Yikes. You're an interesting "friend"All my server friends are so entitled to tips it's annoying as fuck, but as soon as you tell them to further their career into something else they flip out.
Yikes. You're an interesting "friend"All my server friends are so entitled to tips it's annoying as fuck, but as soon as you tell them to further their career into something else they flip out.
Multiple aspects of this conflict with other advice I've been given on tipping.
I think this thread and pretty much every serious discussion on tipping proves customers do not like to tip.
If they're not able to pay for the tip then they're essentially stealing from the staff. And no, I don't think that because you're broke you deserve to get special treatment at a restaurant instead of just making a sandwich at home. If you're planning to eat out, plan to be able to tip the 15-20% or don't go out.Wouldn't you say it's better to eat at that restaurant anyway since providing support to this restaurant means it doesn't go out of business and therefore keeps people's job?
There's also the fact that thinking that people who cannot afford to tip shouldn't enjoy the small pleasure they can afford such as a meal in a restaurant of their linking once per who knows how long of a period of time is just gross.
I basically think that people advocating for and perpetuating this system should at least be able to get together and turn them from a complex and contradictory overlapping unwritten system of rules into a consistent and watertight written system of rules so that people not familiar with this system have something to follow.I know...
The whole thing is stupid. Bottom line, employers should pay their staff a reasonable, livable goddamn wage. End of fucking story. If you can't afford to pay your staff, you shouldn't be in business. You're not entitled to be in business, if it means employing indentured servants and paying slave wages.
At the same time, it's not my job as a consumer to fight for workers' rights. My only concern is to get the best bang for my buck, but without being an asshole about it and a total cheapskate. If servers want to get paid more, that's between them and their employers. If they want it, they have to fight for it. They shouldn't have to, but that's just where we are as a society.
Right now, the onus is on the customer, which it shouldn't. The burden and guilt of subsidizing workers shouldn't be on me. If I tip, I'm enabling a shitty system. If I don't, I'm punishing the worker, not the establishment. I'm screwed either way.
If they're not able to pay for the tip then they're essentially stealing from the staff. And no, I don't think that because you're broke you deserve to get special treatment at a restaurant instead of just making a sandwich at home. If you're planning to eat out, plan to be able to tip the 15-20% or don't go out.
I basically think that people advocating for and perpetuating this system should at least be able to get together and turn them from a complex and contradictory overlapping unwritten system of rules into a consistent and watertight written system of rules so that people not familiar with this system have something to follow.
Until people advocating for this system can agree on what it should actually be, I'm not really sure why anyone not familiar with this system should be shamed about it.
Citation needed.
Imo...unfortubately if soneone does not have the means to eat at a restaurant and not tip...they prolly shouldnt be spending there in the first placeI feel a little uncomfortable about the lack of nuance in this tipping discussion, as it seems to overlook those who may not be as able to tip.
Yes, they sincerely prefer if when they're making more money with tips, even if it comes at the cost of consistency. (as a poster alluded to earlier, there's a hidden "I get to fudge my taxes" element at play here too that makes an all-on-the-books paycheck also a step down pay-wise because suddenly they're being taxed on the real amount, not the one they report.) This is both an anecdotal thing and something we've seen play out time and time again where restaurants that try and make the switch end up with staff retention issues.
No one was really "responsible" for tips happening, it's a thing (much like the stupid Healthcare system here) that emerged out of circumstances. Tipping doesn't actually eliminate payroll costs, it shifts them onto a virtual budget proportional to food/alcohol revenue that management has no control over.
A system where workers get paid more than they do now would increase prices to a spot above the current price + tip total price. Which yes, would result in less people eating out. What you're not grasping is that with the tip structure, whenever prices go up at a restaurant, it's a virtual raise for the employees as long as business is steady! There's not need for a legal requirement because the structure of tipping makes it so wages are directly tied to menu prices and service volume.
The issue with all these external perspectives is the whole "I don't like having a person's income directly in the palm of my hand and I want to change that" motivation works at cross purposes with the waitstaff's "I want to earn as much money as possible" motivation. The customers who want to change it have good intentions, but are not considering the perspective of the people they're trying to aid.
