by some in the community. They hate on me and others because they are hurt."


And those were exactly the words I needed to hear at that moment. So I commented a heart, and then Buck DMed me and he said, "I love you." And I was like, "Senpai noticed me!" and so I said "I love you" back.

Then when I was working on Opulence, I needed a voice actor to do a line from John Waters' book. And it was my co-director, Theryn, who suggested, "Don't you think Buck Angel sounds kind of like John Waters?" And I said, "Well, he just messaged me on Insta. Let's see if he wants to do it."

I just loved the idea of having "Buck Angel as John Waters" in the video credits. Like, a trans icon playing a gay icon. In my head it was just so, well, iconic. So I got in touch with Buck about the line and he was like yeah, I'd love to do it.



So here it is, the 10 second voiceover clip that ruined a month of my life:



"One must remember, there is such a thing as good bad taste and bad bad taste. To understand bad taste, one must have very good taste."


That's it, children. That's why mommy's canceled.

Now I was aware at the time that trans Twitter hated Buck Angel. But my thinking was, "Well, trans Twitter kind of hates every trans celebrity, and they certainly hate me." So I wasn't gonna let that stop me. Little did I know quite how vicious things were about to get.

Now, so far, I've been telling this story from my point of view. But I do want to give a fair and balanced account. So I want to pause and contextualize why some trans people hate Buck Angel so much, they're willing to cancel anyone who even associates with him.

Basically, it all goes back to this old debate in the trans community known today in Tumblr lingo as truscum versus transtrenders. So truscum are trans people who distinguish between "true" trans people and "fake" trans people who they call "trenders" or "tucutes".

Usually, truscum think that what it is to be trans is to have a lifelong struggle with dysphoria, to pursue a medical transition involving hormones and surgery, and to socially re-assimilate into your target binary gender; so male or female. Anyone who is not that, according to truscum, must either be a confused teenager, someone just trying to get attention, or someone mistaking their trauma or their fetish for being trans⁠— in a word, a trender.

So that's a vish of transness that usually excludes non-binary people as well as people who don't want to medically transition for whatever reason. And for that reason, this view is sometimes also called transmedicalism, "truscum" obviously being the derogatory term for these people.

Truscum are very hated by a lot of trans people because their viewpoint is that not all trans identities are valid. And Buck Angel is widely perceived to be truscum. So the next question to ask is, "Is this true? Is Buck Angel, in fact, truscum?"

Now my honest answer to that question is that I don't know. He certainly said some things that sound like things truscum say, I'll give you that.

A point he likes to make a lot is that he's transsexual, not transgender. And the difference between those terms is that "transsexual" sometimes implies that you want to pursue medical transition⁠— so hormones and surgery⁠— and "transgender" doesn't imply that.

People often associate this "I'm transsexual, not transgender" thing with truscum because truscum often call themselves transsexuals, and say that anyone who isn't a transsexual isn't really trans. And often those people will be very mean to people they call trenders, especially certain transmedicalist YouTubers like Vanessa LeBlanc (read: Blaire White) and 2CuteSmasher9000 (read: Kalvin Garrah). Roast me back, Kalvin, I dare you.

But I think it's important to keep in mind that the term truscum is a product of the 2014 Tumblr wars, and trying to apply it to trans people of an older generation can sometimes be misleading. When Buck Angel transitioned, the word "transsexual" was just the word for his identity, and he still identifies that way.

So when younger trans people tell him it's wrong to use the word "transsexual", he feels like these ungrateful Millennials are invalidating his identity. And I do understand where he's coming from with that.

But I also understand why a lot of non-binary people are skeptical about Buck. Beacause he says again and again, "I'm transsexual, not transgender," as if to say, "Don't mix me up with those people." And that eagerness to separate himself from transgender people, it comes across as hostility.

I don't think Buck's ever actually said that non-binary people aren't valid, but I personally don't like that he seems like he wants to distance himself from them. And that's my disagreement with Buck. It's not that he invalidates non-binary identities, because I don't really see him doing that. And if he was doing that, I would have seen it, because for the last two months a lot of people have been doing nothing but sending me problematic Buck Angel tweets.

But as someone who cares a lot about non-binary people and who loves the non-binary people in my life, it does upset me when he does this distancing thing. And I hope he listens to this criticism, because I think it would be cool if he got better about this.

Of course, Buck is technically right that there are different kinds of trans people. And I agree it's important that we can make those distinctions and talk about the differences when they're relevant. But I also think that, as a community, trans people benefit from unity not division.

If you have an employer who discriminates against trans people, they're not gonna care if you're transsexual, transgender, non-binary or gender non-conforming. They're gonna discriminate against you regardless. So we're all in this together. And though there's a lot of disagreements among us, and even though we often don't get along so well, politically, I think we should work together as much as possible instead of splitting into little factions. Because we share most of the same interests, and I think the best way to do that is to build bridges instead of burning them.

And that's why I'm willing to work with people like Buck Angel who I have some disagreements with. It creates a connection, and having that connection can lead to communication and build understanding. Also, I need all the connections I can get, gorg, I am very lonely...that's not a joke I'm really lonely.

I get that some people have views that are so harmful that giving them a platform is potentially dangerous. But in any case, I didn't even give Buck a platform to share his opinions. I gave him a platform to be a John Waters impersonator.

A bunch of people on my subReddit were like, "Why couldn't she just get John Waters to do those lines?" Well first of all, I don't actually know John, but I just have a feeling he would write me off as some kind of tr*nny millennial SJW. I mean, why is Buck Angel canceled but John Waters isn't? Well, because trans Twitter does not know who John Waters is and let's try to keep it that way.

