You seem to be indulging in a spot of self victimisation. But we know that in 1976 the English used to eat more calories than they do now, yet obesity was not a issue as it is today for England.I don't think fat shaming should be tolerated but at the same time I don't think being fat should be normalized. Being fat is pretty much a negative in every way imaginable.
As someone who was fit and now is fat, I can personally say the problem with me is just discipline and making bad choices. Almost every meal that I eat has a healthy alternative but I also choose the bad option. I have time to work out and go to the gym but I watch TV and play video games. It's just bad decision making on my part and until I fix that, it won't change who I am.
I understand and agree with you, but as I said celebrating obesity is not good (in the same way that celebrating being skeletal is not healthy). That's all I'm saying.An absence of ridicule and shaming people is not celebrating. Having clothing sizes available for people is not celebrating.
What bizzaro world do people live in where they think some model being fat, or someone who is fat not being ashamed, is going to make people actively want to be fat. The world is bloody horrible as a fat person.
I've heard he's a giant piece of shit. I can agree with him here, though.
You seem to be indulging in a spot of self victimisation. But we know that in 1976 the English used to eat more calories than they do now, yet obesity was not a issue as it is today for England.
So here's the first big surprise: we ate more in 1976. According to government figures, we currently consume an average of 2,130 kilocalories a day, a figure that appears to include sweets and alcohol. But in 1976, we consumed 2,280 kcal excluding alcohol and sweets, or 2,590 kcal when they're included. I have found no reason to disbelieve the figures.
It seems the issue is more about what we're eating, or more correctly what is being sold to us to eat. Note the Guardian story points out children exercise for the same amount of time "today" as 50 years ago.
Saying it's a personal issue is all very well and good, but obesity and it's increasing incidence is society wide and actully seem's to have been engendered by that very society.
I understand and agree with you, but as I said celebrating obesity is not good (in the same way that celebrating being skeletal is not healthy). That's all I'm saying.
Example:
Ok. I don't want to argue. Fat shaming is terrible, no doubt about it, but so is ignoring the problem and stroking egos... It's not healthy.So, a fat person existing is 'celebrating obesity'? As far as I am aware, the magazine did not have a piece on why you should try to be fatter.
Where is Tess Holliday allowed to be seen? Should she be pixelated if she's in the audience of a televised event?
Fat people exist.
Being underweight is worse for your health then being overweight, yet I doubt you go round posting magazine covers of underweight women which are the norm like 99% of the time. But you did chose to pick a picture of an overweight women when it's a lot rarer because "unhealthy". Overweight people are not dumb , they know why they get treated differently then underweight people and why their phots being promenient bother people, and hey know damn well it has fuck all to do with healthOk. I don't want to argue. Fat shaming is terrible, no doubt about it, but so is ignoring the problem and stroking egos... It's not healthy.
So fuck the poor right... You should read the story it covers this, the writer does argue for changes in society so even the poor's can enjoy obesity free society ala 70s as opposed to defaulting to "only losers are fatties" and "make better choices simpletons."Assuming you're financially set and not in poverty you can still pick what to eat.
Taxes, lots of taxes.Fat shaming doesn't work... neither does understanding... what's the answer?
No it's not and it is impossible for some. Food deserts are growing and under-reported. Just a few weeks ago, they identified several new food deserts in the capital city of the state I live in. Main reason is store closures and distance to the next store. Affects thousands of people. Mostly black and most of them had to walk.While I agree food availability is different for everybody, and junk food is almost always more accessible/convenient, afaik vegetables, rice, pastas, eggs, chicken different combinations of these foods are available almost everywhere in varying degrees. The system is definitely setup for a person with an eating disorders or food addiction to fail, but it's never impossible. The thing that makes it so difficult for me is how available and in your face the junk is. As I mentioned for recovering alcoholics or addicts moderation doesn't often work, with food addicts we don't really have that option and the current industry in fact is constantly tempting you with prices, advertising, and offerings.
Read my comment:Being underweight is worse for your health then being overweight, yet I doubt you go round posting magazine covers of underweight women which are the norm like 99% of the time. But you did chose to pick a picture of an overweight women when it's a lot rarer because "unhealthy". Overweight people are not dumb , they know why they get treated differently then underweight people and why their phots being promenient bother people, and hey know damn well it has fuck all to do with health
It's not skeletal, it's underweight.Read my comment:
"I understand and agree with you, but as I said celebrating obesity is not good (in the same way that celebrating being skeletal is not healthy)."
Not an official study of course, but here's a video I was actually watching just yesterday about this very subject:Are there actually no studies comparing western populations to the japanese? Compared to most of the rest of the world they managed to stay relatively thin(even too thin in many cases), yet they are working even more hours than everyone else. Stress and a lack of time are rampant.
Identifying the differences between these two populations should give us some nice answers on why the west is becoming bigger so fast.
When was the last time Bill Maher attacked the food industry?
Yes people need to do better but the environment is working against you everyday. Work, lifestyle, food options etc.
the gist of what you are saying is fat people cannot and should not be successful because they will then have celebrity and be celebrated... That model built a career being who she is.Read my comment:
"I understand and agree with you, but as I said celebrating obesity is not good (in the same way that celebrating being skeletal is not healthy)."
I like how even Maher's audience wasn't sure whether to applaud.
So fuck the poor right... You should read the story it covers this, the writer does argue for changes in society so even the poor's can enjoy obesity free society ala 70s as opposed to defaulting to "only losers are fatties" and "make better choices simpletons."
