No it wouldn't. The EU would definitely be able to distinguish between general purpose computing devices billions have in their pockets and consoles etc.
They are simply not the same thing that is not how antitrust works.
That, is not the point. The point is that Epic want Apple to lower or remove their service cut, the 30% everyone gets hung up on. They're challenging the fee the industry takes for services, a fee many businesses rely on. By getting one over on Apple, if they succeed, they want to get the ball rolling to every other platform, whether or not a perceived monopoly exists there.
On the immediate surface of it, it seems like it could lead to improvements, with more of the money going towards developers, but if you look any deeper you'll see that damaging the bottom line of platform holders will end up leading to a worse experience for
everybody, both developers and consumers, because
everybody uses those intermediary services and the money to run and develop them has to come from somewhere. In the end, the only beneficiary of this development would be Epic Games themselves, who
want to run their own store, and stand to benefit the most from lowered service cuts as the publishers of the single most widely profitable game product in the industry.
