Apparently pointing out that Maddy Myers may not have had the best judgment in the past about what she decided to post publicly online for everyone to see is considered drive-by shitposting and character assassination now.
Ugh that's disgusting.
Anyone have a link to the Maddy thing about killing ND devs? I've seen it mentioned but not posted.
im not super familiar with pieces like this, but i am aware editors have a lot of sway with the final article, but I have a question:
is it common for editors to insert other opinions in a piece that's already an opinion piece?
it seems like that should be kept for its own separate opinion article
Of course you're in here defending this lmao.Maddy is a brilliant, funny, incredibly talented editor with excellent people skills. What is this drive-by shitposting? You think it's worth trashing her entire character because she made a joke you didn't like? Go away.
That "joke" was gross, I don't see the problem with people calling it out.I think most people would defend colleagues if they see unwarranted attacks.
That "joke" was gross, I don't see the problem with people calling it out.
I never said if it was relevant to her new job or not. I only commented that what writers write is remembered and consistently saying after the fact that it "was a joke" is a pointless exercise.Whether or not the joke is appropriate, and I don't think it was, I'm not sure the relevance to her editing abilities. Is James Gunn not a good director because he made some inappropriate jokes years ago? I think most of us agree that the two don't have much to do with each other.
It's what i don't get. Kuchera has shown his ass so many times that shown he hasn't changed. I don't need to look at newer stuff to believe that he is the same old troll he always was but maybe he's better who knows.Your point being... that I'm replying to a strawman? My opinion of Kuchera will change when he starts writing like he has a clue about what he's talking about. So far that's failed to happen.
o.OMaddy "i want a mini game to kill ND devs, omg it's a joke haha" Myers sounds like a great replacement
Maddy is a great and thoughtful writer and human being, and it irritates me to no end that so much of this thread has been reduced to TLOU2-related sniping. At least I have a long list of new accounts to ignore.
Oh. Felt like he kinda dropped off after leaving Polygon.
Still changes nothing about my point. The hate-boner some folks still nurse about the guy is kinda... weird?
I don't really disagree with you but it happens for basically every single person on this website so it's not something that should be surprising I think. Also I was only really responding to Jason seemingly downplaying the "joke", not casting any judgement on Maddy's ability as an editor.That's your opinion and I don't see an issue thinking the joke was inappropriate but calling it out shouldn't equal every time her name is brought up to unfairly bash her and her abilities as an editor, which I think 99% of us aren't qualified to do anyway.
It'd be like if I had an issue with something you posted once, to bring it up every single time you posted. It'd be a bit much I'd think.
You don't need any luck playing single player games offline on PS4. Never had to manually disconnect the network connection even!Not the point here, but a lot of that stuff DID actually come to fruition, particularly the always online thing. Good luck playing PS4 or Xbox without being online. Game sharing within families/households via home consoles (unless you're f****88 Nintendo), gifting digital titles, etc. They were just about 5 years early and a bit of strict-ness per consumer comfort with it all. (And they were missing a whole LOT of clarity.)
I don't really disagree with you but it happens for basically every single person on this website so it's not something that should be surprising I think. Also I was only really responding to Jason seemingly downplaying the "joke", not casting any judgement on Maddy's ability as an editor.
For the online bit, I was suggesting that they bet on people always being online at least once every 24 hours of play time. And they were largely correct. Sorry it was unclear.I'm confused. You referenced the always online thing as if it's what happens in 2020. And then you say 'nothing in that is false'. You understand the general confusion over these two statements which seem incongruous?
The thing about the always online thing is it's gatekeeping this hobby that we all love to only certain people. No one wants that. With the changes in the last 20 years, gaming is more diverse and far reaching than ever. It's like those super liberals that will pretend everything is fixed when Biden hopefully is elected.
I haven't played the game and don't know anything about Maddy, but that seems like a take dripping with homophobia and gatekeeping. Gross.Ugh, Maddy "Ellie and Dina were heteronormative/it wouldn't have made a difference if Ellie was replaced by a straight man" Myers.
Is it okay to point out hurtful stuff she's said about lesbians though? Or is that not allowed?
Guys, Arthur Gies hasn't professionally written about games for years at this point. Leave the man be lol
It's incredible how much "Journalist had a few bad takes about games" is this unforgivable sin around here that people will bring them up forever.
I haven't played the game and don't know anything about Maddy, but that seems like a take dripping with homophobia and gatekeeping. Gross.
But do you? After you download the patches, do you then take your console offline for the remainder of the experience? Or do you stay hooked into trophies and friends and streaming and sharing photos and the like? It's not that you "can't" it's that hardly anyone does unless forced by an outage or something.You don't need any luck playing single player games offline on PS4. Never had to manually disconnect the network connection even!
- Maddy Myers has a girlfriend.