Maybe forcing food manufactures to stop adding so much sugar to chips, bread, and drinks may help, much like how taxing tobacco, killing their ability to advertise, and banning smoking indoors has actully resulted in better health out comes for societies.
Apparently people need to be reminded that print is dead. Particularly magazines:
Print fashion mag covergirls don't make anybody depressed and in particular aren't entering the orbit a teenage girl's attention. If someone is self conscious about their body, it's likely their skinny popular friend's Snapchat posts or a YouTube influencer nobody ever heard of.
This is disingenuous. If you're saying what I think you are. Because you downplay how prevalent it is.
We are bombarded with unrealistic beautiful women just as much as we ever were. I mean just look at the popular influencers like Kendal Jenner who has made a billion selling products and walking runways. Unrealistic beauty surrounding us never went anywhere and never will.
Those teenage girls are bombarded with just as much as they ever were. They're just getting it all over the internet.
And those magazine covers are at every aisle at checkouts. Enough for those girls to see them.
When you say "but" you kind of negate everything that came before it. It was a good thing you don't want people to be shamed, but when you say "but it shouldn't be normalized", I mean I guess I should have made a more substantial reply but now other people have explained it- not only is it not normalized in our society, but also the goal of mormalizing is just to treat people as normal and well, not to advocate for people being unhealthy.What does this mean? Why do people not engage in conversation but always post stupid hot takes like this. I said people shouldn't be fat shamed, it's not the right thing to do or the correct way to approach the situation. However, being fat/obese is a problem and it's a problem that should be addressed as a public health issue.
That is celebrating an individual, not celebrating obesity. Do you thin fat people just shouldn't have any confidence, they shouldn't put themselves put there?I understand and agree with you, but as I said celebrating obesity is not good (in the same way that celebrating being skeletal is not healthy). That's all I'm saying.
Example:
Our society shouldn't put high fructose corn syrup in everything. Making smart choices as to what we sell will help everyone.When you say "but" you kind of negate everything that came before it. It was a good thing you don't want people to be shamed, but when you say "but it shouldn't be normalized", I mean I guess I should have made a more substantial reply but now other people have explained it- not only is it not normalized in our society, but also the goal of mormalizing is just to treat people as normal and well, not to advocate for people being unhealthy.
That's an interesting observation, I never realized it had been studied? I stopped doing swim team when I was like 10 because I felt like I was too fat and have been embarrassed to be in a swimsuit ever since even though I'm not actually that fat.It's not skeletal, it's underweight.
And again, I doubt you bring up the covers of women in magazines normally which are underweight even if they don't look skeletal.
You are referring to a woman existing in a swimsuit ( you know, that thing you need to wear for exercise which is healthy?) as promoting unhealthiness but you have no evidence it actually does. Plus sized women exist and they should be encouraged that they can go out in public and be seen as human, especially since there's studies that suggest girls drop off doing exercise and sport a lot earlier than boys because of self esteem issues due to their bodies. If you wanted to promote healthy behaviour, an overweight women in a swimsuit being seen as normal is actually a good thing- how do you expect overweight people to lose weight if they are too ashamed to actually go out and be active?
It has been a real while since I read the article - it was how the focus on getting kids into sports after 2012 Olympics in the UK hadn't really worked for girls, I don't know if I'd be able to find it. But there is defo a large difference in the no. of boys that do regular exercise/sport and girls, and it defo starts around puberty. From surveys I think they found a common thread of girls being insecure about their bodies. It matches my experience down to a T, mine would be similar to yours in when I was young I used to love to swim and do sports but as I went into the teens I felt way to insecure and fat. Any exercise I did was at home in private, and was more due to me feeling particularly fat and a binge period of wanting to lose weight (it was in no way sustainable) then any desire for healthiness. This thinking has followed me into adulthood and I still struggle with this thinking. I have started going to the gym but while I feel better after exercising, I still put it off as I feel fat and ridiculous while exercising.That's an interesting observation, I never realized it had been studied? I stopped doing swim team when I was like 10 because I felt like I was too fat and have been embarrassed to be in a swimsuit ever since even though I'm not actually that fat.
Honestly, who really cares. If someone is happy with how they are then more power to them.
Ok. I don't want to argue. Fat shaming is terrible, no doubt about it, but so is ignoring the problem and stroking egos... It's not healthy.
James Corden does, by all accounts."We don't all have a sense of superiority that burns 35,000 calories a day" damn, good on Corden.
Imagine thinking that acknowledging an overweight human being do not deserve to be shunned if they're fat as ego stroking.
I'm a fat fuck and don't care that I'm fat or how people view me, I like eating food that is bad for me.
Also, why do Americans like James Cordon, I can't figure it out?
To serve their own agenda, people like Corden are misrepresenting what Maher was saying by focusing on his punchlines instead of his points.
Maher is not actually advocating for bullying. He's calling for a rejection of across-the-board body positivity.
He's saying that in the name of political correctness, our society has twisted itself into refusing to admit that being fat is bad. Not bad like morally wrong, but bad like it makes you sick.
Corden and his ilk want to make out that Maher is calling obesity an aesthetic crisis, but Maher is saying it's a medical crisis.
Assuming you're financially set and not in poverty you can still pick what to eat.
To serve their own agenda, people like Corden are misrepresenting what Maher was saying by focusing on his punchlines instead of his points.
Maher is not actually advocating for bullying. He's calling for a rejection of across-the-board body positivity.
He's saying that in the name of political correctness, our society has twisted itself into refusing to admit that being fat is bad. Not bad like morally wrong, but bad like it makes you sick.
Corden and his ilk want to make out that Maher is calling obesity an aesthetic crisis, but Maher is saying it's a medical crisis.