This forum is not always a good place to judge mainstream opinion.
Again, please check out this Freakonomics episode. It's very interesting. I found a link.
Do you know any servers? Because all the ones I know/knew made way more being tipped than they would have at other jobs of a similar skill level. My brother is a waiter and he made more than I did back when I worked retail.
just outta curiosity
if you got shit service in america some of you would still tip?
I know plenty of servers, but if I were to posit to them to forego regular pay and move to a tip-based performance system like the US, I'll bet they'd shoot me down.Do you know any servers? Because all the ones I know/knew made way more being tipped than they would have at other jobs of a similar skill level. My brother is a waiter and he made more than I did back when I worked retail.
I don't eat out but still tip
Ah, I assumed you lived in the US. I can't really attest to wait staff wages compared to wages for similarly skilled jobs outside the US, I just know that here that wait staff that make tips tend to make more than they would working at, say, a fast food establishment or a grocery store.I know plenty of servers, but if I were to posit to them to forego regular pay and move to a tip-based performance system like the US, I'll bet they'd shoot me down.
Their thoughts on it will be ready in about 20 minutes but until then would you like something to drink?Everyone on this site always talks about how the workers are exploited and make poverty wages and we need to end tipping. What do wait staff want?
So that was a read, but I guess I'm failing to see how this supports your statement that the US tip-based system is better than the system used in the rest of the world to the point that all waiters prefer it. It says that some waiters lost money (which could mean a whole slew of things, not in the least the fact they might still have been underpaid) and that 1/3rd of them left their jobs. Even if we accept all of them left because of this change, that's still a far cry from all the waiters preferring the tip-based system.
"Staff Turnover" is shorthand for "Staff are making less and leaving for more lucrative positions elsewhere."
Oh, I'm not saying it's better. It's actively worse for the economy as a whole.So that was a read, but I guess I'm failing to see how this supports your statement that the US tip-based system is better than the system used in the rest of the world to the point that all waiters prefer it. It says that some waiters lost money (which could mean a whole slew of things, not in the least the fact they might still have been underpaid) and that 1/3rd of them left their jobs. Even if we accept all of them left because of this change, that's still a far cry from all the waiters preferring the tip-based system.
Step one would be a proper minimum-wage that applies to all service-based jobs, including waiting and retail positions, like is the case in most other countries. Only after this exists, would it be fair to look at what waiting staff would prefer.
But you posited that there was a universal agreement that this was preferred?Oh, I'm not saying it's better. It's actively worse for the economy as a whole.
It's just better for the waitstaff in general because they get paid more.
If they're not able to pay for the tip then they're essentially stealing from the staff. And no, I don't think that because you're broke you deserve to get special treatment at a restaurant instead of just making a sandwich at home. If you're planning to eat out, plan to be able to tip the 15-20% or don't go out.
Yeah. The entire rest of the world has a single one size fits all policy on this.I gave you my list/ system. Some of it has to do with region, income and where you go out to eat. America is far too large, vast, nuanced and diverse to have a one size fits all "policy" on this.
Everyone agrees it sucks. But every country has lame ass customs. If I go to Japan, I'm sure I'll have to exercise a bunch of nonsensical bullshit and traditions that I feel are dumb. But I'm in their country and I sure as hell am not gonna change their system.
The best solution is to pay all workers a livable wage. Make tipping 100% discretionary and guilt free at that point.
By the waitstaff. Because they will make less money collectively under a different pay structure.But you posited that there was a universal agreement that this was preferred?
Why is this stated as fact? Why can't they make the same equal amount or more?By the waitstaff. Because they will make less money collectively under a different pay structure.
If you cant afford the service, don't ask for it. Pretty simple. If you went into a gamestore and bought a new XB do you expect a game for free just because you are poor? That's effectively what your advocating for here.Do you realise how classist this is? This is supposed to make you seem like the good guy?
