• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Armaros

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,901
the funniest part of this continues to be that Bernie himself famously declined to campaign in the south because he knew southern states wouldn't vote for the democratic candidate in the general.

no, he didn't campaign in the south after losing SC by almost 50%

the 'they don't vote for Dems in November' was just damage control after the fact
 

GiantBreadbug

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,992
User Banned (2 weeks): Trolling across multiple posts, dismissing Racial Issues
no, he didn't campaign in the south after losing SC by almost 50%

It's also almost as if he was an insurgent candidate going up against a political dynasty so hegemonic within the democratic apparatus they might as well be analogs for a royal family. Really makes you think!
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
no, he didn't campaign in the south after losing SC by almost 50%

the 'they don't vote for Dems in November' was just damage control after the fact
Yup. His campaign's internal Afircan American outreach team reached out to Sanders and the upper leadership asking him to campaign in the South because they saw the exact same margins 2016 Poli-ERA/GAF did and knew that unless he got a better share of black voters, his campaign was DOA.

They were completely ignored by a campaign which deliberately chose not to take that advice.
It's also almost as if he was an insurgent candidate going up against a political dynasty so hegemonic within the democratic apparatus they might as well be analogs for a royal family. Really makes you think!
"You can't win over black voters because they worship the Clintons like royalty so don't even try" is not the good argument you think it is.
 

Deleted member 8561

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
11,284
It's also almost as if he was an insurgent candidate going up against a political dynasty so hegemonic within the democratic apparatus they might as well be analogs for a royal family. Really makes you think!

Or

He made a really bad error and lost the primary because he ignored a major part of the voting population and thought he might be able to make it up in other areas and failed to do so
 

Ichthyosaurus

Banned
Dec 26, 2018
9,375
It's also almost as if he was an insurgent candidate going up against a political dynasty so hegemonic within the democratic apparatus they might as well be analogs for a royal family. Really makes you think!

Or Bernie gave up because he knew he wasn't prepared for the fight over voters. This is why he should have done more to understand and appeal to the black voting bloc, the key demographic to getting the nomination.
 

Armaros

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,901
It's also almost as if he was an insurgent candidate going up against a political dynasty so hegemonic within the democratic apparatus they might as well be analogs for a royal family. Really makes you think!

a husband and wife in politics is now a political dynasty?

while you equally insult the work and outreach toward black people. Or the idea that black people only voted for her because of 'the Clinton dynasty' and claim their support is like royal worship?

Could you have attempted to cram anymore scary and insulting buzzwords that don't mean anything or apply here?
 

jviggy43

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
18,184
That there is nothing wrong with that statement for you ignores that it is clearly a problem for many and perhaps instead of dismissing why his statement is problematic (specifically for the group of people he once again will need to snag the nomination he lost years ago) you should instead, idk, listen?
Everything Bernie does is an issue for a lot of people on this forum. Still doesn't change the fact that 90% of the threads made on him aren't an actual issue.
 

Deleted member 11046

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
942
Everything Bernie does it an issue for a lot of people on this forum. Still doesn't change the fact that 90% of the threads made on him aren't an actual issue.
What 90 percent of the Bernie threads are about is not the topic nor a reason to come into this specific thread if you don't actually have a stance on the issue at hand.
 

Servbot24

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
43,060
I'll make it easy for you. Give me a decade. In what ten year span of time did the majority of White Americans in the South stop being bigoted? You have a lot of strong opinions about racism in this country so this should be a simply question to answer.
My uninformed impression is that the majority is still bigoted. Even if they weren't, I don't have any way to calculate when a community as a whole ceases to be racist, or ceases to be a certain percentage of racists, so I couldn't answer your question either way.

My opinion is limited to this - "All people in the south are bigots" is an ironic statement.
 

pigeon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,447
My uninformed impression is that the majority is still bigoted. Even if they weren't, I don't have any way to calculate when a community as a whole ceases to be racist, or ceases to be a certain percentage of racists, so I couldn't answer your question either way.

My opinion is limited to this - "All people in the south are bigots" is an ironic statement.

#NotAllConfederates
 

Chie Satonaka

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,622
I'm not going to quote that post, but lol. These are the sorts of people who I'm supposed to believe are on my team.

Pretty interesting that Bernie's continued racial issues have been adopted so well by some of his most dedicated supporters, tho! Really makes you think.
 

