• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

voOsh

Member
Apr 5, 2018
1,665
I have, and I still don't understand why it's a big deal if a game goes exclusive to another launcher on your computer, your not paying for another launcher and it takes at most maybe 5 mins to download? The irrational thinking is what's getting me cause it really just doesn't matter, you want to play the game bad enough you will get it on whatever store it's on.

It's so much more than just another launcher. I've been a Steam user for 15 years. I have that many years worth of friends on my list. I use Big Picture. I use cloud saves. I have a library of hundreds of screenshots. I use the wishlist. I use the Steam Workshop for countless games.

I get none of these things from EGS. Steam is just a better platform and it's not close. And I have no problem if Epic wants to sell games but the exclusivity deals are wrong and go against the culture of PC gaming. I may get ridiculed for caring about PC gaming but it means something to me and Epic threatens it.
 

Deleted member 1589

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,576
I have, and I still don't understand why it's a big deal if a game goes exclusive to another launcher on your computer, your not paying for another launcher and it takes at most maybe 5 mins to download? The irrational thinking is what's getting me cause it really just doesn't matter, you want to play the game bad enough you will get it on whatever store it's on.
Well, for some it's the launcher, for others, it's something else.

There's heaps of reasons why people decide not to use EGS. Mine is simply because their regional pricing isnt good enough, and that 30% transaction fee for Steam has helped me getting cheaper games thanks to GMG.

Some of you have no idea how tough it is having games being sold at 200++ myr.

Now when games that are hosted on Epic's client are as affordable as those hosted on the Steam client? I'll be on it.
 

Hektor

Community Resettler
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
9,884
Deutschland
Y'all want to like games want to take or farther then games. I still really don't understand why you would much rather look out for another companies pocket, they are making MILLIONS anyway so really it's just kinda weird to see this stance over a video game.

People are looking out for their own pockets hun, not valves.
Just so happens that our pockets align.
 

Ge0force

Self-requested ban.
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
5,265
Belgium
Y'all want to like games want to take or farther then games. I still really don't understand why you would much rather look out for another companies pocket, they are making MILLIONS anyway so really it's just kinda weird to see this stance over a video game.

I'm not looking out for another companies pocket. I'm not a Steam fanboy, I own loads of games on other storefronts as well and I actually prefer GoG because of their anti-DRM stance.

I think my previous post was very clear: I want storefronts to compete by offering more value for consumers, not by keeping the most popular games away from competing storefronts. It's that simple.

I also strongly dislike several other things about Epic's strategy, like boycotting 3rd party keystores and making user reviews opt-in for the developers.
 

RoninChaos

Member
Oct 26, 2017
8,338
It can be on both EGS and Steam .. doesn't say anywhere that it's exclusive.

Not sure why people are getting so uppity about this.

edit: also that tweet has been deleted.
You know damn well why people are being "uppity" about it. Stop that. It just so happens people have an issue with how epic runs their store and how it doesn't match steam's feature set. It's coasting on exclusivity.

The PC is supposed to be the best open platform out there and all these launchers and stores are basically splintering the PC into console territory when that's not how gaming on the PC is supposed to be. A HUGE title like borderlands going straight to epic's store and not steam makes the dividing line bigger. If pc gamers wanted to deal with console-wars style storefront bullshit they'd just buy consoles. So stop that. You know why people are upset if this is exclusive to the Epic store.
 
Oct 25, 2017
11,039
So uh how do these deals work

Is epic really throwing insane amounts of money at companies? Seems like everyone is getting paid huge but wont companies like 2k be extremely expensive

I think these companies are in it for the long game perhaps.

If Epic store fails, Steam will become the defacto again.

If that happens, they go back to 70/30 cut.

These companies have an interest in seeing Epic succeed, to grow the userbase on that platform to get more money, and hopefully force Valve into a situation where they MUST increase share to 88/12 or risk Epic becoming the PC platform standard.

I think right now Valve is on a wait and see approach. If Valve goes to 88/12, there is NO going back. That is a SIGNIFICANT cut to their revenue.
 

Tovarisc

Member
Oct 25, 2017
24,435
FIN
These companies have an interest in seeing Epic succeed, to grow the userbase on that platform to get more money, and hopefully force Valve into a situation where they MUST increase share to 88/12 or risk Epic becoming the PC platform standard.

I think right now Valve is on a wait and see approach. If Valve goes to 88/12, there is NO going back. That is a SIGNIFICANT cut to their revenue.

Valve going to that model would be so bad PC gaming.

Key stores like GMG would die over night, Valve would be forced to operate store at loss in certain regions or go full Epic by dropping support for whole regions of the world, cut their R&D for HW and SW etc.
 
