I saw this when posted in the OT Anthem thread. Great summary of some of the issues.
Look at the most played games on your PS4 or Xbox. It's almost all GaaS. Online experiences are increasing this gen and becoming more profitable.Is this really the way forward for games? Despicable!
Ffs i'm glad i'm more into sp games.
This thread is full of people who never even intended to buy the game.
Thanks for the effort but I don't need your short version of something I read in it's entirety.No... follow what I actually wrote.
The precise part of their post I responded to was that the open world is crap. They were talking like this is an objective truth.
I said "plenty of people say that they love the open world"
Rex asked me to find literally one example (their words)
I found several.
That was the conversation thread, I fucking agree with their opinion that the world is empty. I was making it clear it's not objective like they were implying.
"eviscerated"
Wth, lol.
No, this is what happened.First of all the conversation started due to my response refuting the following statement made by another user:
In response I refuted this claim by summarizing all the ways in which the open world in Anthem is a massive step back from Destiny's open worlds:
You then chimed in with this in response to that refutation stating that my comments regarding the open world and it lacking in variety in setting and encounter design:
I replied asking you to show me where anyone says Anthem is what destiny promised it would be and restating that my observations were not opinions but actually statements of fact either they were wrong or right and asking you to refute my statements directly:
You then completely glossed over the entire second part of that response and pointed me to YOUTUBE COMMENTS to prove your point that people say it's the game Destiny promised it would be :
Even ignoring the fact you're citing YouTube comments as proof of "everyone in real life says" as far as I can see none of the YouTube comments say that and instead say things praising the gameplay or flying. I decided to restate the initial questions in my post to you that refused to respond to:
And then your response to those questions was this:
Again refusing to actually answer the questions and instead opting to minimize those observations by referring to ambiguous obvious chatter.
So no those questions have everything to do with my post and our conversation they are just clearly questions you don't want to answer and would rather dismiss or downplay stating they are either not the point or are irrelevant to everyone "outside the internet" despite them being the entire damn post of my original post. So stop trying to characterize me as the problem here when it is your attempts to reframe the narrative here away from the negative criticism of the game is clear as day.
For sure. This is bad for BioWare.this is the premiere release of the gen for a renowned studio. think they were aiming a little higher than that
I saw this when posted in the OT Anthem thread. Great summary of some of the issues.
And so what? Even if this thread was full of people who never intended to buy the game, does it make their opinions or critiques any less valuable? Should a game only be critiqued by those who "intended to buy the game" and how do you even classify those people? If I remember correctly, many where excited for the game when the first trailer was shown a while ago. At that point in time, you could classify those interested as people who intended to purchase the game. Very weird stance and a very weird flex....
Guys FYI this is pedantic and petty.No, this is what happened.
One person said "puts Destiny's open world to shame" - here
You told them it didn't. - here
I responded to you and said "everyone outside the internet I've spoken to says they love the open world" - here
You said "show me one person, literally anywhere" - here
I said "I can't show you the people who are offline... but here's some online" - here
you said "you didn't answer my question, none of my statements were opinions" - here ----- which was not my point, my point was OTHER PEOPLE think the open world is great, and no matter how many objective truths you think you have found that doesn't change that fact.
I AGREE with you, but that wasn't my point. My point, as lcealry written, was that plenty of other people do think the open world is good, and you shouting "objective fact" ad them won't change their minds.
Ie: it's opinion, not objective.
And this is literally shown with the breakdown you posted.
Thanks for the effort but I don't need your short version of something I read in it's entirety.
Rex asked you to find people who say it is what Destiny promised to be, which was your claim. (or rather that "it was the gist of it"). How about you don't misrepresent your own quotes for starters lol. You know damn well that's what they asked for, not "people having fun with Anthem's open world".
The world only having one biome is, for example, very much true, and you simply ignore that fact and tell others that's an opinion they have. The world being empty also isn't an opinion. It straight up is.
GM difficulties are said to be bugged, though. GM1 currently almost akin to what GM3 should be. source: posted in OTYeah echos my own feeling on the game. Glad I watched it didn't know about the GM lvl req thing. I would be the one getting pissed that I met the reqs but still was dieing easy. I'll stay with hard until I get to 400.
I'd say no as anything that keeps the ea meme, rip bioware and similar trash elsewhere and out of the OT is doing great work.Still, 42 pages without any high profile review out? Was this thread opened too soon?
75 would suggest it's going to get some 8s... this game isn't getting any 8s and I don't see it getting anywhere near 75. There's not that many outlets going to be putting a score on this one for some time yet, we've not got the "real" day 1 game yet with the jesus patch (lol) and from there it will take time to experience everything it has to offer to be able to pin a number on there.The writing is on the wall honestly.
This has 75 metacritic written all over it. And from the "A-team" Bioware to get such a "low" score (75 is decent, but for Bioware, its kinda bad) is kinda shocking.
And so what? Even if this thread was full of people who never intended to buy the game, does it make their opinions or critiques any less valuable? Should a game only be critiqued by those who "intended to buy the game" and how do you even classify those people? If I remember correctly, many where excited for the game when the first trailer was shown a while ago. At that point in time, you could classify those interested as people who intended to purchase the game. Very weird stance and a very weird flex....
I trust Datto's opinions more than reviewers when it comes to these types of games. Game looks fun from his footage. If it had a bit more time in the oven, I think it could have been a really solid game. Still wouldn't get it, only have time to invest in Destiny for loot shooters.
