This is good, whatever is happening there is terrible. I hope this trade war sorts China out.Late Wednesday, Reuters reported the U.S. administration was considering Huawei-like sanctions on Chinese video surveillance firm Hikvision over the country's treatment of its Uighur Muslim minority, according to a person briefed on the matter.
By stealing.How did Huawei go from a nobody to the top 3 phone companies in like 5 years anyway?
How did Huawei go from a nobody to the top 3 phone companies in like 5 years anyway?
This is good, whatever is happening there is terrible. I hope this trade war sorts China out.
Apple makes products in China using Chinese manufacturers. Cutting off your nose to spite your face, etc etc.
I doubt that was possible without Chinese government backed sponsoring and subsidies. No brand goes from 0 to the top worldwide without something going on. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...y-chinese-state-security-report-idUSKCN1RW03DThey released great products which got hyped. They also catered to the cheaper markets as well as premium market. They can financially compete with the big two as they don't just rely on mobile revenue as they do all sorts.
Someone put it best when they said that eventually, American companies that set up shop in China will be the ones that struggle.
I'm sure this won't lead to any kind of retaliation from China. US single-handedly dictating which companies may or may not do bussiness
Chinese companies just have a different mindset, it doesnt matter Who did it first, it matters Who doest it better and cheaper and the ones that wins are the consumers.
If every companie worked like that it would me amazing for us.
Of course they will start to make their own chips, software etc. This is just the kick the Chinese need to realise they need complete tech independence. And of course if they perceive the US to not be playing fair then they will no doubt rip off any and all designs they can acquire.
Should probably point out that ARM is British, not American.
This is good news. Apparently it's totally cool when the PRC blatently steals IP, bans most western technology services and requires "technology transfers," but it's TERRIBLY UNJUST when other countries try to punish them for it. Won't somebody think of the totalitarian police state? I need my cheap phones!
As always I'm also loving the Kantian philosophers in here saying the US should let themselves get spied on because it's fair.
But would you rather be tortured by the canadian government or the chinese government ?
this forum is full of american liberals who think all of that shit can just be hand waved away because China is Mordor and Xi Jinping is Sauron
...the chinese people are fine with that given that the government has takin the standard of living to new heights.
No I agree, the average person wouldn't bee affected, unless china got sloppy with their data. Bottom line, the Chinese isn't going to knock down someone's' door in Minnesota for bad mouthing the CCP.
The Chinese government bullied a local council into black banning an Australian-owned media company because they believed it did not toe China's Communist Party line.
Officials from the Chinese consulate in Sydney told the Georges River Council in Sydney's south last year that if it did not abandon a sponsorship deal with the Australian Chinese-language media organisation, Vision China Times, it risked harming relations between NSW and Beijing.
The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and the ABC's Four Corners have obtained council documents showing how Chinese consular officials issued at least eight warnings to the council over the last 14 months after learning it was planning to have Vision China Times sponsor a Chinese New Year event. The campaign had an effect and, in 2018, Vision China Times was banned.
In recent years, Vision China Times has been repeatedly pressured by Beijing because it sometimes publishes information in Mandarin that's critical of the Chinese Communist Party. Ten of the newspaper's advertisers were previously threatened by Chinese officials, including intelligence agents, to pull their advertising in Australia. All did.
Vision China Times manager Maree Ma said the paper had been banned because "the Chinese consulate don't like any media outlets that they cannot have some sort of control over". She stressed the paper was an Australian owned outlet committed to independent journalism and free speech principles.
Last November, Ms Ma confronted councillors at a public meeting, demanding to know if and why some had buckled to threats from the Chinese Communist Party.
Ms Ma told the council: "We are clear about the pressures we face as an independent Chinese media. We are also clear of the possible pressures this council can come under from foreign agents.
"However, council events are to serve the local community. These are not international exchanges. We believe council should be making decisions in the interests of the local community, not foreign governments."
Huawei will make their phones and buy the chips/OS from some "third party". It doesn't seem that hard to get around. I doubt they dissolve the company. I don't even think the majority of their business likely comes from phones, but I'm way to lazy to look that up.
I don't really doubt it would hurt China either, but I also don't think they'd really care. All of FoxConn's workforce could be starving in the streets and I don't think they'd really care. They've literally done that in recent history to their own people, and the country will rally behind them while it happens. Picking a trade war with them seems nuts to me.
