Neat! good to know.Yeh for some labeling us blacks is a nope, I prefer like you said Black community, black people etc etc
Thanks!
Neat! good to know.Yeh for some labeling us blacks is a nope, I prefer like you said Black community, black people etc etc
"Blacks" as a term for black people is a term often used by white people who don't care for black people and would rather use their skin color as a noun rather than an adjective to describe a human being. This goes back a long time in American history.So I'm trying to understand what option they should go with. I'm asking honestly.
"Blacks at Xbox" not great
"Black at Xbox" not great?
"African American at Xbox" sounds dumb and excludes black people not from the US
"Coloured people at Xbox" Christ no
"Diversity at Xbox" we'll that covers people that aren't part of the group
"Non-whites at Xbox" lol
Lol, sarcasm? Right?Black is generally an acceptable word when referring to black people
I AM DEADI think we found at least 1 Era member that wore a dashiki on Black Panther opening night.
ahfeiahogeag My GOD This thread is great.
We ain't closing it till we get an ol' dirty bastard reference .
My genes also include blackfoot Native on my mom's side and- considering my racial features- probably some white in there too.
I was also born in Texas. I'm an American.
EDIT: Like... do you literally think black people can ONLY be from Africa? At this point I'm less angry and more fascinated.
I look just like every other black guy but because of my ancestry/history, my DNA says I am 25% African Decent, 40% northern European and about 35% Native American. To be black is not to just to be from Africa because through all of the years of oppression and rape many people who consider themselves black are less African than some people who consider themselves white.
Again, you can call yourself whatever you want and feel a certain way about Africa if you want. The historical DNA of where you come from doesn't lie.Look I think you mean well, but you can't speak for all of us. I feel nothing but a surface level (if even that) connection to Africa. I've never been there, I don't know any potential family members there, I don't know the customs and I'm not a part of the culture. Even learning the customs doesn't make them mine.
I am American. I am black. That's it. If you asked me where I came from I'm gonna say North Carolina. If I'm abroad and someone asks me what I am, I'm gonna say American. I'm not ever gonna call myself African, I'm not from there. I'm not an immigrant, or anything like that. African American to me implies a separation that for most black people doesn't exist.
Most black people who's family roots go back 100's of years in America are not 100% African...slavery will do that. It's not a whole "nother" story...I get if your're mixed with not a whole lot of African DNA. That's a whole nother story. Regardless, i'm talking about the history of where "black people" come from. It doesn't matter where you were born. Your DNA ties back to Africa. Call yourself whatever you want. "black Americans" Afro latino's, the whole Caribbean and African diaspora are all of African decent.
Again, you can call yourself whatever you want and feel a certain way about Africa if you want. The historical DNA of where you come from doesn't lie.
Yeah, I should say that statement was more of an oughta be kind of thing. It's just bullshit we require anyone darker than olive to qualify their citizenship with a hyphen.Lol tell that to the cops then your I'm just American statement will have weight when the powers that be ascribe to that thinking then and only then will that statement be true
So I'm trying to understand what option they should go with. I'm asking honestly.
"Blacks at Xbox" not great
"Black at Xbox" not great?
"African American at Xbox" sounds dumb and excludes black people not from the US
"Coloured people at Xbox" Christ no
"Diversity at Xbox" we'll that covers people that aren't part of the group
"Non-whites at Xbox" lol
Like...what are their options that won't piss someone off?
What's your alternative? Most black people I know refer to themselves as black...
The hell does this mean? Is this some new racism? I hope so because the "buy Jordans with welfare" is old.
BlaXboxSo I'm trying to understand what option they should go with. I'm asking honestly.
"Blacks at Xbox" not great
"Black at Xbox" not great?
"African American at Xbox" sounds dumb and excludes black people not from the US
"Coloured people at Xbox" Christ no
"Diversity at Xbox" we'll that covers people that aren't part of the group
"Non-whites at Xbox" lol
Like...what are their options that won't piss someone off?
slightly awkward phrasing for sure, but you guys are getting way too desperate for outrage.
Y'all can be mad, BUT I WANT A RED BLACK AND GREEN XBOX CONTROLLER NOW
Or Blacks at Xbox. Simple and done..."Black Women and Men of Xbox"
Thats it. Its not that hard. Yall trippin lol
Nothjng personal to you vern just saying in general as an option to your post
I'm assuming the name was decided from the members within the group itself and not just a group of black people sitting at a desk one day just talking when Major Nelson walks in the room saying "hey everyone, I have an idea.."
