I dunno, I think it's legitimate to find this shit weird and stupid. With JLo for instance, it makes sense that someone would be interested in her perfumes that she makes and promotes, she's a famous celebrity who's worked with many designers and has herself somehwat of an experience with that product, and would surely have qualified people making her perfumes. Not only do you get to "smell" like JLo, but you also know there's at least some quality to the product; "she knows what she's doing". This is why her perfumes are actually very successful, and Justin Bieber's perfumes, for example, went no where.It's the same thing as your generation but it's just smaller scale.
Instead of one big celebrity like JLo promoting their product to make you feel/evoke their glamour, you have someone else on a smaller scale that will do it instead. It's more relatable for people too because they use social media and interact with fans while living the fantasy that you want. Since it's not someone that's as big as JLo, they feel they can achieve to get on the same level.
Same shit, just marketed different.
You have ZERO clue how much work it is to be a successful online personality.
And done.
You are absolutely right that it is extremely hard work along with a combination of luck and timing. Reminds of the story of the woman who put herself in debt trying to portray the "perfect IG lifestyle"You have ZERO clue how much work it is to be a successful online personality.
Although her social media life looked glamorous, she was struggling financially, given that her internship only paid for a transportation stipend. Living off her savings, she also got a part-time retail job. Even after she moved back to Miami and landed a full-time publicist gig, Calveiro sank $10,000 into debt trying to live an Instagram-worthy life.
$Looked at her Instagram and it's not shocking. She barely posts (142 posts ain't shit), and when she does it just looks like normal, boring selfies. How in the world did she get so many followers in the first place?
Most content these days is stories. No one cares about the feed.Looked at her Instagram and it's not shocking. She barely posts (142 posts ain't shit), and when she does it just looks like normal, boring selfies. How in the world did she get so many followers in the first place?
I remember Sabastian Bach of Skid Row fame talking about something similar years ago. He essentially was asking why he has a million followers, but his last album sold only a few thousand copies. It is kind of weird. Like, 1% of your fans are actually supporting you. And odd thing.
Most content these days is stories. No one cares about the feed.
Yes, you saved me some typing!
There are alot of people in this thread are super-toxic about this, and alot of veiled "I'm mad that women are able to make money from posting pictures"! Like, every career, every company has good and bad people. To run with this one person when 99% of women do it the right way is questionable. Like someone even made a comment related to women that do fitness wearing "overly tight clothes"...really? There is the promotion of products, but the vast majority is just expressing ones self while getting support or supporting other women. If you are judging someone on Instagram/Snapchat/Youtube solely by the thirsty dudes commenting there, then that's on you. That's not the reality.
This is a young woman trying to make a career for herself. She made a minor mistake but otherwise seems to be fairly successful (I bet this is the real source of anger as well). You all put up with commercials and advertising and crap all the time...sometimes being angry when a game/movie/whatever isn't "promoted" how you want...arguing on if a movie will make billions or not...but let a teenage/20-something girl try to advertise something and it's OMG this is so disgusting! Like really? HOW DARE YOU MAKE MONEY FROM PICTURES YOU POST OF YOURSELF!
It's fairly obvious sometimes that the only difference between this place, and the other place, is that people here have the "right" answers at the "right" time for certain issues. I'm sure this very same topic is there getting the same type of comments there. It's one thing to say "wow she shouldn't have done that"...you guys are trying to "bully" someone (she isn't here of course) for doing something that has brought an economic windfall to many people of different backgrounds that would be further marginalize otherwise. And yes, that includes Youtube, Soundcloud, Twitch, and any other venue that allows people to express themselves and GOD FORBID make a living.
This thread is one step away from "girls only make money in entertainment because they are pretty" or "this person only got the job because they are pretty"!
But hey, you are better than the other place by being passive aggressive instead of aggressive, and making veiled statements instead of overt statements, so good on that! /s
(And if this doesn't apply to any post someone made here, let it fly)
Come on man, don't do that...no one is talking about the valid criticisms... I clearly said if it doesn't apply let it fly. Look at all the code language and innuendo here. Some people are just saying it in a passive way... It's not cool. It's that white liberal toxicity where you have the "right" answers and say things in the right way. There hasn't been one thread nearly this long based on male influencers.This is a gargantuan stretch. Criticizing influencers isn't an attack on women.
I don't think that's true. It's still important to have some permanent posts, and a lot of folks don't look at stories. Seems like you have a better chance of getting seen by someone scrolling down their feed.Most content these days is stories. No one cares about the feed.
Can relate to that. I have over 1,000 and many off them don't buy my books. So I market to other places now, just random genre readers. Still trying to get a Bookbub.This makes me feel a lot better at the sales of a book I self published and spread word about on Facebook. Nearly 600 friends 30 copies or so sold so far. 5% is compatively amazing.
It's not really a matter of opinion.I don't think that's true. It's still important to have some permanent posts, and a lot of folks don't look at stories. Seems like you have a better chance of getting seen by someone scrolling down their feed.
Also gives them a chance to be part of a discussion. So the poster can engage openly with their followers. Posts matter.
I feel like such an old man when it comes to how social media evolved. I don't understand Instagram or Snapchat at all.
Not the same thing but I have/had worked on multiple 6-figures Facebook pages that would get thousands, tens of thousands of likes at each post. Tons of comments, lots of shares. Then we'd organize meetups, start selling merchandise, and we were lucky to have a dozen people involved overall. The last meetup on one of the 200k+ page had a whopping 4-5 people coming directly from the fans (the rest were buddies of mine), the one before in a far bigger and more relevant town still only got to like 10.
Liking a post in boredom, sharing a funny photo on your profile, watching a video... it's totally not the same as wanting to actually spend money on said content. A healthy reminder.
Yeah.... I've been laughing and scratching my head at the same time since this profession was labeled "influencer."
It does, but Bach hasn't been their singer for over 20 years. He was talking about a solo album.
Yeah.... I've been laughing and scratching my head at the same time since this profession was labeled "influencer."
I feel like such an old man when it comes to how social media evolved. I don't understand Instagram or Snapchat at all.
if we called it "social media marketing" it would sound like they were about to snap out an ad for essential oils or bad leggings.Yeah.... I've been laughing and scratching my head at the same time since this profession was labeled "influencer."
Yeah, but the thing is, your shirt is actually something people would want.Stuff like this is doubly frustrating for me. I have my own brand that by all accounts is pretty successful yet when ever i talk to licensing agents or companies all they can ask is how many followers i have. The truth is i don't have loads, certainly far away from 2 million. They don't ask me how much money i make, how many shirts i sell, only how many people follow me. They don't even care about engagement, just the number of followers you have. It's so backwards and disheartening for me.
For example here's one of the many shirts i sell. I've certainly sold way way more than 36 despite having a tiny "following" compared to her yet all these companies who have the contacts and the ability to take my brand to where it needs to be look down on me because i don't have loads of followers. What i do have is very high engagement, a true fan base and fans who actually love and want to support what i do. But that doesn't matter compared to buying a bunch of followers in the corporate world it seems.
Still even with 2 million followers she should have easily sold more than 36 of a design as if i can do it with a tiny fraction of that you'd think with 2 million people even she'd have a tiny fraction of people who'd purchase them.
Yep. This isn't difficult.Well, from the looks of it, the clothes aren't even hip. Just a low-effort attempt at streetwear.
When are you selling a "BronsonLee <3's NCIS" shirt?I mean i have almost 200 followers and all i do is troll bronsonlee
This is a gargantuan stretch. Criticizing influencers isn't an attack on women.