Oct 25, 2017
4,843
I have, and I still don't understand why it's a big deal if a game goes exclusive to another launcher on your computer, your not paying for another launcher and it takes at most maybe 5 mins to download? The irrational thinking is what's getting me cause it really just doesn't matter, you want to play the game bad enough you will get it on whatever store it's on.
I am paying though. I never pay full price for PC games because there's so many key sites to buy from, but with Epic I have no other choice than Epic store for full price.
 

Lothars

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
9,765
You're thinking pretty narrowly here. It might rub people in communities like this the wrong way but that isn't the majority of consumers. Your average consumer isn't going to care about what launcher you get a thing at.
I think they are especially when the client isn't very good, I bet you the number is way higher than your thinking.
 

Manwell

Member
Oct 25, 2017
392
USA
I think these companies are in it for the long game perhaps.

If Epic store fails, Steam will become the defacto again.

If that happens, they go back to 70/30 cut.

These companies have an interest in seeing Epic succeed, to grow the userbase on that platform to get more money, and hopefully force Valve into a situation where they MUST increase share to 88/12 or risk Epic becoming the PC platform standard.

I think right now Valve is on a wait and see approach. If Valve goes to 88/12, there is NO going back. That is a SIGNIFICANT cut to their revenue.


If Valve switched to 88/12 right now I guarantee you it would change absolutely nothing. Epic would still poach games by offering a big chunk of money and publishers would happily accept.
 
Oct 25, 2017
11,039
Valve going to that model would be so bad PC gaming.

Key stores like GMG would die over night, Valve would be forced to operate store at loss in certain regions or go full Epic by dropping support for whole regions of the world, cut their R&D for HW and SW etc.

Yeah, most devs/pubs don't care about that. At least I don't think they do.

Like, and extra 18% for every sale? That is huge.
 

Komo

Info Analyst
Verified
Jan 3, 2019
7,110
If Valve switched to 88/12 right now I guarantee you it would change absolutely nothing. Epic would still poach games by offering a big chunk of money and publishers would happily accept.
It literally wouldn't effect Valve the slightest. They might actually slow down on any R&D they do.
 

Swenhir

Member
Oct 28, 2017
521
Oh my, look at the date.

I'll give Pitchford that, that's perhaps the ballsiest april's fool in recent memory if that's what this is.

If it does release on EGS, I hope for their sake it won't be an exclusive because they will be hell to pay.
 

eonden

Member
Oct 25, 2017
17,087
It literally wouldn't effect Valve the slightest. They might actually slow down on any R&D they do.
Yeah, most devs/pubs don't care about that. At least I don't think they do.

Like, and extra 18% for every sale? That is huge.
It would kill / slow down PC-sales reinsertion into developing countries, as the added costs (or heck, even outright disapearance) of payment methods would make it much harder to buy games there. Piracy would increase again easily.

You guys seem to forget that piracy is still quite predominant outside of the western world (heck even in the western world it can be easy to fall back to it).

It would also kill most of the guaranteed resellers, basically destroying all the price competition inside the Steam ecosystem, aka the main competition from Steam.
 

Tovarisc

Member
Oct 25, 2017
24,435
FIN
Yeah, most devs/pubs don't care about that. At least I don't think they do.

Like, and extra 18% for every sale? That is huge.

I mean yeah, I doubt many of them give single fuck at the end.

Now with Epic they take in (tens of) millions just for 1 year exclusivity deal and then 88% for every actual sale from 60€ games.

Which goes to what others have pointed out. Even if Valve cut back to 12% and dealt major blow to head of PC gaming market, but didn't start writing multi million sign up checks then those publishers would still flock to Epic for that free cash.
 

Swenhir

Member
Oct 28, 2017
521
By the way, for anyone who wants to ask what the deal with the hostility toward Epic is, this guy offers a pretty good summary. It gets really good from part 2.

 

Davilmar

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,266
I think we need to have further discussion on the continued tension between consumers and the developers/corporations that produce the games we consume through our dollars. I have always opposed the entire idea of using a third-party storefront to play my game instead of just playing it outright, but I understood how much it was convenient for gamers and better for up and coming developers. This approach with Epic is bad for gamers, and Valve has to weight competing against what concessions would mean for the freedom of consumers. Epic has consistently taken awful approaches regarding pricing, storefront features, and transparency on privacy, reviews, etc. At the end of the day, I am less sympathetic toward developers than my right as a gamer and consumer.
 

voOsh

Member
Apr 5, 2018
1,665
Which goes to what others have pointed out. Even if Valve cut back to 12% and dealt major blow to head of PC gaming market, but didn't start writing multi million sign up checks then those publishers would still flock to Epic for that free cash.

Yeah exactly. This is why I doubt Valve will fight Epic head on with 88/12 and moneyhatting. If they do that it becomes a race to the bottom and mutually-assured destruction of both companies. I think Valve may lower their cut to the 20-25% range though.
 

