Not having to worry about student debt if you're unable to find a job out of college would be a huge help.
I don't know about you guys, but as I recall, Trump completely upended the country's norms in less than three years.
We can have drastic changes quickly in the opposite direction, if we choose to actually implement them. I say this as an American who doesn't believe incrementalism is a scientific principle.
Doesn't include people with debt from:
- For-Profit Colleges / Private institutions (HBCUs exempt)
- Trade Schools
- Graduate School
We should be clear on what this actually is.
Let's look at the erosion of abortion rights. Since Roe v Wade, and concurrently with it, conservatives have been chipping away at abortion rights and access with it being virtually inaccessible areas in the country. So a gradual change in a complete opposite direction will run about 50ish years give or take.It should be better is all I'm saying, because your country can afford it. Your politicians are the ones that stand in your way, not actual constraints that necessarily need time to build up. Like if you were a developing nation and had to invest in the infrastructure or economy first.
All I'm saying is what will be the timeline of gradual? Even now your politicians don't give you any supposed 10-15-20 year plan for say, healthcare for all. It seems like you guys are left deciphering what "gradual change" means, which quite honestly means there is never any true focus on getting to systematic change.
Destroying or building requires just putting the laws in place to do the things we want.... That's it. That's pretty much all you have to do.Its easier to destroy than to build, and Trump had powerless Dems and Republicans who only cared about reelection.
I want a Democratic party and a progressive body that's passionately willing to fight for the things they truly want instead of constantly going "Oh shucks, maybe in the next 20 years" every time we capitulate to the other side with half-measures and "well, that's the reality of things." Like... seriously, stop throwing a stick in your own bicycle spokes.
It's a bit unclear. He says that loans will be forgiven if you make under 125k, but doesn't actually indicate an upper amount threshold nor gives any idea of what the phase-in periods will be. If it was all (federal) debt, there wouldnt be a need to include the following passages about making a 5% discretionary income cap and after 20 years the rest is forgiven.
IBR currently caps at 10% of income if you borrowed after July 2014, and 15% before. However its not structured so that your balance is forgiven if you pay consistently after 20 years.
The more I read it, the more unclear it gets. I don't believe its a blanket forgiveness if you're under 125k.
That's why we should probably make it a mission to continuously vote in midterms like we did the last time, and start engaging in local politics and organizations to bolster our own communities and presence, instead of always hinging the entire soul of the country on a four-year cycle that, in effect, was stolen the last time by bigoted-ass white conservatives in the Midwest.That's correct, but for this to mean anything...you need to have the majority of congress on your side. That has only happened rarely and briefly in recent times.
EDIT: Eh, while funny, dogpiling isn't going to change anyone's mind and just makes this an even more negative place
I understand what you want ,but at the same time the Executive Branch wields too much power as is. We really need to scale back what the Executive is capable of.Destroying or building requires just putting the laws in place to do the things we want.... That's it. That's pretty much all you have to do.
Of course, said law-making requires having executive bodies do their jobs, but the answer to those obstacles isn't to come to the table with an incrementalist mindset, especially since we all know Republicans are fuckbois anyway. So demand the most that you can!
I want a Democratic party and a progressive body that's passionately willing to fight for the things they truly want instead of constantly going "Oh shucks, maybe in the next 20 years" every time we capitulate to the other side with half-measures and "well, that's the reality of things." Like... seriously, stop throwing a stick in your own bicycle spokes.
Let's look at the erosion of abortion rights. Since Roe v Wade, and concurrently with it, conservatives have been chipping away at abortion rights and access with it being virtually inaccessible areas in the country. So a gradual change in a complete opposite direction will run about 50ish years give or take.
I mean it's cool and all but what if I want to go to med school? Why isn't he paying for that!?! And no medicare until 60??????? He wants me dead.
No better than the Republicans. Voting down ballot.
So many people are accusing of others of being unhappy because their loans wont be taken care of or other bullshit.