What if I am in the group? I'm Black but not African American...I myself don't like the term blacks. Just say African American.
African American's at Xbox sounds much better.
Ugh. You do know how and why you got here though right?
Gotta go with this.ITT people are offended and made uncomfortable by a group of black individuals identifying themselves however they fucking want. The second you learn this is the name they chose you should say, "oh my bad, maybe I should reexamine my biases and assumptions that a black group may have been created and named without black agency, carry on" not double down on what YOU think they should have done instead. Your discomfort is nobody's problem but your own, Please! fuck off
Honestly, this thread seems like it's just trying to turn something positive into a negative.
Happens all the time here. People talking out of their asses falling over each other to be 'right' about things they have no knowledge of. Then they get called out and it's like "how was I supposed to know?". The issue isn't the lack of knowledge, it's speaking with a lack of knowledge. Makes the whole community look dumb and reactionary.Is the title "incredibly tone-deaf" referring to the resetera member that made this thread?
Wow is my reaction. As someone else said, some responsibility lies with the reader to do some research before reacting blindly to something.
the community is dumb and reactionary, its why i dont delve into off topic much.Happens all the time here. People talking out of their asses falling over each other to be 'right' about things they have no knowledge of. Then they get called out and it's like "how was I supposed to know?". The issue isn't the lack of knowledge, it's speaking with a lack of knowledge. Makes the whole community look dumb and reactionary.
Happens all the time here. People talking out of their asses falling over each other to be 'right' about things they have no knowledge of. Then they get called out and it's like "how was I supposed to know?". The issue isn't the lack of knowledge, it's speaking with a lack of knowledge. Makes the whole community look dumb and reactionary.
"Blacks" as a term for black people is a term often used by white people who don't care for black people and would rather use their skin color as a noun rather than an adjective to describe a human being. This goes back a long time in American history.
The Xbox tweeter made a (imo) forgivable mistake by being white and not knowing that "Our Blacks at Xbox" reads very differently than "Our 'Blacks at Xbox.'
Part of the misstep is that the lack of quotations that would have otherwise denoted referencing an already-established thing (made by black folks) turned into a big mean company implying that it owned black people.
As a more direct response, in common parlance, "black people" is the preferred term, as it does not define the subjects by their skin color, but instead just describes it.
"Black Women and Men of Xbox"
Thats it. Its not that hard. Yall trippin lol
Nothjng personal to you vern just saying in general as an option to your post
I'm mainly referring to the OP, who is not black (they are Pakistani) and clearly did not do the least bit of research to provide proper context as to the nature of the group in question, which should be the bare minimum expected of someone posting a thread.Eh now you're being a douche about this. The people still taking issue with this after the clarification by MS happen to be the black members of our community. They are speaking with the knowledge that using such a name was in very poor taste. I disagree it is in poor taste but I'm not going to pretend like you did that that these individuals are being reactionary without any personal history behind it.
Is the title "incredibly tone-deaf" referring to the resetera member that made this thread?
Wow is my reaction. As someone else said, some responsibility lies with the reader to do some research before reacting blindly to something.
Post historyI'm mainly referring to the OP, who is not black (they are Pakistani) and clearly did not do the least bit of research to provide proper context as to the nature of the group in question, which should be the bare minimum expected of someone posting a thread.
Also, how could it possibly be in poor taste when this is a group of black people who work at Microsoft deciding what to call themselves? Individual posters here may not refer to themselves in that manner, that's their right, but they have no business telling other people how they can and cannot refer to themselves. It would have been obvious this was the case if the OP provided any context for who this group is, but it doesn't, so instead it encourages misinformed hot takes.
Yep.The our is referring to the community "our 'Blacks at Xbox' commnuity"
Isn't that just Resetera though?Well it's mostly just reaction gifs and pics, so not that insightful really. I just initially thought this discussion was going on mainly in Era, but seems like plenty of people are having issues with it.
Edit: There seems to be some console war shit going on too.
First shit I thought of.
I;d rather they just not say shit if they can't figure out a way to do it without shit like this...
Yes, I see that they think the group's name is tone deaf, despite the fact that they now know what the group is and who comprises it. They aren't part of the group nor are they someone who the group represents so...why is this thread-worthy exactly? Also they still haven't updated the OP explaining the group itself, despite putting the community manager's (quite good) response there.Post history
OT: If the community wanted this to be called what it is, whats the big deal?