Thank you.That depends entirely on the form and manner of the opinion. I don't have any issue with people posting about their disappointment in the game, but I think that poster was more referring to the underlying weird glee behind a lot of the "BOMBA RIP BIOWARE" posts, which the first few pages are full of. In that respect, I think it's fair to be annoyed at the manner in which uninterested people are choosing to represent themselves.
PS4 hasn't got access at all until the 22nd. That's where most reviews are usually.
I trust Datto's opinions more than reviewers when it comes to these types of games. Game looks fun from his footage. If it had a bit more time in the oven, I think it could have been a really solid game. Still wouldn't get it, only have time to invest in Destiny for loot shooters.
Yeah it's a bit much - the thread could be half as long without it :P
Which platform will you be reviewing on?We received a mail todat outlining the content of the day 1 patch. My editor let me decide how we approach this and I decided to hold back our review until March the 1st to have a full week of gameplay with the many fixes in place, in order to give our readers the most accurate picture of what they would be spending their money on.
Seems reasonable.We received a mail todat outlining the content of the day 1 patch. My editor let me decide how we approach this and I decided to hold back our review until March the 1st to have a full week of gameplay with the many fixes in place, in order to give our readers the most accurate picture of what they would be spending their money on.
The next 2 months are going to be crazy for this game and the people working on it. I kinda hope it forces their hand a little - get the fixes in place enough to build a stable platform, and really fire out that content at a cadence this genre isn't used to seeing. It's going to be interesting to say the least, wouldn't miss being in the thick of it for anything.This game is not scoring over 70, no way. Half the reivews won't even score it, and those that do won't buck the trend. The writing's on the wall.
Bioware had better give this game super fucking great support and fast, or it's going to fold.
It's not Bioware though, it's EA.This game is not scoring over 70, no way. Half the reivews won't even score it, and those that do won't buck the trend. The writing's on the wall.
Bioware had better give this game super fucking great support and fast, or it's going to fold.
We received a mail todat outlining the content of the day 1 patch. My editor let me decide how we approach this and I decided to hold back our review until March the 1st to have a full week of gameplay with the many fixes in place, in order to give our readers the most accurate picture of what they would be spending their money on.
This is how I feel... I'm giving them two months MAX, then if things aren't moving well I'll cancel and wait for their TTK or whatever.The next 2 months are going to be crazy for this game and the people working on it. I kinda hope it forces their hand a little - get the fixes in place enough to build a stable platform, and really fire out that content at a cadence this genre isn't used to seeing. It's going to be interesting to say the least, wouldn't miss being in the thick of it for anything.
Destiny fans man...
This has been disproved many times ITT and the OT I think, EA had very little to do with the way this game was handled according to people's claims. I've not looked into it myself, so take that with a grain of salt, but I have read a few articles that people linked that seemed to confirm this at a glance.It's not Bioware though, it's EA.
Bioware are a very competent studio, this game looks like them doing the best with a less than ideal budget and/or dev time, same with Mass Effect.
It's simple, EA want the win but don't want to put in the work.
i think the vast majority of folks posting those sorts of things are doing it out of genuine concern or fear for the future of BioWare. Some people just feel the best way to deal with dread or disappointment is by making light of it. I don't think you'll find many (maybe a very small few) who are legitimately wishing and hoping for BioWare to collapse. I see these comments more as a condemnation of EA and an indication of folks genuine worry about what this game's reception might bring about.That depends entirely on the form and manner of the opinion. I don't have any issue with people posting about their disappointment in the game, but I think that poster was more referring to the underlying weird glee behind a lot of the "BOMBA RIP BIOWARE" posts, which the first few pages are full of. In that respect, I think it's fair to be annoyed at the manner in which uninterested people are choosing to represent themselves.
It's not Bioware though, it's EA.
Bioware are a very competent studio, this game looks like them doing the best with a less than ideal budget and/or dev time, same with Mass Effect.
It's simple, EA want the win but don't want to put in the work.
BollocksThis has been disproved many times ITT and the OT I think, EA had very little to do with the way this game was handled according to people's claims. I've not looked into it myself, so take that with a grain of salt, but I have read a few articles that people linked that seemed to confirm this at a glance.
It seems this is almost all on BioWare.
BioWare don't always take the easiest path, they attempt things that maybe aren't in their favour, but with good intentions. EA like their studios to use frostbite. It's a spicy recipe!
Nah, people post that shite 'cause they're immature, lack the ability to take part in worthwhile debate, or just like to get giddy riding bandwagons. Nobody posts a PapEA meme out of love and respect, if they're articulate and intelligent enough to care on any such level they simply put those thoughts into words.i think the vast majority of folks posting those sorts of things are doing it out of genuine concern or fear for the future of BioWare.
I wouldn't worry about Bioware until we see a Battlefield game developed by them.
This games has been in development for like 6 years. How can you tell me this games did not have enough development time or budget?It's not Bioware though, it's EA.
Bioware are a very competent studio, this game looks like them doing the best with a less than ideal budget and/or dev time, same with Mass Effect.
It's simple, EA want the win but don't want to put in the work.
It's not Bioware though, it's EA.
Bioware are a very competent studio, this game looks like them doing the best with a less than ideal budget and/or dev time, same with Mass Effect.
It's simple, EA want the win but don't want to put in the work.