Because men can just go and watch another show to get their fulfillment of male representation.I've never seen a woman going into a thread telling men to wait for more episodes to see more guy characters.
Because men can just go and watch another show to get their fulfillment of male representation.I've never seen a woman going into a thread telling men to wait for more episodes to see more guy characters.
Fairly interesting actually, haven't seen the show yetI just realized that there's not a single human face in the entire second episode
Especially when the throughline of the series seems to be the main character eventually caring for and protecting a child.I only watched the pilot last night but IMO it had a Michael Mann-like "Tough guys being cold professionals" vibe. I can see it changing as the show goes on.
Yeah, Star Wars is really not the tree to be barking up considering how much effort they've put into diversity.It feels like maybe since 3 of the last 4 Star Wars movies had a female lead, that maybe a little bit of slack could be given? Especially on a show that so far has had a very limited cast.
It's a boring show with a protagonist that it's very hard to stay invested in. I like Pedro Pascal a lot and so far he's been completely wasted on a dork who mostly just gets his ass handed to him by local fauna.
how is stating there is no speaking women on the first episode an "opinion"?
I know I'm a little crazy sometimes and lord knows I have no love for her, but this seems like a bait tweet.
Absolutely. Harms the credibility of her claim too. It makes it looks like she was chomping at the bit to throw the accusation out there. Let them finish a season before you start defining it on your terms. If her claims are valid after the first season than have at it, but this is woefully premature.
No. It's a valid criticism despite the minor inaccuracy.Mando has only met three unmasked humans over the first two episodes by my count, one of which gets immediately killed. One is Warner Herzog, the other Carl Weathers.
It's a bait tweet.
Geena Davis had good commentary on this:The barometer should be equality with men. Easy peasy.
It'd be interesting to see what reactions would be if the genders of all the characters were flipped. The Mandalorian hunter, his prey at the start of episode 1 (the weird blue dude), the moisture farmer side-kick, the bounty hunter guild leader, the creepy client and his weirdo doctor, the voice of the bounty hunter droid.
All women.
I bet your ass people would say this show is some sort of silly feminazi fantasy at best, and you'd hear all sorts of comments about SJW pandering.
It was the dearth of female characters in the worlds of the stories — the fact that the fictitious villages and jungles and kingdoms and interplanetary civilizations were nearly bereft of female population — that hit me over the head. This being the case, we are in effect enculturating kids from the very beginning to see women and girls as not taking up half of the space. Couldn't it be that the percentage of women in leadership positions in many areas of society — Congress, law partners, Fortune 500 board members, military officers, tenured professors and many more — stall out at around 17 percent because that's the ratio we've come to see as the norm?
Step 1: Go through the projects you're already working on and change a bunch of the characters' first names to women's names.
Step 2: When describing a crowd scene, write in the script, "A crowd gathers, which is half female." That may seem weird, but I promise you, somehow or other on the set that day the crowd will turn out to be 17 percent female otherwise.
And there you have it. You have just quickly and easily boosted the female presence in your project without changing a line of dialogue.
Of the characters in leadership positions, it found that women and girls were four times more likely than men to be shown wearing revealing clothing; nearly twice as likely to be shown as partially nude; and four times more likely to be shown completely naked. It also found that when a slow motion focus was used on lead characters' bodies, nearly twice as many female leads were sexually objectified than men.
Research also revealed that twice as many men appeared in the 56 films and they spoke twice as much as women.
Male characters were shown as being more effective and more respected when in leadership positions, while female presidents and prime ministers were portrayed as struggling with the job. Where female characters were portrayed as strong, it was in the home.
Pretty much my take, I couldn't imagine getting the shit she gets over such trivial things, but I usually don't allow the man babies online to change my judgement or control the narrative. Like you said just seems premature.There should be more representation in big media franchises. It's only been 2 episodes tho. She shouldn't get harrassment for her bad premature take.
being honest with myself, There is that risk, but I think it's a risk worth taking. An action show where there is equal, diverse representation in main cast, the side cast, the background cast is something I'd like to see.
Even if people did complain, atleast they'd be complaining about something genuinely not seen very often and I'd rather course correct more from that than from having too few.
Yeah, Star Wars is really not the tree to be barking up considering how much effort they've put into diversity.
Anita could tweet about the weather and she'd get harassed, don't victim blameDoesn't matter if she's right or wrong - she got the reaction she wanted.