You realise that people aren't expected to pay for employee's wages in the rest of the world, right? Your analogy makes no sense. The equivalent would be tipping the cashier.If you cant afford the service, don't ask for it. Pretty simple. If you went into a gamestore and bought a new XB do you expect a game for free just because you are poor? That's effectively what your advocating for here.
But your not "in the rest of the world". And yes, if the cashier wasn't paid normal wage, and you used their service but didn't pay them then it would be the same.You realise that people aren't expected to pay for employee's wages in the rest of the world, right? Your analogy makes no sense. The equivalent would be tipping the cashier.
I am, though. I'm not American.But your not "in the rest of the world". And yes, if the cashier wasn't paid normal wage, and you used their service but didn't pay them then it would be the same.
Seriously, its pretty simple. You are getting a service, but not paying for it if you don't tip in America. Can you hire someone to mow your lawn and not pay them? Weed a garden and not pay them? They are giving you a service and they only way they are paid is by you directly. If you don't pay them your rude and a asshole whos not paying for a service you agreed to by going to the restaurant.
Because with tips = income, the salary budget for the waitstaff is equal to ~15% of the business's revenue. This ends up translating to an amount (especially after creative income tax returns) that's a higher net take home pay than it would be if the job was subject to a traditional hourly or salaried income level. Waiting isn't exactly the most skill intensive job, especially once the salesanship aspect of it is massively diminished with the direct commision aspect removed. When Meyer made those changes, he raised the back of house staff's pay at the same time, which wasn't an accident, the BoH end up with lower salaries in the US as a result as the front of house takes up a disproportionately large part of a restaurant's budget as there's less money to go around overall. This isn't the only place that's experienced this issue. It's a common thread throughout these many, many stories of businesses attempting this change then having to revert it because they started bleeding experienced talent.Why is this stated as fact? Why can't they make the same equal amount or more?
They can't because the US fails to deliver any law on this. And because the consumer is made out to be the awful person if they don't tip in the 15 to 20% region.
Again, your article states 1/3rd of the waiters quit (lets negate the fact all of the positions appeared to be filled by new staff), that means 2/3rd of the employees are either willingly taking a huge pay bump, can't find work anywhere else for years now, or -alternatively- are perhaps okay with working for regular wage instead of tips.
Until you start considering the tips as revenue diverted directly to the pay of the waitstaff, you and others will continue to make this error. They aren't being tipped to make up for missing wages, the wages are the tips, as menu prices are lower than they would be otherwise because of this.I am, though. I'm not American.
I think tipping is a good thing, especially in North America where service workers are paid much less than they should be to get by. But there are also many people who work hard long hours for minimum wage and have many dependents. They don't get tipped. The idea that they shouldn't be allowed something nice, and it's their fault that your system is so broken is insane to me. You're completely placing the blame in the wrong place. You're really going to look down on a black single mother who wanted to get her son a treat on his birthday, for example? Really?
Why is this stated as fact? Why can't they make the same equal amount or more?
They can't because the US fails to deliver any law on this. And because the consumer is made out to be the awful person if they don't tip in the 15 to 20% region.
Again, your article states 1/3rd of the waiters quit (lets negate the fact all of the positions appeared to be filled by new staff), that means 2/3rd of the employees are either willingly taking a huge pay bump, can't find work anywhere else for years now, or -alternatively- are perhaps okay with working for regular wage instead of tips.
I'm not sure that's a good analogy. You have already paid for the food, so you have already received your product. Tipping in America, at least, is pretty much making up for what the business is not paying their employees. When you buy a console the game is separate and not apart of the initial purchase. The game is technically is not a required purchase.If you cant afford the service, don't ask for it. Pretty simple. If you went into a gamestore and bought a new XB do you expect a game for free just because you are poor? That's effectively what your advocating for here.
Correct.
I agree its not a great analogy but its close enough for the forum we are on.I'm not sure that's a good analogy. You have already paid for the food, so you have already received your product. Tipping in America, at least, is pretty much making up for what the business is not paying their employees. When you buy a console the game is separate and not apart of the initial purchase. The game is technically is not a required purchase.