No, China will just try to destroy their business, like it did with an Australian newspaper.
https://amp.smh.com.au/politics/fed...dia-over-anti-china-ties-20190404-p51as2.html
A trade war with China is a very bad idea in general, but I have 0 sympathy for Huawei who engaged in extremely blatant corporate espionage and even offered employee bonuses to anyone who was able to steal trade secrets from competitors.
To all celebrating, as a Singaporean, I am less concern of what happened to Huawei and more concerned with the world's reliance on US tech.
If I am my country's administration, I will start to develop more homegrown tech than continue to rely on any foreign dependency as much as possible.
Obviously the US is not going to use this nuclear option to most countries (least not Singapore) but it has shown the world that it hypothetically can do it.
I am sure most EU countries are looking at this developing story with wary. There's a reason why EU kept imposed a monopoly fine on US tech companies.
Whatever coming out of this regarding Huawei & China, the US is not gonna ends up the 'winner' in the long term.
My 2 cents.
To all celebrating, as a Singaporean, I am less concern of what happened to Huawei and more concerned with the world's reliance on US tech.
If I am my country's administration, I will start to develop more homegrown tech than continue to rely on any foreign dependency as much as possible.
Obviously the US is not going to use this nuclear option to most countries (least not Singapore) but it has shown the world that it hypothetically can do it.
I am sure most EU countries are looking at this developing story with wary. There's a reason why EU kept imposed a monopoly fine on US tech companies.
Whatever coming out of this regarding Huawei & China, the US is not gonna ends up the 'winner' in the long term.
My 2 cents.
You mean preventing employees from leaving and using their expertise elsewhere?
China needs to be stopped but more orwellian IP laws are going to be a terrible answer to the problem
I dont care about innovation in phones, I dont buy a phone to reward a great idea, I buy the one that I like more, Huawei phones have BETTER cameras (so I dont think they did that by stealing) AND are way way cheaper.Ah yes. Steal shit and sell it cheap. What an innovation you have there! If only everyone took your advice and no one bothered with innovation!
This isn't new. This has been status quo for years.
China has been doing that for years, so there's not really a retaliation concern. "We're going to keep restricting American companies" isn't really a threat.
Ah yes. Steal shit and sell it cheap. What an innovation you have there! If only everyone took your advice and no one bothered with innovation!
How is this different than the status quo? Stopping copying and getting more companies to focus on innovation will benefit the world.
Yes, the American government wants the company that told it to go fuck itself to rule the world. America doesn't havee a command economy. The government doesn't get to pick winners and losers like that. Apple lives or dies based on its products.
Android phones are better anyway. Samsung Galaxy > Apple iPhone
+1
The Canadians would be very polite about it tho.
American liberal criticize their government plenty. Many even fight it.
But whataboutism doesn't mean other wrongs get to be handwaved away. Criticizing two different things is not a logical inconsistency.
Gonna need receipts on that. Lots of Chinese citizens are not happy with their gov.
No, China will just try to destroy their business, like it did with an Australian newspaper.
https://amp.smh.com.au/politics/fed...dia-over-anti-china-ties-20190404-p51as2.html
To all celebrating, as a Singaporean, I am less concern of what happened to Huawei and more concerned with the world's reliance on US tech.
If I am my country's administration, I will start to develop more homegrown tech than continue to rely on any foreign dependency as much as possible.
Obviously the US is not going to use this nuclear option to most countries (least not Singapore) but it has shown the world that it hypothetically can do it.
I am sure most EU countries are looking at this developing story with wary. There's a reason why EU kept imposed a monopoly fine on US tech companies.
Whatever coming out of this regarding Huawei & China, the US is not gonna ends up the 'winner' in the long term.
My 2 cents.
Chinas imports are very small compared to their exports the retaliatory measures would have some effect but they are in a situation were they are really dependent on exports and being able to do business outside of China.
Chinas economy is also in this weird place were many of the "millionaires" in China are living on borrowed money and some economists have described Chinas economy as one big ponzy scheme.
Here is the quote I found
"As long as their economy keeps growing everything is fine but when the growth stops or slips just a little it could be disaster.
China also has no concept of a financial crisis their economy has done nothing but grow for such a long time but for the first time in quite a while the government in China is worried because it's slowly starting to balance itself out which would be fine in the west and other economies.
In this case you justify production with demand based purely on more production. As long as you keep pushing production up everything looks fine. At its peak in 2014 China turned out 30 times more cement than the United States, and the latest production figures are only a smidgen less than 2014's.
