Oh yes that's true, I hope they import enough to cover how ever long the disruption lasts.it is why there are traffic jams now already. Companies are importing as much as possible now.
Oh yes that's true, I hope they import enough to cover how ever long the disruption lasts.it is why there are traffic jams now already. Companies are importing as much as possible now.
The EU does not have to be reasonable. They are the bigger economy here and able to set the terms to benefit the single market. They can be as selfish as they want to be. Just like any larger, richer economy/country sets the terms for poorer countries.
Not just that, but many importers are pulling their trucks out with no plans on bringing them back (due to the shitshow that's about to hit us).it is why there are traffic jams now already. Companies are importing as much as possible now.
The problem of having to negotiate with an impartial broker to get tariffs up is that it only works if you assume its gonna rarely happen. However, the UK has openly talked about separating standards as soon as possible and delay the tariffs penalty as much as possible.Good insight on the Guardian blog just now:
In his column in the Times (paywall) this morning James Forsyth suggests that a solution is possible to the level playing field dispute in the UK-EU trade talks. He writes:
Forsyth also suggests that the dispute over fisheries could be solved - essentially by paying off the EU fishing fleets likely to lose out most.
My colleague Daniel Boffey thinks Forsyth is referring to an option acceptable to the EU.
The fishing thing is hilarious. Imagine if we just end up subsidizing foreign fishing fleets for the foreseeable future.
If we had put even a portion of that money into our tiny fishing fleet decades ago. We might have avoided all this.
The EU does not have to be reasonable. They are the bigger economy here and able to set the terms to benefit the single market. They can be as selfish as they want to be. Just like any larger, richer economy/country sets the terms for poorer countries.
The problem is not about EU being selfish right now, the problem is that EU has lost any possible trust on the UK not going back on any possible deal as soon as humanly possible, so they want to be able to hit back as soon as the UK steps out, not have to wait 3-4 years for a punch back.In an effect, this is true, because the EU will be affected much less from Brexit than the UK. But it still has to judge whether the damage it will face due to a no-deal is less or more than the potential damage it will face from the ratchet clause that columnist is suggesting (or any other variant thereof).
Isn't the problem that the UK is trying to turn it into an argument of equals 1v1, but it's really 27v1, so the arbitration and UK insistence that the ECJ cannot be involved just doesn't work.
The problem is not about EU being selfish right now, the problem is that EU has lost any possible trust on the UK not going back on any possible deal as soon as humanly possible, so they want to be able to hit back as soon as the UK steps out, not have to wait 3-4 years for a punch back.
I would say it would be fair if the UK hadnt said repeatedly they would just do whatever they want after signing the deal and would do whatever thing possible to not face consequences (or delay them as much as possible). So the EU needs to be able to do something without a big delay.I think it is probably fair for us to ask that the EU can't just implement tariffs on us whenever it wants. The reason this isn't as simple as the Canada deal is we are closer and more intertwined nations. That works both ways.
I have no idea who controls that arbitration, if it's the European courts that would enrage the Daily Mail reader types. Of course, that shouldn't matter but Brexit is built on the outrage of people with no insight into how Europe or any international co-operation works.
No problem, I just wanted to point out that EU is so harsh on the ratchet because UK has shown utter contempt on negotiating in good faith, which doesnt leave a ton of room in the kind of negotiations that require both parties to be negotiating in good faith.Sorry, I didn't mean to invoke a concept of "selfishness" in my post.
Good insight on the Guardian blog just now:
In his column in the Times (paywall) this morning James Forsyth suggests that a solution is possible to the level playing field dispute in the UK-EU trade talks. He writes:
Like clockworkI don't doubt he is calling Merkel now to say Van der Leyen is blocking a deal.
Dunno if this is true but it would be plausible considering reports Boris wanted Merkel and Macron at the meeting but they shot him down.
"We are always hopeful, and as you know the negotiations are continuing and we've got our teams still out there in Brussels.
And if there is a big offer, a big change in what they are saying, then I must say that I've yet to see it.
Unfortunately at the moment, as you know, there are two key things where we just can't seem to make progress and that's this kind of ratchet clause they've got in to keep the UK locked in to whatever they want to do in terms of legislation, which obviously doesn't work.
