• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Apo

Member
Oct 28, 2017
401
Good for AMD but the price increase is crazy. AMD will probably release cheaper non-X models next year. But right now I would have to pay about 66% more for a Zen 5000 8 core CPU and about 75% more for a Zenn 5000 6 core CPU in comparison to the cheapest Zen 3000 CPU model. This is really disappointing.

I was thinking about buying a new gaming PC this year but now I will wait until Intel release their next CPU generation. Not because I want to buy an Intel CPU but I hope they can provide a little bit competition and that the prices for AMD CPUs will drop until then.
 

djplaeskool

Member
Oct 26, 2017
19,731
Not a fan of the $50 increase across the board, but I do like the specs on display here.
Will hold off until I can see some benches, or if I maybe please finally get my hands on a 3080 and I run into any hiccups

Any reason to upgrade from 8700k5ghz for 4k60 gaming?

Doubtful. 4k isn't as CPU intensive as with higher framerates, so you should be good.

What do we think these CPUs are doing against the latest Intels for gaming?

They're directly competitive with Intel's current highest echelon due to the big uplift in single-thread performance.
With Intel's next gen desktop processors not landing until sometime in 2021, this is basically AMD's opening.
 

Gashprex

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,029
Dec 4, 2018
132
Looking at the prices, I don't feel bad about being unable to plug in the Zen 3 cpus into my b350 motherboard. This makes my decision easier to just swap my 1700x for a 3700x and stick with that for a few years.
 

Black_Stride

Avenger
Oct 28, 2017
7,383
Big oof at the price increase.

You can get a 3700X in germany for around 250-260€ and thats not taking deals into account. The 450€ for a 5800X are hard to justify for maybe 10-15% performance increase in 1440p and 4k.

Too right.
That price bump is not worth it at all for the performance gain.

The 3700X was too perfect and fucked the 3800X and XT, and now even more so fucked the 5800X.
I see no logical reason to buy one.

Gaming.....you arent gaining enough to justify ~100 dollars.
Productivity.....you are a few dollars shy of a 3900X
New features......lol what?
 

HamSandwich

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,605
Too right.
That price bump is not worth it at all for the performance gain.

The 3700X was too perfect and fucked the 3800X and XT, and now even more so fucked the 5800X.
I see no logical reason to buy one.

Gaming.....you arent gaining enough to justify ~100 dollars.
Productivity.....you are a few dollars shy of a 3900X
New features......lol what?

This. I have a 3700x and im like, why would I pay 50 bucks more for it's supposed equivalent in the 5800x for marginal increases?
 

CrunchyFrog

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,455
Yeah this pricing is not what I was hoping for. I'll wait and see what rocket lake brings knowing now they'll have pcie 4.0 in q1 '21
 

Mukrab

Member
Apr 19, 2020
7,486
I hace a question. I wanted to buy an AIO for my current rig but dont thionking about upgrading cpu. Will it still work or do the mobos that support those cpu's have a different socket for it?
 

Deleted member 56752

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
May 15, 2019
8,699
Hopefully this isn't a sign of RDNA2 pricing because those prices look terrible. $300 for a 6 core seems like a lot; I wonder if it'd even be enough to match what consoles have.
Ok that was my immediate thought. I'm new to pc gaming but those prices seem like a significant departure from their strategy in the past. Perhaps the tech requires it, but the 550 number seems lame to me.
 

Serpens007

Well, Tosca isn't for everyone
Moderator
Oct 31, 2017
8,123
Chile
Considering the pricing, I think that I'll just go for the R5 3600 (coming from an I7 4770) and just wait a few years until it's really necessary to upgrade to an 8 core machine.
 

dunkzilla

alt account
Banned
Dec 13, 2018
4,762
Pretty disappointing. Going to wait a while to upgrade to an 8 core CPU from my 8600k
 

Gabbo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,564
so now I don't know if I await the inevitable 5700X launch down the line or save and go for a 3700/3800 instead?
 

TaySan

SayTan
Member
Dec 10, 2018
31,387
Tulsa, Oklahoma
I think i'm just going to stay with the 3900x and wait for Zen 4. I game at 4K 120 fps so I don't think I will see much improvement and the upgrade to Zen 4 would be amazing.
 

Davilmar

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,264
Well, I saved some money after seeing this AMD presentation. A giant swing at Intel and a miss. If I can hopefully get a 3080 sometime this decade and maybe a new monitor, I'm clocking out of any PC upgrades for the next few years.
 
OP
OP
Radec

Radec

Member
Oct 26, 2017
4,404
I hace a question. I wanted to buy an AIO for my current rig but dont thionking about upgrading cpu. Will it still work or do the mobos that support those cpu's have a different socket for it?

As long as there's an AM4 bracket in your AIO (which usually does) you're good.
 

Pulp

Member
Nov 4, 2017
3,023
Even more certain that I am keeping the 3700X now. Now to wait to the end of the month for big navi
 

Sax

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
2,322
That price increase is pretty rough but I'm still in since this will be the last thing missing for a new build for me and I'm on a 2500k atm (hah). Maybe at least it might ease up the demand so I can actually get one Nov 5th (double hah).
 

Alvis

Saw the truth behind the copied door
Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,222
Spain
I was thinking on getting the 5800X, but after seeing that price, I'm seriously considering just going with the i7 10700k. I care about high framerates in games over resolution, and emulation is pretty important to me.

I currently have a 1080p 144 Hz monitor and plan to get an RTX 3070. I might upgrade to a 1440p 144 Hz monitor next year.

Thoughts...?
 

