The tweet also straight up says they also paid to "have announcement of its existence delayed" when the PC version was announced from day 1 of World reveal.
The tweet also straight up says they also paid to "have announcement of its existence delayed" when the PC version was announced from day 1 of World reveal.
Good thing they didn't bite then.Day & Date release is literally one of options discussed between nintendo & capcom. So it was literally on the table.
how we forgot the 360/ps3 era....anyways, carry on
Sony stopped giving a shit about the Vita years before World was ever announced.I don't understand why Sony paid for this, but they couldn't be assed to throw money to make a Vita game and keep the system from dying in Japan.
I wish, but that's not going to happen lolThis kind of shit needs to be exorcised from the industry post-haste.
How is that meaningfully different.Nintendo didnt pay to delay the pc version, the switch version was always going to launch 1st, Nintendo just paid to delay the existence of the pc version until later
yeah, starting to seem like they might be leveraging the popularity of the series with Sony and Nintendo going forward.
Did it? I kid - if you remember, it got almost 0 press to the point where people were surprised to hear about it coming out on xbox.That literally makes zero sense as it launched on XBO at the same time
That's fair. You'll need a bit of time to swim to the other side, before arriving at your workspace when another company fills your pool with money.I remember Capcom just said it takes a bit longer to port well.
Because Capcom never intended to release the port day and date. Nintendo just asked them not to mention it until close to its original launch. Different than "dont release on Xbox in Japan or on PC for a period of time"
I wouldn't call it an industry standard. Moreso just a shitty sony standard.This is a pretty standard industry practice. Regardless of how shit it is.
Why is Sony so against crossplay. I dont get it, that should be the natural progression of online gaming
Guessing same reason MS was against it during the PS3/360 generation. They did have crossplay with PCs with some titles during that generation and carried over to the PS4 generation so it really is weird that they were against it with Monster Hunter World.Why is Sony so against crossplay. I dont get it, that should be the natural progression of online gaming
What a statement while cheering for games being denied to other platforms for possibly forever by buying developers/publishers. How would you feel if Sony outright buys Capcom and never released their games on other platforms? Is it better for all gamers then?
Not sure, but could be to do it mainly for the Japanese audience and Asia. MH was big in Asia apparently and the PC market is far bigger than PS over there, so a player can opt to play either on PC or the PS4 for MH which has multiplayer, thus not making the PS4 necessary on that big market in China.The problem then lies with every other game that does have cross play though.
what's the sense of doing it if the biggest games (COD/Fortnite) have it?
If people want to play Capcom games they can buy a PlayStation just like Bethesada fans can buy a Xbox or a pc or .....any device that's streaming apparently.What a statement while cheering for games being denied to other platforms for possibly forever by buying developers/publishers. How would you feel if Sony outright buys Capcom and never released their games on other platforms? Is it better for all gamers then?
Companies wouldn't keep doing it if it was a "giant waste of funds".You really can't flip this as a positive. Buying a dev shows commitment for your userbase. Paying millions to deny releases elsewhere for a time period is just awful business practice and a giant waste of funds.
Except when they were supporting it without friction for all those years, before Xbox decided it was the way forward.They want to be the only place you play. Anything good that Sony has done in the crossplay space has been a rest of the industry dragging them kicking and screaming.
Just FYI but timed exclusives date back to like..the Atari days.
Right, they are focusing on what works and shows results. This is marketing and these deals absolutely work, as shown by stuff like MHW, Destiny, COD, etc
There's no point Capcom lawyers have notifications turned on for when that person posts. Anything more then a text summery get's DMCA'd in minutes.When making accusation like that they probably should do more than a tweet.
so then why are we even talking about this then If we cant even prove it.There's no point Capcom lawyers have notifications turned on for when that person posts. Anything more then a text summery get's DMCA'd in minutes.
It's about the intent. With time exclusive deals like these, the companies pay so consumers get less options to buy the game for. They literally pay so something doesn't get made or delayed on certain plattforms. Sony even stopped cross save from happening, if the reports are true.So timed exclusivity is bad but spending billions buying studios is ok and even praised by lots of people?
What would the reaction be if Sony bought Capcom? That's ok right?
If Sony buys Capcom then they've made a really strong permanent move for their userbase and commited their funds in an effort to aim that Capcom grows and provides continued new content. In an open market every platform holder has the opportunity to buy new or established devs as they please.
Timed denial of games that are destined to be multiformat titles and permanent denial of features is just shitty business practice.
Wow so it is better to deny those previously multi-platform games on other platforms than to just delay it for some time. Ok.If people want to play Capcom games they can buy a PlayStation just like Bethesada fans can buy a Xbox or a pc or .....any device that's streaming apparently.
I rather direct buy outs than this exclusive window, exclusive game mode stuff Sony does.
wait, MHW was announced for PC from day 1? i thought the pc version was announced later.
Did you read what you just typed out loud lmaoNintendo didnt pay to delay the pc version, the switch version was always going to launch 1st, Nintendo just paid to delay the existence of the pc version until later
You're incorrectly assuming that all people or most people here getting 'mad' over timed exclusivity are the same ones who cheerlead developer or publisher acquisitions.I really don't understand people getting mad over this when every Plattform holder will always sign deals that are in there best interest. Be it Sony, Nintendo, MS and co.
Getting offended by timed exclusivity that every leading plattform holder would use to their advantage but at the same time cheerleading developer or publisher aquisitions...
Excellent post.
The only thing bad here is stopping crossplay/crosssave, but this deal was made three or more years ago, when Sony refused crossplay on everything (which was bullshit). We can see today they have changed their stance at least.
wait, MHW was announced for PC from day 1? i thought the pc version was announced later.
There are rumours and there are rumours but at least try and qualify what you read.
Monster Hunter World launched on PS4 and Xbox One. When Sony gets JRPG exclusives like FFXVI they are console exclusives because Xbox is the competition where there is the closest overlap of consumers, not PC.
It's about the intent. With time exclusive deals like these, the companies pay so consumers get less options to buy the game for. They literally pay so something doesn't get made or delayed on certain plattforms. Sony even stopped cross save from happening.
There is nothing to like about time exclusive deals imo, but there are reasons to be fine with Sony buying Insomniac for example, because those acquisition mean the platform holders will invest in them and those studios get access to all the tools, engines, funds, ... of PS studios. Thus they can create better games and sometimes studios can massively expand. These platform holders fully fund these new games, too. So it's theirs, wether we like it or not.