And then there is the whole issue of fish where we've got to be able to take back control of our waters. So there is a way to go - we're hopeful that progress can be made.
But I've got to tell that from where I stand now, here in Blyth, it is looking very, very likely that we will have to go for a solution that I think would be wonderful for the UK, and we'd be able to do exactly what we want from January 1 - it obviously would be different from what we'd set out to achieve but I have no doubt this country can get ready and, as I say, come out on World Trade terms."
Watit is looking very, very likely that we will have to go for a solution that I think would be wonderful for the UK, and we'd be able to do exactly what we want from January 1
Which is why we've spent 4 years negotiating and planning for that not to happenit is looking very, very likely that we will have to go for a solution that I think would be wonderful for the UK, and we'd be able to do exactly what we want from January 1
PM has just said this (via Guardian Liveblog):
I've also discovered that seeing him play dress up every day makes me irrationally angry.
EU already looks like it gave up on a deal and they have put some clear lines in the sand they will not cross. It is all in UK to concede which they havent made any move towards in this week.Do we really think it's going to be no deal? I know this sounds stupid, but could it be a game of chicken, or who will swerve first?
Do we really think it's going to be no deal? I know this sounds stupid, but could it be a game of chicken, or who will swerve first?
Never play chicken with an ocean liner when you are in a rowboat. The ocean liner doesn't need to swerve.Do we really think it's going to be no deal? I know this sounds stupid, but could it be a game of chicken, or who will swerve first?
I do now. I didn't couple of days ago, but it's clear from the slightly frightened looking ministers on various TV shows since then that they've been told it's likely too.Do we really think it's going to be no deal? I know this sounds stupid, but could it be a game of chicken, or who will swerve first?
Just means no deal on January 1st. Doesn't mean it all resets to square one at that point however much the Tories try and badge it that way.Do we really think it's going to be no deal? I know this sounds stupid, but could it be a game of chicken, or who will swerve first?
Yeah and i suspect no deal will worsen their negotiating position and they will eventually agree to the deal the EU is offering after a month of chaos.Even in a No Deal it can't be a forever thing. You're not going to be without a trade deal with your biggest next door neighbour from now on, something will eventually bring them back to the table.
Their scapegoat is COVID.I'm sure Boris' conduct over the last year will be tactically leaked and deployed, Tories get their scapegoat for the chaos and they'll send the next totally moderate British values mug in to 'Get an even better deal' that's all concessions, when it starts hitting their diners pockets. But disaster capitalists they are they'll probably revel in it and just use a new PM as political clickbait.
Sunak's waiting in the wings. No less despicable compared to Johnson but presents himself better.Sure, and they'll want to tie both COVID and Brexit failings to Johnson at the opportune time to 'wipe their slate clean', using COVID to extend the clock as necessary. Then get back to demolishing the country.
They won't (publicly) pin it on Johnson, because they voted for Johnson.Sure, and they'll want to tie both COVID and Brexit failings to Johnson at the opportune time to 'wipe their slate clean', using COVID to extend the clock as necessary. Then get back to demolishing the country.
Yeah, I'm pretty much convinced this is it now.
He also strikes me as the kind of politician who'd do a runner than face the consequences, so hopefully he at least pisses off.
I wonder how long Toyota, Nissan, and others will stay in the UK in the event of a no deal. I give it maximum a year or so before they will start announcing their departure.
Sunak's waiting in the wings. No less despicable compared to Johnson but presents himself better.
They won't (publicly) pin it on Johnson, because they voted for Johnson.
The fear I've got is the line, we have to make hard choices and difficult decisions which is how they destroy the NHS further, reduce rights etc. Shit hits the fan is a green light to mould the UK into what they want and people will be more accepting because things will be bad and possibly desperate. They are waiting for this moment.
England prevails.The fear I've got is the line, we have to make hard choices and difficult decisions which is how they destroy the NHS further, reduce rights etc. Shit hits the fan is a green light to mould the UK into what they want and people will be more accepting because things will be bad and possibly desperate. They are waiting for this moment.