• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Vector

Member
Feb 28, 2018
6,641
The nerve of St. Bernard to still be running instead of conceding the race to less popular candidates! /s

Really happy with the way he's been doing post heart attack.
 

ned_ballad

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
48,220
Rochester, New York
Everyone gets their one of two weeks in the top before fizzling out. Meanwhile the front runner remains stable through the entire race

This has been the trend for both parties' primaries the last few times, and we're seeing it manifest again this time around.
 

Orayn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,945
Everyone gets their one of two weeks in the top before fizzling out. Meanwhile the front runner remains stable through the entire race

This has been the trend for both parties' primaries the last few times, and we're seeing it manifest again this time around.
NwNsitQ.jpg
 

PixelatedDonut

Chicken Chaser
Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,966
Philly ❤️
So you're saying Sanders being Jewish is more important than Warren being a woman and therefore it's more reasonable she drops out instead?
Pretty sure that poster was just emulating you. I mean Bernie lost in a landslide to a female candidate. Warrens just doesn't have big appeal outside of mostly white well off people. Warren be a woman, or Bernie being Jewish neither of them are owed the election/nomination. It's sad that they understand that more than some of their supporters.
 
Oct 27, 2017
767
You got it my man! Ill switch my avatar to Sanders or whatever you want for an entire year. I would be very happy if he won in fact so I wouldn't mind at all. I'm just very concerned because I don't think he stands a chance against any republican. This country is still heavily conservative and most people who happen to vote hate commies/socialists.


I do sometimes exaggerate and joke but very rarely when it comes to politics.

I'm in the same boat. If Sanders is the nominee and actually manages to beat Trump, I'll be amazed.

I'd be thrilled to see America elect Bernie Sanders as President, but I believe his would be the biggest Democratic defeat since 1988. Trump would run almost exclusively on the economy, and socialist scaremongering would win the day, ensuring that he gets to further reshape the Supreme Court and force the Democrats, not unreasonably, to pivot to the right of Obama in order to stand a chance next time around, let alone Sanders or Warren.
 

Jahranimo

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,008
Man that sounds promising but the cynic in me prevents excitement until the night of Nov 3rd.
 

supra

Member
Oct 30, 2017
339
I'm in the same boat. If Sanders is the nominee and actually manages to beat Trump, I'll be amazed.

I'd be thrilled to see America elect Bernie Sanders as President, but I believe his would be the biggest Democratic defeat since 1988. Trump would run almost exclusively on the economy, and socialist scaremongering would win the day, ensuring that he gets to further reshape the Supreme Court and force the Democrats, not unreasonably, to pivot to the right of Obama in order to stand a chance next time around, let alone Sanders or Warren.
Sanders has been driving it home that the DOW at 29,000 means fuck all for the people of this country since day 1, and it resonates.
 

Orayn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,945
Steadily rising to first place in a growing number of key polls over a course of months is a one or two week fluke, reasonable, normal.
 

Vector

Member
Feb 28, 2018
6,641
I'm in the same boat. If Sanders is the nominee and actually manages to beat Trump, I'll be amazed.

I'd be thrilled to see America elect Bernie Sanders as President, but I believe his would be the biggest Democratic defeat since 1988. Trump would run almost exclusively on the economy, and socialist scaremongering would win the day, ensuring that he gets to further reshape the Supreme Court and force the Democrats, not unreasonably, to pivot to the right of Obama in order to stand a chance next time around, let alone Sanders or Warren.
Maybe this take would hold some merit if the country was overwhelmingly right wing but... It isn't. Left leaning ballot initiatives and policies are wildly popular. The GOP platform is deeply unpopular nationally.

There's no reason to cower in fear of Republican framing when you're winning on the issues.
 

Dierce

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,993
I'm in the same boat. If Sanders is the nominee and actually manages to beat Trump, I'll be amazed.

I'd be thrilled to see America elect Bernie Sanders as President, but I believe his would be the biggest Democratic defeat since 1988. Trump would run almost exclusively on the economy, and socialist scaremongering would win the day, ensuring that he gets to further reshape the Supreme Court and force the Democrats, not unreasonably, to pivot to the right of Obama in order to stand a chance next time around, let alone Sanders or Warren.
Yeah that is also a valid concern. A Sanders defeat would tilt the Democratic party even further to the right. Not that it would do any good, republicans will only keep moving rightwards (openly propose eugenics) and bigots will support them even more than before.
 

jviggy43

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
18,184
Pretty sure that poster was just emulating you. I mean Bernie lost in a landslide to a female candidate. Warrens just doesn't have big appeal outside of mostly white well off people. Warren be a woman, or Bernie being Jewish neither of them are owed the election/nomination. It's sad that they understand that more than some of their supporters.
+1
 

Fisty

Member
Oct 25, 2017
20,214
Everyone gets their one of two weeks in the top before fizzling out. Meanwhile the front runner remains stable through the entire race

This has been the trend for both parties' primaries the last few times, and we're seeing it manifest again this time around.

