• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Hazzaku

Member
Oct 25, 2017
310
I thought everyone except for Benq/Zowie moved on with from making TN panel gaming monitors lol. Look forward to seeing the RRP though ...

Is it really well optimized?
It benchmarks well at least. Could probably do more FPS with a 12900 and 5800x3D if using lower settings and internal render resolution + image reconstruction (how competitive players play).
 

demondance

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,808
Curious what the classic gaming crowd will think of this display. I mean eventually we're going to hit the point where a display like this paired with runahead and a good CRT filter is the absolute best way to play old games, right?
 

jett

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
44,687
lol ok

Personally I struggle to see the visual difference between 60 and 120.
 
Oct 27, 2017
5,881
At what point can it just simulate the electron beam of a CRT?

Honestly I don't see the point of super high refresh rates on LCD. Seems like the PC monitor market is just chasing high refresh rates and nothing else. I want local dimming, better HDR, better scalers, etc...
 

NuclearCake

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
9,867
Curious what the classic gaming crowd will think of this display. I mean eventually we're going to hit the point where a display like this paired with runahead and a good CRT filter is the absolute best way to play old games, right?

Well unless you find a way to make classic 60fps games run at 500fps, it ain't gonna make much of a difference. For LCD motion to match a CRT you need absurdly high FPS, like 500-1000, or well-implemented Black Frame Insertion features for 60hz content.
 

TacoSupreme

Member
Jul 26, 2019
1,732
Most people.

Not sure if you're serious.

But yeah. Most people.

Most people probably play at 1080p, but 4k? Steam's hardware survey puts 4K displays at under 3% of the total userbase, and given how many CS players still use 1024x768 after all these years, I'd wager the 4K audience for CS:GO is probably significantly lower than the average out of all Steam users.
 

Sambumbia-PR

Banned
Dec 23, 2017
987
Huh, no picture of a vaseline covered display showing 144hz next to the 500hz windexed 10 times gorgeous display.
 

digitalrelic

Weight Loss Champion 2018: Biggest Change
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,124
In my experience, I can no longer see a difference past ~100fps or so. 100fps and 165fps look exactly the same to me.
 

NoWayOut

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,075
Classic example of a product created by marketing to solve a problem that doesn't exist.
 

Afrikan

Member
Oct 28, 2017
17,079
Is it really well optimized?

I just remember hearing that it could go up to 360hz (edit- my bad it's 340hz) on PC... remember seeing the console versions go up 100fps before the next gen versions, if I remember correctly.

So figured someone could mod it to make it go higher. 🤷🏾‍♂️
 

WhtR88t

Member
May 14, 2018
4,643
lol love how Nvidia makes 144Hz look like a slideshow in this marketing video… I swear this is how some people on Era think 30fps games look.

 

Temperance

"This guy are sick"
Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,863
[NO 2FA]
Huh, no picture of a vaseline covered display showing 144hz next to the 500hz windexed 10 times gorgeous display.
Always. The more things change the more it stays the same.

+
kxRhrFB.png
 

Deleted member 14089

Oct 27, 2017
6,264
Damm the PS5 is going to look great on that display.
 

RoboPlato

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,824
Is CSGO the only game you can run fast enough to display this? Even a lot of older titles have bottlenecks elsewhere that hold back from getting framerates that high
 

ToD_

Member
Oct 27, 2017
405
While we may not see an appreciable difference in fluidity, higher refresh rates still provide other benefits. Input lag and, more importantly, motion resolution. At 1000Hz we'll have 1ms persistence, which finally approximately matches CRT persistence. We have some ways to go.
 

Anustart

9 Million Scovilles
Avenger
Nov 12, 2017
9,082
Yeah but I bet a lot of games would bounce around in between 490 and 500 fps. That's too jarring for me. I'd rather lock it to 250fps for that smoothness.
 

Trieu

Member
Feb 22, 2019
1,774
Would love to try one of these ultra high refresh rate monitors. I have been gaming on 144hz (previously 120hz on the first BenQ gaming TFT and also CRT) since forever. 60 to 120+ is a game changer and I wonder what 300+ feels like. Though I am not a competitive PC gamer and the purchase doesn't make sense for me. Still curious though
 

Iztok

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,164
Most people probably play at 1080p, but 4k? Steam's hardware survey puts 4K displays at under 3% of the total userbase, and given how many CS players still use 1024x768 after all these years, I'd wager the 4K audience for CS:GO is probably significantly lower than the average out of all Steam users.

Yes I meant 1080p.
Both were mentioned.
I see probably 4k was in question, not 1080p.
 

OGM_Madness

Unshakable Resolve - One Winged Slayer
Member
Dec 3, 2019
508
I saw this and I immediately thought of Clone Hero. That game usually runs at a 1000fps
I wonder if 1080p at 500fps is better than 4K at 240fps or 144fps in terms of playing either a shooter or a RTS. I think there's a benefit on pixel precision/having more real estate.
 

JigglesBunny

Prophet of Truth
Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
31,252
Chicago
Find me a graphics card that can push this in any game that isn't over a decade old or something like CS: GO and I'll bite.

EDIT - Oh, 1080p? Psh. Peasant resolution. As if. 💁🏼‍♀️