- She should be able to criticize Naughty Dog's portrayal of the Ellie-Dina relationship within the lens of her own relationships. She spoke/wrote about her thoughts eloquently (in my opinion) and at great length on multiple podcasts and in writing.
- Generalizing that specific, targeted criticism to "hurtful stuff... about lesbians" is inflammatory and untrue.
Maddy Myers having a girlfriend doesn't make her immune from having garbage takes about fictional queer relationships. It doesn't mean I can't criticize her about those dogshit takes.
I've read her takes and even listened to her bringing it up in that Waypoint podcast and she's the one who generalized her criticism to queer relationships like Ellie's. So yeah, I'm gonna speak up about that. How is saying Ellie could be replaced by a straight man and nothing would change an okay thing to say at all?
uh, no. there's a difference between saying you know someone in order defend your position, and actually being someone. Maddy Myers is a queer woman, not she knows one.
How is saying Ellie could be replaced by a straight man and nothing would change an okay thing to say at all?
This is not the take. She is a queer person, not someone with queer friends. She's just a shitty person who happens to be queer.
uh, no. there's a difference between saying you know someone in order defend your position, and actually being someone. Maddy Myers is a queer woman, not she knows one.
Do you have a response to the other two points in the original post though?It still doesn't make you immune to criticism about the subject...It's not a shield lol
Because what she's saying is that the queerness being portrayed in TLOU doesn't represent her at all? Like that's all she means? That the relationship would have the same amount of representational value to her in either situation?
uh, no. there's a difference between saying you know someone in order defend your position, and actually being someone. Maddy Myers is a queer woman, not she knows one.
Do you have a response to the other two points in the original post though?
Maddy is a great editor! She edited my piece here without compromising on the content:
The personal experiences that Lev and Yara’s actors brought to The Last of Us Part 2
"I would take a hammer to the arm for any of my siblings, and I know they’d do the same for me."www.polygon.com
Guys, Arthur Gies hasn't professionally written about games for years at this point. Leave the man be lol
It's incredible how much "Journalist had a few bad takes about games" is this unforgivable sin around here that people will bring them up forever.
I don't think it's a stretch to say that the protagonist's relationship in a AAA game is written for a straight audience, 99% of everything in the world is made for a straight audience. I also don't think it's offensive for her to say that it wouldn't make a difference, a critic's opinions are their reactions to their experience, not attempts to proclaim universal truths.It's one thing if that's all she said but she went further and said that Ellie and Dina's relationship was a heteronormative relationship made for a straight audience. She then said that Ellie could be replaced by a straight man and it wouldn't have made a difference. That's not offensive?
For those who don't understand the context behind the joke- she was criticizing TLOU2's hamhanded "revenge bad" message. Pointing out that you can convey that message without making a 30 hour long game full of grotesque torture and murder revolving around queer women. Pointing out that even the fictional/gamified killing of people can be hurtful.
In short, if you're disgusted by the joke, you should be disgusted by the game.
She criticized their precious movie-game that finally proves to mom and dad that "Games are art," so to them she must be destroyed.Some of y'all are really viscious and personal about journalists. It's fucking weird tbh. Some bad drive bys and character assassinations here.
I don't think it's a stretch to say that the protagonist's relationship in a AAA game is written for a straight audience, 99% of everything in the world is made for a straight audience. I also don't think it's offensive for her to say that it wouldn't make a difference, a critic's opinions are their reactions to their experience, not attempts to proclaim universal truths.
I think most people would defend colleagues if they see unwarranted attacks.
Calling a queer woman a homophobe for not agreeing with their take is not it either.
Great article!Maddy is a great editor! She edited my piece here without compromising on the content:
The personal experiences that Lev and Yara’s actors brought to The Last of Us Part 2
"I would take a hammer to the arm for any of my siblings, and I know they’d do the same for me."www.polygon.com
I think because of the nature of their job when you see that they are clearly not impartial and they reveal over time some really questionable belief systems that show up over and over it's not something you just brush under the rug.
Conversely people might take issue with JC at times but no one is questioning his integrity and ethics over the job he does.
I'll give you a good example. I love Bill Simmons and I have been following most of his stuff since I was a kid but a couple questionable articles he has let out made me uncomfortable and this latest thing with Lebron James - The Decision has made me not only avoid pretty much everything from him but has changed my view of the guy as a professional completely
Imagine "joking" about killing people and thinking it'd be funny to share it with people on the internet. unwarranted lol... If a co-worker said this to me I'd give them the wtf look, same if it was family or friends.
People keep quoting that post without reading the first sentence, its weird. The point is Arthur's "impartiality" isn't relevant to the discussion here. The dude writes about routers or whatever for the New York Times now. There's no rug to brush his video game takes under, he's in an entirely different room.