What do we think these CPUs are doing against the latest Intels for gaming?
What do we think these CPUs are doing against the latest Intels for gaming?
Big oof at the price increase.
You can get a 3700X in germany for around 250-260€ and thats not taking deals into account. The 450€ for a 5800X are hard to justify for maybe 10-15% performance increase in 1440p and 4k.
Which GPU do you have?Will be upgrading from a 6700k but I'm eyeing the 5900x, will need to see 1440p performance gains over Zen 2 though
Too right.
That price bump is not worth it at all for the performance gain.
The 3700X was too perfect and fucked the 3800X and XT, and now even more so fucked the 5800X.
I see no logical reason to buy one.
Gaming.....you arent gaining enough to justify ~100 dollars.
Productivity.....you are a few dollars shy of a 3900X
New features......lol what?
Ok that was my immediate thought. I'm new to pc gaming but those prices seem like a significant departure from their strategy in the past. Perhaps the tech requires it, but the 550 number seems lame to me.Hopefully this isn't a sign of RDNA2 pricing because those prices look terrible. $300 for a 6 core seems like a lot; I wonder if it'd even be enough to match what consoles have.
Well those price convinced me to get a 3600. So good job with that I guess.
I mean they don't over the 10900k - they are either the same or ahead by 2-5% based on their own graphs
I hace a question. I wanted to buy an AIO for my current rig but dont thionking about upgrading cpu. Will it still work or do the mobos that support those cpu's have a different socket for it?
I'd be interested to see if it is 5% better in real world benches rather than just marketing material.These are CPUs we're talking about. 5% is more than the difference between a 3900X and a 10900K on average.
The current best CPU for gaming is a 6c/12t CPU from Intel for ~$300. Not sure what people were expecting honestly.Hopefully this isn't a sign of RDNA2 pricing because those prices look terrible. $300 for a 6 core seems like a lot; I wonder if it'd even be enough to match what consoles have.
Are Ryzen CPUs not suitable for emulation?I was thinking on getting the 5800X, but after seeing that price, I'm seriously considering just going with the i7 10700k. I care about high framerates in games over resolution, and emulation is pretty important to me.
I currently have a 1080p 144 Hz monitor and plan to get an RTX 3070. I might upgrade to a 1440p 144 Hz monitor next year.
Thoughts...?
I didn't say that.
Ohhh, I misunderstood the initial post then.I didn't say that.
But if my understanding is correct, the 5800X will have a similar single threaded performance as that of the i7 10700K, while also having the same amount of cores and threads. So I would get basically the same performance in emulation and other CPU intensive gaming scenarios with both CPUs, right? I can get the i7 for like 369€ right now...
I'd be missing out on PCIe 4.0 though :( that's what makes the choice not very clearOhhh, I misunderstood the initial post then.
I'm currently using an i7-4790K, mostly for emulation too, and was deciding which CPU to upgrade to in the near future.
Given the price/performance though, the 10700K would make more sense.
Looks like my i7-6700K will definitely keep on until DDR5 is here at least, which is fine by me.
I didn't say that.
But if my understanding is correct, the 5800X will have a similar single threaded performance as that of the i7 10700K, while also having the same amount of cores and threads. So I would get basically the same performance in emulation and other CPU intensive gaming scenarios with both CPUs, right? I can get the i7 for like 369€ right now...
No worries, I read it as you intended :)Thats fair enough, thanks. For clarity me saying "I don't understand why" is a genuine lack of understanding and not an attempt to be shitty about it. If there is a reason why they don't use more recent releases then that's cool.
As the end user though, those types of gains are ultimately what I want to see. We are on the verge of a new console gen and you'd assume most users upgrading right now are doing so with next gen games in mind. To not benchmark any games released within the last year of this gen just feels off.
I'm on a 3600/1660ti, and Flight Sim is still the only game I play that genuinely makes me want an upgrade. It would have been nice to hear more about it from Nvidia and AMD's new hardware.
970, trying to find myself a 3080 with little luck
With these prices and the very slight gaming performance gain over what Intel is doing even with the 7nm vs 14nm I think I will just wait until Alder lake to see what Intel can do with 10nm. Gaming performance is really my main take away so waiting a year for Intel seems like the right play when both keep going higher on prices.
You don't think it'd be safe to get a Zen 2? I'm also building a new machine and having seen this info I was thinking of getting a 3700x, pairing it with a 3080 and then upgrading to Zen 3 is a couple of years. Is that a bad idea?I guess I'm obligated to get the zen 3 since I'm building a brand new machine...
You don't think it'd be safe to get a Zen 2? I'm also building a new machine and having seen this info I was thinking of getting a 3700x, pairing it with a 3080 and then upgrading to Zen 3 is a couple of years. Is that a bad idea?
Quite an upgrade. Good luck with the purchase!