Good, Rogan has a large audience, and probably some of it intersects with the kinds of people that would actually benefit from Sanders policy, but may otherwise vote against their socio-economic interests.
As for Rogan himself, he is a controversial figure sure, but he has a pretty good diversity of people he interviews for his show, and some of them are great people. While I am not a phoney 'free speech!' advocate by any means, I do think it is good to expose people to a range of opinions and ways of doing within reason. There are defintely extreme cases where that doesn't apply to such as Milo, who thrives on attention, and lacks any sort of meaningful substance.
I also, dispute that Rogan himself is such an extremist that his endorsement is particularly problematic for Sanders. While I would condemn any transphobic attitudes that he has, I don't think he is as problematic as some of the characters other dems are associated with. Clinton was friends with both Weinstein and Epstein, funny how that is brushed under the carpet by some on here, isn't it?
Otherwise, I think Sanders has a pretty good voting record on trans related issues and this doesn't change that.
she_esh: Gender is for sure, sex isn't although it is more a spectrum with significant differences resolving as you cross the spectrum from one side to the other.