Command systems may be good at deciding where to direct economic effort in wartime but they are hopeless in peacetime at deciding when to stop and do something else.
They just keep going down the same old track and then what you get is economic cancer, uncontrollable growth.
You don't see it right away. Any Ponzi scheme looks just fine as long as more people can be found to put their money in. But the end is inevitable and the longer it is delayed the more resounding the collapse.
It has so long been delayed in the mainland that, when the end finally comes, I believe more than half of the loans and advances of the financial system will prove irrecoverable, which would be very resounding indeed."
Basicly he aint wrong what he wrote in 2017 has started to happen and will accelerate with the trade war.
https://www.scmp.com/news/article/2108442/my-prediction-coming-collapse-chinas-ponzi-scheme-economy
The US cannot be trusted, nor can American monopolies. We have Google and Facebook with a monopoly of information, breaking data protection laws left and right and attacking democracy, and we rely on them for so many information sectors. The regulators are definitely going to be more and more proactive with how the US government is leveraging this for their own interests.To all celebrating, as a Singaporean, I am less concern of what happened to Huawei and more concerned with the world's reliance on US tech.
If I am my country's administration, I will start to develop more homegrown tech than continue to rely on any foreign dependency as much as possible.
Obviously the US is not going to use this nuclear option to most countries (least not Singapore) but it has shown the world that it hypothetically can do it.
I am sure most EU countries are looking at this developing story with wary. There's a reason why EU kept imposed a monopoly fine on US tech companies.
Whatever coming out of this regarding Huawei & China, the US is not gonna ends up the 'winner' in the long term.
My 2 cents.
Samsung licenses the chips and sells them to whomever they want. If I had to choose between Snapdragon and Exynos today, I know which one I would choose.
Speaking of companies with Chinese government backing them, whatever happened to ZTE? The last time I heard of them the US also blocked their spyware filled phones and then they just disappeared from the news.
Might as well get off with some lawsuit loot before Huawei is bankrupt.
Some of them are willing to eat grass if situations go that way. Never underestimate nationalist fervor.
I would be surprised if Huawei will take these recent developments without a fight, they are a big company they have extensive resources.
I wouldn't be surprised if we see a new marketing campaign and several initiatives to change the perception of there company.
The fact is the global market is seeing the US government not only dictating how their local companies do business but their international partners too.
Great post, saves me a lot of typing.
Problem is that externalities are so big with tech products, and barriers to entry are so high. It is a problem in a world where bad actors are becoming more bold, yeah.
That's not how economics work, Trump is attacking China's supply chain, their imports. The US has more imports coming from China than China does from the US, so China can disrupt more of the supply chain.
China also holds lots and lots of American debt, the US keeps running massive deficits that no other country could afford to, and much of this is owned by China. (Both private and public debt) In a normal civilized world, China has no incentive to use that leverage, but with Trump doing Trump things, there's a lot to leverage to be had there.
The US cannot be trusted, nor can American monopolies. We have Google and Facebook with a monopoly of information, breaking data protection laws left and right and attacking democracy, and we rely on them for so many information sectors. The regulators are definitely going to be more and more proactive with how the US government is leveraging this for their own interests.
Well, that's why the Chinese government hasn't done it so far, they aren't crazy.you definitely got the first sentence of your post right.
If China impacted exports, or called on debt, China's economy would implode.
Exynos. Partially developed in the US.
They apologized and got forgiven with a fine and consent agreement.
Yes, they filed the first complaint against Huawei in 2017 because they knew this would happen in 2019!
Why couldn't anyone else see that?
Anything to own the libs...
Why bother fighting in court when the gov will randomly arrest people for you?
This isn't limited to just the US. Europe does it as well. You can't trade internationally without dealing with the laws of other countries.
Well, that's why the Chinese government hasn't done it so far, they aren't crazy.
But when the president of the US is crazy, and is intent on going kamikaze at the Chinese economy, at the cost of the American economy, the reasons to retaliate or threaten to retaliate certainly increase. The US has every bit as much to lose as China, it's losing already, and the consequences will be coming slowly as firms shift strategies to protect themselves from the risk of doing business with the US.
For Americans here, you really have to understand that the US is coming off as a bully in the view of everyone abroad, and the fast eroding trust will have economic and political consequences.