How about this? Biden is not President yet. This is not a bill drafted in Congress. Its a proposal so why should we give up and say its good enough for now like so many seem to have already done? We continue to push to make the proposal better so if it is President Biden and it does eventually come to a possible law we are making sure to not segregate people for school choice etc. Upto 30% of College Students go to a Private/For Profit School each year yet we are going to say they don't deserve the same level of assistance as everyone else who is suffering?
The gradual change for healthcare is going as intended. While there are concessions, such as preexisting conditions, the big goal has been for many in politics who continue to get elected and reelected has been to increase the power of private healthcare providers and insure the business remains profitable since atleast the time of Reagan.I think where its a contested debate is around what the term "gradual change" means? But to me that's the huge issue in of itself. It sounds good, it sounds like you're working towards a "big picture" and most of life in many areas teaches us things come gradually. Usually because you have to learn or study until you can do whatever it is you want to do. But it honestly seems like for as long as I was in a Modern Studies class in school (politics class), America has been involved in this "incremental change" for the healthcare industry. Things are probably even worse now than they were 10-15 years ago.
As much as I sound negative about anything, I'll say Biden doing something, okay, that's good. But to me, an outsider, it really looks like kicking the can down the road. Precisely because the country and the powers that be can afford to do much better and I think this idea of "incremental change" in America over a few key issues, notably education and health, has been the masterclass of stalling for generations.
But they weren't and aren't, so... "useless", right.So it's basically useless. lol. Public universities should just be free to begin with.
Doesn't include people with debt from:
- For-Profit Colleges / Private institutions (HBCUs exempt)
- Trade Schools
- Graduate School
We should be clear on what this actually is.
Current IBR repayment periods are either 20 or 25 years depending on a few factors.
Of course, then you get whacked with the tax on the COD income at the end of the period, which is its own problem.
The gradual change for healthcare is going as intended. While there are concessions, such as preexisting conditions, the big goal has been for many in politics to increase the power of private healthcare providers and insure the business remains profitable since atleast the time of Reagan.
The ambulance company that transported the Wucinskis, American Medical Response, charged the family $2,598 for taking them to the hospital. A company representative declined to comment on the bill "due to patient privacy concerns," but said the company would look into the case.
An additional $90 in charges came from radiologists who read the patients' X-ray scans and do not work for the hospital. Having such doctors, who may be outside a patient's insurance networks, provide services to hospital patients is one of the major causes of surprise medical bills.
As a result of all this, "those who are already experiencing health disparities are going to be the hardest-hit," she says. Her research and that of many others has given us a clear picture of the population of people experiencing those disparities. Many of them are non-white, meaning they're affected by institutional racism, and many have chronic conditions or other disabilities. They're also often service workers in the food, hospitality, or healthcare sectors—jobs that necessitate constant contact with the public.
The Morning Consult poll, released Sunday, surveyed 2,201 adults across the United States between March 12 and March 13. Among other things, respondents were asked, "Has the coronavirus outbreak made you more or less likely to support universal health care proposals, where all Americans would get their health insurance from the government?"
Over a quarter (26 percent) of those surveyed said they were "much more likely" to support universal healthcare, while 15 percent said they were "somewhat more likely" to favor it. Nearly three-fifths of Democrats said they were either somewhat (20 percent) or much more (39 percent) likely to support it. A full quarter of Republicans said they had become more disposed to national health insurance because of COVID-19, with 14 percent of them claiming to be much more likely to support it than they had been before. Among Americans who approve of the job President Donald Trump is doing, 26 percent said they now view universal healthcare more favorably.
The poll went into great detail about respondents' age, sex, ethnicity, religion, and so on. Few of the results would shock anyone familiar with American politics, though some might be mildly surprised to learn, for instance, just how many Evangelical Christians (35 percent) and self-identified conservatives (23 percent) say COVID-19 has pushed them in the direction of universal healthcare.
This is a very, very valid way to look at things. I get it. I'm 35 and I've been fucked really badly by the first recession, which caused me to take on a ton of debt. I think I may get through this one okay. But I know a lot of my friends who won't. This is unsustainable. We need to fight back and focus on local elections. We need to elect people locally who do what we want. Primary the fuck out of old establishment politicians. We have to fight for it."Gradual progress" usually stops at "Gradual progress" because to actually tackle the underlying issue it requires systematic change, not a band-aid.
