Isn't it weird that we consider our organs objects? Like you say shit like my stomach or my brain hurts. My bones ache. My blood. etc. But what are you if you're not these organs? Should we begin referring to organs in a first person fashion
I am Jack's colon.
What are you? Where does "you" begin and end? Are you the body you inhabit, as a whole? And if so, are you not also an expression of everything you've interacted with and manipulated? Your cells continually replace themselves. You shed skin and hair. You poop. Does your poop, which is part of you, no longer be you once it has been pooped? Is sewage a collection of people, by extension, existing in poop?
You are just an idea formed by neurological activity. Your brain chemistry, the electrical signals, define you. Or the idea of you. And which ones? Is it each of them, individually nothing, still you? Or are they required to work together for an emergent property that is you? But then that emergent you is an ontological abstract, you are still an idea, an emergent property of expression rather than the defined pieces of you. Are you even emergent? If these pieces, these chemicals and signals, are all operating under set Newtonian physics and Quantum probabilities, is there divergence in the emergent you, or is your free will a product of determinism? And if you are a product of determinism, the you is just an idea of you, a set of narrow probabilities, chain reaction set in motion since the very beginning, destined to always exist and be a "you", as is all "yous", and all collectively an expression of false consciousness of the universe reflecting on itself. The you is everything, everything is you, in this moment as an emergent product of the pieces of you, that were always destined to produce exactly you in this specific moment, and destined to reflect on the very idea of "you".
But back to the poop. Are we all not poop?