Garafolo, not Schefter sorry:
It'll of course depend on what we call a "top tier QB" but it sounds like they only expected to be in on Watson or maybe Rodgers.
Yea that's the tweet I saw earlier. We'll see what happens. But the message is very clear: we're looking to move on because we don't think you can lead a team to the Super Bowl and the Browns have no interest in having the worst QB in what is -- at worst -- the second best division in the AFC. They will not let QB play be the reason their top 10 roster isn't positioned as a playoff team consistently.
Baker's opportunity is equally clear: Play better and at minimum increase your trade value and the size of your next contract, which is currently in shambles right now. Or, win over the team leadership and the fanbase and be secure for years to come. In the end, his play and leadership will dictate what happens and his career trajectory.
*nods*I don't think they cared how he'd respond tbh. He's under contract with them for another season and its unlikely they were interested in giving him a long term extension. So he either has to play the year out for them, or wherever they decide to trade him if thats what the choose to do. He can try and sit out or whatever, but not sure what that accomplishes for a mediocre QB coming off a terrible year who is looking for a pay day.