How long has America, the richest country in the world, or one of them, been stuck in a process of "Gradual change"? Your country could literally afford to do the "actual change" bit, you know, any time, right now. You're not a developing nation that needs to say to its population, "this is a 70 year process".
But we can do this song and dance in another 10~15 years when we see where American healthcare is and where the education system is, another grossly hyper-capitalist market. Why is it America seems to take everything that should be for the people/population in life and absolutely reems the population with debt?
And then your masters say to you, here's a few breadcrumbs, and the response is "we're soo grateful!". It's soo fucked up to see. Like honestly, it's heart-breaking.
Negatively, many citizens and politicians want things to go this way. Whether they are employees, shareholders, executives, sadists, etc. Many profit or depend on the way healthcare in the US work and want it to continue to be as profitable as possible. The suffering of others doesn't especially matter to them. They have spent a great deal of time, money, and energy politically to make sure they get all the small, gradual changes they need for that.By going as intended are you suggesting to me positively or negatively? Because many of the articles you read about your healthcare industry from 2010 up to now, 2020, are hellish. Given we're going through a pandemic right now it's even scarier, irrespective of Trump saying shit online about how he'll pay for everything for anyone who needs it. That's not happening.
Your healthcare industry is going to look for the maximum profit possible out of the coronavirus outbreak
Kept at the Hospital on Coronavirus Fears, Now Facing Large Medical Bills (Published 2020)
Care was mandated by the government, but it’s not clear who has to pay.www.nytimes.com
Things like that are just absolute lunacy for anyone looking in.
And who gets hit the hardest?
The American healthcare system is only making COVID-19 worse
The patchwork of public and private care—and a lack of mandatory paid sick leave—makes the country more vulnerable.www.popsci.com
But hey
COVID-19 Causing Americans to Favor Universal Healthcare, Poll Finds - The New American
A new poll finds that the coronavirus is causing Americans increasingly to favor universal healthcare, but is government healthcare really better at combating the disease than free-market care? by Michael Tennantwww.thenewamerican.com
Maybe eventually people will force the politicians who keep ascending into power to give a shit. Biden offering LESS than Clinton did in 2016, if I've read that right, is absolutely embarrassing. Offering less than what was offered before can hardly be chalked up as "incremental change".
So it's basically useless. lol. Public universities should just be free to begin with.
Ah, so it is just pretty words and a big ol' fuck you to people who went the private route. I would have gone to a public university had the schools not been so impacted due to a lack of funding and/or so outrageously priced they might as well be private schools.
Edit: I should say I would be happy for it to help any number of people, but it's absolutely lame that it wouldn't cover everybody in low to middle income families attending ANY college.
Negatively, many citizens and politicians want things to go this way. Whether they are employees, shareholders, executives, sadists, etc. Many profit or depend on the way healthcare in the US work and want it to continue to be as profitable as possible. The suffering of others doesn't especially matter to them. They have spent a great deal of time, money, and energy politically to make sure they get all the small, gradual changes they need for that.
How does this change it if I am 5 years into PSLF? Does it just start knocking down 10k a year from my loan as I make payments? RIght now I'm at 10%, would it drop down to 5%?Good shit.
- Immediately cancel a minimum of $10,000 of student debt per person, as proposed by Senator Warren in the midst of the coronavirus crisis.
- Those earning less than $25,000 per year will not have to make monthly payments and will accrue no interest
- Those earning more than $25,000 per year will pay no more than 5% of discretionary income toward payments
- After 20 years, the remainder of federal student loans will be forgiven without any tax burden
- Those who participate in public service will be eligible for additional federal loan forgiveness, including $10,000 per year of forgiveness for up to five years.
