Look, this whole incident hinges, first of all, on whether Buck Angel is in fact a horrible person. So who is Buck Angel? Well, he's a trans man of my parents' generation. He grew up in a world where there was not anything like the visibility and access to information about transition we have today, and where there was a strict medical gatekeeping system in place for people who wanted to transition. In fact, Buck was the first female to male patient his doctor had ever treated.
In the 2000s, he rose to prominence as an adult performer, his gimmick at the time being "the man with a p*ssy". But he also became an activist. He wanted to create more positive trans representation within the porn world. And from there, he became a more general educator and advocate for trans people.
I first heard about him in the early 2010s when I was doing some googling about some little gender issues I was having myself, although I ended up deciding to remain a female. And Buck was one of the first female-to-male people I'd ever heard about. And he made an impact on me in part because you take one look at him and you think, "Honey, that's a man. But he was born a woman...You can do that?"
It's not that he inspired me to transition or anything, it was just one of many moments along my whole entire gender journey.
So I had positive feelings about Tranpa (that's what he calls himself) from back then, and then a few months ago when I was feeling angry and miserable and despised over another time I was being canceled by trans Twitter (we'll get to that one later) I saw this post from Buck on Instagram:
"Dear beautiful human being, I see your pain. It is okay that you lash out at me. You do this because I am you and you are reflecting your self hate to me. I am strong and will be here for you forever and no matter what. This is my intention as a human being, to help others. Love, Buck Angel."
And then the caption:
"Suffering. That is why the trans community lashes out at each other. I am very aware of the hate towards me by some in the community. They hate on me and others because they are hurt."
And those were exactly the words I needed to hear at that moment. So I commented a heart, and then Buck DMed me and he said, "I love you." And I was like, "Senpai noticed me!" and so I said "I love you" back.
Then when I was working on
Opulence, I needed a voice actor to do a line from John Waters' book. And it was my co-director, Theryn, who suggested, "Don't you think Buck Angel sounds kind of like John Waters?" And I said, "Well, he just messaged me on Insta. Let's see if he wants to do it."
I just loved the idea of having "Buck Angel as John Waters" in the video credits. Like, a trans icon playing a gay icon. In my head it was just so, well, iconic. So I got in touch with Buck about the line and he was like yeah, I'd love to do it.
So here it is, the 10 second voiceover clip that ruined a month of my life:
"One must remember, there is such a thing as good bad taste and bad bad taste. To understand bad taste, one must have very good taste."
That's it, children. That's why mommy's canceled.
Now I was aware at the time that trans Twitter hated Buck Angel. But my thinking was, "Well, trans Twitter kind of hates every trans celebrity, and they certainly hate me." So I wasn't gonna let that stop me. Little did I know quite how vicious things were about to get.
Now, so far, I've been telling this story from my point of view. But I do want to give a fair and balanced account. So I want to pause and contextualize why some trans people hate Buck Angel so much, they're willing to cancel anyone who even associates with him.
Basically, it all goes back to this old debate in the trans community known today in Tumblr lingo as truscum versus transtrenders. So truscum are trans people who distinguish between "true" trans people and "fake" trans people who they call "trenders" or "tucutes".
Usually, truscum think that what it is to be trans is to have a lifelong struggle with dysphoria, to pursue a medical transition involving hormones and surgery, and to socially re-assimilate into your target binary gender; so male or female. Anyone who is not that, according to truscum, must either be a confused teenager, someone just trying to get attention, or someone mistaking their trauma or their fetish for being trans— in a word, a trender.
So that's a
vish of transness that usually excludes non-binary people as well as people who don't want to medically transition for whatever reason. And for that reason, this view is sometimes also called transmedicalism, "truscum" obviously being the derogatory term for these people.
Truscum are very hated by a lot of trans people because their viewpoint is that not all trans identities are valid. And Buck Angel is widely perceived to be truscum. So the next question to ask is, "Is this true? Is Buck Angel, in fact, truscum?"
Now my honest answer to that question is that I don't know. He certainly said some things that sound like things truscum say, I'll give you that.
A point he likes to make a lot is that he's transsexual, not transgender. And the difference between those terms is that "transsexual" sometimes implies that you want to pursue medical transition— so hormones and surgery— and "transgender" doesn't imply that.
People often associate this "I'm transsexual, not transgender" thing with truscum because truscum often call themselves transsexuals, and say that anyone who isn't a transsexual isn't really trans. And often those people will be very mean to people they call trenders, especially certain transmedicalist YouTubers like Vanessa LeBlanc (read: Blaire White) and 2CuteSmasher9000 (read: Kalvin Garrah). Roast me back, Kalvin, I dare you.
But I think it's important to keep in mind that the term truscum is a product of the 2014 Tumblr wars, and trying to apply it to trans people of an older generation can sometimes be misleading. When Buck Angel transitioned, the word "transsexual" was just the word for his identity, and he still identifies that way.
So when younger trans people tell him it's wrong to use the word "transsexual", he feels like these ungrateful Millennials are invalidating his identity. And I do understand where he's coming from with that.
But I also understand why a lot of non-binary people are skeptical about Buck. Beacause he says again and again, "I'm transsexual, not transgender," as if to say, "Don't mix me up with those people." And that eagerness to separate himself from transgender people, it comes across as hostility.
I don't think Buck's ever actually said that non-binary people aren't valid, but I personally don't like that he seems like he wants to distance himself from them. And that's my disagreement with Buck. It's not that he invalidates non-binary identities, because I don't really see him doing that. And if he was doing that, I would have seen it, because for the last two months a lot of people have been doing nothing but sending me problematic Buck Angel tweets.
