arstechnica.com
Nintendo has good online for their in-house fighting game (ARMS). As you said in parenthesis, Bamco is the problem.
And people ignore the games with immaculate online like KI and Skullgirls.
Not really wild. Rollback name got unfortunately tainted by SFV crappy implementation, not to mention Harada disinformation about what it really is.
If people don't like the feel/look of a game, immaculate online won't make it popular.
Rollback probably would've had more attention much sooner if Capcom wasn't such garbage a couple years ago. The back to back of SFV having a terrible launch with faulty rollback and Marvel Infinite despite having the fixed netcode in general giving a terrible impression of the game basically set us back a couple of years. If Strive actually gets JP devs to care about Rollback then Strive might be the most impactful FG we've gotten in generations. Probably since SFIV
Absolutely there was. I had ZERO faith in Arcsys doing good netcode even if it was rollback and had a finger on the trigger ready to cancel my Steam pre-order of the game depending on the reports of the netcode.
if the embed doesn't work
You think the average fighting game player knows anything beyond capcom stuff? :P
To be fair, the average video game player can't read either.
Im really hoping it happens and I hope all fighters do it in the future
It's unrealistic. But it'd be cool if all the different devs came together to form a common cross play infrastructure and account system that's shared across them all. So your account for NRS, ArcSys, Namco, etc games is the same