Eternia

Member
Oct 25, 2017
490
Saying it's only a $50 increase is deceptive if they're not announcing their whole lineup yet. Those old same core step up versions (3600X, 3800X) were never worth their MSRP pricing. AMD holding back all their cheaper SKUs feels a bit sleazy since they have not really done that yet with Ryzen.
 

orochi91

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,796
Canada
I was thinking on getting the 5800X, but after seeing that price, I'm seriously considering just going with the i7 10700k. I care about high framerates in games over resolution, and emulation is pretty important to me.

I currently have a 1080p 144 Hz monitor and plan to get an RTX 3070. I might upgrade to a 1440p 144 Hz monitor next year.

Thoughts...?
Are Ryzen CPUs not suitable for emulation?
 

1-D_FE

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,252
Too rich for my blood. I think I paid 206 for my 2700. Between being on sale at Newegg, and the stupid sales ebay was running every other month (purchased through the Newegg store on ebay).

I'm also not sure how I'd be hamstrung my memory speeds. I have some high quality Samsung B-Die, but I run it at 3200/Cas 14/really aggressive sub-timings. My mobo is only rated to overclock to 3466. So I don't even think I could prioritize speed over latency even if I wanted to.
 

Alvis

Saw the truth behind the copied door
Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,222
Spain
Are Ryzen CPUs not suitable for emulation?
I didn't say that.

But if my understanding is correct, the 5800X will have a similar single threaded performance as that of the i7 10700K, while also having the same amount of cores and threads. So I would get basically the same performance in emulation and other CPU intensive gaming scenarios with both CPUs, right? I can get the i7 for like 369€ right now...
 

orochi91

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,796
Canada
I didn't say that.

But if my understanding is correct, the 5800X will have a similar single threaded performance as that of the i7 10700K, while also having the same amount of cores and threads. So I would get basically the same performance in emulation and other CPU intensive gaming scenarios with both CPUs, right? I can get the i7 for like 369€ right now...
Ohhh, I misunderstood the initial post then.

I'm currently using an i7-4790K, mostly for emulation too, and was deciding which CPU to upgrade to in the near future.

Given the price/performance though, the 10700K would make more sense.
 

Alvis

Saw the truth behind the copied door
Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,222
Spain
Ohhh, I misunderstood the initial post then.

I'm currently using an i7-4790K, mostly for emulation too, and was deciding which CPU to upgrade to in the near future.

Given the price/performance though, the 10700K would make more sense.
I'd be missing out on PCIe 4.0 though :( that's what makes the choice not very clear
 

Dalto11

Member
Oct 27, 2017
139
Looks like my i7-6700K will definitely keep on until DDR5 is here at least, which is fine by me.
 

Deleted member 10847

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,343
I didn't say that.

But if my understanding is correct, the 5800X will have a similar single threaded performance as that of the i7 10700K, while also having the same amount of cores and threads. So I would get basically the same performance in emulation and other CPU intensive gaming scenarios with both CPUs, right? I can get the i7 for like 369€ right now...

Single thread is apparently superior and current 10700k is missing some features like pcie4, if you can spend the extra I would go towards the 5800x.
 

Portmanteau

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,499
Thats fair enough, thanks. For clarity me saying "I don't understand why" is a genuine lack of understanding and not an attempt to be shitty about it. If there is a reason why they don't use more recent releases then that's cool.

As the end user though, those types of gains are ultimately what I want to see. We are on the verge of a new console gen and you'd assume most users upgrading right now are doing so with next gen games in mind. To not benchmark any games released within the last year of this gen just feels off.

I'm on a 3600/1660ti, and Flight Sim is still the only game I play that genuinely makes me want an upgrade. It would have been nice to hear more about it from Nvidia and AMD's new hardware.
No worries, I read it as you intended :)
 

Shifty Capone

Member
Oct 27, 2017
620
Los Angeles
With these prices and the very slight gaming performance gain over what Intel is doing even with the 7nm vs 14nm I think I will just wait until Alder lake to see what Intel can do with 10nm. Gaming performance is really my main take away so waiting a year for Intel seems like the right play when both keep going higher on prices.
 
Oct 27, 2017
6,888
With these prices and the very slight gaming performance gain over what Intel is doing even with the 7nm vs 14nm I think I will just wait until Alder lake to see what Intel can do with 10nm. Gaming performance is really my main take away so waiting a year for Intel seems like the right play when both keep going higher on prices.

Alder Lake is supposed to be DDR5 ready, but you know damn well DDR5 pricing will be insane and will take a while before they get to reasonable pricing per kit.
 

Kingpin Rogers

HILF
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,459
I guess I'm obligated to get the zen 3 since I'm building a brand new machine...
You don't think it'd be safe to get a Zen 2? I'm also building a new machine and having seen this info I was thinking of getting a 3700x, pairing it with a 3080 and then upgrading to Zen 3 is a couple of years. Is that a bad idea?
 

Sorad

Member
Sep 17, 2020
39
I have a 6700k and looking to get a 3080. Would I be CPU bottlenecked if I stick with my current CPU or should I go with one of these new 5000 series? I game, stream, and use it as a workstation.
 

LCGeek

Member
Oct 28, 2017
5,856
You don't think it'd be safe to get a Zen 2? I'm also building a new machine and having seen this info I was thinking of getting a 3700x, pairing it with a 3080 and then upgrading to Zen 3 is a couple of years. Is that a bad idea?

Depends on needs. The zen3 give you a little more longevity. I'm want 1440p and 4k benches to see how much stuff improved.