Deleted member 60302

User requested account closure
Banned
Sep 29, 2019
100
It's also almost as if he was an insurgent candidate going up against a political dynasty so hegemonic within the democratic apparatus they might as well be analogs for a royal family. Really makes you think!
Didnt Obama beat Hillary? Guess that political dynasty that consists of literally husband, wife, and Chelsea Clinton isnt exactly that strong lmao.

Please stop boogeyman posting about the Clintons. You make it sound like Bernie was up against the Kennedy's
 

Aaron

I’m seeing double here!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,077
Minneapolis
My uninformed impression is that the majority is still bigoted. Even if they weren't, I don't have any way to calculate when a community as a whole ceases to be racist, or ceases to be a certain percentage of racists, so I couldn't answer your question either way.

My opinion is limited to this - "All people in the south are bigots" is an ironic statement.
No one is saying "all people in the South are bigots." What most who take issue with Sanders' statement are arguing is that the ~90% of white voters in Mississippi he discusses are probably racist.

That leaves you about 10% of white voters and, oh yeah, all of the black voters. Along with literally anyone else.

I find it rather curious this conflation of "90% of white voters in MS are racist" with "all Mississippians are racist" keeps happening. African-Americans are the backbone of Democratic support in the Deep South and kept Obama within 12% of Mitt Romney, no one is calling them racist and yet they are every much a part of Mississippi as the white working class Sanders spends so much time fetishizing.
 

Shyotl

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,272
It's also almost as if he was an insurgent candidate going up against a political dynasty so hegemonic within the democratic apparatus they might as well be analogs for a royal family. Really makes you think!
Now this... this is some rhetoric. I don't think I've ever seen such a mixture of pretentiousness and loaded language in my life. Good lord. I'm going to throw up.
 

Deleted member 11046

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
942
My uninformed impression is that the majority is still bigoted.
Is that your final answer? Because in the very post that initiated our exchange you said "yikes" to the suggestion that the majority of Southern White Americans are, in fact, bigoted.


Edit: I appreciate that Aaron is pointing out your construction of a strawman. It's easy to ignore what people are actually saying and instead attack the ridiculous notion of literally every single person in Miss being racist. The only problem is that I'm not sure there is anyone in this thread who has championed that rhetoric.
 

photonblack

Member
Oct 27, 2017
338
Current democrats don't wanna make a case to poor whites because they see poor whiteness as a personal failure in this system. And it would require soul-searching on the part of corporate sponsored and funded policies of the party. Instead of linking the economic struggle of all the working class its easier to hand wave away these people as just racist and deserving of their misfortune. instead of seeing people turning to radical/dangerous ideology as a result of the violence that is poverty caused by democratic and republican policy and an indictment of capitalism like it is all over the world ( See Latin America, Africa and the Middle East and people turning to gangs here ) its looked at a failure of not taking advance of their whiteness.
 

Tfritz

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,254
That leaves you about 10% of white voters and, oh yeah, all of the black voters. Along with literally anyone else.

big deal that's only like 45% of the state

Current democrats don't wanna make a case to poor whites because they see poor whiteness as a personal failure in this system. And it would require soul-searching on the part of corporate sponsored and funded policies of the party. Instead of linking the economic struggle of all the working class its easier to hand wave away these people as just racist and deserving of their misfortune. instead of seeing people turning to radical/dangerous ideology as a result of the violence that is poverty caused by democratic and republican policy and an indictment of capitalism like it is all over the world ( See Latin America, Africa and the Middle East and people turning to gangs here ) its looked at a failure of not taking advance of their whiteness.

the evil scary liberals actually make cases to poor white people all the time, it's just the poor white people prefer what the conservatives are saying. this is a Big Issue that the left is actually going to have to grapple with at some point instead of just plugging their ears and repeating their mantra about how the libs never campaign to poor white people.
 
Oct 27, 2017
6,733
So, who's worse on race? Bernie or Biden? Cause the way I read the thread it seems like a lot of people would say Bernie. I find that really weird since Biden was good buds with segregationists in the 1970's. He even tried to justify it during this election cycle.

And that's not even mentioning Biden's role in the 1994 Crime bill. He wrote the damn bill and fought for it hard. He said some racist ass shit while doing that too. That bill ruined lives. It still ruins lives. Biden may have called the bill a mistake during this election cycle, but he also lied about it and minimized it's impact by saying it didn't increase the incarceration rates.