Yeah ask Clinton how that worked out for her in 2008

Some youngins in this thread, or just goldfish
 

BoosterDuck

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,681
I'm in the same boat. If Sanders is the nominee and actually manages to beat Trump, I'll be amazed.

I'd be thrilled to see America elect Bernie Sanders as President, but I believe his would be the biggest Democratic defeat since 1988. Trump would run almost exclusively on the economy, and socialist scaremongering would win the day, ensuring that he gets to further reshape the Supreme Court and force the Democrats, not unreasonably, to pivot to the right of Obama in order to stand a chance next time around, let alone Sanders or Warren.
pretty sure the economy was like this in 2016 yet Hillary still lost

people will vote if you platform on real change
 

Deleted member 11046

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
942
which to expend energy on? the insidious erasure of any diversity among a large group of supporters? or rabble rousing? the insidious erasure of any diversity among a large group of supporters? or rabble rousing?
Fair. I'll bite since you're specifically calling out my wording. Please demonstrate where anyone has done what you're describing in this thread to justify the need for us to argue about it in this topic. Maybe I missed a post. Show me.
 

Deleted member 7051

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,254
Are you saying being Jewish is less important than being a woman? (also I never said anything close to what you suggested)

I love how you totally refuse to answer the question that was simply clarifying something you absolutely implied, but whatever...

Do I think it's more important that a woman becomes President of the United States than a Jewish man? Yes, I do.

Women are horrifically underrepresented and undervalued in literally every single social and economic criteria you can think of. Less than a quarter of elected politicians in America are women, which is totally unacceptable, and you finally have a fantastic candidate for the presidency that's also a woman and you want her to drop out of the race for a old, white man because he's Jewish?

And don't pretend that's not what you meant. You're the one who brought up his Jewish heritage as a rebuttal against him stepping aside so a woman could be in charge - at a time when news is rampant of reports he doesn't think a woman can win, no less.

At least I can say my country has had multiple women in the highest office of power. What's America's excuse?
 

Orayn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,945
Yeah that is also a valid concern. A Sanders defeat would tilt the Democratic party even further to the right. Not that it would do any good, republicans will only keep moving rightwards (openly propose eugenics) and bigots will support them even more than before.
Why does the Republican party not have this problem? Nothing can make them go left, but the Dems are ready to sprint right at the first sign of trouble. Almost like the party establishment is actually fucking conservative, really wants to act on it, and is waiting for an excuse. Weird.
 

Deleted member 203

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,899
I love how you totally refuse to answer the question that was simply clarifying something you absolutely implied, but whatever...

Do I think it's more important that a woman becomes President of the United States than a Jewish man? Yes, I do.

Women are horrifically underrepresented and undervalued in literally every single social and economic criteria you can think of. Less than a quarter of elected politicians in America are women, which is totally unacceptable, and you finally have a fantastic candidate for the presidency that's also a woman and you want her to drop out of the race for a old, white man because he's Jewish?

And don't pretend that's not what you meant. You're the one who brought up his Jewish heritage as a rebuttal against him stepping aside so a woman could be in charge - at a time when news is rampant of reports he doesn't think a woman can win, no less.

At least I can say my country has had multiple women in the highest office of power. What's America's excuse?
stop treating politics like it's fan-casting a fucking TV show
 

ned_ballad

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
48,220
Rochester, New York
Why does the Republican party not have this problem? Nothing can make them go left, but the Dems are ready to sprint right at the first sign of trouble. Almost like the party establishment is actually fucking conservative, really wants to act on it, and is waiting for an excuse. Weird.
Because Republicans can win simply be being racist. Racists don't care about their policy, so when Republicans lose they just go more racist and then they win again.
 

Deleted member 12224

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
6,113
"An old white man just because he's Jewish"

That's an ugly point to make when trying to note the importance of a woman president.
 

Nephtes

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,547
Is CNN even allowed to report Bernie in the lead?
I'm shocked he's not listed as "other" or something.
 
Oct 27, 2017
936
Are there actually still people saying Sanders should drop out for Warren's sake?

You all told him that when she was leading, and look where we are now. He's almost 10 points ahead of her in the CNN and Monmouth polls. Thank God he didn't listen to you at the time.
 

Deleted member 2145

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
29,223
I love how you totally refuse to answer the question that was simply clarifying something you absolutely implied, but whatever...

Do I think it's more important that a woman becomes President of the United States than a Jewish man? Yes, I do.

Women are horrifically underrepresented and undervalued in literally every single social and economic criteria you can think of. Less than a quarter of elected politicians in America are women, which is totally unacceptable, and you finally have a fantastic candidate for the presidency that's also a woman and you want her to drop out of the race for a old, white man because he's Jewish?

