I like the slower methodical nature of PUBG so this may be a great battle royale option for me. I'm not a huge fan of Apex. Tanks worry me.
F8RGE (Global Community Engagement Manager at DICE) said:Normally I don't comment on leaks for a number of reasons but breaking that habit today. Whatever has leaked has leaked, there's no stopping that, but I just want to clarify one thing.
Leaks of early versions and information are just that, early. When you read or watch something there's a risk that some of the things that you will see will be different when things release. Just wanted to flag that some information may change over time.
What do you mean?
It's curious, I remember when the mode was announced they said that it would be only squads, and then in this leaked video they mentions duos and solo.
I mean there will be destruction and tanks in a BR game. But thats really about it. Thats standard BF stuff though.So basically nothing new or original compared to other battle royales in the market.
Never.
Easilywhy is everyone so down on this? Looks 10x more interesting than Blackout or PUBG.
It's curious, I remember when the mode was announced they said that it would be only squads, and then in this leaked video they mentions duos and solo.
What does this even mean? If bfv is bland so is all battlefields. Do you want them to add magic and stuff?This looks like the blandest thing possible. Just like the main game. DICE really needs to take their time with the next game and surprise people
Not really. Blackout and PUBG have vehicles, Apex has supply drops, and Fortnite has the ability to make cover. The only differences this has ate the setting and the firestorm destroying buildings as it closes inEh the "looks bland" and "ww2 is boring" comments are off the mark imo, actually looks pretty fun with plenty of elements that other BRs lack.
Bad Company 2 was anything but blandWhat does this even mean? If bfv is bland so is all battlefields. Do you want them to add magic and stuff?
Strange question...because someone prefers Battlefield's, more specifically, Battlefield V's gunplay? I don't really have any interest in the others you listed but Battlefield is by far my favorite shooter series when it comes to shooting and vehicle warfare.it doesnt look THAT bad. But with Apex, PUBG, Fortnite, and Blackout already being a thing, why should I play Firestorm over those?
I like the slower methodical nature of PUBG so this may be a great battle royale option for me. I'm not a huge fan of Apex. Tanks worry me.
There was room in the market because Fortnite and PUBG have frankly garbage shooting mechanics. Apex beat BFV to the punch on fixing that. BO4 put its hat in the ring with a pretty solid offering, but with a big price tag and within the CoD-style mechanics.
I don't know what BF can offer to make it a compelling experience against Apex or CoD.
Bad company is barely any different then the other bfs except for the humorous campaign.
What does this even mean? If bfv is bland so is all battlefields. Do you want them to add magic and stuff?
Battlefield 2142 was an amazing game with a fresh setting and new ideas.
I don't think it's hate, just lack of excitement. There wasnt anything that would pull you off of your current BR of choice (except maybe PUBG or Minecraft) because it's not free and there's nothing extremely distinguishing about itDunno why theres the hate here, I think this could be decently successful. It won't touch Fortnite or Apex (due to them being free to play standalones) but it will be competetive with Blackout.
To me, what I saw was a slower, more deliberate BR game like PUBG.
But without the jank.
So sign me up