Pascal Rides Again, Nvidia Launches the GeForce GT 1010
Nvidia is not done with Pascal, yet
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
They are joking, they don't even have a 3080 thanks to shortages.
GT cards are actually great for media living room PCs/non gaming PCs, this might be a nice upgrade for the GT710 I have in my secondary workhorse PC right now.
these are not meant to be for gaming, just everyday graphics acceleration like for videos, encoding/decoding, UI, Web and windows stuff, and to connect more monitors to work PCs and so on.
these are not meant to be for gaming, just everyday graphics acceleration like for videos, encoding/decoding, UI, Web and windows stuff, and to connect more monitors to work PCs and so on.
Last edited:
The 3090 is a better upgrade, or wait for the 3080 Ti.
Last edited:
I don't think so. It's even slower than the GT 1030 which is already painfully slow for everything except really old games.
LowSpecGamer salivating over a new toy.
I might end up picking up one of these myself, as a Ryzen owner with no backup GPU right now, at like 50 bucks or so this would be a good "waiting on RMA" card.
I might end up picking up one of these myself, as a Ryzen owner with no backup GPU right now, at like 50 bucks or so this would be a good "waiting on RMA" card.
Probably would be worse. This is more for adding a couple more hdmi slots, or for adding 4k video encoding/decoding for older pcs that are otherwise still usable.
Would a card like this work for game streaming, or is it too low-end? So if I were to build a HTPC and maybe want to put Moonlight on it to stream games from my legit PC, would I have issues?
Yeah, I think I may do the same. I'm pretty sure I'll have to hold my current GPU for a good while until stock gets better before upgrading, but if it dies, yikes. Rather have something like this as backup.
None. APUs and Intel Xe are better. This is essentially a video-decoder card for really old machines.
If I just want play Melty Blood (and some old fighting games) and Nihon Falcom games I could be good with this? I'm half joking here, because my shitty tablet laptop GPU can already do this but I want build a proper rig.
No reason why it wouldn't, but if you're building an HTPC, it'd probably be cheaper and more efficient just to get a processor with a good integrated graphics.
To anyone else asking for recommendations for this card, if your use case isn't one of these two things, don't bother.
A: you want a cheap way to connect additional monitors to your current setup
B: you are using an older machine (think DDR3, yes that old) and don't already have a dedicated graphics card AND you specifically need something to accelerate 4k video decoding or play simple modern indie games.
For any other reason, there are better and more cost effective solutions. This is a very niche product.
That's a good idea too. I'm more thinking I have an old computer laying around - this could maybe be what I need to make it a Moonlight/HTPC.
Would be great if there was a low-profile model. I could build it all into a nice little wooden box.
Yeah, me too lol. Wouldn't most integrated graphics from modern cpus more powerful than this?
These kind of GPU are aimed at those office Desktops, where connections and media capabilities are important. It lets the company upgrade the Desktop capability without replacing it. It doesn't make much sense to the mainstream public