EUA approvals for potential treatments in a pandemic are very different from the approval process for a general public vaccine (even in a pandemic). What you've described regarding Russia is nonsensical.Correction: That's how creating a vaccine normally works under a competent, less corrupt administration. You don't think if Russia creates a fake vaccine with fake data backing it up, Trump won't pressure the FDA into issuing an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to allow it to save lives now? Again, he already got people killed by pressuring the FDA into issuing an EUA for hydroxychloroquine.
As to your other HCQ references about it doing more harm, which data are you referring to? Because if it's the study I'm thinking you're talking about then it's not a good one to reference:
Science | AAAS
www.sciencemag.org
Surgisphere and Their Data (Updated) | In the Pipeline
Update, and this one needs to be at the top of the page. As you will see from the additions to this post, the entire Surgisphere story has collapsed. None of their papers can now be regarded as valid – vide infra. So we have a very strange situation with some recent publications, one that
blogs.sciencemag.org
After numerous trials we've now found that it just doesn't have much of an effect either way for covid, and so now it's not being used.
You or I likely won't be administered a vaccine during a Trump administration anyways, so this seems all a bit pointless really.