I gave you a list of quirky games or games that aren't typical, do you actually filter your game preferences by how much money is spent on the games? Boy id really like to play astrobot, if only they spent 4 million less to develop it! Not that concrete genie, astrobot or sackboy had anywhere near big budgets.
I actually play lots of games, as I'm sure you know, but like many others here have already said, their output is far less interesting than it has been in the past , which is why you list of quirky titles was padded out with
Racing game 7
Ratchet and Clank...15
Souls game 5
And please don't take that as a sleight on those games , because it is not, simply a comment on how interesting they are to ME vs something fresh - Something Sony were super good at in good volume.
I miss the Sony that brought us
Ape Escape, Journey,folklore, Puppeteer, PAIN, PixelJunk Eden, Locoroco, Fat Princess, Shadow of the Collossus, Tokyo Jungle + the countless new IPs they tried and retired.
There are too many to list across their history, modern PlayStation doesn't come close to PS3 era Sony, let alone Ps2.
In all fairness, I don't think this is unique to Sony either, I think games on the whole are far less interesting than they have been. The gen just gone was the worst one IMO.
And of course the budget does have something to do with it, you don't get the same risks taken when you have a game that has had a 1000 people working on it that has cost 250million to make and market, which is why there is a degree of homogeneity across the huge games that Sony and other big publishers are famous for.
But perhaps that is it's own thread.