-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Assassin's Creed Valhalla: NX Gamer's Next Gen Console Comparison - PS5 | Series X
- Thread starter Optmst
- Start date
PS5:
Dynamic 4K 60fps
Fully vsynced
Drops a frame occasionally
Xbox Series X:
Dynamic 4K 60fps
Adaptive vsync - screen tears occasionally
Dynamic 4K 60fps
Fully vsynced
Drops a frame occasionally
Xbox Series X:
Dynamic 4K 60fps
Adaptive vsync - screen tears occasionally
Last edited:
I havent seen the video, but no it's not.
They're both dynamic.
Performance
- Series S runs at dynamic 1440p/30 FPS
- Series X and PS5 target 60 FPS. Both have small drops.
- Series X has adaptive V Sync and tears when under stress.
- PS5 is fully V Synced, no tearing but can skip a frame when stressed.
- Regardless, they are damn near identical in terms of performance.
- Series X and PS5 both target dynamic 4K.
- Both rarely hold 2160p. More often than not 1620p to 1800p.
- Rare drops of 1440p seen on Series X. Lowest on PS5 observed 1620p.
- Series X has 1% or two higher avg frame rate in cut-scenes.
- Otherwise they are damn near identical.
- PS5 has 12% advantage in loading (which realistically translates to 1~ sec 'advantage')
Edit:
PS5 version also likely has some tearing as mentioned in the text blurb in the part of the video where NXGamer narrates that there is no tearing on that version:
- Series X and PS5 target 60 FPS. Both have small drops.
- Series X has adaptive V Sync and tears when under stress.
- PS5 is fully V Synced, no tearing but can skip a frame when stressed.
- Regardless, they are damn near identical in terms of performance.
- Series X and PS5 both target dynamic 4K.
- Both rarely hold 2160p. More often than not 1620p to 1800p.
- Rare drops of 1440p seen on Series X. Lowest on PS5 observed 1620p.
- Series X has 1% or two higher avg frame rate in cut-scenes.
- Otherwise they are damn near identical.
- PS5 has 12% advantage in loading (which realistically translates to 1~ sec 'advantage')
Edit:
PS5 version also likely has some tearing as mentioned in the text blurb in the part of the video where NXGamer narrates that there is no tearing on that version:
Last edited:
I should have waited till after I finished the video, it's dynamic but goes up to 4K.
Fantastic stuff from NX Gamer as always! I look forward to seeing a Next gen and PC exclusive Assassin's Creed game, like 2014's Assassin's Creed Unity!
Looks as expected. Basically the same thing. Most multiplats will be as well early on. Things can change when devs better learn these machines though. Or they may not lol. Basically choosing one machine over another based on graphical differences in multiplats is pointless
This place is peerless lol.
If the PS5 has DualSense support then it's a no brainer IMO. DualSense is making me rethink my entire multiplat strategy, which used to be strictly tied to my PC.
Doubtful. Whatever's next will likely be built on Anvil that they've been refining all gen. Unity was an overstep and their first game on Anvil as they shot for the moon.
I'm telling you, PS5 is going to punch above its weight performance-wise. A lot of custom logic/accelerators offloading cycles from the CPU will definitely help in streaming-engine, open-world type games, especially with regard to I/O-based data streaming. That is where PS5 is really a beast.
Most of the time, PS5 and XSX are going to perform and look near identical, especially in third party games.
Playing on Series X and I ONLY encounter tearing while in villlages etc... never out exploring or fighting
Can't believe the graphics are getting praised, this looks like shit
Also mentions btw that the game likely uses temporal reconstruction on top of the dynamic res, basically halving the res of one axis then reconstructing it up. That would explain (in part) why even 3080/90's aren't reaching 60 fps consistently at 4k, the PC version is not a great port by any means but that's a heck of a lot more pixels to push than an aggressive dynamic scaler + temporal upscale.
Still it's yet another argument for how 'native' resolution really doesn't matter in the age of reconstruction. I've seen plenty of Series X screenshots and if it is temporal, it works damn well - same as with Demons Souls, where I really have to squint and zoom in to see the diff with its performance mode and the native 4k one.
yes I know the video is still 360p, ain't I a little stinker
Also mentions btw that the game likely uses temporal reconstruction on top of the dynamic res, basically halving the res of one axis then reconstructing it up. That would explain (in part) why even 3080/90's aren't reaching 60 fps consistently at 4k, the PC version is not a great port by any means but that's a heck of a lot more pixels to push than an aggressive dynamic scaler + temporal upscale.
Still it's yet another argument for how 'native' resolution really doesn't matter in the age of reconstruction. I've seen plenty of Series X screenshots and if it is temporal, it works damn well - same as with Demons Souls, where I really have to squint and zoom in to see the diff with its performance mode and the native 4k one.