Not only that, but it's baffling that it doesn't strike them as odd that their 'right' one is typically the one they happened to be born into. That sure is lucky, huh?One thing I'll never understand is how there's so many religions yet religious people be like "Nah, mine is right"
Agnostic means you believe in some kind of "higher power" but not among the established religions. Atheist literally means no god.
My whole family pretty much is religious. We never went to church though.
Not only that, but it's baffling that it doesn't strike them as odd that their 'right' one is typically the one they happened to be born into. That sure is lucky, huh?
If there is a God and those 10 commandments are actually his I'll probably still go to heaven. I fulfill 9 of them, which is way more than most people. I've also believed if he does exist and holds it against me then oh well, he's the shitbag.
Can't answer your main question as I've always been pretty much an atheist, but no god worth believing in would damn me for the way I live.
I deny God's existence just fine as an atheist.
I still keep an open mind too (though even if I had some divine vision suddenly, it's more likely that my brain would play tricks on me) - there's always the theoretical chance it's real after all. But in practice the chance is low, that it's reasonable to deny the existence. If strong evidence comes at some point, you can still change your mind.
Maybe it is a language thing, but when I hear "I deny God's existence" what that means to me is basically "I am saying god does not exist".
And as a reasonable being, since I do not know that with absolute, 100% certainty, it is not something I would say.
Then I won't be alone. There are a lot of different religions with a lot of devout followers, all equally sure of their righteousness. If one of those religions turns out to be true, everyone who bet on the wrong horse will be joining my atheist ass in hell. Not to mention the fact that if god does exist then they're a psychopathic, manipulative, egocentric, mass murderer. I'd rather go back to being space dust than hang out with that asshole.
The concept of heaven is complete nonsense. It falls apart when you begin to ask the most basic questions. For instance, let's say that heaven for one person involves being alone. Then say that heaven for another person involves having the person from the first proposition over for tea. Who's "heaven" is getting fucked up in this scenario? As for what actually happens when we die... no one can say for sure. However, there was "nothing" before you were born so it's not that hard to imagine what "nothing" would be like after you're dead.
Because you're still here. You might not be around once you're dead but the effects of your life will still be felt by those you leave behind. Do some good while you're here and you can die knowing that you're leaving the world slightly better off because of your actions.-Your legacy won't matter to you when you're dead. Why should it matter now?
I've given up on the notion of abolishing religion. It's here to stay. The fact that you'd be killed for your lack of a religion in certain countries should speak volumes about religion in general. That being said, atheism is on the rise in the United States. I can't speak for the rest of the world but from what I understand, many countries already contain a huge percentage of people that don't consider themselves religious.-In a country so heavy in Christianity, am I a minority? Other countries would kill me for not being a believer.
This goes far beyond religion. I mean, when you consider the idea of a multiverse or the possibility that we're all in a simulation... where do you even begin?
Agnosticism and atheism answer two different questions. Here's a video that may help you out with that. As for whether or not you should "come out", that's entirely up to you. You know your friends and family better than anyone here. You can probably guess what their reaction might be like and whether or not you're prepared to deal with that reaction.Am I Agnostic or Atheist? Is there really a difference? Should I come out? What are the ramifications if I do?
What?
[Then you weren't religious son, in a Christian family, you're at church a minimum of once a week or else you're literally not even considered religious]
Love Cosmic Skeptic!Then I won't be alone. There are a lot of different religions with a lot of devout followers, all equally sure of their righteousness. If one of those religions turns out to be true, everyone who bet on the wrong horse will be joining my atheist ass in hell. Not to mention the fact that if god does exist then they're a psychopathic, manipulative, egocentric, mass murderer. I'd rather go back to being space dust than hang out with that asshole.
The concept of heaven is complete nonsense. It falls apart when you begin to ask the most basic questions. For instance, let's say that heaven for one person involves being alone. Then say that heaven for another person involves having the person from the first proposition over for tea. Who's "heaven" is getting fucked up in this scenario? As for what actually happens when we die... no one can say for sure. However, there was "nothing" before you were born so it's not that hard to imagine what "nothing" would be like after you're dead.
Because you're still here. You might not be around once you're dead but the effects of your life will still be felt by those you leave behind. Do some good while you're here and you can die knowing that you're leaving the world slightly better off because of your actions.
I've given up on the notion of abolishing religion. It's here to stay. The fact that you'd be killed for your lack of a religion in certain countries should speak volumes about religion in general. That being said, atheism is on the rise in the United States. I can't speak for the rest of the world but from what I understand, many countries already contain a huge percentage of people that don't consider themselves religious.
This goes far beyond religion. I mean, when you consider the idea of a multiverse or the possibility that we're all in a simulation... where do you even begin?
Agnosticism and atheism answer two different questions. Here's a video that may help you out with that. As for whether or not you should "come out", that's entirely up to you. You know your friends and family better than anyone here. You can probably guess what their reaction might be like and whether or not you're prepared to deal with that reaction.
Agnostic is more like they don't know. If they believe in a higher power, but don't know what it is, it's agnostic theist. If they don't believe in a higher power and don't know that there is one, then its agnostic atheism (default for many atheists).Agnostic means you believe in some kind of "higher power" but not among the established religions. Atheist literally means no god.
... If he does exist than he is either a petty asswipe or a good person. If he is good then he will let me into heaven for being a good person...
...There may be a God, or may not be, but even if a God exists, you can be sure I won't follow nor kneel nor have that being control my life...
"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?"
One thing I'll never understand is how there's so many religions yet religious people be like "Nah, mine is right"
If there is a capital-G God, then doesn't it seem unwise to thumb your nose at his (potentially) sovereign rule?