Bernie's statements here were distasteful maybe, but I'd trust him on race policies far more than I'd trust Biden. Biden is a racist by most people's standards. He may have cleaned up his act since being VP, but he has one of the worst records on race of any Democratic politician still around today.
I don't think anyone in this thread is saying Bernie is worse than Biden.

People are saying this is a fuckup, and he should work to be better. There's just been a stupid amount of pushback on this sentiment.
 

Tfritz

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,254
I'd like to invite all the Very Wise Internet Leftists in this thread to actually come down to Mississippi, and Alabama, because y'all seem to have the secret sauce that's guaranteed to persuade poor white people in the south to vote for leftist ideas and candidates and it'd be incredibly helpful for the movement.
 

Aaron

I’m seeing double here!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,077
Minneapolis
big deal that's only like 45% of the state



the evil scary liberals actually make cases to poor white people all the time, it's just the poor white people prefer what the conservatives are saying. this is a Big Issue that the left is actually going to have to grapple with at some point instead of just plugging their ears and repeating their mantra about how the libs never campaign to poor white people.
I mean technically only 23.9% of the state's voting age population voted for Obama in 2012. 45.5% just didn't bother showing up, so who knows what their deal is.
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
Current democrats don't wanna make a case to poor whites because they see poor whiteness as a personal failure in this system. And it would require soul-searching on the part of corporate sponsored and funded policies of the party. Instead of linking the economic struggle of all the working class its easier to hand wave away these people as just racist and deserving of their misfortune. instead of seeing people turning to radical/dangerous ideology as a result of the violence that is poverty caused by democratic and republican policy and an indictment of capitalism like it is all over the world ( See Latin America, Africa and the Middle East and people turning to gangs here ) its looked at a failure of not taking advance of their whiteness.
Like seriously, this stuff is horrific. It actively enables these types of xenophobic assholes by pretending they're a star wars villain who just needs to be redeemed instead of people who actively and deliberately target minorities that need to be treated as the serious threat that they are to others' well-being. Poverty isn't causing Trump and his buddies to go after minorities, it's not why you have immigrants and black people systemically targeted here, it's not why India and China are both systematically targeting muslim minorities.

I really hope that this piece ends up helping some of you come to a realization on this stuff, because this "class is the root of all evil stuff" is just a fantasy appealing to the upper middle class and members of demographic majorities that is totally divorced from the way the actual world works.

At this point, we might pause for a moment to ask how racism came to be so completely dematerialized as to be relegated to the status of ideas ("prejudices") or consciousness, and declared so transitory that to make anti-racism a central part of a strategy for socialist transformation could appear to be a mistaking of the contingent for the necessary and the inessential for the essential. The explanation that the denial of the centrality of racism (or more accurately, the centrality of the interlocking of racial oppression and capitalist exploitation) is yet another ruse of a white supremacy, a domination that works all the more effectively when it operates invisibly and inaudibly, is not sufficient. The question we must all face is how the Left in the US could trivialize and minimize the effects of racism at the very moment of a resurgence of openly white supremacist and neo-fascist movements whose ideas have conquered a place in public discourse. And to argue that these movements, whose mass base is unlike anything seen since the 1930s, are not really fascist or that their activists, if treated with respect and instructed as to their material interests, can be won to socialism, despite their repeatedly demonstrated commitment to violent racism, Islamophobia and Anti-Semitism, is simply another way of denying that organized racism has grown enormously in the last few years and poses a danger to those who are the objects of their hatred, including Marxists. It is indeed possible for the Left to reduce the threat they represent and even to reach a part of their periphery, but only if and when the relationship of forces shifts in favor of anti-racist and anti-fascist movements which the Left must help build. The more powerful the white nationalist movements become, they more they are able to attract and hold adherents. To justify abstention from anti-racist action by arguing that winning universal health care will make neo-Nazis, militias and neo-fascist street-fighting organizations suddenly disappear is precisely an example of that simplified version of Marxism, responsible for a great many of the disasters and betrayals of the past century, we have called economism.
 

Deleted member 60302

User requested account closure
Banned
Sep 29, 2019
100
I don't think anyone in this thread is saying Bernie is worse than Biden.
They only brought that up because theyre voting for Bernie and Bidens the front runner.
They just wanted to remind us all that his candidate is better than the current front runner. You shouldnt even have to respond to posts from people who outfit their accounts like propaganda adverts during election season.
 
Oct 27, 2017
12,975
I'm not going to quote that post, but lol. These are the sorts of people who I'm supposed to believe are on my team.

