There is no way you'll get close to 500 fps in any modern game.
Probably not even in cs:go?
Is it really well optimized?
Most people.
It benchmarks well at least. Could probably do more FPS with a 12900 and 5800x3D if using lower settings and internal render resolution + image reconstruction (how competitive players play).
Curious what the classic gaming crowd will think of this display. I mean eventually we're going to hit the point where a display like this paired with runahead and a good CRT filter is the absolute best way to play old games, right?
This is a niche product, same as the 360hz monitor. The end goal is 1000hz.
Most people.
Not sure if you're serious.
But yeah. Most people.
Wouldn't that be a 1GHz panel?
lol ok
Personally I struggle to see the visual difference between 60 and 120.
I think it was satire.WTF is wrong with you? 450 is slide show. 475 is the sweet spot.
Always. The more things change the more it stays the same.Huh, no picture of a vaseline covered display showing 144hz next to the 500hz windexed 10 times gorgeous display.
It's very specialized. So they're probably aware it's not mass market product.So dumb, hope this fails, can we please have good hdr and more accurate colors
1000Hz is 1kHz.
Was my response taken serious?
Most people probably play at 1080p, but 4k? Steam's hardware survey puts 4K displays at under 3% of the total userbase, and given how many CS players still use 1024x768 after all these years, I'd wager the 4K audience for CS:GO is probably significantly lower than the average out of all Steam users.