It's sad that we all kinda knew this already. Writing is on the wall and clapping like seals, it won't be so bad then the inevitable EU fault, remainers putting us down, you've just got to believe.
So can anyone who is in the know break down the NI announcement. How is this different from the arrangements that would have existed based on the withdrawl agreement.
Basically, has the government actually benefited from it's "we are happy to break international law" play?
The arrangements talked about by Connolly in that series of Tweets are in line with the Northern Ireland protocol of the withdrawal agreement. That protocol gives a pretty wide set of creative powers to the Joint Committee to make decisions about how EU <-> NI and NI <-> GB trade works, and what regulations can be derogated under what conditions.So can anyone who is in the know break down the NI announcement. How is this different from the arrangements that would have existed based on the withdrawl agreement.
Basically, has the government actually benefited from it's "we are happy to break international law" play?
Boris is going to brussels tonight. Presumably after we'll get an ideaIsn't today supposed to be the deadline? Doesn't look very promising.
Boris Johnson: no PM could accept trade terms offered by EU
Not from what I've seen. They've basically accepted what was always required for the withdrawal agreement to work, and there were always practicalities to work out to implement it.
A commitment to keep to EU food safety standards, after months of saying we weren't going to commit, that's a win for the EU.
The arrangements talked about by Connolly in that series of Tweets are in line with the Northern Ireland protocol of the withdrawal agreement. That protocol gives a pretty wide set of creative powers to the Joint Committee to make decisions about how EU <-> NI and NI <-> GB trade works, and what regulations can be derogated under what conditions.
The bills that break international law did not cause this to happen and are more likely a threat to this agreement.
Isn't today supposed to be the deadline? Doesn't look very promising.
Boris Johnson: no PM could accept trade terms offered by EU
Hopefully a shit-ton of humble pie.
You have a lack of faith. He fathered an entire rugby team worth of kids in less time than that!Wait, he is leaving just now? So basically it is a 2-3 hour visit unless he thinks he'll be welcomed at the European top tomorrow.
Spoiler: he won't.
That blustering blonde bastard better not releases a new press release tonight saying how after some tough last minute negotiations we've managed to cinch the deal exactly how we wanted.
He's absolutely playing his base with this last minute 'dash' to Brussells.
Both the comments and a lot of the quoted RTs...
So so so so much delusion.
Look at the state of that lying scumbag.
FFS, Australia is no deal, Canada only applies because it's fucking miles away, won't cover what we have now and it destroys UK financial services probably. I want to scream.
I totally agree. Just don't see how we can let the EU impose any changes to its laws on us, the UK would essentially be a vassal state. Looking like a no deal to me. It's going to be messy at the beginning of 2021.It's pretty much no deal now. I always felt that we're all in (my preference) or all out (no deal). From what's being said by Boris, no deal it is.
If Brexit was about UK parliament making UK laws and no-one else (and note the if, I'm not convinced that's what the Leave majority was about), then you could not have a scenario where if the EU passes a new law, then Britain has no choice but to do so as well, or have tariffs imposed, be fined etc That's not independence, that's not sovereignty. The UK electorate would have no say in what environmental, food safety or employment laws are passed - the EU decides, the UK has to abide. I believe the UK has already said we wouldn't regress on the existing laws in these areas.
No deal will hit the economy, but the negotiations were always about the economy/market access vs sovereignty and the electorate has voted twice now for the later (first in the referendum, then in the General election) and this is what they must get.
In 5 years time, we'll either be taking about rejoining or will have decided that we're happy with (what will be by that point) the status quo.I am guessing the later.
I do not believe the UK electorate was informed of this. They were told their economy would be better.No deal will hit the economy, but the negotiations were always about the economy/market access vs sovereignty and the electorate has voted twice now for the later (first in the referendum, then in the General election) and this is what they must get.
More people voted for parties that supported a second referendum than voted for parties that didn't.No deal will hit the economy, but the negotiations were always about the economy/market access vs sovereignty and the electorate has voted twice now for the later (first in the referendum, then in the General election) and this is what they must get.
They voted to "take back control", now you might disagree with that (as do I) and might debate what that phrase really meant, but they chose this over the very clear warnings over the impact that leaving the EU would have on the economy.I do not believe the UK electorate was informed of this. They were told their economy would be better.
They also voted to give 350 million a week to the nhs and for better trade deals. The latter they could get at the expense of sovereignty.They voted to "take back control", now you might disagree with that (as do I) and might debate what that phrase really meant, but they chose this over the very clear warnings over the impact that leaving the EU would have on the economy.
I totally agree. Just don't see how we can let the EU impose any changes to its laws on us, the UK would essentially be a vassal state. Looking like a no deal to me. It's going to be messy at the beginning of 2021.
And I hope it was British caught just for spite
Well i can only speak for our clients but everyone is and has been working under the assumption of no deal for the past 3 months. If it doesn't happen fine but if it does better safe than sorry.Man, this is so ridiculous. There are three weeks left out of which 1 is like non-existent. How are companies supposed to prepare for anything that's not decided yet? Emergency measures in their Christmas zoom calls?
This is the same stupid game again and again. Just go for no deal already and stop this craziness. It's clear that UK doesn't want a deal.
If it's no deal do you think the EU and UK would come to an agreement to not do it January 1st, like a buffer period to prepare, I know work has been done but UK in particular are caught with their pants down.
Assumption in EU capitals is to get it over with and a lot of countries expect the UK to walk back and sign a deal early next year.If it's no deal do you think the EU and UK would come to an agreement to not do it January 1st, like a buffer period to prepare, I know work has been done but UK in particular are caught with their pants down.