Sand people died for laughs?nobody said shit about the sand person who died purely for laughs in the previous ep
Sand people died for laughs?nobody said shit about the sand person who died purely for laughs in the previous ep
This is Star Wars. You should know by now that this is just the tip of the iceberg.I didnt find it funny, but this here is taking it to far... it's kinda embarrassing.
Well it's canonical name is The Child. When people say Baby Yoda all I think it's it's not Yoda and technically it's not even a baby. It's closer to a toddler. It's name in the show and in the script etc for now is it's The Child, so call it The Child or if you wanna be specific The Child from The Mandalorian. It's not that hard. "Baby Yoda" drives me nuts, haha, because it makes absolutely zero sense. Again; this might be because I'm autistic and I'm very punctual about stuff like this, so sorry if this seems dumb.What else are people supposed to call him? "The Child" is vague and generic. You say "Baby Yoda" and everyone knows exactly who you're talking about. If they want people to call him something else they're going to have to give him an actual name.
They put out bait and the Hutt that put the bait there got eaten instead.
The entire point of the joke here is that Yoda is doing an awful thing. It's hard to tell how aware it is, but atleast on it's face, he's a child and that means he's primarily concerned with base desires, such as hunger.
They put out bait and the Hutt that put the bait there got eaten instead.
Eh the whole episode is very cheesy so I definitely think it was played for laughs.I don't really think that was played for "laughs" so much as it was just meant to establish that the dragon was more dangerous and unpredictable than they had planned. I think it's a fair criticism that the tuskens have been nameless canon fodder throughout all of star wars, but i dunno if i agree that this specific shot was a joke so much as an escalation of stakes. it's classic monster movie stuff.
Eh the whole episode is very cheesy so I definitely think it was played for laughs.
it is a character in a tv-show. not a real child. good god.Well it's canonical name is The Child. When people say Baby Yoda all I think it's it's not Yoda and technically it's not even a baby. It's closer to a toddler. It's name in the show and in the script etc for now is it's The Child, so call it The Child or if you wanna be specific The Child from The Mandalorian. It's not that hard. "Baby Yoda" drives me nuts, haha, because it makes absolutely zero sense. Again; this might be because I'm autistic and I'm very punctual about stuff like this, so sorry if this seems dumb.
You wouldn't like it if I would call your newborn kid Baby Mark because all newborn kids look the same, would you?
And Baby Yoda is not the name of said character. So why call it that? Why call it that after a year of knowing it's not the name of that character?
I'm not gonna call Miles Morales Peter Parker in the new Spider-Man game because they're both Spider-Men.
The real story is that a LucasFilm employee made a fucking gross racist tweet about it.
I mean, the difference is pretty obvious, right? The live frog wasn't a sentient being specifically mentioned as to be the last in its line.in an episode in the first season he eats a live frog but noone says anything, now it's unfertilized eggs and suddenly he's a monster?
Yeah... no.
Why do people keep calling it Baby Yoda? 🤦🏼♂️ It's been a year. Do they still not know it's not Yoda and/or Yoda is not a species? Or is this just my autism speaking?
Well it's canonical name is The Child. When people say Baby Yoda all I think it's it's not Yoda and technically it's not even a baby. It's closer to a toddler. It's name in the show and in the script etc for now is it's The Child, so call it The Child or if you wanna be specific The Child from The Mandalorian. It's not that hard. "Baby Yoda" drives me nuts, haha, because it makes absolutely zero sense. Again; this might be because I'm autistic and I'm very punctual about stuff like this, so sorry if this seems dumb.
You wouldn't like it if I would call your newborn kid Baby Mark because all newborn kids look the same, would you?
I mean, the difference is pretty obvious, right? The live frog wasn't a sentient being specifically mentioned as to be the last in its line.
and how a child that in human age is about 2 should know the difference exactly? If anything it should be more grossed out about eating living things (who is actually sentient instead of a fertilized egg).I mean, the difference is pretty obvious, right? The live frog wasn't a sentient being specifically mentioned as to be the last in its line.
I still say the container is going to get destroyed or something in the next episode and all is lost and then baby Yoda barfs up the unchewed eggs and saves the species.
The Child comes up and somehow deliver the stored eggs hatched to her
Seems to be selling and generating income though.As someone who has to stock baby yoda merch every morning, fuck that little dude
I wonder if people understand that these are eggs as in ovum, not eggs as in chicken. They're taking them to be inseminated. It's basically eating genetic material, not living things. It's as if people made a big deal of eating... that white sticky liquid that humans make ;)
While I think the case brought up by the subject of the thread is silly, these comparisons aren't quite valid. It seems to be me that it'd be more like if you had frozen your sperm earlier, with a plan to use it very soon and then have a vasectomy. But then suddenly something gets to where your sperm is and eats it. Now you can't have children despite your plans.Do you have the same problem with people swallowing semen after a BJ? Because that's the same kind of genetic material (and then would become a consent problem and not a cannibalistic problem which seems to be how people are making it out to be)
Didn't they say that they're her last eggs and she can't make more?I wonder if people understand that these are eggs as in ovum, not eggs as in chicken. They're taking them to be inseminated. It's basically eating genetic material, not living things. It's as if people made a big deal of eating... that white sticky liquid that humans make ;)
Whether they're fertilized or not has nothing to do with them being the last chance for her to continue her family line (I thought it was just family line and not species extinction). Playing it for laughs was frankly just annoying, odd, and kind of creepy. I mean, it's essentially making a joke of fertility issues.
People getting so upset over these eggs that they literally want a baby to be killed. How is this happening ahaha
I missed this, who is saying they want (a "literal" 50 year-old) Baby Yoda to die?
didn't the scan in the first episode say baby yoda was 50 years old? That's a long time to remain dumb. I would boot the kid out the airlock and be done with it.
I didn't love Baby Yoda messing all episode with that poor woman's last hope at having a family. It says a bit about the character development in the show that I was more empathetic toward this new character, and wanting Baby Yoda to get abandoned on the spider planet.