Just read about the DA who fumbled itFucking prosecutor needs to be slapped in the teeth by those upon whom Cosby preyed. Cosby himself can go live in a ditch, and fuck anybody who puts money in his pocket to listen to his "experience."
So who is this guy?But the decision centres around a non-prosecution agreement struck with Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce L. Castor Jr in 2005. The attorney gave Cosby his "assurance that he would not be charged in the case", The New York Times (NYT) reports.
"Castor testified that while there was insufficient evidence to bring a criminal prosecution, he had given Mr Cosby the assurance to encourage him to testify in a subsequent civil case brought by Ms. Constand," the paper adds.
Yup, a Trumper scumbag piece of shit.Bruce Lee Castor Jr.[1] (born October 24, 1961)[2][3] is an American lawyer and retired Republican politician from Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. He was appointed as the first Solicitor General of Pennsylvania in March 2016, and also first deputy attorney general the following July. Castor became acting attorney general less than a month later. He led for the defense of the second impeachment trial of Donald Trump along with American lawyer David Schoen.[4]
Yeah, Cosby's mouth.But word of mouth is not enough to full convict someone. As far as I know besides his own testimony to settle a case, there has been nothing substantial to convict him of.
Just read about the DA who fumbled it
So who is this guy?
Yup, a Trumper scumbag piece of shit.
Yup. He wasn't released because he was innocent. He was released on a technicality. I know it's fictional, but Freddy Krueger was released on a technicality. Sometimes the investigators and lawyers fuck up the whole process. Again, that don't mean the perp is innocent, especially if the perp admitted and went into detail about what he did.Yeah, Cosby's mouth.
He admitted and got off because his admission was given in exchange for immunity.
Jesus Fucking Christmas.
How does he have any friends, celeb or otherwise and who would make this shit.
Yup. He wasn't released because he was innocent. He was released on a technicality. I know it's fictional, but Freddy Krueger was released on a technicality. Sometimes the investigators and lawyers fuck up the whole process. Again, that don't mean the perp is innocent, especially if the perp admitted and went into detail about what he did.
I'm thinking Ellen would actually give him a platform long before W would be seen anywhere near his ass.
He's seemingly still worth just shy of half a billion dollars now, so I doubt that's it. This is an ego thing.A comedy tour at 83? Sounds like someone broke the bank paying for legal fees.
I'm thinking Ellen would actually give him a platform long before W would be seen anywhere near his ass.
He's seemingly still worth just shy of half a billion dollars now, so I doubt that's it. This is an ego thing.
Wow. Pretty shameless.
I would imagine that any comedy tour would have a good about of hecklers (and for good reason).
Y'all really need to stop phrasing it like this. He gave testimony in a civil suit in exchange for immunity from criminal prosecution, which a different DA completely ignored & used his testimony to prosecute him. That violated his Fifth Amendment rights. That's not "cutting corners" like it was some kind of procedural error.His case had to get thrown out on appeal because the prosecutor cut some corners.
Bruh.Louis CK just showed back up at clubs when he decided he had served his time.
Louis CK used his position of power to hold women against their will and perform sexual acts in front of them. Just because he didn't touch them doesn't mean it wasn't sexual assault. And the only reason we know he stopped is because he was caught. Had there not been a culture of increased accountability, he could have easily done it for decades. And he faced almost no censure. No civil suits. He lost out on a few deals and had to stop doing comedy for 6 months. That's it. He was probably the most prominent comic in the business at the time of the revelations. Yes, raping and drugging and women is worse, but there's no "okay" level of sexual crimes.Bruh.
Louis CK fucked up. I get it. He fucked up.
Cosby is in a different galaxy, man. Dude DRUGGED women. He had his way with unconscious women. Last count was 60+. For DECADES.
Cosby is a dude who was a fucking pillar. A pillar for comedians, a pillar for educators, a pillar for fathers, a pillar for the black community. He was one of the best success stories of the 20th century.
Fucker threw all of that away. He would have tarnished his legacy having done that to ONE woman. He salted the damn earth with the amount of victims he has.
The way he went to prison was bullshit, and it sucks that they had to pull some backhanded shady shit that didn't work because he's rich, because the legal system works for the rich.
However Cosby is still a person that should never again be able to get paid to speak publicly. I'm trippin' that ANY venue would host him, and can't imagine it ever going well for him.
Louis CK is a pervert. He will say that himself.
Bill Cosby is a predator. He has abused dozens of women, and in no way should he ever be given a forum. I'd wish worse upon him, but I don't want to get banned.
The public and venues don't really care how much of a predator you are. Polanski still gets accolades and Cosby is infinitely more popular and profitable than him. Venues will bend over backwards to get a slice of that money. As far as CK goes if any regular person did the shit he did they'd beat best a social pariah. Just because he made some good TV and standup doesn't mean sexual abusing women is just being a pervert and not serial abuse.Bruh.
Louis CK fucked up. I get it. He fucked up.
Cosby is in a different galaxy, man. Dude DRUGGED women. He had his way with unconscious women. Last count was 60+. For DECADES.
Cosby is a dude who was a fucking pillar. A pillar for comedians, a pillar for educators, a pillar for fathers, a pillar for the black community. He was one of the best success stories of the 20th century.
Fucker threw all of that away. He would have tarnished his legacy having done that to ONE woman. He salted the damn earth with the amount of victims he has.
The way he went to prison was bullshit, and it sucks that they had to pull some backhanded shady shit that didn't work because he's rich, because the legal system works for the rich.
However Cosby is still a person that should never again be able to get paid to speak publicly. I'm trippin' that ANY venue would host him, and can't imagine it ever going well for him.
Louis CK is a pervert. He will say that himself.
Bill Cosby is a predator. He has abused dozens of women, and in no way should he ever be given a forum. I'd wish worse upon him, but I don't want to get banned.
You're correct but I'm not a lawyer and I don't know the proper level of fuckery to label the second prosecutor's actions.Y'all really need to stop phrasing it like this. He gave testimony in a civil suit in exchange for immunity from criminal prosecution, which a different DA completely ignored & used his testimony to prosecute him. That violated his Fifth Amendment rights. That's not "cutting corners" like it was some kind of procedural error.
Cosby needs to rot in all the different hells that exist, but let's at least get the details right.
Well, things like mishandling evidence, using inadmissible statements, perjury... those things can be labeled as "technicalities" because that all has to do with the procedure of prosecuting someone.You're correct but I'm not a lawyer and I don't know the proper level of fuckery to label the second prosecutor's actions.
To me, it sounds like they did something extremely wrong which makes a lot of their past convictions look shaky and should not be a prosecutor anymore. Would it be fair to word it like that or is this type of misconduct something that frequently happens?
I'm actually not sure the bolded is true, as I thought all of the allegations (and rumors of incidents well before the NYT story broke) were largely in the early/mid 00s? But I could be remembering wrong.Louis CK used his position of power to hold women against their will and perform sexual acts in front of them. Just because he didn't touch them doesn't mean it wasn't sexual assault. And the only reason we know he stopped is because he was caught. Had there not been a culture of increased accountability, he could have easily done it for decades. And he faced almost no censure. No civil suits. He lost out on a few deals and had to stop doing comedy for 6 months. That's it. He was probably the most prominent comic in the business at the time of the revelations. Yes, raping and drugging and women is worse, but there's no "okay" level of sexual crimes.