I actually mentioned this to a friend of mine who knows John and he told me that he and John have actually watched Buck Angel's p*rn together. So... plot twist!

Okay, so trans Twitter won't forgive me unless I condemn Buck Angel as truscum and apologize for ever working with him. But I'm not going to do that because I don't think it would be the right thing to do, and doing it just to get myself uncanceled would be cowardly.

I'm happy to tell you that I absolutely disagree with Buck's divisive rhetoric about "transsexual versus transgender". I wish he would be an ally to the whole transgender umbrella instead of trying to distance himself from the rest. And I'm happy to hear out the perspective of non-binary people who don't trust him because I totally get where they're coming from, and I think that's valid.

But I also respect the decades of good activism Buck Angel has done for trans people and I am grateful to him for that. And in light of that, I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt about where his heart is and express my criticism in a more measured way than just attacking who he is as a person.

But Twitter needs to establish that he's a horrible person because this is the strategy they've chosen to establish that I am a horrible person. And if the truscum allegation isn't strong enough to prove it, oh, they have other pieces of evidence to fall back on to hold up their conclusion. For example, here's a tweet claiming:



"Natalie's trying so fucking hard to make it sound like the only thing Buck Angel ever did was write a few iffy tweets, and that's just so fucking far from the truth. Dude launched a targeted tabloid harassment campaign outing a trans woman against her will with a specific intent of causing her physical, emotional and professional harm. The shorter way of saying that is that he wanted to make her suffer and she very well could have been killed."


Yikes, this ain't it chief. Friendly reminder that this isn't a good look. Maybe don't try to get trans women killed? Disappointing.

It sounds pretty serious, let's investigate. Here's what I've managed to piece together.

Scene one, the year is 2003, Los Angeles, where the movie world, the porn world and the BDSM scene come together in a tale of heartbreak, betrayal and transsexualism: La La Land!

Dramatis personae: Buck Angel, transsexual porn star; Ilsa Strix, dominatrix, then wife of Buck Angel; Lana Wachowski, wildly successful director of The Matrix, and at the time, not yet out as a transgender woman. The synopsis is that Ilsa Strix and Buck Angel's marriage ended after Ilsa had an affair with Lana Wachowski who was not yet out as trans.

So Buck was understandably upset about the affair and, in what seems like a petty act of revenge, told a series of magazines that this celebrity director, Wachowski, was a cross dresser who had stolen his wife, which, I guess, was the information he had at the time.

So is that outing a trans woman against her will? Well, in retrospect it seems like it, though that may not be what he thought he was doing at the time. But to really get to the bottom of this, we have to do some digging. We have to trawl through the dirty details of trans people's personal histories, which I've noticed is one of the Internet's favorite activities.

So I actually went on eBay and I purchased Rolling Stone issue 991, January 2006, and I'm finally able to reveal…

*drum roll*...

...that the seller canceled the order. Goddammit! But I was finally able to track down and translate a Spanish version of the Rolling Stone article from the Wayback Machine, and I'm finally able to expose the truth.

Stop. Freeze exactly where you are. Take a look at yourself and what all of us have been doing for the last 30 seconds. Who does this behavior remind you of? If your answer is social justice advocates fighting for trans equality, you are incorrect. If your answer is creepy stalkers who hate trans people... ding! ding! ding!

I am very suspicious of anyone whose online behavior prompts me to dig through articles full of dead names and sordid scandals involving trans people from almost two decades ago. This is very similar to techniques used against trans people by internet fascists. So I'm pretty suspicious of anyone pushing this kind of investigation.

How can you tell the difference between a trans-anarcho socialist with an anime avatar and a Nazi pretending to be a trans-anarcho socialist with an anime avatar? Well, you can't. Anonymous is anonymous is anonymous, whether it's on 4chan or Twitter.

So unless Buck Angel, Ilsa Strix or Lana Wachowski gets in touch with me and lets me know that for some unimaginable reason they want me to publicly dig up their 17-year old divorce drama, this is none of my fucking business. And it's none of yours either. So shut up, and go back to Kiwi Farms where you belong.
www.contrapoints.com

Transcript of "Canceling" — ContraPoints

Read the transcript for video essay "Canceling" by Natalie Wynn, creator of ContraPoints

She also said you know looking into what he did to Lana Wachowski makes us just like Kiwiwfarms nazis but sure.

Ironically while defending herself from claims she platformed him, she did much more to platform him than those 10 seconds did.

Let's go back to Buck Angel.

I'm kind of a conscientious objector to the practice of condemning someone based on a collage of their worst tweets taken out of context, but I definitely do have anxiety about this. Like, I think I'm doing the right thing by not condemning Buck as truscum and evil but, I mean, I could be wrong.

What if I am basically sacrificing myself for the sake of a person who really is as bad as Twitter says? Maybe tomorrow he'll tweet "fuck non-binary people" and then I'll have fucked up. *sigh* This whole thing is incredibly stressful to me.

But I do believe that by refusing to participate in the anti-Buck Angel pile-on, I am erring on the morally safer side of things. Because even if he is a little truscummy, excommunicating him from the trans community is still probably not the best approach to take.
This section from the transcript is pretty hilarious in light of Buck going wild.
 

Icemonk191

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,814
she didn't actually do that though, if you watch the video she says that she doesn't agree with all of his views
And yet she still invited him to be in her video 🤔

and her giving him a 10 second voice over on the channel is not "platforming him
I can say the sky is purple but that doesn't make it true.

and also that if he continues on this path she would disassociate from him
He's been on this path for years. She knew who he was and didn't care.