I mean, those are all shell companies, they do the financial part, things like that. Every multinational company has shell subsidiaries in every country. They are a tiny part of the sector, and if China really wanted to go crazy like Trump is, that would not be an obstacle.China can't retaliate rashly because every American business in China also has a Chinese partner. I think China will definitely play the victim role on the world stage, become more self reliant and maybe more 'collaboration' with EU in the future. Their internal economy is way overdue for correction and they will just have to take their loses for now. I think that's why Xi has been telling the citizens to buckle up for a long march. If they can truly catch up in technology and become more self reliant in a decade, they will be much more difficult to deal with. Meanwhile, Russia is probably laughing their asses off seeing the trust between the US and the rest of the world erode.
Well, that's why the Chinese government hasn't done it so far, they aren't crazy.
But when the president of the US is crazy, and is intent on going kamikaze at the Chinese economy, at the cost of the American economy, the reasons to retaliate or threaten to retaliate certainly increase. The US has every bit as much to lose as China, it's losing already, and the consequences will be coming slowly as firms shift strategies to protect themselves from the risk of doing business with the US.
For Americans here, you really have to understand that the US is coming off as a bully in the view of everyone abroad, and the fast eroding trust will have economic and political consequences.
I mean, those are all shell companies, they do the financial part, things like that. Every multinational company has shell subsidiaries in every country. They are a tiny part of the sector, and if China really wanted to go crazy like Trump is, that would not be an obstacle.
I don't think China will go that route, as you say, it's a much better play to rely on the international institutions, formal and informal, to arbitrate in all this, and let the US hurt its own image. I think this will be like ZTE in the end, the ban will be lifted sooner than later after some apologizing, a fine, whatever, only the reputation of the US is more tarnished than before. In the coming years there's going to be a huge strategic shift as you say, because it's clear you cannot trust or rely on the US for key sectors of the economy.
Chinese President Xi Jinping has stressed the need for self-reliance and innovation in a rallying call to the country to prepare to fend off various long-term challenges from the United States.
"Technological innovation is the root of life for businesses," Xi said on Monday on a visit to Jiangxi province, state-run news agency Xinhua reported. "Only if we own our own intellectual property and core technologies, then can we produce products with core competitiveness and [we] won't be beaten in intensifying competition."
Driving Huawei out of the United States and Europe is "10 times more important" than a trade deal with China, according to former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon.
He also said he would dedicate all his time to shutting Chinese companies out of US capital markets.
The remark by Bannon, a strong advocate of an "all-encompassing war" against China, came days after US President Donald Trump signed an executive order effectively banning Huawei from the US market and cutting off its vital components supply.
"It is a massive national security issue to the West," Bannon said, in a phone interview on Saturday with the South China Morning Post. "The executive order is 10 times more important than walking away from the trade deal. It [Huawei] is a major national security threat, not just to the US but to the rest of the world. We are going to shut it down".
It seems like this is the mechanism that Trump is always doing. Like with tariffs with other countries. First Trump puts on tariffs, bans, etc.. and then the other side complies and they gave in with Trump using the tariffs he started as currency. In that way, Trump never gives up anything and the other side must give in on all demands. It is weird that this tactic works so well.
To people saying it's not going to happen to companies which are not shade: Trump called imported Toyotas a national security threat. There is no stopping it now that it started. It's end of benevolent US empire and start of British style of ruling the world.
I don't see how that is relevant. This ban hurts American companies as well! Trump is hurting American companies by depriving them of one of their biggest business partners. Of course a Chinese ban would hurt Chinese companies, that goes without saying!No it's because China trapped themselves by requiring technology transfers and partnerships which means attacks on Us interests locally means hurting their own companies.
Also you give the big cheeto too much credit. This ban has the fingerprints of.his trade.rep Lighthizer who is known for his hawkish position against China on trade
In the long run, business will go away from American companies. So it makes sense to be the calm actor, even if in the short run you have to make sacrifices.Huawei is taking a very measured response. They are saying they are going to file an official complaint.
People around them also say that they will release a new operating system before spring next year and that they are working on it since 2012.
China itself is saying that America must first roll back the sanctions and then they can talk further on trade.
It seems like this is the mechanism that Trump is always doing. Like with tariffs with other countries. First Trump puts on tariffs, bans, etc.. and then the other side complies and they gave in with Trump using the tariffs he started as currency. In that way, Trump never gives up anything and the other side must give in on all demands. It is weird that this tactic works so well.
SEOUL (Reuters) - The U.S. government is lobbying South Korea not to use Huawei Technologies Co Ltd products, a South Korean newspaper reported on Thursday, amid a wider push by Washington to get its allies to reject the Chinese tech firm's goods.
