We know that the people used as sources in media characterise them as friendly. Not friendly 10 years ago.
Yes - do bring in the cops integrity to this and cast it in an American light. That's going to go over just fine (see the post above yours).
I have no idea about how the suspect makes his decisions - so I can not say one way or the other how race affected this. Neither can you. We can both speculate - that's easy, I just did that on the post you didn't like. I assumed (because that seems likely) that the suspects racism made it worse.
No we are not. However, In a country where police is not supposed to communicate unqualified guesswork to the media we have to accept that given an existing non-race related motive the police is not likely to say "based on a tatoos and post history on social media we assume that this is driven by race".
Also - he killed a guy, he didn't "go a bit too far". As for the role of race the police is well aware that it may play a secondary role (presumably in degree of violence etc.) that is clear from the media articles I have read. In light of this they still maintain that the primary factor was a disagreement that people around the victim/suspects knew about.
I am not backing white supremacists. I'm communicating that inference like you illustrate here is not going to be communicated by the Danish police when they have evidence that points to a pre-existing disagreement.
As for the methods and mindset making it clear that the instigating incident was race related I find that to be reductive. That would mean that whatever crime he would commit it would always be race related if the other person was PoC. I find it just as likely that he decided to kill the guy for other reasons and then made it excessively violent with a background in race.
