Right because at that point you have to assume the intention is to kill and you likely already know there are children in the parade. You also don't know if the car has a bomb.
Right.
lol
yeah the bots are in full swing on twitter, already blaming this on BLM and the like. It's best to wait for something official.
But just to be clear you'd still shoot them right
Not going to dignify that bait attempt with an answer. Do better.
the guy killed children (or at the very least injured several). Kindly F off.
I don't think something like this falls under being "trigger happy." This is a rare instance where deadly force would be justified as long as it isn't also being aimed into a crowd or other people in general.
No but open firing into a crowd of innocents isn't the answer
Im confused. Can you explain why once the name came out why you would ask if the poster would still shoot? "Trigger happy" doesn't follow. 🤷
Gonna go with I don't know because its not my job but maybe not possibly killing innocent people
You remember how the Boston bombers internet sleuths were totally right the first time right
About? What does this have to do with what I asked you? 🤔
Right it's not like the cops know who the driver is when they see a car ramming through barriers and heading towards a parade full of kids, nor would it matter frankly if they did know who was driving.
Your posts make no sense. There is a significant difference between firing at a driver who is trying to kill many and firing into a crowd.
Yup its fucked up. I know that street. This is really messed up but blindly shooting into a crowd shouldn't be the answer.