Swenhir

Member
Oct 28, 2017
521
Yeah exactly. This is why I doubt Valve will fight Epic head on with 88/12 and moneyhatting. If they do that it becomes a race to the bottom and mutually-assured destruction of both companies. I think Valve may lower their cut to the 20-25% range though.

They already have though, years ago with key sellers and recently with sales above a threshold that I've honestly forgotten. I don't know, I'm not too pleased with Valve or anyone else lowering their cut and possibly making their presence precarious because of this bullshit. If it happens, I want it to be for the right reasons and not a knee-jerk reaction to a bad actor that is deliberately trying to starve and destabilize the ecosystem.
 

Kaeden

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,910
US
By the way, for anyone who wants to ask what the deal with the hostility toward Epic is, this guy offers a pretty good summary. It gets really good from part 2.


It's really, really weird how many separate tweets refer to Valve as volvo. I know it's an auto correct issue (or is it a joke I'm not aware of?), but it happened a LOT in his flurry of tweets. Good write up though by him.
 

arts&crafts

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,123
Toronto
It's really, really weird how many separate tweets refer to Valve as volvo. I know it's an auto correct issue (or is it a joke I'm not aware of?), but it happened a LOT in his flurry of tweets. Good write up though by him.

Its an inside joke I wasnt a part of :(
But it probably stems from a few autocorrects back in the day.
 

low-G

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,144
On one hand, Epic should waste their money buying up garbage like Borderlands 3.
On the other hand, Gearbox getting any money is bad.
 

Youngfossil

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,670
You know damn well why people are being "uppity" about it. Stop that. It just so happens people have an issue with how epic runs their store and how it doesn't match steam's feature set. It's coasting on exclusivity.

The PC is supposed to be the best open platform out there and all these launchers and stores are basically splintering the PC into console territory when that's not how gaming on the PC is supposed to be. A HUGE title like borderlands going straight to epic's store and not steam makes the dividing line bigger. If pc gamers wanted to deal with console-wars style storefront bullshit they'd just buy consoles. So stop that. You know why people are upset if this is exclusive to the Epic store.
Difference is though, you dont have to buy another console, it's just a download. Not really comparable. Being open is a double edge sword.
 

Ploid 6.0

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,440
This really looks weird.

Like, no PS4 logo? Any console logo? Just EGS? Just looks weird.

It's the way to do it going forward. If plans change and it don't show up a storefront, no one can go back to that reveal and say "way to take it off of StoreX for exclusivity money." For now at least EGS is confirmed so if it change and become Steam only, we'll know what's going on.

Also not showing store logos is a good way to let the bidding begin. "Hey we didn't prevent it from being on that other store, it was never advertised to go to that store."
 

Swenhir

Member
Oct 28, 2017
521
It's really, really weird how many separate tweets refer to Valve as volvo. I know it's an auto correct issue (or is it a joke I'm not aware of?), but it happened a LOT in his flurry of tweets. Good write up though by him.

It's actually a joke refering to a spat the community had with Valve over a dota 2 event they wouldn't repeat despite the community asking them. The volvo meme sprang from there but I can't remember how.
 

SteveWinwood

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,682
USA USA USA
Yeah exactly. This is why I doubt Valve will fight Epic head on with 88/12 and moneyhatting. If they do that it becomes a race to the bottom and mutually-assured destruction of both companies. I think Valve may lower their cut to the 20-25% range though.
both epic and valve are smart enough to pull out of a nose dive in a MAD situation

but its not about the two multi billion dollar companies at that point

gog, itchio, discord any and all of those would be the first casualties long before epic or valve even felt anything

which again is the overall point of most people here, theyre not even necessarily pro valve, they just want all the games to come out everywhere and then the consumer can choose what store they want to buy it from

if you want to buy something on gog or even epic games store more power to you but dont celebrate limiting other peoples choices and saying its a good thing. discord store did exclusive deals a while ago, people didnt like it then, i was there i saw it
 

P A Z

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,915
Barnsley, UK
A game like Borderlands 3 would sell what? 5 million in its first year on Steam?

Taking a pure 70% cut of that with none of the new changes made to the cut Steam takes depending on how successful a game is, leaves you at $210m. Also assuming no special editions, DLC or mtx either. But Borderlands 3 will definitely have one or more of these.

You're telling me Epic have paid 2K in excess of that amount to keep the game off Steam for a year?
 

Delusibeta

Prophet of Truth
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
5,648
A game like Borderlands 3 would sell what? 5 million in its first year on Steam?

Taking a pure 70% cut of that with none of the new changes made to the cut Steam takes depending on how successful a game is, leaves you at $210m. Also assuming no special editions, DLC or mtx either. But Borderlands 3 will definitely have one or more of these.

