But who "blamed the Jews" and who denies any genocide?
That's fucking gaslighting 101 what you are doing here.
All I see here are people who have internalized a status quo and now think it's impossible to change it in any meaningful way.
And everyone who tries has to be some kind of nutjob or have malicious intentions.
Cenk made deliberate attempts to appeal to people who want to blame the Jews by bringing up a Jew who they believe is part of a vast Jewish conspiracy in order to destroy America* by propping up the interests of minorities and anything resembling the left.
Cenk still supports groups that denied genocide. It's all over this fucking thread.
*White people
You don't need to support trash like Cenk to support change.
Also, about the electoral college:
To ditch the Electoral College entirely, the US would have to pass a constitutional amendment (passed by two-thirds of the House and Senate and approved by 38 states) — or convene a constitutional convention (which has never been done, but would have to be called for by 34 states). Either method is vanishingly unlikely because each would require many small states to approve a change that would reduce their influence on the presidential outcome.
There is one potential workaround, however: the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, a clever proposal that uses the Constitution's ambiguity on electors to its own ends.
A state signing on to the compact agrees that it will pledge all its electors not to its state winner but to the victor in the national popular vote — but only if states controlling 270 or more electoral votes have agreed to do the same. If they do, and everything works as planned, then whoever wins the popular vote will necessarily win the electoral vote too.
It's an interesting proposal that's already been enacted into law by 12 states (including the large states of California and New York) and the District of Columbia, which together control 181 electoral votes. But there's one big obstacle: Most of the states that have adopted it are solidly Democratic, and just one is a swing state.
So unless a bunch of swing states decides to reduce their own power or Republican politicians conclude that a system bringing the power of small and rural states in line with that of big urban centers is a good idea, the compact isn't going to get the support it needs
So, yes we should, but no, we can't.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...toral-college-elizabeth-warren-pete-buttigieg
So, for now, the best plan is to make DC and Puerto Rico states.
Last edited: