Uhh, is the BBC seriously "there is reasonable disagreement on this issue"-ing the Armenian Genocide?
The dispute about whether it was genocide centres on the question of premeditation - the degree to which the killings were orchestrated.
Many historians, governments and the Armenian people believe that they were, but a number of scholars question this.
Turkish officials accept that atrocities were committed but argue that there was no systematic attempt to destroy the Christian Armenian people. Turkey says many innocent Muslim Turks also died in the turmoil of war.
There was a time when the BBC's news division didn't suck absolute ass, right?
They used to earlier in the country's history.Do states often try to fuck over each other? This seems like a sensible rule in a country not literally named "United States".
You don't. There are plenty of Brits that don't pay the TV licence fee.In short, the BBC is absolute trash. It would be nice if I didnt have to fund their bollocks by law.
It's a bit complicated but the intent is to protect states rights. Say every other state wanted to vote to say California has to pay all the taxes for the whole country. A California Senator could block it from being heard. Extreme example but still. They can be overruled but for something like this where it's not actual legislation there is no political will to do it.
Seems he has the power to be the only vote that counts in America. Along with his master.
Both. In different layers of the government.So is it Lindsey or his master that has the only vote that counts?
...How is it possible that a single asshole can block a resolution?
They can be overridden but when it's something symbolic like this they most likely aren't going to bother with all that process.Why not have that rule only if the vote is regarding their own state then?
The way it currently is seems a bit undemocratic.
. . .
After years of rapping about and generally commenting on how important it was that his wife's body was sexy, it seemed that Kanye suddenly had an issue with Kim showing it off because it was affecting his "spirit" and "soul."
Let him tell it, "The corset, underwear, all of that vibe, I just feel like I went through this transition from being a rapper, looking at all these girls, and then looking at my wife like, 'Oh, my girl needs to be just like these other girls, showing her body off, showing this, showing that.'"
Before you scream in both irony and agony related to male entitlement, he kept going: "I didn't realize that that was affecting my soul and my spirit as someone that's married and loved, the father of what's about to be four kids. A corset is a form of underwear. It's hot. It's like, it's hot for who though?"
. . .
In response to his newly puritanical wardrobe concerns, Kim — who, by the way, had been planning this look for nearly a year — told her husband that his negativity was worsening her anxiety over the Met Gala. "The night before the Met, you're gonna come in here and say that you're not into a corset vibe? You're giving me really bad anxiety — what are you talking about?"
Kim went on to remind her husband that, as we've seen in past seasons of "Keeping Up With The Kardashians," "You built me up to be this sexy person and have confidence and all this stuff, and just because you're on your journey and you're on a transformation, doesn't mean that I'm in the same spot with you."
"You are my wife, and it affects me when pictures are too sexy," Kanye said. It ended with Kanye storming off in a diva fit and Kim accurately observing "That's absolutely ridiculous."
The substance of Graham's conversation with Stolyarov, who was posing as Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar, is newly relevant in light of the South Carolina senator's push for sanctions on Turkey as punishment for their offensive against the Kurds in northern Syria. Graham labeled the Kurds a "threat" to Turkey in the call, seemingly contradicting what he has said publicly in recent days.
probably, but:
anyway, South Carolina realllly needs to abandon Lindsey Graham, a pathetic individual who has had a place of prominence at the table for far, far too long
Wait so a single senator can block something like this? Am I missing something or is America just that fucked up?
It works more or less like a filibuster in that it would take 60 votes for couture.
Uhh, is the BBC seriously "there is reasonable disagreement on this issue"-ing the Armenian Genocide?
The dispute about whether it was genocide centres on the question of premeditation - the degree to which the killings were orchestrated.
Many historians, governments and the Armenian people believe that they were, but a number of scholars question this.
Turkish officials accept that atrocities were committed but argue that there was no systematic attempt to destroy the Christian Armenian people. Turkey says many innocent Muslim Turks also died in the turmoil of war.
There was a time when the BBC's news division didn't suck absolute ass, right?
It's not a bug, it's a feature intended to ensure that hick-assed flyover states can punch well above their demographic weight.
no it's america, america is the stupid oneBut that isn't Democracy surely? I'm just so confused right now >_< I'm almost 35 and this baffles me. Am I absolutely stupid?