Why would a capital-G God care?If there is a capital-G God, then doesn't it seem unwise to thumb your nose at his (potentially) sovereign rule?
I'm a Christian who also has a degree in biochemistry. I've been fascinated by the study of origins and I think there are probably a few people in this thread who share that interest. For those select people, I highly recommend this book. It is in its second printing now and it includes Meyer's response to the critics from the original publication.
I'm a Christian who also has a degree in biochemistry. I've been fascinated by the study of origins and I think there are probably a few people in this thread who share that interest. For those select people, I highly recommend this book. It is in its second printing now and it includes Meyer's response to the critics from the original publication.
_____________________________________
Surely there are many possible answers to that but, from a biblical perspective, God cares how we live because we bear his likeness. We reflect his character and he, ultimately, became human in the person of Jesus.
I should also note I'm just against the whole idea of some Supreme Arbiter, who isn't even a human, judging humans for their actions. Like, who the fuck are you to judge me or anyone else?
Surely there are many possible answers to that but, from a biblical perspective, God cares how we live because we bear his likeness. We reflect his character and he, ultimately, became human in the person of Jesus.
Jesus' humanity will never be taken away. He is and will forever be human like the rest of us. It's part of the reason BossAttack might want to re-think his position on Christianity...
Stephen "Discovery Institute" Myer? No thanks. I have little interest in supporting people who try to undermine science, and fight to force intelligent design into public schools.
That book is pseudo science, misleading hogwash, funded by anti evolution thinktank discovery institute. I suggest reading the criticisms, to see the intellectually dishonest stretches he makes to even have a premise.
There was no coming to terms for me.
All deities that humans believe in are manmade, like the Easter Bunny.
Atheism is the only logical and sane choice.
We're probably all wrong anyway. I'm confident that no established, modernly practiced religion is actually true. If something out there is responsible for all of this, it is far beyond human comprehension.
What have we done to deserve an afterlife? All we have is now, so live your life like it's your last (because it probably is)
Although Heaven may not be real, that doesn't make the people around you and the world you live in any less real. People matter, relationships matter, life matters; Your "legacy" should be concerned with preserving these principles for yourself and others.-Your legacy won't matter to you when you're dead. Why should it matter now?
As of now you're technically a religious minority. Some other countries aren't too fond of atheism, so if you're ever visiting, just keep your mouth shut about it and you'll be fine.-In a country so heavy in Christianity, am I a minority? Other countries would kill me for not being a believer.
Who knows? Who cares? Don't think about it, just live your life.
If ID proponents want to be taken seriously, they should publish papers in respected scientific journals so they can be scrutinized by peer review. I can't accept arguments from ignorance as evidence for design.If you want to sweep his scientific arguments under the rug, I obviously can't stop you. But being closed-minded to a well-argued, well-supported book is probably not to your benefit.
The Discovery Institute is actually fairly clear on this issue – public school is no place for ID education – and it had that stance before the Dover trial. Furthermore, I have read some of the criticisms to Meyer's work, but I haven't found anything yet that is overly compelling.
Since I haven't read the book, could you post excerpts of some of their scientific arguments?If you want to sweep his scientific arguments under the rug, I obviously can't stop you. But being closed-minded to a well-argued, well-supported book is probably not to your benefit.
The Discovery Institute is actually fairly clear on this issue – public school is no place for ID education – and it had that stance before the Dover trial. Furthermore, I have read some of the criticisms to Meyer's work, but I haven't found anything yet that is overly compelling.
If ID proponents want to be taken seriously, they should publish papers in respected scientific journals so they can be scrutinized by peer review.
Since I haven't read the book, could you post excerpts of some of their scientific arguments?
-What if you're wrong
-There's no afterlife
-Your legacy won't matter to you when you're dead. Why should it matter now?
-In a country so heavy in Christianity, am I a minority? Other countries would kill me for not being a believer.
-Was "free will" ever a thing?
So I've been meaning to make this discussion for a while now. I was born and raised a Baptist in Virginia. But as I began to reach my mid-twenties, I began to become more and more aware. More thirsty for knowledge and reason. More curious of all things, especially scientific, and then gradually more social. As this progressed, I began to question God. His existence, the lack of practicality, the hypocrisy, the toxicity, and the meaninglessness of it all. And eventually, began to feel like I was lied to for all of my life. Indoctrinated by a control system that said I had to 'believe' in order to be moral, yet I felt I was being more immoral by buying into and practicing in religion. My best friend is a non-believer, and has been saying for years that I too am already a non-believer, and that I'm struggling to come to terms with it. To admit it to family and friends, and be ok with the reality that Heaven and Hell do not exist.
I can't shut my mind off to it. ButI struggle with those obviously larger questions:
-What if you're wrong
-There's no afterlife
-Your legacy won't matter to you when you're dead. Why should it matter now?
-In a country so heavy in Christianity, am I a minority? Other countries would kill me for not being a believer.
-Was "free will" ever a thing?
How does one accept this? How do you embrace it. How do you come to terms with it all, and move past the hurt that in my heart and mind- there is no Creator. Am I Agnostic or Atheist? Is there really a difference? Should I come out? What are the ramifications if I do?
Yeah. A lot of this resonates with me. When I hung up my faith, what followed was liberating. Starting with actually understanding what science says about evolution, rather than creationist strawmen, I reassessed everything I originally believed as I encountered it for the very first time with an open mind.
Your examples support the power of peer review, not weaken it. Those concepts would never have been published in scientific literature if they weren't backed by evidence. If journals only published papers that echoed current beliefs, we would never make any advancements.The academy isn't exactly friendly to outside ideas and it has been that way for centuries. Whether the issue was plate tectonics or stomach ulcers, paradigms are hard to shift due the built-in opposition to new theories.