Pretty interesting that Bernie's continued racial issues have been adopted so well by some of his most dedicated supporters, tho! Really makes you think.

Ditto. It's part of a larger microcosm in general. White "progressives" in general seem to completely lack any sort of progressivism when it comes to racial issues.
 
Oct 25, 2017
1,103
Konoha
There's a difference between "racism comes from a bad economy" and "it's easier to weaponize racism when the economy is bad," the latter of which has been shown time and time again for centuries. Secondly what Trump did was use the dysfunctional economy to focus that smoldering racist undercurrent, that has always been there, into a semi-facsist political force.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
the evil scary liberals actually make cases to poor white people all the time, it's just the poor white people prefer what the conservatives are saying. this is a Big Issue that the left is actually going to have to grapple with at some point instead of just plugging their ears and repeating their mantra about how the libs never campaign to poor white people.
Yep it's fucking infuriating

Doesnt help that this thread is filled with people ignoring every election in those states
 
Oct 26, 2017
17,360
I'd like to invite all the Very Wise Internet Leftists in this thread to actually come down to Mississippi, and Alabama, because y'all seem to have the secret sauce that's guaranteed to persuade poor white people in the south to vote for leftist ideas and candidates and it'd be incredibly helpful for the movement.

Pretty sure medicare, medicaid, social security, and other social programs are valued because they are incredibly beneficial to those who are financially insecure across the board. I don't think there is a way to convince a lot of poor, white Southerners to support that sort of agenda because of how anything "socialist" is blasted by the general political culture of the right. But if we are ever able to implement these programs at a functional capacity, I hope they will be protected in the same way.
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
Pretty sure medicare, medicaid, social security, and other social programs are valued because they are incredibly beneficial to those who are financially insecure across the board. I don't think there is a way to convince a lot of poor, white Southerners to support that sort of agenda because of how anything "socialist" is blasted by the general political culture of the right. But if we are ever able to implement these programs at a functional capacity, I hope they will be protected in the same way.
The reason the "socialist" labeling works is because the real thing they're upset about is those programs going to the "other". They'd rather no one get anything than give things to nonwhite people as part of a universal program. LBJ had them pegged.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
Pretty sure medicare, medicaid, social security, and other social programs are valued because they are incredibly beneficial to those who are financially insecure across the board. I don't think there is a way to convince a lot of poor, white Southerners to support that sort of agenda because of how anything "socialist" is blasted by the general political culture of the right. But if we are ever able to implement these programs at a functional capacity, I hope they will be protected in the same way.
They specifically vote against the expansion of those programs
 

ViperVisor

Member
Oct 29, 2017
860
Back 10-20 years ago this had merit. But the internet and smartphones has made it so easy to look beyond the horizon of liberals bad.
If you can't break out of the cycle of ignorance and hate by turning off the bullshit of AM radio and Fox News and taking a lookie-loo at reality that's more of a you problem.
 

Deleted member 35740

User requested account closure
Banned
Dec 9, 2017
262
I'm not so sure what conclusion I should be getting from this thread. Should Democrats not attempt to go after the poor Southern White vote at all? If previous attempts by Democrats have failed, does that mean that at this point in time that demographic is a lost cause due to racism? If the social angle didn't work in the past, should it never be attempted again?

I ask this very sincerely as a Hispanic Bernie supporter. It's obviously important to never sacrifice our principals as progressives and give in to catering to racists, but surely there's gotta be a way to get enough non racists or even dupe some of the racists to get positive results for a Democratic presidential candidate in some of these southern states?
 

Steel

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
18,220
There's a difference between "racism comes from a bad economy" and "it's easier to weaponize racism when the economy is bad," the latter of which has been shown time and time again for centuries. Secondly what Trump did was use the dysfunctional economy to focus that smoldering racist undercurrent, that has always been there, into a semi-facsist political force.
Economy is growing no faster than it was before he was elected and those racists are now fine with economic conditions.
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
It's been depressingly eye-opening for me lately to realize just how many dyed-in-the-wool leftists are straight up racist.
The upper left quadrant and specifically in this case, that left edge on figure 2 is why you will see this despite the "left" label, as social and economic political axes are not the same at all. If you don't actually police yourself s https://www.voterstudygroup.org/publication/political-divisions-in-2016-and-beyond

It's also why the "economics is the only thing that matters" is such a gigantic red flag.