You're telling me Epic have paid 2K in excess of that amount to keep the game off Steam for a year?
That's about two months of Fortnite's income. It'll probably sting, but Epic totally does have the coin to pull it off.
 

.exe

Member
Oct 25, 2017
22,241
Difference is though, you dont have to buy another console, it's just a download. Not really comparable. Being open is a double edge sword.

It's about convenience and features, even if it's just a download. Even the eShop is more feature rich for crying out loud. It's like if you had to sideload a new store and account system on your console to play certain games but the ecosystem was about as feature rich as the PS2's startup interface and you couldn't use some of your controllers to boot.
 

Jeff6851

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
753
Them Epic pockets run deep fam

They run hella deep. People also really keep forgetting that the game will continue to sell after the exclusive period. Every sale after that point only puts them even more ahead.

Yep. I plan to get it used on Xbox at some point and maybe a deep sale when it eventually does come to Steam (assuming the year exclusivity).
 

Dust

C H A O S
Member
Oct 25, 2017
32,288
I will be extremely surprised if it's not exclusive to Epic's store.
Everything aligns to that.
 
Nov 8, 2017
13,111
[QUOTE
A game like Borderlands 3 would sell what? 5 million in its first year on Steam?

Taking a pure 70% cut of that with none of the new changes made to the cut Steam takes depending on how successful a game is, leaves you at $210m. Also assuming no special editions, DLC or mtx either. But Borderlands 3 will definitely have one or more of these.

You're telling me Epic have paid 2K in excess of that amount to keep the game off Steam for a year?

We have no idea what the payment and minimum sales guarantees are but it's not clear that BL3 will sell to the same extent as the previous games because now it's not the only looter shooter on the market. Destiny, The Division and Anthem are all big sellers.
 

Deleted member 42

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
16,939
A game like Borderlands 3 would sell what? 5 million in its first year on Steam?

Taking a pure 70% cut of that with none of the new changes made to the cut Steam takes depending on how successful a game is, leaves you at $210m. Also assuming no special editions, DLC or mtx either. But Borderlands 3 will definitely have one or more of these.

You're telling me Epic have paid 2K in excess of that amount to keep the game off Steam for a year?

That's about two months of Fortnite's income. It'll probably sting, but Epic totally does have the coin to pull it off.

They're not paying 200 million dollars for one games you crazies lol

if it is exclusive they'll guarantee a certain amount of sales in addition to something to sweeten the pot but definitely not that sweet
 

SirKai

Member
Dec 28, 2017
7,381
Washington
A game like Borderlands 3 would sell what? 5 million in its first year on Steam?

Taking a pure 70% cut of that with none of the new changes made to the cut Steam takes depending on how successful a game is, leaves you at $210m. Also assuming no special editions, DLC or mtx either. But Borderlands 3 will definitely have one or more of these.

You're telling me Epic have paid 2K in excess of that amount to keep the game off Steam for a year?

There's also the factor that 2K is still banking on those Steam sales when it does release on Steam a year later. It's not $210m worth of sales that are gone, but delayed, and there will still of course be a lot of sales on the EGS (but definitely nothing to the tune of what it would be on Steam).

[QUOTE


We have no idea what the payment and minimum sales guarantees are but it's not clear that BL3 will sell to the same extent as the previous games because now it's not the only looter shooter on the market. Destiny, The Division and Anthem are all big sellers.

Most of those aren't on Steam though, and Steam alone is WAY bigger than when BL2 came out in 2012. I have no question that a BL3 Steam launch, at least if it released on Steam in September of this year, would more than double the active player count of BL2 in their respective launch days.
 
Oct 29, 2017
415
Valve going to that model would be so bad PC gaming...Valve would be forced to operate store at loss in certain regions or go full Epic by dropping support for whole regions of the world, cut their R&D for HW and SW etc.

Wait, how do you guys know so much about a private company's finances? Have they disclosed this information somewhere, or is this armchair theorizing?
 

Jawmuncher

Crisis Dino
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
38,511
Ibis Island
They're not paying 200 million dollars for one games you crazies lol

if it is exclusive they'll guarantee a certain amount of sales in addition to something to sweeten the pot but definitely not that sweet

I'd imagine it'd be something like not having to pay royalties for Unreal usage that year or something (Literally no clue what i'm talking about)
 

Delusibeta

Prophet of Truth
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
5,648
They're not paying 200 million dollars for one games you crazies lol

if it is exclusive they'll guarantee a certain amount of sales in addition to something to sweeten the pot but definitely not that sweet
I dunno, Borderlands 2 has been rolling along from 5k-8k concurrent on Steam alone for about six years now, without any new content. 2K and Gearbox both know this is a massive IP, and I would hope that they got a king's ransom for any exclusivity deal. And even Epic guaranteeing three million sales at US$60 could potentially cost Epic US$158 million
 
Status
Not open for further replies.