Who's gonna break the bad news to the entire Mandalorian OT that it's premature to share first impressions before they're old?
Can't women do this as well? I mean its only the second episode?Because men can just go and watch another show to get their fulfillment of male representation.
Not as easily as men can. Which is the point of the post I quoted.Can't women do this as well? I mean its only the second episode?
You'll note that I wasn't specifically that piece but the one time (and that I clearly didn't care about it anyway). It's one thing to say an entire piece of work is bereft of a particular people, it's another to point at one specific part of it and talk publicly about it. Particularly given her reputation. Particularly knowing the reactions that things like this get. I'm not blaming her for the rancor of the responses, but I can at least say it was a poor decision for her to not take a step back and think "Hey, maybe this isn't the best criticism to make right now." It's not silencing a voice to be heard, it's making a judgement call that maybe what the point you're trying to make just ain't that important right now, especially given the response doing so will receive.
This is also true. Don't like her, but nobody deserves the dogpiles she gets unless they do something ridiculously terrible. Unfortunately this means, to some people, that she breathed.Anita could tweet about the weather and she'd get harassed, don't victim blame
appreciate the clarificationNot as easily as men can. Which is the point of the post I quoted.
Men don't have to make an effort to seek out entertainment on a basic level of visual representation of men on screen.
Because there's more of them on screen than women.
Well, no one would do anything if they didn't get paid lol. Kinda weak argument.It's not but she makes money on getting people worked up (social media engagement). If there was no money in doing it whether it was movies, games or tv shows then she wouldn't do it at all which says it all about her motivations.
It was a premature hot take, and I have vehemently defended her in the past but...I get the feeling that she did this on purpose and it's not helping the cause.
I think they're talking about future episodes, we've seen multiple female characters in promo stuff and we know some female cast members.You think more women with speaking roles might pop up in those episodes one day?
Like patched in?
I will say that judging a series on the first two episodes about representation seems kind of silly. For all we know the show could be full of fantastic female representation and only the first two episodes were light on it.
But also, it was kind of light commentary and she really didn't need to be dogpiled for it.
Ah. Yes. More conspiratorial nonsense.It's not but she makes money on getting people worked up (social media engagement). If there was no money in doing it whether it was movies, games or tv shows then she wouldn't do it at all which says it all about her motivations.
To be fair, she was specific critiquing the first two episodes. It is pretty weird to have a major television show where the main character only interacts with ONE woman by the end of the second episode.
I mean to be fair the main character only interacts with what 4 humans total throughout the first 2 episodes?
It's not but she makes money on getting people worked up (social media engagement). If there was no money in doing it whether it was movies, games or tv shows then she wouldn't do it at all which says it all about her motivations.
do aliens in star wars even adhere to human gender?Some of the aliens could've been women. The scientist with Werner Herzog could've been a woman. There are lots of ways to do this. Assuming that male is the default is the problem.
Some of the aliens could've been women. The scientist with Werner Herzog could've been a woman. There are lots of ways to do this. Assuming that male is the default is the problem.
do aliens in star wars even adhere to human gender?
I legitimately dont know the answer to that.
Does female alien representation actually count?
There are plenty of aliens with binary genders in Star Wars, and there are likely just as many with non-binary genders. There are male and female Zabrak, there are male and female Togruta, there are male and female Twi'leks, wookiees, etc.
Plenty of opportunities for female representation in the alien space.
You'll note that I wasn't specifically that piece but the one time (and that I clearly didn't care about it anyway). It's one thing to say an entire piece of work is bereft of a particular people, it's another to point at one specific part of it and talk publicly about it. Particularly given her reputation. Particularly knowing the reactions that things like this get. I'm not blaming her for the rancor of the responses, but I can at least say it was a poor decision for her to not take a step back and think "Hey, maybe this isn't the best criticism to make right now." It's not silencing a voice to be heard, it's making a judgement call that maybe what the point you're trying to make just ain't that important right now, especially given the response doing so will receive.
While i agree there was more realm there for representation i do find it a bit premature to dog the show about a lack of representation when there have been like 5 or 6 speaking roles of any type in 2 episodes.
I guess it would be one thing if there were some story supported reason why they needed to be men but there isn't. So realistically speaking it should be about a 50/50 or at least 60/40 split but it isn't and I suppose thats the problemLike I said, the critique is about those first two episodes. The fact the show doesn't have a lot of characters in it is part of the problem, the other problem is that virtually all the characters who ARE there default to men.