Being a leftist and progressive isn't the same thing. I'm progressive but not economically leftists. And many leftist nations haven't been the most progressive historically.
Yeah, but capitalism isn't at stake in this fight between two behemoth corporations.
This additional information of it lasting a year is not an additional fault of Epic though, is it? Either it is a general rule then it should have been known for longer, or it is a specific action from Apple against Epic, in which case this specific action is on Apple.
Yeah, get hit with an anti-trust lawsuit, behave like a monopolist. I'm starting to doubt these guys judgment. They are going about this the dumbest way possible.
Someone commented that they are sending a message to every other company out there. Just take a second and think how that might look to a judge in between your Sweeney-hate fueled gloating. I still think Epic is in the better position here.
Yeah, but capitalism isn't at stake in this fight between two behemoth corporations.
The year long block to reinstate the dev account is an additional point though. Of course Epic could have reverted the Fortnite change, but since they claim that Apple's rules are breaking the law, they refuse to do that.In the initial court ruling the judge said Apple was within right to terminate the Epic account associated with Fortnite, and that Epic could just revert the change to get back on the store. That's all they had to do, roll back the upadte and the app could have continued to live on the App Store while they fought this battle. This happens ALL the time with Dev accounts on Apple's platform when accounts get blocked, suspended or what not. You find out the issue, revert it, and then worry about the fight after. This is 100% on Epic at this stage.
The year long block to reinstate the dev account is an additional point though. Of course Epic could have reverted the Fortnite change, but since they claim that Apple's rules are breaking the law, they refuse to do that.
Being a leftist and progressive isn't the same thing. I'm progressive but not economically leftists. And many leftist nations haven't been the most progressive historically.
From what I understand - you could. If you bought that currency on your PC it carried over to your mobile account. I could be mis-remembering though.
Probably, yes. Thing is people are more likely to impulse buy when the icon is right there in the app rather than going through external payment hassle, even if cheaper. Epic got greedy basically, everything else is a smoke screen.
For what I understand they could do that, but they are not allowed to even mention the existence of that site in the app as that also goes against Apple's Terms of Service if the price there is also lower. So that would basically be equal to the move they pulled that got them into this mess, but again, that's is if they mention it anywhere in the app, otherwise they could actually do it.
Nope, this mess is self inflicted
I feel as though people in this thread could use a wider perspective on this whole situation. This is no longer just Epic vs. Apple. Apple's fighting this battle on many, many fronts, which is probably why you see them being as protective of their 30% cut as they are.
Here's a really quick recap of what's happened over the last couple of months:
โข Congress investigating App Store as potential monopoly (along with Amazon, FB, and Google)
โข Epic vs. Apple over 30% platform cut
โข Facebook, Microsoft, Spotify, Amazon being vocal about the same
โข Russia looking to reduce platform cut to 20% (I don't believe this has been discussed here before)
โข Japan anti-trust regulators investigating App Store policies after dev community complaints (ditto)
Regardless of what your stance on Apple is, and whether you love or hate them, Epic's war against the company has caused a lot of other developers and communities to speak out as well. Again, the implications of this go far beyond just Fortnite, and I get the feeling Epic knows it, which is why they're persistingโbecause they're one of the very few companies that can afford to take the financial hit and not be "bullied" into backing down.
LOL straight for the jugular....i love it
Epic is very much not dead, but their case IS quite weak.Apple continues to engage in the industry practice known as corpse fucking.
Indeed! Start with Epic Games please, and get them to conform to the PC platform. Forcing a lower standard of service in the name of higher profit margins is capitalist as all get out, and exclusive dealing is anti-competitive tactics that they shouldn't be able to get away with.Capitalism must be muzzled and brought to fucking heel. THAT is the take from all this.
This post is like water in the desert of Apple vs. Epic threads.I too am disappointed by a lot of the juvenile and naive takes I see here.
Apple is flaunting the spirit of the judge's ruling, which everyone agreed was quite fair to all parties. ESPECIALLY all those other game devs using unreal engine that APPLE made into hostages. Not Epic. Epic expected their Unreal Games dev license to to be pulled, but not their Unreal engine dev license.
And quite frankly, Apple's behavior here, and this demonstration of their power to the detriment of said hostages is justt one of MANY examples that clearly illustrate the dangers they (or any other in their position) pose to a free and open market. They are out of control and they need to be spanked until they fucking quit it! The whole deal with capitalism is it's great for growth but then you have to spank the ones that get big and powerful because they almost inevitably start swinging their gorilla dicks around, pissing all over the small people and shitting all over democracy and justice. Controlled growth is what we want. We do not want neutered or captive government agencies like we have now. Hi FCC. Hi EPA.
Capitalism must be muzzled and brought to fucking heel. THAT is the take from all this.
If you doubt it, then what are you doing on a leftist forum?
lol WHERE
It's funny how people seem to be rooting for Apple yet both companies are as despicable to me.
No
This. In every single thread, people come in to slap the hands of those "supporting" or "cheerleading" Apple, when most of us are just enjoying seeing a billionaire get smacked down when he throws his toys out of the pram.More like people basking in the schadenfreude that Epic acting surprised that they burned their hand after touching a heated stove.
Well in that case, even sillier!
Should have just made a website where you can buy Fortnite credit and promoted the hell out of it on their social media and season trailers.
Epic willing breached the Developer agreement, that is why this is happening. Apple didn't just decide to make an example of Epic for the sake of flexing.
People are only "rooting" for Apple because Epic has been completely idiotic in their approach to this whole thing.
This post is like water in the desert of Apple vs. Epic threads.
People here only look through their hatred of EGS to see the bigger picture and it's MADDENING.
There is oversight in this case though, it's the judge that already ruled mostly against Epic.clearly epic fucked up royally here, but i dont think anyone should be happy about apple being able to deny access to a huge marketplace with zero outside oversight.
i've read enough developer experiences about struggling to get apps approved and how tricky it can be, of how pernicious apple can be to those who try to make a living on its ecosystem.
people are quite happy to crow about this because it's more about shitting on epic, but really we should be discussing the seriousness of how apple runs their market and not what it means for epic, but for what it means for millions of smaller developers who struggle with it every day.
Yes! Victory Royale for my favourite monopoly! Get pwned scrub! insert gif ๐๐๐๐
Most people buy iPhones as status objects (even if they don't admit to it). That's not gonna change because of fortnite missing.