Our background checks suck. I used to work at a store that sold guns and the background check as basically "are you 18" and "do you have a criminal record"?Ummm... we DO have background checks? The issue is that around 20% of gun sales are done on a personal basis, and not through a vendor.
Nancy is being primaried in 2020 lol I hope she flops then we can meme her "They're just 4 people"
Why can't the Dem old guards produce the same level of venom and vitrol towards the GOP as they seemingly, constantly do to people on their own side? People like Pelosi and Shumer are meek as hell when come to dealing with the GOP. But when it come to dealing with an outspoken person on their own party? They can throw the venom as well as any GOP partisan hack can.
Earlier in the year during the Pelosi/"The Squad" spat, I was honestly surprised at how vicious the Dems can be when they try. Too bad that viciousness is never pointed at fucking Mitch McConnell.
Why can't the Dem old guards produce the same level of venom and vitrol towards the GOP as they seemingly, constantly do to people on their own side? People like Pelosi and Shumer are meek as hell when come to dealing with the GOP. But when it come to dealing with an outspoken person on their own party? They can throw the venom as well as any GOP partisan hack can.
Earlier in the year during the Pelosi/"The Squad" spat, I was honestly surprised at how vicious the Dems can be when they try. Too bad that viciousness is never pointed at fucking Mitch McConnell.
0% chance of winning Texas Senate pushing a mandatory weapon confiscation program. He is not pushing for a voluntary buyback, he is advocating to make owners into criminals. He done.
How is that Schumer's fault? He doesn't have the majority in the Senate. Pelosi does, and she passed a gun control bill this year. That happened seven months ago!Yes, it's ridiculous that even with overwhelming public support, meaningful gun legislation can't get passed (among other things, but that's off topic).
Schumer represents everything wrong with the legacy Democratic party. Their goal for 2020 is to simply return the country 'mostly' to 2015 status quo. Every candidate should be telling him that isn't good enough.
How is that Schumer's fault? He doesn't have the majority in the Senate. Pelosi does, and she passed a gun control bill this year. That happened seven months ago!
If Warren wins she should try to get Abrams to get some southern votes.Honestly, while I would love a Sanders/Warren ticket, I could see Beto being a quality pick for VP.
Schumer represents everything wrong with the legacy Democratic party. Their goal for 2020 is to simply return the country 'mostly' to 2015 status quo. Every candidate should be telling him that isn't good enough.
I mean Pelosi will never have a majority in the Senate, I'm not really sure what you're asking here. She's Speaker of the House. What goes on in the Senate isn't her responsibility.Let's see her do it when she has a majority in the Senate. Also Beto's point.
It's easier to pass a bill that makes you look good in the house when you know it will die in the oppositions senate. The question is, if the dems had the senate would she still be passing that bill? They had four years of both houses and we didn't see much progress then. two years of both houses AND the presidency. Zilch.I mean Pelosi will never have a majority in the Senate, I'm not really sure what you're asking here. She's Speaker of the House. What goes on in the Senate isn't her responsibility.
you people keep saying this, but when he loses the texas senate two years in a row his political career would be effectively over.Seriously, fuck Schumer though. Beto really does need to run for Senate again.
Pelosi passed several major bills between the 09-10 session that didn't go anywhere in the Senate. Cap & trade probably killed several Congresspersons' careers. The House also passed the DREAM Act during the lame duck session, but it failed to beat a Senate filibuster (because of five turncoat Democrats and one Manchin who wasn't present to vote on it, and yes, that is complete bullshit and you can totally be mad at them for it - I am! - although only Manchin and Jon Tester are still in office).It's easier to pass a bill that makes you look good in the house when you know it will die in the oppositions senate. The question is, if the dems had the senate would she still be passing that bill? They had four years of both houses and we didn't see much progress then.
Back up plan. Running for president is letting him get his name out even more.
I can buy that a mass shooting in his district made him change his mind.I question his motives, seeing as he wasn't talking this way when he had a realistic shot at being senator. Now that he's low in the polls in the presidential race, he has nothing to lose and is taking potshots.
I question his motives, seeing as he wasn't talking this way when he had a realistic shot at being senator. Now that he's low in the polls in the presidential race, he has nothing to lose and is taking potshots. I think the guy is disingenuous, and he tends to play it safe normally.
Many Americans are angry, frightened, and frustrated these days. Yet the Democratic presidential campaign remains largely a procession of speeches and photo ops. Tonight, in O'Rourke's home state of Texas, 10 candidates will appear on the debate stage and again smack one another with heavily rehearsed answers, as if there's much relevant or revelatory to be found in this performance art.
Much of O'Rourke's presidential campaign can seem like a rolling existential crisis, playing itself out via livestreams and the journal entries he posts on Medium. Now, O'Rourke says, he's actually had an existential crisis—and he thinks the rest of the country should be having one too. For O'Rourke and his aides, his campaign can be divided into two phases: before the August 3 mass shooting that targeted Latino immigrants in his hometown of El Paso, and after. In the days that followed the violence, he told me in a recent interview, he was in such a dark place that he wondered how to go on, and even whether he should.
O'Rourke says the shooting has given him a new kind of mission. But his challenge now is jamming his epiphany into the presidential race: explaining how El Paso changed him and why voters should care enough about that change to give him a second look, while sticking to his promise to campaign in forgotten parts of the country without insulting the picky and provincial residents in early-voting states. In the process, he needs to move the polls that have had him solidly in the low single digits since his initial post-campaign-launch burst in March. In a national CNN poll released yesterday, he crept up to 5 percent, but he's still far behind the leading candidates in the race.
"At a really deep, fundamental level, [the shooting] made me wonder what I'm doing, and what I'd ever been doing, or what we were doing," O'Rourke told me last week as we rode the Bolt Bus from New York to Boston, in an interview that can be heard in full on the Radio Atlantic podcast. "And this is probably not making sense, but—how could this happen? How could I have allowed this to happen, as a part of this country, as someone who held public office, as an El Pasoan?"
I believe 49% is a majority in that poll since there was a split between undecided and no's. I might be wrong though. Still as he keeps talking about it and brings it into the spotlight, support for it will only increase.Where did you read that? I know the Austin American Statesman posted the UT Tyler poll on mandatory buyback support here as 49%. Most people are for mag restrictions here though.
semi-off topic but bill simmons put up an interview with beto. haven't watched it yet though so I don't know how thread-worthy it'd be
Had no idea that was actually an issue haha, good interview thoughLol he just mentioned feral hogs in relation to hunters and rifles