In one incident, a U.S. State Department official said in a recent meeting with a South Korean counterpart that local telco LG Uplus Corp, which uses Huawei's equipment, should "not be allowed to serve in sensitive areas in South Korea", Chosun Ilbo reported. The official added Huawei needs be eventually driven out of the country, if not immediately.
More like end of US empire, period. Germany are correct, nobody can any longer rely on the United States for business as usual. America First is basically an adversarial position towards everyone else. It's not actually Trump's worst quality, he's delivering on promises and trying to squeeze more out of China so that the balance in the relationship is more in the favour of the US, but he's playing hardball and you have to wonder what the consequences will be if China and other countries decide they just can't do business on fair terms with the US and instead start looking to found their Western branches and business relationships in Europe. European and African nations should really look at exploiting this position and inviting China in. I don't for a minute buy all the sinophobic propaganda, personally.
If there is *no* retaliation, I don't see why Trump wouldn't just push things even further. He's testing boundaries here and so far getting no push back.
Huawei is taking a very measured response. They are saying they are going to file an official complaint.
People around them also say that they will release a new operating system before spring next year and that they are working on it since 2012.
China itself is saying that America must first roll back the sanctions and then they can talk further on trade.
It seems like this is the mechanism that Trump is always doing. Like with tariffs with other countries. First Trump puts on tariffs, bans, etc.. and then the other side complies and they gave in with Trump using the tariffs he started as currency. In that way, Trump never gives up anything and the other side must give in on all demands. It is weird that this tactic works so well.
I don't see how that is relevant. This ban hurts American companies as well! Trump is hurting American companies by depriving them of one of their biggest business partners. Of course a Chinese ban would hurt Chinese companies, that goes without saying!
In the long run, business will go away from American companies.
Well, originally I was not talking about a full ban on American economies, rather a symbolic one like the Huawei ban is, like, say, banning Apple. I think it's obvious that with a full ban of each other's economy, there would be a global recession like we haven't seen before, and both economies would have a double digit recession.Like Dekuman said, it's not just shell companies. CCP themselves will lose money as well. Chinese economy was already on the verge of implosion due to years of inflated growth. The chain reaction from massively ban US companies would be too much to bear right now.
Here are some articles in English worth reading wrt why I think China will do what I think it will do.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/pol...lls-self-reliance-china-grapples-long-term-us
And we all know that Trump is still having frequent conversation with Steve Bannon...
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/dip...says-killing-huawei-more-important-trade-deal
Huawei is taking a measured response because they're scared shitless, don't kid yourself.Huawei is taking a measured response because they know its China the one that will make the big blow blocking the Rare Earths exports to US.
Huawei is taking a measured response because they're scared shitless, don't kid yourself.
Yeah, I don't like what China is doing either. Canada ended up stuck in the middle because of the Huawei-US mess. That sucks. There are plenty of other issues in China that are wrong as well and nobody else in the world likes it. They are no angels.China was polling Chinese companies on vulnerable Canadian companies as they ratcheted up their bullying of Canada in recent months. They already cut off CANOLA Imports to hurt our farmers . So the way I see it, they are getting a taste of their own medicine
Yeah, I don't like what China is doing either. Canada ended up stuck in the middle because of the Huawei-US mess. That sucks. There are plenty of other issues in China that are wrong as well and nobody else in the world likes it. They are no angels.
BUT, the US uses "national security" as an excuse to economically attack others, and I don't like that either. Americans get all riled up and get their hate on for the wrong reasons. China is not gonna have a political war and is not a military threat to the United States no matter how much Americans want to believe it. But they are an economic power and American business interests do not like that. With the US, it's always about the money. So the Trump government has a trade war and does their bullying, but I really don't think they fully understand what they're getting into. If they want a trade war, they're gonna get it. If the US keeps trying to economically crush other countries, they're not going to like the outcome of their trade wars.
Seems like they're just playing fair now.
Well, originally I was not talking about a full ban on American economies, rather a symbolic one like the Huawei ban is, like, say, banning Apple. I think it's obvious that with a full ban of each other's economy, there would be a global recession like we haven't seen before, and both economies would have a double digit recession.
The truth is, the American economy depends on China's economy as much as China's economy depends on the American economy. Those deals weren't done with a gun on their heads, they were done because China is leading in many essential sectors, and as of today many American firms absolutely rely on Chinese firms that have infrastructure and know-how nobody else does.