It's not all rich people. You tell a guy in Macon, Georgia his insurance sales job is going away after putting in 20 years and he's going to panic and do whatever to make sure he can keep food on the table even if it means his neighbor blows their brains out after seeing their bill for cancer treatment. Same thing when you some company that's makes its money selling overpriced medical equipment scares a whole town with doomsday scenarios if they can't charge X hundred times the cost to manufacture and would have to do layoffs of the handful of employees they have employed domestically. There's a lot of warranted and unwarranted self-preservation instincts kicking in with working class people who want the medical industry to continue as it does in the US.That's the perfect word to describe some of the people alluded to, sadists. Probably better terminology for me to use rather than "masters" and "crumbs", given I've sorta just pieced together over the last while how that sounds.
Making money out of suffering is sadly the way it is for many that are filthy rich due to it. It's always been a lucrative industry profiteering off the misery, desperation or even death of others.
It's not all rich people. You tell a guy in Macon, Georgia his insurance sales job is going away after putting in 20 years and he's going to panic and do whatever to make sure he can keep food on the table even if it means his neighbor blows their brains out after seeing their bill for cancer treatment. Same thing when you some company that's makes its money selling overpriced medical equipment scares a whole town with doomsday scenarios if they can't charge X hundred times the cost to manufacture and would have to do layoffs of the handful of employees they have employed domestically. There's a lot of warranted and unwarranted self-preservation instincts kicking in with working class people who want the medical industry to continue as it does in the US.
I don't know about you guys, but as I recall, Trump completely upended the country's norms in less than three years.
We can have drastic changes quickly in the opposite direction, if we choose to actually implement them. I say this as an American who doesn't believe incrementalism is a scientific principle.
Boy, people are determined to hate anything Biden does, huh?
Good for him. This is proof that people's voices and influences can push a moderate candidate. He'll always be moderate, but these policies directly help people, even if you don't think they help *enough*. Which is valid, and continue to push! But also I want to give credit where credit is due.
Student loan debt forgiveness is pretty aggressive. It contains Elizabeth Warren's $10k forgiveness program for all Americans and then additionally forgives public college/u debt for anybody earning less than $125k/year.
Additionally:
People can poopoo it or be cynical because it's Joe Biden, but this is an aggressive policy proposal especially when combined with his no-debt community college expansion and expansion of Pell grants.
- Immediately cancel a minimum of $10,000 of student debt per person, as proposed by Senator Warren in the midst of the coronavirus crisis.
- Those earning less than $25,000 per year will not have to make monthly payments and will accrue no interest
- Those earning more than $25,000 per year will pay no more than 5% of discretionary income toward payments
- After 20 years, the remainder of federal student loans will be forgiven without any tax burden
- Those who participate in public service will be eligible for additional federal loan forgiveness, including $10,000 per year of forgiveness for up to five years.
I think it's pretty clear that getting rid of student debt period would be good enough."But how come it doesn't cover private colleges??"
Nothing will ever be good enough. That much is clear.
I think he wants to make community college completely free. As it should be anyhow. Personally public colleges/community colleges/tech/vocational training should all be free.Throw on two years of free community college too! Plenty of vocational / technical courses a person can complete in two years and enter the workforce making good money. Everyone doesn't need a four year degree or more.
I still feel guilty when I see the debt modern students are saddled with. I graduated literally right before the cost of tuition and books skyrocketed for seemingly no reason. I will support any kind of policy of this nature.
This is actually one of the things that could probably be done by executive order.That's correct, but for this to mean anything...you need to have the majority of congress on your side. That has only happened rarely and briefly in recent times.
If not, then the legislative chamber will remain the cemetery for many of these great ideas.
Not sure if youre saying so here, but thats already in his platform. Lol.Throw on two years of free community college too! Plenty of vocational / technical courses a person can complete in two years and enter the workforce making good money. Everyone doesn't need a four year degree or more.
I still feel guilty when I see the debt modern students are saddled with. I graduated literally right before the cost of tuition and books skyrocketed for seemingly no reason. I will support any kind of policy of this nature.
The Medicare at 60 is actually worse policy than the current, when you think for half a goddamn second about it. There's about 15 million people between the ages of 60 and 65. What will the for-profit insurers do when that multi-billion dollar wad of revenue evaporates? Jack up the rest of us who are still stuck with them, that's what.