I mean that I think by making this about Sanders in the first place that this thread was not made to be a good faith discussion about Cenk's flaws as a candidate. Which is a shame, as I think that's a more interesting discussion
I mean, that itself is kinda important though since this is a very purple district that apparently has a jungle-primary system of all things, so Sanders waltzing into this race and endorsing anyone, nevermind someone like this, makes everything a lot more complicated and greatly opens up the chances that no D candidates make it through the jungle primary at all.
There was no reason for Sanders to do that. Especially since there will be 435 congressional races, the vast majority any given candidate will say nothing about, because it's almost always the exception when they endorse someone for a particular race, not the norm. So for Sanders to make one of those exceptions in this particular district of all districts, and endorse this person of all persons, despite all of his issues (especially since on top of that it's been a recurring problem with the Sanders campaign, not just in terms of endorsements but who they've been hiring onto their campaign as well without properly vetting and having to let go once someone else does their vetting for them, whereas for other candidates it might happen occasionally, for Sanders it seems to be a much more recurrent problem than most others), that's definitely worth a discussion in of itself IMO and is not inherently some "bad faith" thing no matter how many people want to frame it that way.