But as someone who cares a lot about non-binary people and who loves the non-binary people in my life, it does upset me when he does this distancing thing. And I hope he listens to this criticism, because I think it would be cool if he got better about this.
Of course, Buck is technically right that there are different kinds of trans people. And I agree it's important that we can make those distinctions and talk about the differences when they're relevant. But I also think that, as a community, trans people benefit from unity not division.
If you have an employer who discriminates against trans people, they're not gonna care if you're transsexual, transgender, non-binary or gender non-conforming. They're gonna discriminate against you regardless. So we're all in this together. And though there's a lot of disagreements among us, and even though we often don't get along so well, politically, I think we should work together as much as possible instead of splitting into little factions. Because we share most of the same interests, and I think the best way to do that is to build bridges instead of burning them.
And that's why I'm willing to work with people like Buck Angel who I have some disagreements with. It creates a connection, and having that connection can lead to communication and build understanding. Also, I need all the connections I can get, gorg, I am very lonely...that's not a joke I'm really lonely.
I get that some people have views that are so harmful that giving them a platform is potentially dangerous. But in any case, I didn't even give Buck a platform to share his opinions. I gave him a platform to be a John Waters impersonator.
A bunch of people on my subReddit were like, "Why couldn't she just get John Waters to do those lines?" Well first of all, I don't actually know John, but I just have a feeling he would write me off as some kind of tr*nny millennial SJW. I mean, why is Buck Angel canceled but John Waters isn't? Well, because trans Twitter does not know who John Waters is and let's try to keep it that way.
I actually mentioned this to a friend of mine who knows John and he told me that he and John have actually watched Buck Angel's p*rn together. So... plot twist!
Okay, so trans Twitter won't forgive me unless I condemn Buck Angel as truscum and apologize for ever working with him. But I'm not going to do that because I don't think it would be the right thing to do, and doing it just to get myself uncanceled would be cowardly.
I'm happy to tell you that I absolutely disagree with Buck's divisive rhetoric about "transsexual versus transgender". I wish he would be an ally to the whole transgender umbrella instead of trying to distance himself from the rest. And I'm happy to hear out the perspective of non-binary people who don't trust him because I totally get where they're coming from, and I think that's valid.
But I also respect the decades of good activism Buck Angel has done for trans people and I am grateful to him for that. And in light of that, I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt about where his heart is and express my criticism in a more measured way than just attacking who he is as a person.
But Twitter needs to establish that he's a horrible person because this is the strategy they've chosen to establish that I am a horrible person. And if the truscum allegation isn't strong enough to prove it, oh, they have other pieces of evidence to fall back on to hold up their conclusion. For example, here's a tweet claiming:
"Natalie's trying so fucking hard to make it sound like the only thing Buck Angel ever did was write a few iffy tweets, and that's just so fucking far from the truth. Dude launched a targeted tabloid harassment campaign outing a trans woman against her will with a specific intent of causing her physical, emotional and professional harm. The shorter way of saying that is that he wanted to make her suffer and she very well could have been killed."
Yikes, this ain't it chief. Friendly reminder that this isn't a good look. Maybe don't try to get trans women killed? Disappointing.
It sounds pretty serious, let's investigate. Here's what I've managed to piece together.
Scene one, the year is 2003, Los Angeles, where the movie world, the porn world and the BDSM scene come together in a tale of heartbreak, betrayal and transsexualism:
La La Land!
Dramatis personae: Buck Angel, transsexual porn star; Ilsa Strix, dominatrix, then wife of Buck Angel; Lana Wachowski, wildly successful director of The Matrix, and at the time, not yet out as a transgender woman. The synopsis is that Ilsa Strix and Buck Angel's marriage ended after Ilsa had an affair with Lana Wachowski who was not yet out as trans.
So Buck was understandably upset about the affair and, in what seems like a petty act of revenge, told a series of magazines that this celebrity director, Wachowski, was a cross dresser who had stolen his wife, which, I guess, was the information he had at the time.
So is that outing a trans woman against her will? Well, in retrospect it seems like it, though that may not be what he thought he was doing at the time. But to really get to the bottom of this, we have to do some digging. We have to trawl through the dirty details of trans people's personal histories, which I've noticed is one of the Internet's favorite activities.
So I actually went on eBay and I purchased Rolling Stone issue 991, January 2006, and I'm finally able to reveal…
*drum roll*...
...that the seller canceled the order. Goddammit! But I was finally able to track down and translate a Spanish version of the Rolling Stone article from the Wayback Machine, and I'm finally able to expose the truth.
Stop. Freeze exactly where you are. Take a look at yourself and what all of us have been doing for the last 30 seconds. Who does this behavior remind you of? If your answer is social justice advocates fighting for trans equality, you are incorrect. If your answer is creepy stalkers who hate trans people...
ding! ding! ding!
I am very suspicious of anyone whose online behavior prompts me to dig through articles full of dead names and sordid scandals involving trans people from almost two decades ago. This is very similar to techniques used against trans people by internet fascists. So I'm pretty suspicious of anyone pushing this kind of investigation.
How can you tell the difference between a trans-anarcho socialist with an anime avatar and a Nazi pretending to be a trans-anarcho socialist with an anime avatar? Well, you can't. Anonymous is anonymous is anonymous, whether it's on 4chan or Twitter.
So unless Buck Angel, Ilsa Strix or Lana Wachowski gets in touch with me and lets me know that for some unimaginable reason they want me to publicly dig up their 17-year old divorce drama, this is none of my fucking business. And it's none of yours either. So shut up, and go back to Kiwi Farms where you belong.