And don't pretend that's not what you meant. You're the one who brought up his Jewish heritage as a rebuttal against him stepping aside so a woman could be in charge - at a time when news is rampant of reports he doesn't think a woman can win, no less.

At least I can say my country has had multiple women in the highest office of power. What's America's excuse?

for anyone wondering, yes, this post is disgusting
 

Geoff

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,115
As someone looking in from the UK I'd guess that Bernie Sanders has precisely fuck all chance of taking votes off Trump and will go down in flames.
 

Hycran

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
1,494
As someone looking in from the UK I'd guess that Bernie Sanders has precisely fuck all chance of taking votes off Trump and will go down in flames.

Except every poll that has them facing off shows Bernie smashing trump into a pulp. Think again before making an ignorant drive by comment.
 

Dude Abides

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,382
User banned (3 days): personal attacks
I love how you totally refuse to answer the question that was simply clarifying something you absolutely implied, but whatever...

Do I think it's more important that a woman becomes President of the United States than a Jewish man? Yes, I do.

Women are horrifically underrepresented and undervalued in literally every single social and economic criteria you can think of. Less than a quarter of elected politicians in America are women, which is totally unacceptable, and you finally have a fantastic candidate for the presidency that's also a woman and you want her to drop out of the race for a old, white man because he's Jewish?

And don't pretend that's not what you meant. You're the one who brought up his Jewish heritage as a rebuttal against him stepping aside so a woman could be in charge - at a time when news is rampant of reports he doesn't think a woman can win, no less.

At least I can say my country has had multiple women in the highest office of power. What's America's excuse?

maybe they weren't exaggerating the anti-Semitism problem in England.
 

Fatoy

Member
Mar 13, 2019
7,220
I'm in the same boat. If Sanders is the nominee and actually manages to beat Trump, I'll be amazed.

I'd be thrilled to see America elect Bernie Sanders as President, but I believe his would be the biggest Democratic defeat since 1988. Trump would run almost exclusively on the economy, and socialist scaremongering would win the day, ensuring that he gets to further reshape the Supreme Court and force the Democrats, not unreasonably, to pivot to the right of Obama in order to stand a chance next time around, let alone Sanders or Warren.
Precisely. As much as I admire Sanders' positions on most issues, the opposition research writes itself.
  • Well-off centrist? Republicans have it easy here: he's coming for your wealth.
  • Middle of the road, fiscally minded voter? Republicans will point out the sheer cost of Sanders' overhauls and his scant legislative accomplishments and make it all seem infeasible. Anyone thinking "sure, it sounds nice, but how practical is it?" is going to have their doubts catered to.
  • Young, progressive voter? Republicans are going to dredge up every bit of vacillation Sanders has done on your hot button issues, like gun control, to divide you.
  • Person of colour? Republicans will remind you non-stop of the positions Sanders has taken to appeal to white, rural communities in Vermont - making him seem out of touch with what you feel.
Please note that I don't think any of these things are fair. Hell, half of them are only partly true. I'm not from the US, but if I was, I'd be considered pretty far to the left on the political compass. But I am from the UK, where a fairly "socialist" party leader just suffered one of the worst general election defeats in a century - and it was a defeat that bore a lot of the same hallmarks that a Trump vs. Sanders race is going to. Anyone who sees Sanders as an outsider that the right are unprepared to drag through the mud isn't prepared for the mud-dragging they have lined up for him.
 

Hazzuh

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,166
I love how you totally refuse to answer the question that was simply clarifying something you absolutely implied, but whatever...

Do I think it's more important that a woman becomes President of the United States than a Jewish man? Yes, I do.

Women are horrifically underrepresented and undervalued in literally every single social and economic criteria you can think of. Less than a quarter of elected politicians in America are women, which is totally unacceptable, and you finally have a fantastic candidate for the presidency that's also a woman and you want her to drop out of the race for a old, white man because he's Jewish?

And don't pretend that's not what you meant. You're the one who brought up his Jewish heritage as a rebuttal against him stepping aside so a woman could be in charge - at a time when news is rampant of reports he doesn't think a woman can win, no less.

At least I can say my country has had multiple women in the highest office of power. What's America's excuse?
Would you support a female Republican candidate for president over a Democrat man?
 

WestEgg

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,047
As someone looking in from the UK I'd guess that Bernie Sanders has precisely fuck all chance of taking votes off Trump and will go down in flames.
It's less about taking votes from Trump's base and more about getting the apathetic middle to go out and actually vote. Like Obama did in 2008. That's why Biden being the "safe" choice scares me.
 

svacina

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,439
As someone looking in from the UK I'd guess that Bernie Sanders has precisely fuck all chance of taking votes off Trump and will go down in flames.
He doesn't have to take votes away from Donny, he just needs to make some of the one half of the entire fucking electorate who never bothered to vote last the time vote for himself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.