Got a link to this?The director is an outspoken Gamergater and made a lot of inflammatory comments about ethnicity.
Got a link to this?The director is an outspoken Gamergater and made a lot of inflammatory comments about ethnicity.
Doing a simple Google search of 8chan would paint a very obvious message. Regardless of how you frame it, the PR guy never looks good in the endAbundantly transparent is as opinionated as me saying it was a simple mistake. I read archived parts of the AMA and I disagree :)
It would be a different story if they'd ever displayed a shred of evidence that they support that filth.
Plus don't the platform holders pay licensing fees to said publishers? Regardless of what you subscribe to, the publishers you dislike are going to get money.If you get a game on Plus, Games with Gold, Now, or Game Pass, the publisher of the game gets paid. It's generally not just a flat fee, each download equals more revenue for the publisher.
I skipped the Humble Monthly Bundle for Kingdom Come Deliverance and in the fill out form for why I was cancelling explained the situation. A simple (POLITE) call to customer service is a good way of letting services like this know that things like this matter.
I don't have a link to the latter part of the poster you're replying to him is saying, but he's gone on record in several interviews that he supports GamerGate. https://techraptor.net/content/interview-daniel-vavra
I'll take naive over blind, thanks.
Unless I'm missing something? Does Phillip Brock or THQ Nordic have a history of supporting the trash that used to be on 8chan (or still is? idk if the site came back up)?
This whole movement of scorched Earth against anyone who has a different view or associates with the enemy knowingly or not, is nonsensical. Sad that people want his blood and his job for what appears to be a simple mistake.
Doing a simple Google search of 8chan would paint a very obvious message. Regardless of how you frame it, the PR guy never looks good in the end
If you get a game on Plus, Games with Gold, Now, or Game Pass, the publisher of the game gets paid. It's generally not just a flat fee, each download equals more revenue for the publisher.
The amount of defending of THQN of their 8chan AMA is disgusting. Shame on you. Don't defend this shit, don't downplay it. It was by all admissions, one of the grossest things I've seen a videogame company do in a long time. They fucking deserve to be raked over the coals for this.
Really bizarre anyone would throw them in with Vavra or Voidpoint, one of which never apologized and the other apologized but backtracked.
In reality, nothing is black and white, just shades of gray. It'd be one thing if THQN didn't apologize, or backtracked, but they recognized it was bad, they apologized, and they moved on. They haven't had repeat infractions, and they're a better company now. That's how getting better works, that's how growing works.
99% of people who knew they messed up have seen that they took ownership of it, and corrected it, and have moved forward. If you can't forgive them for it, and you want to show that by not buying their game or supporting them, that's fine, I guess I'm just confused as to why this is the battle anyone would want to take time to fight. It seems to me there are game devs and publishers who are not remorseful, have not apologized, and are continuing their practices, and those are the ones that people should be boycotting if they want to send a message.
99% of people seems like a weird statistic to make up.
THQN posted a boilerplate apology and no follow up action was taken, no demonstrable action was taken. You're talking about a company hosting an AMA on a hate website filled with child porn. How about contributing positively to a social cause as a way to make up for it? They did absolutely nothing outside of that one public statement. They're afraid to anger their audience, and instead do the bare minimum and put their hands in their pockets.
They didn't do another AMA on 8chan or any other controversial space, so I guess I see that as correcting the behavior. Apologizing in itself is humbling, embarrassing, and humiliating. If you want a statistic, it would be people that use the phrase "boilerplate apology" have never apologized for a thing they've ever done.
If you don't wish to support a company then do not redeem those games to your library if they're offered. They get paid per redemption, there's a reason games aren't automatically added to libraries when they go up for offer.This thread was spurred by some of the discussions going on in the PS+ thread where September's games includes one of THQ Nordic's games (Darksiders III) and how to approach the desire to not support THQ Nordic when you have no control over whose products are added to the various subscription services out there (PS+, PS Now, XBL Games with Gold, Xbox Game Pass, Humble Bundle Monthly, etc). Obviously, it's easy to avoid directly purchasing games published by THQ Nordic, 3D Realms, or any other companies you have issues with, but it seems more nebulous when it comes to subscription services and I wanted to see what people here had to say on the subject. Is it bad to grab that company's games when it's on PS+ or XBL Games with Gold or download and play them when they're offered on PS Now or Xbox Game Pass?
I was just going to ask how pay is distributed in these types of deals. Seems like OP has his answer.If you get a game on Plus, Games with Gold, Now, or Game Pass, the publisher of the game gets paid. It's generally not just a flat fee, each download equals more revenue for the publisher.
They didn't do another AMA on 8chan or any other controversial space, so I guess I see that as correcting the behavior. Apologizing in itself is humbling, embarrassing, and humiliating. If you want a statistic, it would be people that use the phrase "boilerplate apology" have never apologized for a thing they've ever done.
That's pretty much why I make sure to redeem every EGS free game. More money for developers.If you don't wish to support a company then do not redeem those games to your library if they're offered. They get paid per redemption, there's a reason games aren't automatically added to libraries when they go up for offer.
If you don't wish to support a company then do not redeem those games to your library if they're offered. They get paid per redemption, there's a reason games aren't automatically added to libraries when they go up for offer.
If it permanently stopped the behavior, then possibly. It could also be a situation where the person would be hard to terminate if they had no prior infractions and the AMA was approved up the chain with everyone thinking it was someone else's responsibility to vet the site. At that point it can be really difficult from a legal perspective to assign blame and take action, depending on your country and state laws. Maybe the most you can do is a final warning in a corrective action unless you could absolutely prove this person knew what 8chan was and it was spelled out in their job description that it was their responsibility to vet any sites where an AMA was taking place, and it was spelled out in a policy somewhere that states kind of sites the company will not partner with.So Shifty1897, how is that correcting behavior? The offending party, who knew of 8chan, and who conducted and participated in the AMA is still working at THQ.
A light tap on the wrist is a correction?