Good to know, I wonder how much Dan influenced this game. Surely it was in development with him to a degree?Sam is still there, he's president of R*. So very much leading the change.
Good to know, I wonder how much Dan influenced this game. Surely it was in development with him to a degree?Sam is still there, he's president of R*. So very much leading the change.
Lmao. What's woke gameplay?Finally an overhaul, hope they dont get too woke on the gameplay i still just want to blow up people and their shit.
BFV wasn't the first time you could play as a women in BF. There were female snipers in BF1 just the year before. Although I guess BFV had more controversy since it was front and center.Remember how the BF community reacted to finally being able to play as a woman? And how much gaslighting was involved? The gaming community has not given any indication that they will react well to a woman being the protagonist or even face of GTA. ESPECIALLY if she's a WOC with a darker skin tone. Don't even get me started on how we're very likely to see people unironically call her a Mary Sue.
I'd like to know your definition of woke gameplay.Finally an overhaul, hope they dont get too woke on the gameplay i still just want to blow up people and their shit.
They were in stock on Sonys site for like 2 hours yesterday. Follow wario64 on twitter if you aren't already.
Very jarring bc for how mean spirited V was RDR2 was just as sincere, hope they can keep that goingDan Houser left in 2018 and was accused of a lot of that behavior so I think they at least can move forward.
All sounds quite good, I just hope the story isn't really 60 hours, that's a bit overkill.
The meltdowns on twitter about this is absolutely hilarious. When chuds are malding it means your company is on the right path so kudos to Rockstar.
I get the thought process from both sides.
Some people don't feel comfortable enough/relate enough to using a female protagonist.
That has 100% the same equal weight to someone not comfortable enough/relate enough to using a male protagonist.
This is why choice is good. Not choice to play it or not but choice of character at the start of the game.
what scares me the most is that concept of evolving the content by including new cities and missions regularly
it sound pretty much as a gaas, but this time fully integrated at the single-player side
i would rather prefer a classic single-player campaign with a great history and missions.
Then do whatever you want for the multiplayer experience
Fuck noI get the thought process from both sides.
Some people don't feel comfortable enough/relate enough to using a female protagonist.
That has 100% the same equal weight to someone not comfortable enough/relate enough to using a male protagonist.
This is why choice is good. Not choice to play it or not but choice of character at the start of the game.
The thing is they originally wanted the game to span across the Americas, which is insane. Chopping a lot of that out for post-launch is fine by me if the "scaled-back" base game is comparable to GTA V.what scares me the most is that concept of evolving the content by including new cities and missions regularly
it sound pretty much as a gaas, but this time fully integrated at the single-player side
i would rather prefer a classic single-player campaign with a great history and missions.
Then do whatever you want for the multiplayer experience
The enlightened centrist has entered the threadI get the thought process from both sides.
Some people don't feel comfortable enough/relate enough to using a female protagonist.
That has 100% the same equal weight to someone not comfortable enough/relate enough to using a male protagonist.
This is why choice is good. Not choice to play it or not but choice of character at the start of the game.
I get the thought process from both sides.
Some people don't feel comfortable enough/relate enough to using a female protagonist.
That has 100% the same equal weight to someone not comfortable enough/relate enough to using a male protagonist.
This is why choice is good. Not choice to play it or not but choice of character at the start of the game.
why would people be uncomfortable playing a female character?I get the thought process from both sides.
Some people don't feel comfortable enough/relate enough to using a female protagonist.
That has 100% the same equal weight to someone not comfortable enough/relate enough to using a male protagonist.
This is why choice is good. Not choice to play it or not but choice of character at the start of the game.
Some people don't feel comfortable enough/relate enough to using a female protagonist.
That has 100% the same equal weight to someone not comfortable enough/relate enough to using a male protagonist.
I get the thought process from both sides.
Some people don't feel comfortable enough/relate enough to using a female protagonist.
That has 100% the same equal weight to someone not comfortable enough/relate enough to using a male protagonist.
This is why choice is good. Not choice to play it or not but choice of character at the start of the game.
Blowing shit up in rainbow colours.
Very jarring bc for how mean spirited V was RDR2 was just as sincere, hope they can keep that going
Gamers having to play as a woman in a series like GTA where the characters are as sexually active as they are is probably their worst nightmare
Remember how good Valentine looked at night? They got this.Vice City in a modern Rockstar world is going to be something, like my expectations visually for this game with the neon lights etc. are very high
I don't understand how this is genuine question. A very sizable portion of the community that had gamergate to the point that it was on the news, and since then has had multiple studies coronating the accusations about its consistently observable misogyny, that had a huge controversy just a few short years ago because a bro shooter let you play as a woman, has very consistently stated "Rockstar's the last non woke studio." Amongst the reaction to basic feminism 101 in the form of Feminist Frequency, which people are STILL angry about. That community, that one in particular, you're asking why they'd have a problem with a series wherein the writers of the last entry stated that masculinity is key to the series? They absolutely shouldn't be uncomfortable, but man people like TheQuartering are gonna be eating some real expensive food from all the revenue he's gonna make off of angry misogynistic gamers.
Weren't they dlc and not at the forefront of marketing including the cover?BFV wasn't the first time you could play as a women in BF. There were female snipers in BF1 just the year before. Although I guess BFV had more controversy since it was front and center.
I don't remember that much controversy over the Russian snipers in BF1.
Is this AI generated?There are too many people quoting my post which is not surprising. But I won't engage in any conversation that is denying choice. So your opinions are right and this female protagonist needs to he forced to fit your opinion ?
Have a female
Have a male
Have Trans
Have non binary
No one is above anyone else. So there is no need to rejoice or discourage based on who is in the game. Having a choice is not being against another. In this age of cancel culture the only thing that needs to be taught is respect and acceptance of others regardless of anything.
But that does not mean you need to change someone's opinion.
The biggest progress in this is choice. Allow people to choose.
I get it I will be picked apart yet again, but thay is simply because of a difference of opinions. I still respect and accept yours and others, respect mine.